Is capitalism an inherently Jewish system?
>>531829698Employees only sell their labour when the marginal utility of Money exceeds the disutilites of labour sold. If the employees thought they are underpaid,they would leave the job. But this didn’t happen, because for them themarginal utility of Money exceeds the disutilites of labour sold. So,the employees weren’t underpaid
>>531829698both communism and capitalism exist by exploiting the peasants.......
Profit is simply the wealth extracted from the worked, modern capitalist systems do not fail because of under supply but a lack of demand.The chronic over supply as more goods are produced than goods that can be consumed leads to 90% of economic crashes.They intentionally kill their own system by enriching themselves and then blame you for not being a good consumer.
>>531829698no just look at boomers they love slots and gambling the economy is a direct reflection of that it's exactly what they wanted
Capitalism doesnt work when some parties in the system have a button that allots them infinite capital whenever they want.
>>531830869>Capitalism doesn't work when capitalism works as intendedOy vey!
>>531830869>>531831066Look up the difference between industrial capitalism and market capitalism.
>>531829698Was it not them who were commanded to use just weights and measurements
>>531829698
>>531829698"Capitalism" was still when like 80% of people were still in agriculture. I don't know what we are today.
>Trading goods and services is jewishReturn to caveman, reading and writing is jewish
>>531830332You have to be really retarded and or evil to think like this.>they would leave the jobThey are forced to stay due to the threat of homelessness and death. They are forced to work with not enough in return under the threat of homelessness and death. It's just slavery re-invented.
>>531831642>when you find out about payroll tax>Why am I making $10 an hour less than I should?
>>531830626Any system with a central bank cannot be called capitalist, Lenin himself said this.Also 'capitalism' is a made up word that just means 'having shit', being anti-capitalist means you want to own nothing and be happy. This is the socialists themselves saying this. This is their utopia. The incorporated state owns everything and you own nothing.
>>531829698>>531830409no it's not symmetrical... it's not a chess game or basketball match, the field isn't mirrored with same number of player on each side; one side achieved miraculous performance but far from an utopia; the other side has accomplished to starve people en mass>>531829698that pic is retardedthere's a concept called "median wage" and that wage is what most business can afford, by definition they can't pay more, if they DID pay more, it'd just be inflation, because it's the MEDIAN wage If you do not understand why this is true I'm sorry but you're not going to ngmi in this doggy do world
>>531829698capitalism, socialism and communism all can work and prosper long term as long as they're not burdened by the jew parasitewhenever the jew parasite is present it twists the system into wicked evil parody of itself
>>531830332>Nobody stays at a underpaid shit job out of necessity
>>531831623kek'd. /thread
>>531831623Real capitalism has NEVER been tried.
>>531831976yes it has
>>531831976Real capitalism means you dont die of typhus at 5 years old anymore, and your back isnt broken from working in the field all day and then a feudal bureacrat steals all your shit and rapes your wife for fun.
>>531831813I think capitalism is the philosophy of a free market. People can sell what they want, earn what people give them, and then use those earnings (capital) to buy what they want. This is different from feudalism where only certain families are allowed to own land. Socialism/communism says the state will take some of the capital and use it to benefit society.But as I said before, all of this relies on having a fair system of exchange, i.e. money. You cannot have a capitalist economy if I have a magic button that lets me generate infinite capital which I then use to buy up the economy. Fiat central banking is what we have had for 100 or 200 years now.
>>531832250>Doesn't understand that the gilded age never ended but compromised for a new form of slavery with new problems.
>>531829698Skill issue. I always get the raises ive asked for.
>>531832407Meh, most of those problems started in 1913 when socialism became trendy (which immediately caused a bunch of non-stop wars) and you installed the central bank and the welfare/warfare state. And then you blame it on the market.Socialism is just feudalism re-marketed for the serfs.
>>531832276Completely agree, others call it voluntarism instead of a free market but it's basically a free market, voluntarily trading goods and services without coercion, force or fraud.That 'magic button' you're talking about is the government, the government monopolizes and mandates that only government money can be used, of course they then abuse this and it causes all kinds of problems you talk about like hyperinflation and monopolization. The Austrian school of economics talks about all these kinds of things.mises.org
I think I will go ahead and define capital as being wealth. If I have a button that awards me a billion dollars (like central and private banks do currently in our system), then I am awarding myself capital. However, if I own a bunch of productive assets, that is also capital. If I own a patent, that is capital. Capital is synonymous with wealth. The problem is when parties have the ability to create money out of nothing, they are creating wealth for free. In particular, the stability of currency is important for capitalism, not just for that reason alone, but also to incentivize normal people to engage in capital accrual (saving up money). A wageslave can save his wages and use them to buy a productive enterprise. Saving becomes fruitless when the currency is constantly dwindling in value due to trillions of new currency being created every year. Hence, in the fiat central bank economy, areas which are not being invested in by the bankers will tend to become progressively poorer and more run down, while other areas that have the bankers as benefactors will always have brand new shiny constructions. The idea of me and my neighborhood pooling together our savings to build a factory becomes impractical when our savings are constantly losing value. Instead, we tend to invest our earnings into stocks, alternative currencies, or real estate, in order to mitigate the damage being done to it by inflation. Thereby preventing it from being free for productive communal or personal investments, such as infrastructure, factories, machines, etc.
>>531831835Which one is easier? Changing jobs or avoiding taxes? Therein lies the answer of what is more poisonous.
>>531829698Capitalism is communism but with the added lie that the average man can, through hard work, reach the same level as the oligarchs.So yes, very jewish.
