/pol/ would you rather live in a safe, orderly society with mass surveillance than this current situation? why or why not?
>>531200775I choose the third option
>>531200954bold
>>531200775Total personalized surveillance is the current situation.If you apply for a job, a VC grant, insurance, a school, anything really, the browser fingerprint is used to buy and analyse your activity profile from big 1984 corporations. You are ranked for all life-deciding situations by this system, and everything you do online contributes. This is partially illegal due to some leftover laws of society, and largely ignored.UK officials consider not all staring or shouting to be illegal, but they still want to manage it early.Even Germany has gait and pose recognition for public places.What else do you need? I fail to see an effective increase to the current level.
>>531201616Gait? How the hell did that not cause at least a protest
>>531200954>Pretending youre going to do something and never doing it
>>531200775>live in a safe, orderly society with mass surveillancea surveillance state only makes things easier for the state, crime will remain the same.
>>531200775No, because the only safety that'd bring is the fact that anyone reporting inducations of unsafety would get suppressed.There is a reason these sorta things tend to implode over time, they lose their capacity to improve.
>>531200775Removing blacks and jews from society is both necessary and sufficient to make it safe and orderly. Without them there is no problem for mass surveillance to solve, and with them mass surveillance wouldn't solve the problem anyway.
>>531200775You don’t need total surveillance or a police state in a healthy, homogenous society. High trust societies can police themselves without taking these repressive measures. The reason they’re speed running the implementation of a surveillance state is to manage the civil unrest that comes with deliberately selling out your population, the consequences of mass immigration, the undermining and erosion of public trust and social cohesion, the destruction of the economy causing people to become increasingly desperate and prone to criminality, etc.The ruling class knows they deserve to be overthrown but they want to force stop it from happening by creating a police state that can be used to crack down on challenges to their power. It might be “safe” but it will be more like living in a more degenerate and spiritually bankrupt version of North Korea than living in a truly healthy and high trust community.
>destroy phone>incinerate computer>buy a tent>get news from newspapers >shitpost with fellow hobos instead on 4chan>have degenerate sex people instead of watching porn>dont have a digital ID and don't take the mark of the beast >take down cell towers and bomb data centers >go to heaven to be with Jesus>????>profit
>>531200775I would rather have no mass surveillance and be able to kill surveillers instead
>>531200954There is no third option. The choice is authoritarianism vs liberalism whether it's left or right doesn't matter.
>>531203868>Nyerrr [false dichotomy]Sure thing, fag
>>531200775All the breeders depend on the government to protect their tax spawn from Tyrone and Abdul as well as you chuds. Most people are docile breeder wagies who have no interest in any revolution or radical change, never mind risking their life for anything. All they care about is waging so that their tax spawn can survive into adulthood and perpetuate the cycle.
>>531203868If we just get rid of all the non whites then it doesn't really matter whether or not we have a surveillance state. If it's a whites only society, you can have as much liberalism as you want. You can even have socialism in such a society. A nation, a homogeneous people, with socialism for all. A sort of national socialism.
>>531204147Fuck off, kike
>>531200775Are you offering the real thing, or the one where they continuously refuse to appropriately deal with niggers?Because the real thing would be funny as fuck for a while, and then they'd notice they never actually fucking needed it.
>>531200775We already have mass surveillance and we're less safe than ever.
>>531202263I'm a professional at this
