Reducing 10% of the female population as property for breeding would actually be enough to maintain high enough fertility in addition to focusing on the females most suited for it. https://vintologi.com/threads/breeding-schools.3717/#post-12415Older females could still maybe be useful on the front lines as cannon fodder.
N
>>531451329How would you decide which women become property and which women can go be girlboss career women?
>>531451480Send them all back to the kitchen and let God sort them out.
All women need to be steered towards breedingGuys we need Jewish law. You really don't know how perfect it is.You have to kill the gays and make the women into breeding property, or your race and civilization dies
>>531451480The government would determine who would be used for aggressive breeding. https://vintologi.com/threads/elite-rule.24/
>>531451329This is unironically good, as it creates pressure to just artificially breed humans without bothering with malexfemale relationships rituals
>>531451622Most females do not have particularly good genetics for breeding to begin with so it makes sense to focus on the minority most suited for it.
>>531451329I think it will be a self correcting problem, once there aren't enough people to sustain a tax base for the welfare state we'll revert to fuedalism and women will be property again.
One limiting factor is that a lot of males wouldn't be comfortable or willing to brutally dominate females as required. Will be fixed over time under authoritarianism of course (most people will adjust based on what the government is pushing under authoritarianism).
>>531454057Merely cutting of welfare isn't a good solution since then a lot of females would simply resort to getting money from work. Things like that can work somewhat on low iq females mostly but those are not the ones we need to focus on when it comes to breeding.
>>531454220No you don't understand, the power will go off permanently, there won't be internet, tapwater will stop running. This can happen in 2 generations and seems to be the likely outcome.
>>531454057I agree we are already watching all infiltrated systems collapse in real time. So on a long enough timeline it should correct itself.
>>531454453If that happens to a country it will likely simply get invaded. A societal collapse isn't going to be some salvation.
>>531454453Correct even in USA in 10-20 years 80% of hundreds of millions of violent brown cannibal horses will live without power water and data. The top 20% will think they are smart for living in standards somewhat comparable to what we enjoy today. Ruling ashes isn't fun or glamorous it just makes you a jew.
>>531454623For most it's not. "Winners" will be whomever hold onto the past.
>>531454623there will be no one to do the invading, this is a transnational phenomenon - Africa (where they have positive fertility but high infant mortality) will revert to its precolonial population in 50 years
>>531454721Amish will be fine. They don't need anyone. We have our wagon circles where we live, solar power and borehole water, but we need chinese factories for that. It's not gonna last.
>>531454961Not all states are going to go down. Some authoritarian governments will instead take that as an opportunity to expand which will likely be very bad for the people getting invaded after the societal collapse. https://vintologi.com/threads/societal-survival-of-the-fittest.979/
>>531451329True. We need some kind of female conscription system based around the necessity to keep birth rates up. If women voluntarily have 2.1 births then no-one needs to get conscripted, but otherwise we will need to conscript as many as we need to get it up to that point. It's a matter of national security, and should be treated on the same level of seriousness as a literal foreign invasion over the border.
>>531455390Also it's a good excuse to do some eugenics. Since we can do selection of the female part we can also select whose sperm is used.
>>5314553902.1 shouldn't be the goal since we need want a growing population to expand our borders.
>>531451329There is no upside to female rights They have given the world nothing in exchange for their rights in a century. They only devour and destroy.
>>531452064You either give the average (and really, 30% below average) man a legitimate hope of marrying a virgin and owning a house or you don't have electricity in a couple decades.There's no trick to get around it.
>>531455575I suppose you could adjust for that depending on what the goals are. Sometimes in history they've had to dump a lot of migrants on others because they actually wanted less people.
>>531455798Most men are not really needed for anything. It's a minority of males who are holding up society and contributing a lot.
>>531451329Here is what happened on the second dip around 1970 in OP image. Feminism is definitely an issue. I don't actually want to go back to the past, but clearly we have a problem.
