What would WW3 look like in actuality?
>>531412741Unending horror.
>>531412741sweet release from simulacra
>>531412741*gestures to the general viscinity*
>>531412741>when israel fights, the world stopsnigga wtf is this tiktok?
>>531414546its recent conflicts in chronological order dum-dumalthough azeri armenian conflict was older and only for a second turned hot the last time and paki-pajeet conflict ended quickly too
>>531412741It would simply come down to industrial capacity again, which in turn means there will be strategic bombing, which inevitably escalates to nuclear war, and at that point it depends who can best disperse or hide their industry yet keep it functional and can economize production of efficient weapons like drones, or has access to international trade with neutral countries, which means shipping would be massively affected, not least because virtually all shipbuilding docks would be destroyed, and neutral countries would in practice not exist unless they stop international trade, which isn't an option for most, and would simply be blackmailed with nukes, then nuked by the other side. In other words the world economy would be utterly destroyed.
>>531412741>What would WW3 look like in actuality?Drones, hacking attacks eliminating infrastructureJust shut down your enemy's electricity, banking and money, water, roads, heat etc. using drones and hacksKill off their population and military capacity this way.
>>531414912It would also cause Kessler syndrome, since you cannot protect anything while the enemy has satellite intel. Country's (or alliances, rather) chance of survival is closely connected to their population, cohesion and territorial size. North America would inevitably be a strong player, while Russia + China also are well equipped, especially if they can absorb surrounding countries and establish a defensive eprimeter. For Europe it would depend largely on whether they can control the Mediterranean. Africa would become a slave continent for ressource extraction or outsourcing basic industries.The wildcard is mainly SEA, since it's virtually indefensible being a million islands of various sizes, and also India, since it isn't aligned and at the same time an important region, by neccessity it would have to align with Russia and China, otherwise will naturally be destroyed by them.The key to North America would be South America, meaning they'd naturally form one alliance (by force). A large amount of fighting would be concentrated on the Middle East and South East Asia. The safest places likely would be the far south of the planet.
>>531414912>>531415356Muslims suck at everything, so while they'd try to form a block they would fuck it unless they kneel to the European alliance, who is most reliant on controlling that territory (North Africa, Near East, South-Eastern Eurasia) for self-defense, which also gives them easy access to Africa, and if they could align with Super-America could control practically the entire western hemisphere as a unit, concentrating fighting along the European border down to the Caucasus, Iran, India. Since Indians are stupid they'd likely suffer massively unless they align with the East from the start. SEA is essentially guaranteed to be chaotic and devolve into a sort of island-WW1.As such the conflict zones would end up being quite static, Ukraine style, and large scale shipping viable only in internal or heavily protected waters, as sea drones would operate world-wide and smuggling (including smuggling nukes into your habor) would be a major problem. At that point the war can only be solved by completely eradicating enemies through megaton nukes on cities.
>>531412741You wouldn't see it as the internet would go down. Your only access to war news would be by local broadcasts which would be controlled for propaganda.
>>531412741Nukes dropping Simple as
>>531412741pathetic and moany
>>531412741limited nuclear strikes followed by a ceasefire, concessions from all sides, then peace.
>>531412741Like nothing ever happens.
>>531412741Nukes. It wouldn't be long as a "traditional" military conflict.
>>531412741if china and nato joins its ww3 but it needs nukes
>>531412741Free sex everywhere
>>531412741A real WW3 would likely involve a satellite carnage, where opposing sides would knock out communication satellites and cutting seabed cables, followed by a lull where we go back to atmospheric communication systems and then probable peace because everyone is too pissed about no wireless. WW3 will never happen, it’s just boomers coping with their encroaching dirtnaps
>>531417509Nukes aren't real Hivan.
>>531412741lame, fake and gay since everyone's a fucking faggot and keeps opticscucking.
>>531412741We've been in WW3 for couple years now already. It's mostly economic warfare with occasional proxy war here and there.Too many kids got raised playing Modern Warfare and watching Hollywood and now they think this is how war actually looks like. Smh.
>>531412741You're in it right now in real time, nigga.
>>531412741What it looks like right now lol!
>>531419604this.
