[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why isn't more money spent on developing faster than light travel?
>>
Oh, boy, niggers to alpha centauri.
>inb4 Geordi was a good one it's fiction you numbskill
>>
>>530901655
need to master slower that light travel first.
>>
>>530901655
How are you going to travel faster than light through space debris, even dust?
>>
>>530901976
worm holes/space folding
>>
>>530901655
spaceniggers!
>>
File: hinata-218.png (330 KB, 801x712)
330 KB
330 KB PNG
>>530901655
It's impossible you dummy
>>
>>530901976
Deflector shield
>>
>>530901976
deflector dish you dip
>>
>>530901793
Also 200+ years into the future
>>
>>530901976
Warp bubble protects,
>>
>>530901655
Going to space would mean escaping the global wagie cagie and that's no good
>>
>>530901655
You're made of light, gonna go faster than yourself?
>>
>>530901655
>faster than light travel
It MAY be super impossibru.
But that's not such a big deal, if we could get close to light speed there are one or two thousand stars within 50 lightyears.
>>530901976
Kilometers-thick ice armor, duh.
Think big.
Just need to be able to produce MASSIVE amounts of energy to accelerate all of this mass.
>>
>>530901655
>Why isn't more money spent on developing faster than light travel?
Because it can't be done. Anything with mass requires infinite energy to reach the speed of light.
>>
>>530901655
Amerigoys would use it to send money to Israel faster than bank transits can.
>>
Because the people who control everything have no interest in space. Their prophecy doesn't involve advanced technology.
>>
>>530901976
You send a suicide crew first and you follow the trail.
>>
>>530902642
When fish jump out of an aquarium into a room otherwise void of water I assume that fish was about as smart as a jeet.
>>
File: Neutronium-1024x683.jpg (101 KB, 860x574)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
why does general/special relativity not work on micro or macro scales
>>
>>530901655
For the same reason no money is being spent on voodoo spells. Sci-fi movies aren't documentaries. There is no way to travel faster than light.
>>
>>530901655
Because the jews know whitey won't come back.
>>
>>530904871
If you turn on the headlights of your gay Swedish car while in park they are shooting light out at the speed of light, but if you start driving the light will be moving at the speed of light plus the speed of your gay Swedish car.
>>
>>530904785
>why does general/special relativity not work on micro
Because QM is probabilistic.
>or macro scales
Because of dark matter (or rather, the effects of dark matter) and also the math becomes bonkers when you try to model singularities.
>>
>>530901655
it would mean an end to capitalism to have technology where humans don't have to compete in a class struggle