>>531454623Every economy is interlinked.A collapse of the United states would see half a billion people die in china.All economies are one economy. It's a global suicide pact.>>531455229Expand with what gas? What food for your troops? What pay? You dystopia faggots always warble on about armies of sociopathic mercenaries not remembering what actually happens to the people relying on sociopathic mercenaries throughout history when they can't pay them.There is no multipolar world. There are no "alternative states" there is one enormous state and it has embraced suicide as policy universally.
>>531455544Every single time a government decides to do some "based eugenics" they instantly decide "eugenic" traits are being blobby slug-like babies that will never rebel.
>>531456038>I don't actually want to go back to the past,Well it's that or die screaming swarmed by cannibals so that's an odd stance to take.
>>531456152IQ, health and physical characteristics that are deemed ideal for the nation.
>>531455988>Most men are not really needed for anything.You "need" most men to be working hard to keep your gay sci fi society running. You "need" those average white men to fix your power lines and fight your wars and grow your food. The Middle Class is always the most productive class and makes up the most effective segments of any military. The size and relative wealth of the Middle class is basically the best determinant of a society's performance in every single relevant metric. The larger your middle class (married white house owners) is the better your people's physical health, mental health, artistic achievement, economic prosperity, and military success. You also "need" to bribe most men to not rip down your power lines out of spite, which they could do very easily and you'd have no way to stop them.
>>531456217You don't need to go back to the past. If you just get away from extreme feminism and misandry, you would already be better off. They are just digging our grave with what they are pushing. I don't think we need to give up any freedoms to fix it, they just need to reduce their propaganda.
>>531456038Why do we need "go back to the past"? Treat them like men and hold them accountable, they will be. VoAting and "democracy" has done nothing but shit the bed, there's plenty of PEOPLE in general who need to be held accountable, and there's many people who walk around with about twenty-k parasites in their ass, who will do nothing to cleanse themselves, continuing to wonder>why am I unhappy?
>>531456425Here we see the fundamental inability of the Theoryfag to understand Pattern Recognition.He can't possibly recognize the fact that a given choice might have consistent effects totally divorced from it's "stated goals", and so he would if you let him continue to make the same mistake one billion times because his solution "should work".
>>531451329Almost everyone I know here has kids except a british guy who decided not to because of jewish climate change propaganda I don't believe the statsFurthermore Japan isn't even the worst as far as official stats go
>>531456624Merely moving away from extreme feminism isn't going to cut it when it comes to demographics and the quality of the gene pool.
>>531451329You don't want fertility at 4.5 though. Remember that capital is a revolutionary force. Women's rights are a consequence of capitalism. So is mass immigration.
>>531455988>>531456608Most people don't need themselves and sit and let themselves rot, doing EVERYTHING to>not think themselves>not hear themselves>not>just not in general>and a lot of times, not by doingAre you, or are you not, shithead? Most people will gravitate towards gluing themselves to a chair in front of a screen, and simply take in everything they can, simply because they do not know how to put out. FROM CHILDHOOD. Nothing is taught! Nothing is learned! They don't want to! THAT's how WE got here.
>>531456624>If you just get away from extreme feminism and misandrySo, the past.>They are just digging our grave with what they are pushing.Degeneracy doesn't "recognize danger" or "plan ahead" it just accelerates in every direction forever until arrested by the barrier of extreme violence.>I don't think we need to give up any freedoms to fix it,Then you're not talking about getting rid of feminism and misandry.>they just need to reduce their propaganda.There is no, has been no, and will be no society, ever, that gives women voting and public schooling and maintains a survivable birth rate.
>>531456793Our races were created through the pressures of the environment in its earliest stages. When civilization took root we culled people who were not compatible with it, for example criminals were eliminated for centuries. Eugenics for IQ, health and physical uniformity are all in line for maintaining civilization. Having random outbreeding with nigger migrants is the antithesis of maintaining a civilization.
>>531456941If your fertility is not above 2 you're going to die.It never "self corrects", it doesn't stop, at least not until your society collapses and feudal warlords order the women back in the home.