>>531829698No cost of living increase this year. So now I leave for another company. And my boss was bewildered and mad when I gave him a 2 weeks. I am high enough up that he is a director. I just told him, “what did you expect? $0 increase is unacceptable, I made the company tens of millions and my costs are all up over 10%. There’s no situation where I continue with this employment. Next thing you know these millionaires will be ripping out our lead fillings.
>>531831202real capitalism has never been tried
>>531831976Literally has. We used to not have a central bank.
>>531833023Taxes sucking doesn't make wage slavery awesome. Quit being directionbrained.
>>531832976The thing is if a private bank issued its own currency, and it goes ahead and hands a bunch of people a billion dollars, that currency is immediately going to become worthless and no one will use it anymore.But with central banks, exactly the same thing happens, the currency becomes worth less and less, but then they FORCE you to use it, this is the problem that always comes with state force, the state and its cronies are never allowed to fail, and it completely degenerates the system. But everyone else is not only allowed to fail but they are fucked over by state nepotism and forced to submit to it and become serfs in the degenerating system.
>>531833340We didnt used to have a central bank. So, yes, it has.
>>531829698Yup, nailed it, those lying motherfuckers need louigied
>>531829698>Is capitalism an inherently Jewish system?Sure seems like a bunch of greedy kikelets run every company now
>>531831820>one side achieved miraculous performance but far from an utopia;National Socialism was far from a utopia? It was pretty much the closest we'd ever achieved as a species.> the other side has accomplished to starve people en massYeah, capitalism and communism both suck as attested to by all the mass famines of communism and the global economic crash that happens every 20-30 years in capitalist countries which we are currently experiencing in slow burn right now.
>>531829698Capitalism, no.The pesudo-communist financialist system where goods and services are allotted by loan officers with fed created money that lefties call capitalism is quintessentially jewish.
>>531829698Yes.
>>531833419How did workers fare in the 19th century before the central bank was put in place? Hours? Wages? Freedom?
>>531831813>Any system with a central bank cannot be called capitalistIt is a fascist kleptocracyhttps://rumble.com/v3v5plc-all-wars-are-bankers-wars-michael-rivero.html
>>531833422I'm simply saying X is better than Y, which is true, so we can eliminate statism as being positive for society, that doesnt mean that there isn't anything better than X, but X might be the best we can do right now, basic logic. I'm not saying 'X is better than Y therefore nothing is better than X', as you say that would be a directionbrained fallacy, i'm just using deductive reasoning which isn't binary.
>>531833707Rising all the time.
In the permanently inflationary economy which characterizes fiat central banking, what you see are tendencies similar to in hyperinflation, except slowed down. In hyperinflation, people do not bother saving money which they know will be worthless tomorrow. Instead, they try to get their wealth into foreign currencies, or stable assets like land, or non currency objects like drugs, prostitution, the black market. This is because in hyperinflation the entire moral framework of working to earn money, saving for hard times/useful investments does not work, since the money is becoming increasingly worthless. Hence, in hyperinflationary periods, we see lots of women prostituting themselves for food, we see rich people attempting to get their wealth out of the country to more stable societies. The basic psychology is that if my currency will be worthless tomorrow than it is today, it is wise to spend it today rather than try to save. In the fiat central banking system, this same philosophy is true, except on a longer time frame. And this is a big part of why psychologically crime and prostitution are at the front of young people's minds, while careerism is becoming seen as a waste of time. Get rich quick schemes abound. Why does prostitution, black market, crime, drugs flourish in times of hyperinflation? Because it allows people to exist outside of the broken financial system. If it were a perfect world where everyone were farmers, and the currency started rapidly losing value, they would simply forgo using the currency and barter with eachother. If 10$ will be worth 5$ tomorrow, I'm not going to give you an apple for 10$. Instead, I'll give you an apple for a blowjob, a cigarette, heroin, unpaid work, if you go and beat up a guy I don't like, or if you have some cheese and that's what I want. Hyperinflation's central feature is the delegitimization of currency and the resulting breakdown in the capitalist market economy. In permainflation, its the same, slowed.
>>531829698The root problem that people have with capitalism is the idea of going to work for someone else, which always implies exploitation, your boss hires you because he expects to benefit more than what he pays you. The evolutionary path of humans is to only work for your tribe, which is more or less an extended family plus everyone else that joins minus members that leave, which is a thing that happens. Working for some stranger is always slavery in disguise. If death is the alternative then its still slavery.To not be enslaved you should work alone or with relatives, and never get hired by anyone.
>>531833485>he's unironically believing this
>>531833707It created the biggest increase in living standards in the history of humanity, it created the most powerful country in world history, of course they've squandered all that now by abandoning their roots and stealing from the serfs. Maybe you can say people are more happy living poor and in squalor, maybe.
>>531829698> picthey can't pay more because dodge will sue them
>>531833896>If it were a perfect world where everyone were farmers, and the currency started rapidly losing value, they would simply forgo using the currency and barter with eachother.Yep. Ideally you would let that shit currency collapse and use a different less inflationary currency, but the state forbids this and forces you to use their hyperinflationary currency whether it fails or not.
>>531833907Based jew or vpn?
I think both system can work. Capitalism or Socialism are both fine system that can successed or fail. What matters the most is having a strong state with a high trust society. Where everyone has the state well-being as goal even if they're corrupt and people that fall outside of that can be punished. This is why multiple asian countries have lifted themselves from zero. They're collectivists. Unlike Americans whom trust liberalism and think that an unregulated market is fine because people just want the best for their community. We all can see this isn't true. When an individual amass enough power that they can overpower the people and the state, everything start to fail.