so it would help regular people, but not the ruling class
>>
>>530901655
>>
>>530905118
No, it won't. It'll still only travel at the speed of light.
>>
>>530904871
they literally spend trillions on voodoo.
>>
>>530901655
because pursuing goals, that if possible(a very big if), would probably require harnessing all available energy in the solar system, is low IQ.
>>
>>530901655
Ummm, sweaty, Based Elon is taking us to Mars ok
>>
>>530905188
we hand waved the problems away using vague indefinable terms?
the problems are still there even if we bury our heads in the sand
>>
>>530901655
Before we do that we NEED to have better energy sources, and Isreal keeps killing all the physicists that are working on cold fusion so good luck with that.
>>
>>530905482
Myeah, they know, anon. No one's burying their head anywhere.
>>
>>530901655
I think America should spend 1 trillion a year on that. Trust Trump on that one, it will be worth it
>>
>>530905118
nah, but the light will be a bit more powerful
>>
>>530901655
There’s some galactic politics BS but long story short, aliens would destroy us instantly. Elites know this of course.
>>
>>530905482
the thumbnail looks like kirby characters
>>
>>530905118
It absolutely will not
>>
File: 1744487343922815.png (2.14 MB, 1920x1080)
2.14 MB
2.14 MB PNG
>>530901655
Why do you assume we would know about it?
>>
>>530908988
Swedish cars can go faster than you realize.
>>
File: 1769865838191125.jpg (41 KB, 400x225)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
Another question: if you had the secret to faster than light travel or "free" energy, would sharing that with the world even be the morally correct decision?
>>
You can't see where you're going with FTL, that's dangerous!
>>
>>530901655
Space is fake and gay. All it sells you is dreams.
>>
>>530901655
We don't underatnd the physics to so that. That's centuries away and then making use of it is more centuries away. We won't get that far until environmental collapse. We won't make it on our current trajectory. Gotta either give up being human or remove humanity from biology. Either way really doesn't concern me as I'm all biology baby.
>>
>>530901655
If you try it and goes boom you blowed up earth
>>
>>530901976
Oh, you dumb nigger. You can't. But you can fold space time and just materialize far away. That's what I do in Saturdays
>>
>>530901655
FTL is not possible. The incomprehensible scale of the universe and the constraints of the laws of physics on traveling such vast distances is the solution to the Fermi Paradox.
>>
File: 1388148489498.gif (1.68 MB, 443x277)
1.68 MB
1.68 MB GIF
>>530901904
Oh its been mastered, bucko.
>>
>>530901655
Still stuck with beautiful clean coal here in burger land
>>
>>530901655
>Why isn't more money spent on developing faster than light travel?
niggers
>>
File: stw325.png (21 KB, 920x858)
21 KB
21 KB PNG
>>530901976
Even travelling at a fraction of light speed. a grain of sand sized piece of space debris hitting the space craft at those speeds would be like creating the energy of a nuclear bomb.
>>
File: give me your data.jpg (135 KB, 1280x716)
135 KB
135 KB JPG
>>
>>530913511
Once you create something that can withstand the kinetic force blow it up far away from here
>>
>>530913699
By the way, people often talk about reaching the speed of light, they rarely talk about that it would take equally the same energy to slow down and stop. Also, The speed of light feels incredibly fast to us, but on a universal scale, it’s quite slow. It would take about 4.2 years traveling at light speed just to reach our closest star.
>>
File: 1711195285120313.jpg (605 KB, 1436x1080)
605 KB
605 KB JPG
>>530914191
But less than a second to get to your moms house.
>>
>>530901655
No! People would flee to avoid paying money to Israel.
>>
File: 1772225405131669.png (315 KB, 402x617)
315 KB
315 KB PNG
>>530901655
Because we need to make sure our blackest citizens have a 30 bmi or higher before we can focus on anything else.
>>
File: 1770002354943430.jpg (146 KB, 1005x628)
146 KB
146 KB JPG
>>530914353
I dont remember that episode
>>
>>530901655
What's the point? Israel is the promised land, and that's right here on earth. We don't need to go anywhere else.
>>
>>530901655
Well i kinda would whip those faggots working on ITER. But cant do that because then they are upset.
Imagine what beasts those scientists were around the early 20th century and now they are a bunch of spastics. We had nuclear plants since the 50s and no improvements have been made, that is clearly because they are peddled too much.
>>
>>530901655
>Why isn't more money spent on developing faster than light travel?
You would need more energy that we can safely manage. If you can send a ship at the speed of light, you can send a grain of sand thru your enemies skulls at the speed of light. You will know when any government attains SoL travel because their enemies will be SOL as well.
>>
File: 1733179746487154.jpg (19 KB, 280x400)
19 KB
19 KB JPG
>>530901655
Because it's impossible. Niggers have been completely misled by sci-fi tards and trekkers talking about space magic saying "HERP A DERP bUt ThE wArP" like that means anything outside of goytrek. Them and a few absolutely up their own ass physicists who say "well um ackchually um err theoretically ackchually um the warp um is possible um bend space time um you wouldn't understand I am very smart" without saying in any detail how it might be practically done in any reality outside of their psilocibin-induced mental masturbation and being completely unscientific about it and based on no data at all because IT NEVER HAPPENS.
If it was possible the ayylmaos would have worked it out by now and we would have visitors, we'd have many, many visitors because the universe is so vast and there must be many aliums out there, buut they can't reach us because IT'S IMPOSSIBLE. Get fucked scifi-tards put the fucking bong down.
>>
>>530914865
The universe expands faster than the speed of light because you cannot shape a sphere more into a sphere.
>>
>>530901655
Because we already have the tech. It's just wrapped up tight in black budget projects.
>>
>>530916014
Your mom is wrapped up tight.
Go pay the military more, next time they charge you a billion for a paperplane.
>>
>>530916188
>>
>>530916663
IF france was a bar, then this would be their national anthem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IslF_EyhMzg
>>
Because it isn't possible.
>>
>>530902129
I think ways around that make more sense
Or my personal favourite is from 3 body where we have 1/10th speed of light travel(?) or something but everyone on board has to be suspended in O2 jelly
>>
>>530917280
or why not just a dragon that pulls the spaceship? or sonic the hedgehog?
>>
>>530917280
Radioactivity is also kinda a violation of the speed of light because some "information" randomly decided that core would fall apart.
>>
>>530905240
This is the actual reason why faster than light travel is impossible.
Physics reactions are limited themselves by the speed of light. Gravity field changes, for example, travel at the speed of light; if the sun were to disappear entirely from existence, it would take us about 8 minutes to notice, since that's how long it takes light to get here, but Earth would also keep revolving around where the sun was, for the same amount of time.
Time dilation occurs when an object's velocity slows down time for the object in question. As an example, let's say you had a hollow vacuum rod inside of which is a device that can fire a beam of light at a mirror on the other side, and which could then receive it back. If you're driving in a car at high speed with it, and fire the beam, it would take longer for the light beam to return to the device than it would compared to the same setup on a stationary surface, since the additional distance being traveled during the operation of the device by the car means that the light has to travel farther (since light has no mass, it can neither impact nor inherit inertia) and thus by the same metric physics interactions also slow down by the same relative amount of time. If you're in the car yourself, nothing seems to change, but this is also because you are subject to the same slowing effect upon the biological, chemical and physical interactions of your own body, do your own perception also slows down relative to the area outside your car.
>>
>>530918301
Lets say you for example sit in a spaceship that travels with 50% of the speed of light, for you time would pass regularly and be perceived in a regular way whereas from some outside observer you yourself would be moving in slow motion?
>>
>>530901655
Imagine if Israel found the U.S.S. Defiant...
>>
>>530918548
Exactly, because in this scenario, because you're traveling at 50% the speed of light, light need to travel farther within the vacuum tube, itself in motion, to return to the start of the device, and consequently the interactions on the physics level would likewise be slowed down. You, also being slower, do not sense anything amiss, except that everything outside your ship seems to be moving much faster than normal.
>>
>>530905118
If you're standing on the top floor of building 7 and the jews control demolition it and you jump as high as you can before reaching the ground, you'll walk away unscathed.
>t.black astrophysicist PhD
>>
>>530918849
I think richard feynman should have given that as an explanation.