>>531456941It's really easy to control the rate if women naturally fall below 2.1 births without a "birth conscription system." You just conscript as many as you need at any given time.It's the same in war time with military conscription. They can adjust the rate there too.
>>531451329More egalitarian societies have higher post demographic transition tfr than less equal societies. Its part of why you see a nearly universal apocalyptically low fertility rate across developed asia, but why most of the anglosphere was hovering around 1.7 until the economy tightened up too much post during covid and all the shitstorms going on since.1.7 isn't 2.1. But if your environment isn't making it easy or necessary to raise children its actually surprisingly high. Israel is very pro woman (if you are jewish) and goes to extreme lengths to keep the environment conducive to forming families and they are able to maintain 2.1 even in urban families. Granted all of that comes at the cost of stealing land constantly to keep the real-estate bonanza rolling.Another thing that gets neglected is how fast the tfr collapses matters a lot. The united kingdom went through the transition first and it took hundreds of years to go from the old order of 6-10 children down to where it is now. That means ageing happens very slowly. By comparison a country like south korea went from 6 children per woman to less than 2 in the span of 25 years or some shit. That means the ageing will happen incredibly fast. Giving governments way less time to adapt. This is even true in places like Iran which are going to age rapidly. South America is also having a tfr collapse so fast it is sometimes beating the United Nations lowest projections.
>>531456646>Treat them like men and hold them accountableThis annihilates society, rendering the society to come a feudalistic, tribalistic, "society of the past".You'll do anything but admit the solution is the solution.True egalitarianism leads to the ethics of Medieval Man. Thus every "egalitarian" who denies this is secretly harboring a willingness to bend his rules to try to force reality into his vision of Star Trek. If you hold everyone to the same standard and baby no one to fudge the numbers you get whites ruling or annihilating the other races and women in the home raising babies, and at this point doing so would also kill half the planet (mostly brown though). "We'll let the women in the military but only if they pass the same standards as the men" has been said one million times, and it has been a lie every single time. That is a 100% hit rate. Recognize a pattern when you see one.
>>531457463Israel would have fertility significantly below replacement if it wasn't for the haredi jews (who are in constant conflict with the government and tend to leech of the system).
>>531457056>When civilization took root we culled people who were not compatible with itAnd got the bronze age collapse. Successful civilizations cultivated independent strength and achievement, not bugmen.>Having random outbreeding with nigger migrants is the antithesis of maintaining a civilization.It is however the thesis of the very bedrock of the kind of hyper centralized government your ideas require. It does not matter what should be in theory, what matters is what actually happens.Your idea has and always will lead to the central government authority attempting to breed cattle that will never rebel, which leads to savages a thousand years behind you overrunning your dying civilization.
>>531457329Military conscription has been a hilarious failure for almost 200 years. Even in the further past, volunteers always outperformed conscripts ludicrously.
>>531457709Non haredi jews are still at 2.4-3.1. Above replacement level. Israel is an anomaly with entirely unique circumstances in the world of fertility demographics though. You do have weird shit like the Haredi jews going around trying to compete with the amish for popping babies out.
Just ban women from education after age 10. This will solve all problems of feminism and low birth rates and fix society. Its very simple and easy to explain. It should be the official position of /pol/ as there is really no counter argument to this. It actually just saves taxpayer money and the girls kicked out of school will go right to working for their parents or whatever and help the economy a lot more than if we continued to teach them shit they don't need to worry about.
>>5314579451. jews fudge their numbers2. non ultra orthodox jews have the highest rate of miscegenation on the planet, and you can basically discount all those births (I don't give a fuck that Moloch or the big black cube told them the bastards of their daughters are full jews or whatever the Talmud says)
>>531451329>breeding property >I TOADALLY FUCK DOODS!!!Youre fat and never get pussy lmao
>>531457826The Sea Peoples were literal rapefugees set on pillaging other lands with resources, much like what we are seeing now. We could still turn things around if we put up defenses against this and weathered economic storms. You use the word "bugmen", but the Chinese have a lot of wisdom when it comes to this. They will weather the storm of multiculturalism and be better off in the long run. I suspect Europe would be much like China today if it wasn't for Christianity. We would have ancestors worship in some form or another, and deeper cultural ties to our actual land, without our minds constantly wondering to the desert to look for an identity.