>>531831642Sorry libtard,but anything other than what I said is Socialism. Huh, so you wanna turn the whole world into a giant North Korea?Capitalism is freedom. freedom or death. You choose
>>531834428What I am trying to do is explaining to the frog boiling in the pot that the speed at which the water is heated does not make a difference. As the money loses its value, "capitalism" breaks down, which is why young people today abhor careerism and are more interested in crime, drugs, prostitution, and being really violent. It's the same as hyperinflation, but slowed down. Because the basic morality of capitalism "work hard, save up, invest" cannot work when saving is punished by inflation. Hence, return to caveman morality, just like in hyperinflationary times. People simply do not care about money when it is not a reliable store of value.
>>531833996I know you probably dont know much about US history passed what you've seen in shitty movies, but, yes. We have disbanded our central bank more than once.
>>531829698Yes.I won't even read below OP because golem sperging throughout this thread is a near certainty.
>>531830409Both are oligarchies
>>531830409That was true before we even had Civilization. The strong will do as they want and the weak will suffer what they must.
>>531830626> Being a good consumer.Jews don’t typically dish out the blame, but they are disproportionately responsible for the Civil Rights Movement, which largely made Socialism a non-starter.I don’t blame Jews for perpetuating the current state of things, rather I blame them for destroying the only viable alternative, White American Socialism.
>>531831202Currently, the goal is to put as many niggers in jail as possible. I’m not sure how tweaking Capitalism achieves that.
>>531831607You are in Capitalism.
>>531834865Of course, a monopolized central bank is always the most disastrous part of any system, by monopolizing money they are monopolizing the entire economy, and thereby degrading the entire society. Keynesian economists openly talk about it all the time and say it's a good thing. They say they control every behaviour by puppeteering the monopolized money system via the central bank, behaviours are increased and decreased at their whims and not according to the natural order or market signals. Such a society is doomed.
>>531829698As long as israel exists, you live under a jewish system.
>>531829698I don't know about Jewish but it leads to a race to the bottom every time safety rails are removed. Capitalists are like spoiled toddlers. You have to keep a tight leash on them.
>>531829698Capitalism works fine until stock markets and international manufacturing join the mix.
>>531829698Capitalism is just expecting something in return for your labor or monetary investment. Communism is inherently Jewish. It was created by a Jew (Marx)A Jew named lenin borrowed money from a Jewish bank in order to fund the October revolution. Most of the workers who took part were from labor bunds (Jewish organizations). All of modern leftism (post 60's) was created by critical theorists (who were all Jews) who only got teaching gigs in the US because Israel blackmailed the Rockefeller family. Every western communist organization (KPD, sparticus league, labor bunds, SDS) is historically run and funded by Jews. Communism is 100% Jewish from top to bottom, start to finish.
>>531835595>but it leads to a race to the bottom every time safety rails are removed>things I just made up because I like the way it sounds.
>>531830409Sad but true.
>>>531835796>Deflect because I'm a dumbass migger
>>531835595Liberals and Jews are disproportionately responsible for the current demographic situation. The current demographic situation all but ensures that workers will not organize.This is why (You) must have a memory. If some highly visible Jews (Bari Weiss) are at the helm, rolling back transexuals in public, allowing token racism against brown people who are also Muslim, etc, that must be contextualized within a larger historical picture of Jewish political activity in America. Probably don’t need to go back further than 1941.
Libertarianism is a disease>JUST ONE LESS REGULATION AND YOU WILL SE BRO>JUST A LITTLE LESS CENTRAL BANKING BRO JUST TRUST ME
>>531829698No one should own anything, only jews in the government should own things.
>>531829698perhaps
>>531835513We were under a jewish system before israel existed. So were the brits, that's why israel exists. Why do you want us focused on thwarting kikes in the middle east instead of the here, muhammed?
>>531834781>There's only two options for everything.>Right or left.>Fascism or Communism.>Capitalism or Socialism. I don't have any time for binary thinking, team joining, herd following subhumans.
>demographicNgmi
>>531835761Okay, but Stalin took over the levers of power and purged Jews from NKVD leadership under the guise of reprisals for the unrelated murder of Kirov.Jews do not prefer communism. If the correct ethnic divisions are created (as they were with the various ethnic blocs of the SSR) then Jews are easily outmaneuvered by the dominant ethnicity.
>>531831202Who is that suppose to be?
>>531831623>>531831813>not real capitalismIf you know anything about economic policy you know in the west we switched from themore socialist classical liberal economics that allowed the boomers a good life to the more capitalist neoliberalism ~40 years ago.Capitalism is capitalists (the rich) investing capital (money) for returns (money for doing nothing).If they were as smart as they claim they would have no problem with massive capital gains taxes and low business taxes as they would all use their money to start buisnesses that drive the economy.Instead they know you can't make as much money actually doing something in the real world as you can by taking out huge loans at 1% and investing for 5% returns.They don't want to be good for the economy as a whole, they want to drive inflation and burn it all down so long as their wealth is outgrowing inflation.
>>531835595Yeah, there's a reason merchants have always been considered scum. Turns out a profession that rewards you for only caring about grubbing shekels doesn't tend to produce good people.
>>531836132No, he just sent them to israel. It was a personnel transfer, not a purge.
>>531836132If stalin had not purged the Jewish communists, a Jewish man named leonered burnstein (Leon Trotsky) would have successfully taken control of eastern Europe on behalf of Jews. This was always the point of Judaism. World Jewery did not fund communism and create the revolution in order to give it to goyim. Jews absolutely prefer communism. Jews created all forms of leftism including the new left we have today in america. There is no difference because both are designed to give Jews control.
