[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (244 KB, 1280x720)
244 KB
244 KB JPG
>be 2026
>look at the map of the West
>it’s not "Capitalism" anymore; that died when the "Lords" realized competition was a bug, not a feature
>enter Techno-Feudalism: the unholy marriage of Old Money (land/banking dynasties) and the Tech Barons (Platform Lords)
>the goal? Total management of the "vassals" (you) through a "Green" and "Social" panopticon

> THE CARBON STRAITJACKET
>the EU Globalists roll out the CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism)
>they tell you it’s to "save the planet"
>reality: it’s a Regulatory Moat
>it taxes every atom of steel, cement, and energy entering the EU
>it bankrupted the European middle-class industry that can’t afford the "Green" transition
>only the "Barons" with Old Money reserves can pay the "indulgences" (Carbon Credits) to >stay in business

> THE MARITIME BLOCKADE
>the EU tries to force a global tax on the SHIPS Act and maritime fuel
>the US (protecting its own tech/energy Lords) blocks it at the IMO
>the EU doesn't care; they implement it anyway for any ship docking in their ports
>the cost of moving goods spikes 20% overnight
>translation: Enforced Scarcity
>if it’s too expensive to move goods, you can’t buy them
>if you can’t buy them, you are dependent on the State’s "Digital Rationing"

(cont)
>>
> THE SOCIAL ENGINEERING PINCER
>during the Biden years, the US and EU "harmonized" their playbooks
>the "Global Norms" were actually a blueprint for Demographic Dilution
>mass immigration isn't a "policy failure"; it’s a Weaponized Feature
>by flooding the zone with un-integrated populations, the Globalists break the "Immune System" of the Nation-State
>a fractured, atomized populace cannot form a unified resistance against the Lords

> THE DEMONIZATION ENGINE
>try to notice the pattern?
>the State and Media immediately label the native populace as "extremists" for wanting borders or cheap energy
>they use "Disinformation" bureaus (pioneered by the Biden admin) to de-bank and de-platform anyone who notices the "Great Transition"
>the EU Globalists have successfully Captured their own states
>the "State" no longer represents the "People"; the State is now just the Enforcement Arm of the Platform

> THE SYNTHESIS
>you don't own your house; you rent it from a BlackRock-tier entity (Old Money)
>you don't own your tools; you subscribe to them (Tech Lords)
>you don't own your movement; it’s taxed by the mile (Carbon Tax)
>you don't own your culture; it’s being replaced to ensure you stay compliant (Social Engineering)

> be 2026
> you own nothing
> you have no privacy
> and if you complain, your "Carbon Score" drops and your digital wallet locks
> Welcome to the New Middle Ages
> it's not a conspiracy, it's just Integrated Management

Welcome to the dawn of the Deleuzian control society.
>>
Deleuze and guatari , Derrida , lacan and all those fucking people were unironic schizophrenics
>>
>>531243756
Somebody post the psycho/normie/schitzo video for this memeflaggot
>>
File: Comrade_Kirk.jpg (356 KB, 809x608)
356 KB
356 KB JPG
>>531243654
You are retarded, monopolies are the end state of capatilism

>inb4 muh true capatilism has never been tried
>>
File: SCHIZOS FTW.mp4 (3.27 MB, 720x1280)
3.27 MB
3.27 MB MP4
>>531243841
>>531243756
>>
>>531244007
>monopolies are the end state of capatilism
this was before technology was as developed as it is
Look up the technological revolution, retard
>>
>>531244148
thanks anon
>>
>>531244150
>this was before technology was as developed as it is
Please explain this a little more, if you don't mind. Is it not possible for monopolies on technology to develop?
>>
>>531244270
Dont look into
>standard oil
>U.S. steel
>J.P. Morgan
> western union
>union pacific

Breaking up monopolies is government intervention and literally anti capitalist.
>>
>>531244598
I understand the theory of how monopolies are inevitable under capitalism, but OP implies the change in technology has somehow disrupted that mechanism. There might be something to that, after all what is the "information age" all about?
>>
>>531244270
>Is it not possible for monopolies on technology to develop?
It absolutely is possible for monopolies in technology to develop. My understanding is that the other anon was trying to point out that we're heading towards a monopoly and NOT a structural transformation.

JP Morgan is still dominant in banking and the big railroads have so much resources and manpower it's hard to compete. The role of technology in this transformation allows us to set the logic of a system as we build it and then adhere by fewer rules while it is on autopilot.

The purpose of the Iran conflict at the moment is to eiffel tower the UK with Russia and impose a surveillance state once we drain their economic leverage over our ability to build ourselves (the US) into a more dominant logistical hub with the SHIPS Act. They want to stop this at all costs including the imposition of the IMO Carbon tax which will put a damper on all logistics operations and route capital to the EU. This is war to suffocate the globalist agenda and return sovereignty to countries.
>>
>>531244811
OPs post is obviously ai slop so im just revelling in the irony. You can easily tell by how its structured.

People who are take the Thiel/Land/Yarvin philosophy seriously (i.e. technofuedalism) are giving them way more credit than they deserve.
>>
>>531245299
The EU is in a managed decline and their pulling their political and financial capital in every way they can to impose proxy techno-feudalism in the states. Everyone thinks the foriegn agents on here are kikes but they aren't. They're mi6 dei hires and EU tech firm lackies trying to sow discord into the narrative.
The Jews ARE a problem, but not as much as the EU is.
>>
>>531245299
>giving them way more credit than they deserve.
Checked but they don't need 'credit' to implement technocracy.
So long as they have control over the monopoly on violence (i.e. government), they can just put in place. What are you going to do about it? You're one person. Without organization, there's no way to fight back.
>>
>>531245494
Its not techno-fuedalism its neo-liberal capatilism.
>>
>>531245560
We need to build social structures outside the state but without religion thay seems almost impossible. Technology is the opiate of the masses so I really dont know what to do. My whole point though is we are not moving into a new thing, this is the logical end state of capitalism.
>>
>>531245604
>neo-liberal capatilism
I thought this was about deregulation. The winning faction at the moment is successfully regulating our economy. We also use tariffs as a form of regulation. When our top hedge firms managing trillions of dollars tell the gov to impose tariffs, they listen cause their computers and models are doing more computing that a thousand men can do in a decade. How is this neo-liberal capitalism? Some controls are important so we can infer that full release of deregulation is not in the cards. Leaving only a few alternatives...
>>
>>531245776
>We need to build social structures outside the state
not going to happen. If the state can't control the platforms underlying these social structures you won't be allowed to do it

Maybe if we didn't import millions of turd worlders this wouldnt be the case but our countrymen and women are absolute retards and took the propaganda too easily. It's almost game over
>>
>>531245860
Its about turning everything and anything into a market that private capital can exploit

>native Alaskans want to live in there ancestral homes like they have for 1000s of years
>nope you need a native corporation to exploit the land and if its not profitable you will be forced to sell it to the highest bidder

>a south american country wants land reform
>nope you have to have a right wing dictator with death squads installed by the US

>a middle eastern nation wants to nationalize its oil reserves
>nope you have to let private conpanies extract that oil and we will bomb you into submission.

Technology is just turning your attention and personal data into markets that private corporations can buy and sell and make a profit off of



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.