>>531457945Religion can help with the fertility rate. Secular women in israel already has less than 2 children each on average. Problem is that those religions are obviously false and might not work to get high iq females to have more children. It relies on people being dumb.
>>531458089The average "hard core woman hating revolutionary" on /pol/ is actually just thinly disguising their desire to time travel back to 1995 where everything was still fucked but it wasn't directly effecting them yet and they would literally shoot you in the back on even a hollow promise of getting that environment back even though it would immediately corrode into what we have today.
>>531458239Support for gays is the dumbest stance of all.
>>531458212Ah, so you're some kind of slant or a larper huh.
>>531457895It's a necessity when you have serious threats nearby. Low birth rates should be viewed similarly as a threat. Neither of them are necessary if there isn't a call for it.
>I can't afford a family>instead of fighting for wealth equality, I will blame women instead>praise molochswedes...
>>531458094Jews mostly fudge their numbers when it comes to how many children they shoot in the head. When it comes to stuff like this they are reasonably accurate.Miscegenation is an issue entirely separate from raw tfr data. We can sit around arguing quality vs quantity all day, but its not like either of us care how racially pure each successive israeli generation is.
>>531451329Giving women rights made politicians and tech CEOs richer. Its worth it even if the average man loses
>>531458239Religion is a reflection of culture. If economics and culture align I believe you would see a more healthy tfr. It will happen eventually or else we will go extinct. My main point is we don't need to artificially restrict anybody's dignity in order to accomplish a healthy tfr.
>>531458445China hasn't installed any such systems yet for adjusting birth rates. This is actually a good opportunity to one-up China and do it before they do.
>>531451329>When given rights women would rather not fuck Japanese menSkill issue
>>531456941How's above 4.5 bad though
>>531451329>So while scientifically the best heterosexual relationship would be a 15 year old female and a 30 year old male, it would be INSANE in this society.History is a flat circle.
>>531458094>big black cubeThat belongs to the sandniggers. Kikes kill thousands of them a month to prevent the second Shoah, just like how the Aztecs sacrificed people to Quetzacoatl or God knows who to prevent armageddon. Complete opposites.
>>531458560Low birth rates in east asia are roughly equivalent to fighting a world war 2 intensity conflict decade after decade for potentially longer than a century.China's population is projected to decline by over 72 million from 2060 to 2066. Oddly specific time frame I know, but world war 2 lasted pretty much exactly 6 years and killed 70-85 million people. Which is why I chose that timeframe.China alone will be haemorrhaging people at a rate faster than than the world was during ww2. All without a single bullet being fired. And this will continue for decades.Across east asian countries the trend is that the total female population who *can* give birth in the future will be about half of what it was in the 1950s by the year 2100. Even with some generous numbers to accommodate for modern medicine in favour of older pregnancies in the future population pyramids.By the 2090s the fucking USA is projected to have a larger baby cohort than China, which suggests a future some time in the 2100s where the USA outpopulates China. Granted with immigration the USA numbers are a lot more subject to change than the smooth curves in the China data.
>>531456941>Women's rights are a consequence of communismFixed for ya>The first modern no-fault divorce law was enacted in Russia in December 1917 following the October Revolution of the same year. Regarding marriage as a bourgeois institution, the new government transferred divorce jurisdiction from the Russian Orthodox Church to the state courts, which could grant it on application of either spouse.[4][5] Alimony guarantees under the new regime were weak until a new family code was passed in 1926.[5][6]>With a law adopted in 1969, California became the first U.S. state to permit no-fault divorce.[7] California's law was framed on a roughly contemporaneous effort of the non-governmental organization National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, which began drafting a model of no-fault divorce statute for states to consider in 1967.[8]>The Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) is a model law in the United States and has been used since 1970.>Australia established no-fault divorce in 1975, with the only ground for divorce being irretrievable breakdown of marriage, evidenced by a twelve-month separation. Canada effectively permitted no-fault divorce in 1986 by reducing the separation period to one year.