>>531831820>the other side has accomplished to starve people en massI'm no communist but show me where in the communist playbook it tells you that you are supposed to starve your populations?Show me where in the capitalist playbook you are supposed to create monopolies that buy up all of the power taking it away from the general population?"True communism" or "true capitalism" both have unironically never been tried. Both are ideologies and stupid people are idealists who don't separate idealism from reality unless they are speaking about the side they oppose.
>>531829698Henry Ford wanted payment of employees to scale with company profits but Jews lobbied against him and made that illegal.Redditors that claim to be pro-worker will ban you for bringing up Henry Fords pro worker position.
There was a sweet spot of capitalism between child labor and a complete lack of worker's rights, and the current international globalist system. I'd say probably between the 50s and 80s. Before union demands killed off western manufacturing. Between offshoring and global trade, all business has become so cut-throat that there's an impetus to basically walk all over your workers and consumers. It's compounded by a lot of factors, but publicly traded companies and global pricing are big factors. Companies have more of a responsibility to shareholders than workers. They also fuck over domestic consumers because why would you sell your products cheaper locally when you can sell it for more overseas. Anyone who tries to do the right thing tends to be boxed out of the market. Take auto manufacturing. The steel mills and auto workers wanted more money. Price of both goes up, so now you import steel since it's cheaper elsewhere. Now theres less steel industry because of less demand and higher cost to produce. Less demand, means the smaller steel mills that do right by their customers are either force to export or shut down, which fucks over other industries that use steel, since now they cant get cheap local steel.
>>531836533>the guy that hated unions loved workersSure thing.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Overpass
>>531836665>>531836533Ford didn't really love workers. He wanted to starve the competition from good workers, so he raised salaries. Same tactics that modern tech companies use nowadays. That doesn't change the fact that shareholder primacy was a total disaster for humanity.
>>531836370Yeah, and then his successors built the Aswan High Dam, ensuring that Egypt could have a modern economy. Stalins gift to Jews was more like a parting “fuck you, get out,” than a warm goodbye. The USSR has always provided material support to the Arabs. Even if we pretend that there is no ideological brotherhood between the USSR and the Arab world, choosing the Arabs over the Jews was a practical and correct move, owing to the knowledge that the United States would do ANYTHING to protect Israel. Nothing has changed in this regard. Russia provides basic intel and cheap weapons to Israels foes, and it disproportionately weakens America and Europe because America and Europe are controlled by Zionists.
>>531836824Now that makes sense, he could have given the workers stock options if he actually wanted to help them but that would cost him long term and not just short term.
>>531836665>implying that unions and workers are the same
>>531836439Jewry’s current weak point is Israel. If you attack it—which you should— you will rub shoulders with communists and Arabs.
>>531836341And what does produce good people? Taking tax money while producing nothing?
>>531830409and (((they))) were the ones telling us the Monarchs were exploiting the peasants. most peasants are of the unworthy type
>>531829698Capitalism rewards greed. Greed is counteracted by civilityThis is why capitalism can only work mostly white countries and why it collapses as soon as those countries have enough Jews or brownoids. Nobody else is capable of being civil.
>>531836989I have no interest in attacking Israel. My interest is in educating young whites.
>>531836665He explicitly states in his book the “international Jew” that unions are a form of control done by Jews. He wanted control of his employees to treat them correctly.You are kike retard
>>531836970You are a 21st century American having grown up decades after the capital class broken unions with gunfire and rebuilt them as HR departments so I wouldn't expect you do know this but collective bargaining is the greatest power the workers have to increase wages.Have a read about pre-50s unions.>>531837129>if none of us come to work the company collapses>we can use this to negotiate better wagesHow is this bad for the workers?
>>531836989>Jewry’s current weak point is IsraelIt's not at all. The bad press isn't helping them, but the source of their power is the banks. If Israel was a radioactive crater and every single person on earth was happy all the zionists were dead it wouldn't do anything to free us from the kikes.
>>531836457>Both are ideologies and stupid people are idealists who don't separate idealism from reality unless they are speaking about the side they oppose.
>>531831623Seriously, the average retard has absolutely no idea what capitalism is.
>>531836321>socialist>classical liberalThese words, I don't think you know what they mean.
>>531834249>It created the biggest increase in living standards in the history of humanity,So successful that /pol/acks openly reminisce about the lifestyle of a medieval serf? What is a "living standard," utilities run by less-capitalist methods? Is a "living standard" the ability to doomscroll?You're obviously dodging the questions, at least the person I replied to had the good sense to not reply back.
>>531836457"true capitalism" has no government intervention with things like anti-monopoly laws.>>531837296https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalismhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeoliberalismYou don't know what they mean because how the media use them and how economics use them are very different.
>>531837218I found an old photo of you from 2019.
>>531830409Have you tried just not being a peasant?
>>531837216I know all about unions. I know that they take worker's money for political campaigns those workers oppose and I know they can't demand in compensation what does not exsist. Unions can only shift time preference. You're giving unions credit for the products of a growing economy.
>>531837216Ford's Detailed Beliefs on Why Unions Were Bad1. Unions as Corrupt and Alien Intermediaries:Ford believed unions inserted a corrupt, unnecessary third party between the employer and the employee. He argued that union leaders were often professional agitators who did not understand the business and had no real stake in its success, but rather profited from conflict and dues. In his view, this "interference" disrupted a natural, harmonious relationship that should exist between a benevolent employer and his workers.2. Disruption of Industrial Harmony and Efficiency:Ford's business philosophy was built on the principles of scientific management and assembly-line efficiency. He saw unions as a direct threat to this system. He believed union rules—like strict job classifications, work slowdowns, and strikes—were inherently inefficient and chaotic. They prevented management from making rapid changes to improve productivity and innovation. To Ford, the assembly line was a perfectly synchronized machine, and unions were the wrench thrown into the gears.
