The one good thing blacks bring to society is that we can't have a police state because a police state would be super duper racist.
>>531200005wtf based niggas
we'd have a police state but only for whiteys duuuh
>police state being stopped because it's racistLMAOOOOOOO
>>531200005It would be racist, but only towards white people. A nigger would rape a white girl in front of the camera and get called a "victim of society" or smth while people praise him for lashing out at those white oppressors
>>531200005It's because you get a shit ton of false postivers with niggers. The average White HR women will tell you>"it's because of le societal predjewdece we have!"but the truth is niggers are so homogenous they really do all look the same and AI genuinely cannot tell T'shawn apart for DeMall.
>>531202356AI is trained for criminal recognition on whites to prevent racism
>>531200005This is kinda hilarious. The cameras are probably specifically programmed not to use skin color.But they will id darkies every time anyway most likely.
they want to outlaw police body cams too. (((They))) asked for them to prove that white cops were racists against the poor minorities. Turns out niggers are feral animals incapable of basic self control. I also enjoy watching the bodycam youtube channels.
>>531202679Feral animals generally leave you alone
>>531202679Its all so tiresome. I've been pro cop body cam since day 1 and will continue to be so, because I think having more police accountability is a good thing. Publicizing the chimpouts and protecting good cops seems like it would make it a win for both sides. And yet all of a sudden libs woke up and decided they hate body cams. Dumb motherfuckers.
>>531200005Only whites can be labeled the enemies, cant you see?
>>531200005how long is this "thats racist" shit going to go on
>>531202356All niggers are guiltyExcept Afroman
>>531200005why do american police do stupid shit you ask?In the early 2000s, a legal precedent established that US police departments are not legally required to hire highly intelligent applicants and can actually reject them for scoring too high on IQ tests. This stems from the federal court case Jordan v. City of New London (2000), which centered on the following: The Rejection: Robert Jordan, a 49-year-old college graduate, applied to be a police officer in New London, Connecticut, in 1996. He scored a 33 on the Wonderlic Personnel Test (roughly a 125 IQ), but the department only interviewed those who scored between 20 and 27.The Police Rationale: The department argued that highly intelligent recruits would quickly become bored with police work and quit. Since training a new officer cost roughly $25,000, they aimed to reduce turnover by hiring candidates of average intelligence (around a 104 IQ) who they believed were more likely to stay long-term.The Ruling: The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the city's right to use this "upper cut-off". The court found that because the city applied the same standard to all high-scorers, there was no illegal discrimination. They ruled that under "rational basis review," the city only needed a logical reason (reducing turnover costs) for its policy, even if the policy itself was considered "unwise".Legal Precedent: The court concluded that intelligence is not a "protected class" (like race or gender), meaning there is no fundamental constitutional right to be a police officer regardless of your IQ. While this case is frequently cited as proof that police "don't want smart people," most departments today do not use an explicit maximum IQ cap, though many still use cognitive testing to find candidates within specific score ranges.
>>531201862>wouldthis literally is how the entire western world works already
>>531200005LMAOhttps://x.com/BROKENBRITAIN0/status/2034870668265701418
>>531202356Yeah, it's almost like they're literally evolved to blend in with the dark and we are literally evolved to be highly visible. Wouldn't that be crazy?
>>531202356Wrong!>Essex commissioned University of Cambridge academics to conduct a study, which involved 188 actors walking past cameras being actively deployed from marked police vans in Chelmsford. The results were published last week and showed about half of the people on a watchlist were correctly identified and incorrect identifications were extremely rare, but the system was more likely to correctly identify men than women and it was “statistically significantly more likely to correctly identify black participants than participants from other ethnic groups”.
>>531200005Black people also jam up any attempt to bureaucratize any aspect of society, making EU style homofascism totally impossible. The crime rates are a net-zero tradeoff, but that doesn't bother me if we can keep them contained Atlanta and Chicago.
>>531202356the opposite is true>But the study found it was "statistically significantly more likely" to correctly identify black people than other ethnicities. It was also "more likely" to spot men than women.basically the AI works well, but it suggests ahmet and dembele commit more crimes than Liam
>>531202987Evil golem works better than feral animals
>>531204379Until you eugenically end all leftists