>>531458560You'll do anything other than what we know, for a fact, works.
>>531458573>but its not like either of us care how racially pure each successive israeli generation is.Well, I care insomuch as it effects their ability to actually *run* their schemes. You're never going to have a Rothschild level conspiracy that's half black and a quarter Arab.
>>531459662touche
>>531459408>That belongs to the sandniggers.Oh dear, no.Every degenerate cult on the planet worships cubes, generally black ones, but they're willing to make occasional exceptions. Jews affix black cubes to their heads to pray in private.
>>531459441Exactly. Military exists to avoid potential losses of land and people. Birth rates are like waging a war where you continuously lose manpower, and ultimately land as well, since a lot of the rural areas which experience population decline will be depopulated. The land might be under your jurisdiction on paper, but it'll be like Siberia is to China, only under Russia's control because they have nukes, but looking more and more like it doesn't belong to Russia.
>>531451329>japanese stopped having sex after getting nuked 2 times wow who would have thought!
>>531459763>Jews affix black cubes to their heads to pray in private.Yeah, tefilin. But that's a small black cube so I'm still right in the "Jews don't worship *big* black cubes" sense.
>>531459441It's a bit surprising none of the authoritarian governments there have implemented effective measures to stop it. Might be that the dictators there are simply incompetent fools clinging onto power, many such cases.
>>531459801True. Demographic decline is also a matter of national security. I think Ukraine is trying to keep under 25s from joining the military for that reason although that's really putting a bandaid on a gaping wound. Russia is in a similar boat long term.
>>531451329Rights and privileges should be tied to responsibilities. True for citizens and leaders, true for men and women, true for anything else.
>>531459999Anon do you think the hundreds of huge black cubes bought by jews and placed outside major businesses and government centers around the world are there for muslims.What do you think the company name "blackrock" refers to?
>>531460261The only known effective measures involve hard cuts to to the profit margins of a competitive business class that wields enormous influence through lobbying and other mechanisms.If a country like China wanted to reverse this trend they would have to institute a maximum age limit of around 60-70 and go around killing everybody above it for a few decades.Most of the ruling party is above that age. The hypocrisy allegations would literally write themselves. I can only imagine the absolute shitstorm it would cause.Khamenei tried to get Iranian women to have more children in a relatively heavy handed way but failed pretty badly. I think there are some pretty choice quotes from him out there on demographics. So Its not like dictators are retards. Its just a competing mix of interests that essentially locks them out of solving problems because they often rely on the problem for part of their power.
>>531460360The way Singapore does it they have a thing called Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP) that dictates the percentage of Chinese, Malay and Indian in any given neighborhood. They won't let this balance go off so as not to upset regional harmony. We need constitutional level demographic representation similar to this that says you can't go over certain percentages of outside groups until there is room for them.
>>531459999
>>531461011Anon it's very simple you just remove the browns and everything's fine, stop trying to find some clever way around it.
>>531461150We don't want other Europeans to crowd our cities either. Capitalists would just move the goal post and shill for Romanian migrants next.
>>531461306the ultimate curl of the monkey's paw.
>>531456646>Treat them like men and hold them accountableI've tried to do this, women do not appreciate being held accountable for their actions, and outside fringe cases like autistic women, will NEVER admit accountability or fault. They will deflect, or come up with the stupidest fucking reasons like "I felt that you wouldn't like it if I didnt cheat on you"
>>531451329It's worse than the graph shows at first glance.That plateau is the "Hikikomori" generations(s). Children spoiled by parents who sacrificed everything for their children's comfort and coddling.The dip is the result of the Hikis' lower-still fertility and it's it's going to get worse. Some kind of Malthusian trap accelerated by rapid cultural change following WW2.