>>5318375893. The "Divide and Conquer" Conspiracy:This is where his antisemitism became deeply entwined with his business views. Ford believed that Jewish financiers and international bankers were the puppet masters behind labor movements. His theory was that these powerful, unseen Jewish figures funded and controlled unions to create internal strife within non-Jewish-owned industrial companies like his own. The goal, in his mind, was twofold:Economic Sabotage: To weaken strong, independent American businesses from within, making them easier to acquire or control at a low price.Social Control: To foster class conflict and social disorder, which would create a demand for a stronger, centralized government that these same Jewish interests could then dominate.He saw the union leader not as a worker advocate, but as a paid agent of this international conspiracy, whose job was to poison the minds of contented workers against their generous employers.4. Undermining the Patriarchal Relationship:Ford saw himself as more than just a CEO; he saw himself as the patriarch of a vast industrial family. His famous "$5 day" in 1914 was not just a wage, it was a tool for social engineering. It was designed to attract the best workers and, through his "Sociological Department," to mold them into his ideal of a productive, sober, and morally upright citizen. He provided schools, medical clinics, and housing inspections.Unions threatened this entire patriarchal structure. They encouraged workers to see themselves not as members of the Ford family, but as members of a collective with distinct class interests. This promoted solidarity with workers at other companies and fostered an "us vs. them" mentality, which directly challenged Ford's vision of himself as the sole, benevolent provider and authority figure.
>>531831642Your point is reasonable and that's what I used to think, and the reason why people arguing for capitalism need to be careful with their words in order to not give the opposite message of what they're trying to say.The person you're responding to was probably trying to say that in an actually free market, the system optimizes itself in a way that the worker gets paid as much as possible. This is because, in a system based on free exchange and cooperation without violence or a coercive authority (capitalism), different people's choices and interests will interact in a way that optimizes the best outcome for everyone. This is the whole point of libertarian theory and the whole reason communism is bad compared to capitalism.An idiot's idea of a libertarian is someone who thinks workers should be poor because they arent hardworking enough to be rich or something. We actually think the opposite.
>>531831642Not really, the reality is that most labor markets work in this way. The reality is that if a company needs people do X they will hire at the rate they can pay as little as possible to get task X done.A lot of that comes down to supply and demand in the labor market, meaning how many people are in the pool to do X and how many companies need X done. For unskilled or lower-skilled labor this number of "available workers" (supply) is high even if demand is high they can be replaced easily because the job does not take much education/training or experience.Whereas a job that has 10x fewer people who can do it, will likely have income that reflects it because when a company needs that done, they know the person is in demand and not going to work for a lower wage.It really is just like any commodity. We place it in a different category because its about people's livelihoods but it functions the same. Meaning if you want to make good money, don't do something everyone else and their mom can do, and try to pick something that is trendy/always needed (like a trade).
Real capitalism has never been tried.Imagine being so utterly brainwashed that you actually believe capitalism is being forced to pay taxes to the state by threat of imprisonment
>>531829698>I need walled garden capitalism because I am special>only I am allowed to chase moneyI work C suite and we laugh at the slaves who need to suck dick daily in order to survive. We call it “employability”. You’d be surprised what married chicks and girlfriends do for a bonus, especially in this economy. I do executive shit for a medium size globohomo firm basically. Hope you guys don’t send your girl to ask for a raise. Get a DNA test for your kids.
>>531837290As society gets more and more socialist they have to blame more and more of their increasing failures on capitalism, i think people are starting to become more and more skeptical of extreme statism, nobody trusts governments anymore, they just havent made the final step that statism is inherently destructive. if or when that happens, its over for the adminstrative bureacrats.
>>531837626Why Ford Wanted Absolute Control Over His EmployeesFord's desire for control was not just about profit; it was ideological and deeply personal.1. To Realize His Vision of Social Engineering:Ford wanted to control every aspect of his workers' lives because he believed he was building a new, better type of American society. The factory was his laboratory. By controlling their wages (and thus their ability to buy a Ford car), their schedules, and even their moral conduct through his Sociological Department, he believed he could create a more stable, efficient, and prosperous nation. A union, representing an external power, would completely derail this social experiment by giving workers a voice and a power base independent of Ford himself.2. To Maintain Unfettered Managerial Authority:Ford was an autocrat. He believed in a clear chain of command with himself at the top. He wanted the absolute right to hire, fire, promote, set wages, and change work rules at will, without any negotiation or opposition. He saw collective bargaining as an absurd infringement on his rights as the owner and creator of the enterprise. For Ford, his authority was natural and divinely ordained; the union's authority was artificial and subversive.
>>5318377203. To Protect His Business Model and Innovation:The assembly line was Ford's revolutionary invention, and its success depended on total control over the production process. He feared that union contracts would freeze his ability to innovate. If a union dictated that a worker could only perform one specific task, Ford couldn't cross-train them or reorganize the line for a new car model. He saw unions as a bureaucratic anchor that would prevent him from adapting and improving, ultimately dooming his company.4. To Prevent "Outside Agitation":Ford's control was also a defense mechanism. By creating a company town-like atmosphere, he could screen out what he considered "undesirable" elements—namely, union organizers, socialists, and other radicals. His security force, Harry Bennett's "Service Department," functioned as an internal police and intelligence agency, using spies, informants, and physical intimidation to crush any organizing activity before it could take root. For Ford, control was synonymous with security, both for his business and for his social order.
>>531837409>Classical liberalism (sometimes called English liberalism[1][2][3]) is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism that advocates free market and laissez-faire economics and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech.[4] Classical liberalism, contrary to liberal branches like social liberalism, looks more negatively on social policies, taxation and state involvement in the lives of individuals, and it advocates deregulation.[5]Brother you're posting wikipedia articles without even reading the first line of them, it's probably time to take a break.
