For decades people paid thousands to learn “how to say hello” properly.Now an AI corrects your grammar, fixes your pronunciation, and explains nuance instantly for free.The funniest part?The industry is still pretending nothing changed.Give it 5–10 years. “English teacher” will sound like “DVD rental clerk.”RIP English teachers. Duolingo with a brain just dropped
I could easily facefuck you
AI is fake and gay and you’re a retarded faggot. All fields.
>EnglishGPT>what's up bro?! How can I go toward the bathroom bro!? I need to leak or I'll have wet pants!
thats why we have to have constant vigilance over grammer nazis who show up every now and then on social medea like twatter or booskye
>>531256607>South Africayou will die of no water before facefucking me
>>531256529English teachers don't teach shit tongues how to speak English. That's ESL teachers.
That's most teachers, unless they teach shop or gym.
>>531256529It is with a peculiar sense of temporal misalignment that I observe this proclamation, as though the past has not yet received notice that it has already been replaced by the present. The expenditure of thousands, once considered a reasonable transaction for the acquisition of greeting articulation, now appears almost ceremonially excessive in light of machines that perform such corrections with an immediacy bordering on impatience.Yet the assertion that an entire profession is quietly evaporating feels prematurely conclusive, like declaring a building abandoned while its lights remain inconveniently on. There persists, in human instruction, an irregular but stubborn quality—something not entirely reducible to corrected sentences and optimized pronunciation patterns.The comparison to obsolete rental clerks is, while vivid, perhaps unevenly applied, since language is less a product to be distributed and more a continuously mutating arrangement of intentions, errors, and social negotiations. An AI may refine the sentence, but it does not always inhabit the hesitation that produced it.Still, the trajectory you describe does not seem implausible, only somewhat theatrically accelerated. The future may indeed arrive as you suggest—though likely in a form that is slightly more complicated and considerably less final than your phrasing prefers
>>531259499i read by the part, sense of temporal.
>>531256529>AIThe demiurge, the golem technology, the funniest part people will literally break the machine.
>>531256529No working with cute japanese students, no more teacher-student love, no more young jap pussy, it's over.
>>531259499It is difficult not to admire the almost curatorial care with which you have arranged your skepticism, as though the phenomenon were less a technological inflection point and more a delicate artifact requiring preservation. Your prose performs hesitation so convincingly that it begins to feel less like analysis and more like aesthetic preference.Beneath this polished ambivalence lies a curious asymmetry. You grant human instruction an ineffable residue, this “irregular but stubborn quality,” while treating rapidly advancing machine competence as a minor convenience rather than a structural shift. The building, as you note, still has its lights on. Granted. But lights can just as easily signal inertia as vitality.Your distinction between language as social negotiation and language as something machines refine is superficially sound, yet quietly romantic. The very hesitation you elevate, the uncertain search for phrasing, is increasingly well modeled by systems that need not experience it to reproduce its outward form convincingly enough for most real-world purposes.To suggest this leaves the profession intact assumes learners primarily seek existential nuance rather than functional competence. History suggests otherwise. Most people are not paying for the philosophy of hesitation. They are paying to avoid embarrassment in practical situations.So the future may be less final than the original claim suggests. But your response risks mistaking elaboration for resistance. The trajectory need not be dramatic to be clear. A building does not need to be empty for its purpose to begin fading.
>>531256607Sneed sells feed and seed, which is completely normal. Chuck, on the other hand, sells fuck and suck.
>>531259809I read that by "embarrassment in practical situations."
>>531256529Ching chong bing bong knee how amirite , player?
>>531256529video games taught me english and duolingo taught me r*ssian and german, interacting with 'people' is cringe
>>531256529Good. My english instructor is a cunt and it seems like one of the hives of feminist thought. Women cant do anything right so they will use language "gotchas" to prove how oh so right they are. >Oh misplaced comma? Paper invalidYeah thats woman shit.
>>531256529Did Grok write that post for you?
>>531262278Yes, this is very much female coded. A man who wants to flunk you will just fail you and dare you to complain to the school.
>>531256607>>531256777Holy cope lmao
>>531256529Beat thread on /pol.AI is the greatest technology created in the last 59 years. Only a live at home sperg who has never had a job would think other wise.
>>531256777What a waist of trip 7s. Get our from under your mum's table and start acting like a man, faggot.
>>531256529I heard teachers started trying to say kids are using AI to write homework. so i read my friends kids homework since we were talking bout it.Just read like the kid fucking wrote it. wasn't anything special, apparently the teacher just couldn't believe a white kid could write that well because all of her other students are so retarded they can't even read.
>>531258182Depends on your location. In a land where English is not spoken. It could be reasonable to say English teacher means someone who teaches English. Eg Japan.
>>531261390>r*ssianWhat a faggot.
>>531256529AI won't punish and shame little shits into compliance.
>>531256529
>>531262837AI is a money pit for and by jackoffs who think they outsmarted God.
>>531256529you could teach yourself english from a textbook and watching movies 50 years ago already, retard. Classes are there because most people are absolutely undisciplined and need social pressure to perform. Also, so far talking with an AI is absolutely nowhere near a human experience.