Well then i would put a radioactive element on a plan and see if that still holds up.
>>
>>530901655
Because it's not possible and wouldn't be feasible. You would need the entire energy of the sun to move close to the speed of light. Time is dilated at the speed of light. The closest star to earth is proxima centauri. It would take YOU 8.48 light years for a round trip flight there and back. As stated earlier time is dilated at the speed of light. So 8.5 years would pass for you but 12K years will have passed outside your ship. You would accidentally travel to the future all the time.
>>
>>530901655
Why you wanna race light?
>>
>>530901655
no thank you, I'd rather give it to israel
>>
>>530918301
What's the equation proving light doesn't have mass?
>>
>>530901655
>he doesn't know about arvs and off world officers
>he believes in public consumption physics
Maybe the jews are right and most of humanity are little better than animals.
>>
Fuck, I thought I had a smart answer until actually reading the thread. Damn, this can be a smart board sometimes.
>>
>>530901655
>Why isn't more money spent on developing faster than light travel?
Because we already have it
>>
File: images (3).png (10 KB, 201x251)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
>>530901655
Your picture is directly related

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909402/
>The study comprised 1,324,466 live births in total. The pooled estimate of sub-Saharan Africa's overall fertility rate was five children per woman (95% CI: 4.63–5.37). Consequently, the pooled estimate of total fertility for people living in urban and rural areas was 3.90 (95% CI: 3.60–4.21) and 5.82 (95% CI: 5.43–6.21) children per woman, respectively. In sub-group analysis, the pooled estimates of the TFR for the East African, Central African, Southern African, and West African regions, respectively, were 4.74, 5.59, 3.18, and 5.38 children per woman. Total fertility rates were greater in low-income nations (5.45), lower-middle-income countries (4.70), and high-middle-income countries (3.80

Mind you these are the same niggers we're told we need to feed every year because they're starving to death

https://archive.is/wip/BoeQh
https://eachf.org/why-the-food-crisis-in-africa-demands-global-attention-in-2026-2/#:~:text=Across%20West%20and%20Central%20Africa,rethink%20how%20hunger%20is%20addressed.

https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/horn-of-africa-projections-of-a-famine-in-2023/
https://archive.is/wip/CQlfR

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-10976093
https://archive.is/wip/5rpqz

Fuck niggers, let them all starve, then we kill all kikes and trannies
>>
File: 960x0.png (107 KB, 959x630)
107 KB
107 KB PNG
>>530924009
>>530905206
Glad to see another knower

Fuck niggers, literally why we can't have anything fucking good



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.