>>531461306>It wouldn't work b-becauseWrong. Stop being a theoryfag. The problems are not relative, there is no white man that substitutes for the brown man.All browns out, all problems gone. Porous borders are not a result of a free trade mentality among whites, they are a result, and exclusively a result, of jews. Not "capitalists", not "greed", jews. The goal of mass immigration is not to make money, it's to kill and rape you. Sadism towards whites is the source and cause of the world's current ills, not "greed", as whites massively outperform browns in every way, to the extent that browns aren't even "making" any money at all anymore in modern countries, they have to be paid with stolen profits from white men.
>>531460910The business class will not be able to effectively control the government under authoritarianism. But even authoritarian governments tend to value the strength of the economy. Investing capital into raising the fertility rate will mean less money elsewhere which most political leaders don't want (even in dictatorships) and most are unwilling to implement measures that would actually be effective.
>>531461904The Government and business are one entity in practice. Making them one entity on paper does not change anything.Greed does not control the world. Sadism does. They don't want money more than they want all white babies dead.
>>531451329Gee I wonder what happened between 1940 and 1950
>>531451329we need to preserve rights for everyone including females or we will be back into the feudal age where you are payed shit wages and no medical care to do back-breaking labor because the Jews enjoy your suffering.To achieve this without going back on womens rights is simple and the solution is almost here. Egg donors and surrogates. That is it. Women fuck everything up so better they are not involved in reproduction other than their eggs. As for sex, AI or sex bots are close and porn is better than 99% of women anyway.Disregard womenAcquire prosperity
>>531451329I dont think that image has anything to do with equal rights. It does show when japanese womem were thrown into assembly lines working long hours and low pay. South Korea is the same way today, assembly line workers are overwhelmingly women along with other shit low pay jobs
>>531451329So recruit all the fatherless hoes and sluts into breeding roles? And keep them there? Actually good idea. Won't happen. We don't do idealpolitik since the 19th centurt, sorry anon
>>531457042Freedom will increase with less feminism and misandry. If there was less forcefull repression of dissent, it would probably fix itself.> Giving women rights guarantees a society doesn't reproduceThis is probably false. Look at OPs graph. Only after the radical feminist wave, did they fall below replacement.
>>531451876>The government would --opinion discarded
>>531462760Once the fertility-rate has fallen you cannot get it back up without resorting to extreme authoritarainism (to the point where not even the CCP is willing to implement something that would actually be effective).
>>531451329>>531451398>>531451480>>531451600>>531451622>>531451876>>531451911yet another dumb impractical idea. just take away their ability to compete with men for education and wages. until we stop them from pretending to be men the birthrate will only decline. probably the same retard posted this that shills the age of consent threads.
>>531463122Removing all females from the work-force would be worse for the economy and worse in terms of breeding and eugenics than focusing on the females actually most suited for reproduction. What you are advocating for instead would be significantly worse for societal competitiveness with basically nothing to make it even worth considering as an alternative.
>>531463098Do you have any basis for that claim?The entire developed world is feminist as fuck. It has never been tried.
>>531464389plenty of softer measures have been tried in various societies with noting particularly successful. Nicolae Ceaușescu did have some success with decree 770 but even that lost effectiveness over time so it's likely that it would be insufficient in today's climate.
>>531464389Not all asian countries are super into feminism but their fertility rates are still an utter disaster. Subjecting 3 to 10 percent of the female population to forced breeding is the only measure that actually make sense.
>>531451329Why do you idiots peddle all these retard ideas? Slow the board down. Improve quality. The internet already has plenty of places for children.