>>531836665Unions existed for a reason, but they're a product of a different time. Nowadays they're just political donors and artificial market forces. They're also extremely anti competition. The issue with unions is, the top 10-25% of your workforce are the best workers, with the highest output. A union boss shows up and promises every goober in the building will get benefits and a payrise, now you're paying all these goobers with reduced output, while your best workers have no incentive to work harder since unions have leveled the playing field. Meanwhile they killed the concept of piece meal, so dumb goobers get paid the same for less work and sign up for their union and they get more money to buy off politicians and line their own pockets.
>>531837659Capitalism and taxation are two different issues. Just like consumer protection laws and anti-monopoly laws are not "anti-capitalist" they are controls on it to keep from becoming a complete oligarchy.And if you think that somehow validates socialism or communism, you are equally retarded.
>>531837666Corporate statism will be destroyed and you will immediately lose your job and become a male hooker.
>>531837839Unions can be decent but you're trusting them to not be corrupt, which is naive. Any system will eventually become corrupt, sooner or later. It's almost inherent to humanity.It's almost a derived prisoner's dilemma. A company/system can start out not corrupt but at some point it takes hold and isn't routed, so it spreads like cancer and eventually takes over the host.Statistically it makes sense how this "entropy" happens. Think about what are the possible outcomes from someone:1) join the corruption2) turn a blind eye to it3) fight itThe first two basically allow it to grow + continue, or and the last option only has a chance at succeeding (which goes down each time it grows larger). So over time its like flipping a coin and wondering why it goes to shit after 20 flips.
>>531837227Capitalism is a practice, not an ideology. >Capitalism is primarily an economic system and a set of practices based on private ownership, profit motives, and market competition. While it operates as a practical method for production and exchange, it is often intertwined with ideologies like classical liberalism or neoliberalism, which justify and promote its practices. Pretty good AI run down for you.
>>531837666idk if this meme is true but, if this happens with capitalism where people can change jobs, imagine with communism where bureaucrats are much more powerful
>>531837671The failures aren't the fault of capitalism or socialism. That's just Jewish framing.That kind of argument is for midwits who don't even understand what money is.
>>531837855Government is just the biggest monopoly corporation in a given area that also steals and initiates violence on you if you try to compete with it. We just want to bring back competition and, if possible, bring peace to the land and end the theft.
>>5318375891) He's also describing management, a role I'm sure he had no issue with.2) Yes, strikes, the only true power the workers hold reduce production.3) So the bankers, that invested in ford wanted ford to fail?Class conflict is a natural byproduct of capitalism, you can't have the CEO make in a day what a worker makes in a year without people getting pissed.4) So he had the cops beat and shoot his "family", hot tip if any company ever says "we're like a family" it's time to leave.>>531837788Look at the years it was active and look at regulation of the time, more banking regulation, more government ownership, less small business regulation.>>531837839The investors and CEOs are huge political donors so if politicians are so sale the workers need to buy some too.>The issue with unions is, the top 10-25% of your workforce are the best workers, with the highest outputSounds like you need to increase wages to attract better people, that's how it's meant to work.
>>531837969Statism is just a byproduct of industrialization with no care for the human condition. We forgot why classical liberalism was so important three hundred years ago, and we are going to suffer for it.
>>531833707In colonial america indentured servitude and slavery were implemented because colonists could charge far beyond the standard in England for their labor, or the fruits thereof. Importing cheap labor to maintain an aristocracy is a tale as old as time. All central banking and fiat did was remove the need to traffic people. The current immigration crisis is happening for different reasons (more consumers, degrading the population, votes, etc.)
>>531835394What a great way of describing it. So much of ideology comes down to whether you can describe an action in sympathetic or unattractive terms. You have successfully described the keynesians in an unattractive way here, which is key to changing popular discourse that has been made to see it in a positive light for a century now. What do you think about the role that private banks play? I have heard the majority of "money creation" comes from private banks. Who are backed by the central banks in various complicated and hard to explain fashions.
>>531838092The Australian uniparty is basically unions back one side, corporations the other. I've spoken to blokes that get harassed on job sites for not being members, i know heaps of blokes that join simply because big (often government funded) job sites openly will not hire you unless you are a union member. The whole union system is corrupt and half the people I know that have had issues on sites or in workplaces, have had no help from their unions.
Look at Shark Tank. Anybody with a good idea gets an "opportunity" to beg a zionist or shabbos goy to take at least 30% of their company to be able to sell and market their product. There has to be a better way.
>>531836457>show me where in the communist playbook it tells you that you are supposed to starve your populations?one of the first problems Cuba had when becoming communist is that they weren't very efficient at growing potatoes. Industry is tremendously complex, even the most basic things. A bunch of retards with God complex do not have the know-how, thus people starve.
>>531838256Slavery was like buying a car in 2026. Retards didn't realize they were going to end up underwater like Jeffersons dad.
>>531838185Then what is it the fault of?
>>531838383Technology and apathy.
>>531837855>Capitalism and taxation are two different issuesCorrect. They both cannot coincide together. Real capitalism has never been tried.
>>531838104Of course it's an ideology. You're being pedantic. It has a definition and criteria, people associate with it and label themselves as "capitalists". Capitalists have a dogmatic "with us or against us" mentality. Other people oppose it, some even oppose it dogmatically. It's a belief system and ideology that also has practices.
