Is having a king as the head of the executive branch retarded?The king approves of laws passed by the legislature like the president does. However, because he is not elected, his signature is simply ceremonial so he passes every single bill that comes through. Essentially bills cannot be vetoed in monarchiesIs not having a head of state capable of vetoeing bills a good or bad system?
He has a whole masonic network. Who the fuck cares? They do what they want.https://youtu.be/p3m9IZmc25Y
>>531453277everything is ceremony, your country's president does the same thing. it's a democracy thing, it needs a figurehead at the top to bring the parties together. they are not direct rulers like in US and most dictatorships, though in theory they could be which is what keeps the ceremony going.
>>531453277It's ceremonial until its not. He can unilaterally vote anything he wants but the catch is that he has to do it by turning into a giant red rage monster, which is kind of a secret thing.you wouldn't like him when he's angry
>>531453277>Is having a king as the head of the executive branch retarded?Yes.>>531453944>everything is ceremony,No.
>>531453277Republics are Jewish. Monarchism is the only way.
>>531453277It is if he has to LARP as a Christian at least to wear the crown.
>>531454126Monarchs literally killed billions. They also destroyed ancient technologies, including various free energy generators.
>>531454125why do people dress up when they get married? why do they hire a priest and let him decide they are married? why do we have birthday parties?
>>531453277kings used to die on the battle field. there are no true kings anymore. does this answer your question, jam boy?
His faggot's evil mom's soul is now burning in hell.
>>531454311King Charles has already done enough to justify him being banished to the usa.
>>531454243They control the banks and the issuance of the money.Also if you track back to various Holstein-Gottorps, Oldenburgs, and black nobility , there are the same last names that are running countries for literally CENTURIES. Right now they just created a system of fronts that are hired - company CEOs, boards of directors, vatican jesuits and freemasons for brainwashing etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_nobility
>>531453944Chuck has power over the military. The solders swear allegiance to him and not the parliament that is supposed to represent the people. If he really wanted to. He could dissolve Parliament and use to army to take over the country. It is not like the US where soldiers do not have to follow orders if it goes against The Constitution. Whatever happened to your bill of rights anyways?
>>531454737he's not just king of England which is probably what stops him
>>531454737You copied most of them and added some retarded stuff.
>>531453277Monarchs own their country.Democratic/Republican politicians only rent.Ever noticed how shitty most rental property looks?
>bills cannot be vetoed in monarchiesBut they can, retard. The English crown retains the royal prerogative. EII blocked the MAAI Bill from ever even being debated. Crown consent is necessary for laws to even be discussed, let alone passed.
Y'know growing up I thought that monarchs grew as their population did. Ie the more English men populating the world the more sway the current English Lord had.But Britain has all this land and is inert, and India with its massive population is...also inert.That makes me wonder, what gives a monarch power? England has a shitty military so it isn't that either.I'm missing something.
It is when there's no (actual) nobility of the sword from which the king is elected. They're all a bunch of inbred socialites with a real estate portfolio. There is no essential difference between Paris Hilton and the king of England. Monarchy is shit. Hereditary monarchy is even shittier and an absolute monarchy is shittiest form of government ever devised (hence why the latter collapsed into republicanism and constitutional "monarchy" nearly instantly everywhere).
>>531454126Ceremonial kings are a humiliation ritual
>>531454261>there are no true kings anymore.Oh really, timmy
>>531453277owned by the jews
>>531455728in our case their power comes from the US, the monarchy is part of your foundation story so your hatred or envy gives them energy. our elites spend more time in your country than this one.
>>531454737>f he really wanted to. He could dissolve ParliamentSure he could and Parliament can have Mr Battenberg killt like they did done the real Kings
>>531453277having a ceremonial king who pretends to have executive power is retarded...... expensive too
>>531455656whats more interesting are the weekly secret meetings between the sitting PM and the Monarch. no one knows what they say. its likely that the monarch makes sure theres never anything to disagree about in public.
It makes perfect sense. The House of Windsor is just a pathetic, degenerated husk lounging around and indulging itself while it waits for more proper Nobles to finally come along and kill it.
>>531456118Makes sense, though the thought of a high blood British noble grabbing a burger feels a odd. We are a big country.
>>531456019can't call yourself a king if you don't lead your kin into battle.
>>531457231they wouldn't be a noble in the US, just inexplicably rich
>>531457384> I insist on my own private definition of wordsThat's cool, means you are always right. It's also denial of the Logos otherwise known as blasphemy against the holy spirit
>>531454737>He could dissolve Parliament and use to army to take over the country.He could technically oust all the invaders and save England but doesn't?Sounds like a shit king
>>531453277He's a kike puppet, like his brother.
>>531453277Systems busted if laws constantly need rectifying. When you hit that point its time to nullify everything and everyone that came after the zero
QUESTION FOR CANADIANS:I’ve always thought monarchy was completely irrelevant, just a small quirk of history we could get rid of any time we wanted. But I’ve come to believe there is much more going on.It’s very obvious that Canada is doing everything in its power to debase and belittle Canada’s white European history. There is constant talk of ‘decolonization’… but there is something strange about this, ‘a dog that didn’t bark’ factor.NOBODY of any consequence, in media, academia or in the political scene ever mentions the most obvious, in your face, aspect of ‘colonization’…THE MONARCHY. It sits there and is never even critiqued. I can’t understand WHY??I honestly thought this was just out of respect for Elizabeth 2. But nobody likes or respects Charles, or the rest of that inbred dysfunctional family.There is zero discussion about the monarchy by anyone. Even people who theoretically should be completely hostile to it.Something is not right about the situation. Hereditary power (by a fusty Anglo family!) is completely at odds with the worldview of contemporary canada, yet it remains an unspoken factorWTF is going on here?
>>531453277Hes a faggot who should be rapped by mudslimes to death on video for the world to see
>>531453277fascism is the way saaaaar
>>531453277yes no maybe its kinda pointless anyways because if he wants to keep his pretend monarch job he just signs whatever comes across his desk.
>>531453277WE WUZ KANGZ
>>531453277Monarchs are by and large self-obsessed niggers who push everyone and then themselves into unending debt and poverty.
>>531453277we could actually make the president the king and then appoint a prime minister to make decisions about whether to be at war or not...it would probably go better
