how to argue like a leftist:>pick an arbitrary moral standard and turn it into a minted phrase>e.g. "boots on the ground">act like it is the biggest taboo in the world and if anyone movies a piece on that square on the game board is must be instant game over>refuse to elaborate>throw a huge fake shitstorm as if "the consensus agrees" that the game-losing move has been played so the other side has to go away now and let the communists be in charge>if anyone questions it, scream "cope" or slippery slope or whateverWhy is "boots on the ground" bad?I literally don't care if people who signed a contract and swore an oath saying "I will kill and die for you" go to a place to do those things they agreed to do.And that's beside the point it takes more effort and bad luck to die as a US soldier than it does as an average resident of a blue inner city. You're literally safer getting free weapons and armor and humvees than you are riding US public transportation.Funny how the people who spent 10 years shrieking "ZOGBOTS" are suddenly SUPER concerned about their precious welfare now.
You don't argue with leftists, socialists, commies, fags, etc. you ignore them or end them.
>>531246822Not to mention the ones who actually fight, want to go to war. That's what they signed up for.
>>531246822sounds very jewy
Boots on the ground means a high chance that now you're too tangled up with the war to pull out and it spirals into another expensive forever war because even if you beat their army you have to deal with the forever insurgency that never goes away. And that goes on until people had enough and you finally retreat and the insurgency takes over, and you can now file that whole thing into the "wars we lost" file.
how to argue like a rightoid: >UHH ZION DON SAID NO NEW WARS HE DID NOT SAY NO FOREVER WARS.
>>531247244That's got more to do with nation building than boots on the ground. We could have just left Iraq after defeating saddam the way we did after desert storm or the way we ignored Libya after deposing gadaffi.It's harder to leave physically in the sense that all that equipment needs to be packed up and shipped back along with the men, but there's nothing requiring our victory condition be "perpetual stability" just because we used ground forces.
>>531247601Why do leftists always set arbitrary "THIS LINE MUST NEVER BE CROSSED" and then scream like infantile children when it is?Shit changed. Your argument is "nothing ever changes, politics must be set in stone, if it changes t-than you have to give up and let us commies be in charge"sorry faggot your screeching consensus bubble doesn't matter to me
>>531246822>argue as a migger>do everything for israel but lie and say its for america>whoever disagrees call a commie, antisemite, naziyou new hasbara guys are weak, try again shlomo
>>531247975>complete compost heap of nonsensical buzzwordsI don't speak hysterical leftist.
>>531246822You lost tranny
>>531248160Yeah, makes a lot of sense for the left to call people who oppose them "tranny". Just reverse the buzzword polarity and it should work, right? Total super serious political opinions from losers like this.Last I checked, Trump is your President and you're powerless to stop him.
>>531248160>no punctuation>generic, <80-I. Q. memeBot.
>>531246822Hahahaha holy shit, the absolute comedy
>>531248340>can't articulate a thoughtSee? That simple to show what these "people" are.
Having "the peace president" was a nice lark. Having the "utter US dominance" president is also good. The world is always in conflict and there are people who want to utterly consume you alive, peace is always an illusion. The left is more pissed about the WORDS "no new wars" because it was used effectively to defeat them in a fucking election than they are about the ACTUAL STATE OF THE WORLD. That's what enrages them. They want "revenge" because they were laughed at using that phrase during campaign season when the reality is most people don't give a shit. Disingenuous twats.
>>531247709Could be, but since almost all of the successful ones are from like the early 90s and before, these are all people know or remember and then there's that the major ones of Korea and Vietnam ending up in a similar fashion.So all in all, people don't have confidence that deploying boots on the ground won't end up as a mess. Doesn't help that Trump doesn't really seem to be inspiring confidence that he has a solid plan.