>>531833556>trickle down = literally how retards think taxes will be "redistributed" loooOOOOOOOOOoooOOOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>531838201America didn't even have a central bank or an income tax, hell it didn't even have a central government for a while, that's just factually inaccurate and i'm guessing you don't know any of the history behind the things you're discussing, capitalism was a rebellion against feudalism and dissolved many of its bureacratic structures, which socialists then reinvented and brought back again in the early 20th century.
>>531838569I'm not being pendantic, I'm being technical. Capitalism is not traditional defined as an ideology.
>>531836319Leon, Resident Evil
>>531838348That's all fine and dandy but it didn't answer my question. I'll answer it for you. It doesn't say that. Everything thinks they are right, everyone thinks they are the good guys. Everyone believes in some sort of means to an end. Some are suicidally empathetic to achieve their end goals, others are brutally pragmatic to achieve their end goals.
>>531838569Here. Since I don't want to give you a politics 101 class.
>>531838221Agreed 100% I don't think it's a coincidence that statism rose at the tail end of the industrial revolution and essentially destroyed a lot of the progress, there really is something big to what you're talking about, i don't know if anyones done any academic work on it, it's very troubling to me that technological progress seems to lead to micromanaged dictatorship over society, this is the problem of our times and we need a solution to it.
>>531838728Stop it. Don't flash websters fucking dictionary in front of my face. Be better than that. We both know it's an ideology.
>>531838870It's simple cousin. Homo sapiens were designed biologically to live in societies of approximately 200 people max. Give or take.
>>531838383Banks, nigger. Or really, global power dynamics. Go read the NSDAP 25-point program for a basic primer.Point is, what we call capitalism is actually just finance. It's basically a big crypto ponzi-scheme powered by central banks.And the whole "muh socialism" is really just Keynesian.
>>531838625>capitalism was a rebellion against feudalismHahahahaha, so if I look up the familes of feudal lords there is no way they transitioned while retaining their wealth and political influence, right?As for the US you guys have tried it all, you went full laissez-faire until the big farmers brought all the bridges and wouldn't let the smaller farmers use them to access their property until they went under and sold to the big guys.Then you did anti-monopoly laws to crack down on that, then you stopped enforcing them and it came but a bit but not as bad because the capitalists feared triggering more regultion.Then the banks were fully deregulated again causing the great depression.Then you went democratic socialist to unfuck yourself.Then WW2 kicks off and the MIC becomes a major economic and political power.You have done it all and still don't realize which system lead to 1 man working 40 hours affording a stay at home wife, a house and as many kids as he wanted.
>>531838922Read this please>>531838861
>>531831066This is what illiterate normies always say.No, that is not what capitalism is. Wars are not capitalism. Money printing is not capitalism. Monopolies are not capitalism. Million $ homes are not capitalism.Anything that's not one solid currency without inflation, non violent, and no forced monopolies, patents, or any other kind of government favors, is not capitalism."But real capitalism has never been tried!": That's what real capitalism is. I would be happy with much less too, eg Singapore, Liechtenstein or Switzerland. But not with this shit.
>>531831623How come they have money for A (empowers jews central bank) and not B (Aids the tax payers)>Because the money printed from thin air and changed interest on will only be loaned for the reason jews central banks say it will be used for.
>>531839072I did and I don't appeal to that authority whatsoever. I can see two inches in front of my face from seeing and experiencing it on a regular basis that capitalists are definitely following an ideology. Communists do it too. Even libertarians do it. You're being a definition idealist which is almost an ideology in itself lol. I see it all the time. Be better.
>>531829698capitalism?
>>531837658>Meaning if you want to make good money, don't do something everyone else and their mom can do, and try to pick something that is trendy/always needed (like a trade).The game theory of this sort of thing is all fucked up and leads to bad outcomes because of the long training time to become specialized. Doctors are maybe the most extreme example. It was a good path in life. Then it wasn't, because of overcompetition, and number of people trying to become doctors massively fell off. Now we have a huge shortage of specialists and they tell us importing retards with fake degrees from India is the only way to fix the problem.
>>531830332This would only be true in a system free from government intervention. Yet of government actively looks to crush union power, forces strikes to end, makes stock by backs legal etc etc to aid the wealthy elite you have a huge power vacuum on the worker's side.They even keep health care in the USA tied to work so you fear leaving and having none. But there is no reason for say UPS and others to extract millions and millions of dollars in earned labor power from the workers with stock buy backs. Funneling that labor made profits from the workers and into the hands of investors. Only to turn around and claim workers are paid too much and start making cuts.If there was protected universal bargaining we would see everyone being paid more and wealth gains spread across entire populations. Yet greedy fucks with power can never have enough. Then the under educated like you fail to understand why and how only the top percent gain wealth. As now now 50% of consumer consumption is by the top 10%... As in 90% of us are servant class.. You're just too blind and stupid to see it. Odds are due to doing slightly better. So you have four carrots, mock with three carrots guy and ignore the people who took almost all the carrots.
>>531838287Yes you have a great intuition about systems, as you say, the way that money is created and distributed is made labyrinthine and complex on purpose, i'm not totally sure why it is this way, but i think its designed to artificially simulate a real economy and keep the scam going as long as possible without collapsing.America has a private-public central bank, the fed, really the state is just the enforcer of the monopoly of this giant private bank, and it gives it the power to inflate the money supply, no one really knows what it does, we just know the money that they print gets handed out to the government and the monopoly corporations. And then you have 'the central bank of central banks' which is like a world central bank, the IMF, which hands out loans to all the worlds central banks, it all gets very complicated. But i think essentially the state is just the enforcer of the monopoly of this cartel of 'private' banks. If you want to learn more about this you can look into something called 'private-public partnerships' which are everywhere. And also on the American fed there's a book called the creature from jekyll island.It's been a pleasure reading your posts and talking to you, a rare occasion on pol, cheers.
