[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Progressives can't stop putting their numbers behind delusional geriatrics
>>
Trump is the same age as Bernie
>>
>>531227854
I would actually like to see human AI debates.
I would watch that John Henry shit.
>>
>>531228001
Could be funny if it was a character AI. But you'd have to base it on a model only trained on works published in their lifespan
>>
>>531228186
Nah, real debates between people, are based on restricted reference sets. people trained on highly limited information compared to models.
A person can read what, 4 novels, 1 non-fiction book a week?
Train it on everything. The point is that people can extrapolate on limited information and hold context over a lifetime. Models can't do that (or they have weird breakdowns, and hallucinate)

I guess I just want to watch people break AI in a ceremonial event-esque setting.
>>
>>531228733
Most books just copy info from other books. Read one self help book from some era and you've read 95% of them



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.