>>531463122>norm for the past 5000 years>impractial
>>531451329sure, but only if you make abortion legaljewish studies show that killing babies actually raises the fertility of a civilization. its magic science, so you know it's good, like women rights
>>531451480prettyones become propertyugly ones get to choose to be sent to the frontlines, or exiled from the land (marked on the forehead or inner thigh with a fire brand, like cattle, but to denote abandonment not ownership)
>>531465676I am not aware of any study showing abortion to cause higher fertility. > Fertility rates were compared over time between states that varied in the timing of abortion legalization. RESULTS: States legalizing abortion experienced a 4% decline in fertility relative to states where the legal status of abortion was unchanged. The relative reductions in births to teens, women more than 35 years of age, non-White women, and unmarried women were considerably larger. If women did not travel between states to obtain an abortion, the estimated impact of abortion legalization on birth rates would be about 11%. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508542/
>>531465840It's not just about physical attractiveness. Intelligence is also very important. Besides the front-lines there is also various forms of labor people can do like cleaning toilets.
>>531456793There has never been a proper attempt at eugenics as far as i know. Forced breeding is the main form of eugenics that make sense when there are multiple competing states. You can still send useless people to die on the front but then that's still for the purpose of expanding the borders and might be elderly who weren't going to have any more children regardless.
>>531451329>He unironically believes in the bullshit of the dying West>The most common number of children a British or American woman has by her mid-thirties is now zero>The share of young adults in the west living as a couple is in decline>Birth rates in liberal, developed countries look exceptionally unlikely to return to replacement level any time soon
>>531462080>we need to preserve rights for everyone including females or we will be back into the feudal age where you are payed shit wages and no medical care to do back-breaking labor because the Jews enjoy your suffering.This is the jew age, the time you're describing is the anti jew age you modernoid garbage.
>>531462760>Freedom will increase with less feminism and misandryIncorrect. Men are robbed and threatened to pay for "enforced equality" with women, this is the only circumstance in which women have what you think of as "freedom">If there was less forcefull repression of dissent, it would probably fix itself.If there wasn't an almost infinite amount of violent repression of dissent, women would lose their rights instantaneously.That's the best thing about your world view, all it takes to destroy it is "jews do nothing for a week" and we're back to normality.>This is probably false. Look at OPs graph. Only after the radical feminist wave, did they fall below replacement.That's like saying being set on fire doesn't interfere with your ability to breathe because it didn't become impossible for the first couple of seconds.
>>531465672OP suggested the government taking possession of ten percent of women and whoring them out to men under strict supervision while allowing "the majority" of men to have nothing, no home, no women, no future, and just expecting them to play along while they died, while 90% of women were still working make-work-fake-work modern jobs.
>>531464389Your claim is the original, that a society is going to magically bounce back from women having state sponsored education and the vote, which has never happened once in history.
>>531466517>You can still send useless people to die on the front but then that's still for the purpose of expanding the borders and might be elderly who weren't going to have any more children regardless.Those people will just kill you and tear down your gay glass towers, retard.
>abolish social media entirely>take away all the rights boomers gave women>send off all the +30 childless women to a meat grinder Would reverse the trend instantly.
>>531467277For the purpose of breeding it works fine. You can implement other measures to satisfy most men. Currently most men don't rebel as long as they can access porn and you could even expand that to providing access to recreational sex (at least for young men).
>>531468533Some females older than 30 that are childless could still be useful for breeding so sending them all to a meatgrinder would be wasteful.
>>531467343My basis is that it is less invasive. That is why it should tried first.
>>531451329Instead of removing women's rights it would be better to remove most men's rights. We only need a few men to continue breeding so by making most men slaves we can improve the condition to not only breed but to also take care of the child to grow up.
>>531451876>>531451911It's best to move solely to in-vitro fertilization and genetic editing only. Castrate most men at birth to be willing slaves without the danger of spreading their maligned genes.
>>531455702The problem isn't women rights but human rights. 50% of all men are a useless drain on society which could be put to good use if we simply enslaved them.
>>531456038Based on the text feminism is the issue but its men who are the problem.