>>531838991So it seems so it seems, maybe we just have to return to monke after all.
>>531839472You don't think there's any distinction to be made between a collection of natural human behaviors that came about without any plan and an actual framework for behavior created by a person theoretically?
>>531838383>Let me addThat Ponzi-Scheme could literally go to zero tomorrow. The only reason it doesn't is because we print more dollars. As soon as the money printer stops, it'll all come crashing down because it's all fake as fuck. There's a reason the Federal Reserve and the Income Tax were created the same year. It's just a way to control the artificial revenues from the fake ass financial system. If they "deregulated it", or lowered interest rates like Trump is always whining about, it would work just like Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX. The whole reason they regulate it is to "protect" its fake ass investments. Especially to attract foreign capital, which often has no financial system of their own, and thus they throw their capital into our financial system in hopes of some future return(and because we are constantly engaging in economic warfare against any competitor).Moreover, capitalism didn't "win" the Cold War because of efficiency or any other such nonsense. We won the Cold War because we divided our enemies and because the Saudis created the Petrodollar in return for security guarantees to the family dictatorships/gulf monarchies created by the British.
>>531840160I don't think so. We just need to understand what we are and create a healthy relationship with technology. That may not be possible until drastic global change occurs though.
>>531829698yes.they financed most bourgeois revolutions to end the feudal system so they can buy land.
>>531837658That's unironically a great explanation of the basics for anyone with the reasoning abilities to follow it. I would also add:Most people would reasonably wonder:>How does capitalism even work then? Doesn't that mean wagies will have to get paid peanuts?A worker has no option other than work for peanuts if that's all that he is offered, however, if workers work for peanuts and businesses could afford to pay more but don't, it means business profits will be high. High business profits means more businesses, and more and more businesses means businesses have to compete for unskilled workers too, not only those jobs with few people who can do it.But there's a limit to this. At some point, businesses stop coming up / expanding and paying more, because there's a limit to what people are willing to pay for what businesses do with those workers. Some businesses are more efficient than others and can pay workers less than they could afford, while others are struggling, and salaries can't catch up unless the struggling ones improve their methods.Also>Would a minimum wage help?Some businesses are more efficient than others and could afford to pay workers more, but don't have to, because less efficient businesses can't compete with them on salaries. If there's a minimum wage, those workers at the worst (typically small) businesses would lose their jobs while workers at more profitable businesses would benefit and would make more money. So min wage is not objectively good or bad, it has pros and cons.Idk how many people will be able to process this, considering what the IQ of people posting opinions on the internet is usually like. But I felt like saying it because many comments here (not yours) are an idiot's idea of a libertarian and basically what commies want people to think we think.
>>531840291>We just need to understand what we are and create a healthy relationship with technology.It's a hard task but I think it can be done. The problem is no one seems to be addressing it or thinking about it in a meaningful way apart from insanity like "BAN CARS!"By the time a drastic global change occurs it may be too late.
>>531840546It would require a massive amount of power to force any meaningful change like that. It could also end in a hellish orwellian nightmare state like any ideology requiring corecive change to human behavior. I think the most we can do is write down what we see and what we know, then hope future generations can learn from our mistakes.
>>531840168Yea if you're being an annoying pedantic technical gay retard. For all intensive purposes it's an ideology. Don't be one of those diamond dozen folks who gets out a dictionary, it's insulting. It's already enough of a doggy dog world so stop ankle biting. Nip it in the butt now.>ACKSHWULLY IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEFINITION...
>>531829698PLEASE GOYIM WHY WON'T YOU GIVE ME I MEAN GOVERMENT I MEAN THE PEOPLE WHO ARE YOU ABSOLUTE POWA???????????
>>531840865I can see technicality is wasted on you isn't it? At least when it's not in your corner.
>>531835914Thats not a deflection dumbass
>>531837658>Meaning if you want to make good money, don't do something everyone else and their mom can do, and try to pick something that is trendy/always needed (like a trade).True. Which is why most high-income professions create artificial scarcity through barriers of entry. Especially the medical field which controls how many are even allowed to get a degree, and thus a license. The truth is, outside of STEM, most professions don't really need a degree. Degrees primarily used as filtering mechanisms for employers. It's basically the only legal form of discrimination.
>>531841011Nigger I done gone over that hill a long ass time ago. I can be brutally German and autistic when it comes to technicalities. It used to be my natural state and then I grew up and ascended.
>>531837655Libertarianism essentially boils down to 'initiating violence is wealth destroying and wrong', this simple axiom has an infinity of complex implications which you can clearly get to step by step from the original axiom. Even if you disagree with it it really is a beautiful and aesthetic philosophy, which is extremely rare in politics, and also why some of it's followers may be a little idealistic, but who changes things who doesn't have an ideal? Modern Libertarianism is a very new philosophical movement in the long arc of history anyway, it's natural that it will progress more, but i still think it adds value to discourse even if it's wrong.
>>531830409If only there was a third way...
>>531839064>Hahahahaha, so if I look up the familes of feudal lords there is no way they transitioned while retaining their wealth and political influence, right?Buddy the Russian soviet commissars still kept many positions of power and wealth when communism collapsed that doesn't mean Russia was still commmunist, youre being directionbrained.
>>531841455Even the samurais turned into capitalistic lords. See Mitsubishi
>>531841455My point is claiming it was a rebellion against feudalism is a huge stretch, the merchants had gotten rich enough they wanted in the club so the club was renamed the feudal power structers remained intact.
>>531840969Da government are da people goy! theyre you! trust me i- i mean da government put it in da textbook! so it must be true!
>>531841619>the feudal power structers remained intactnot really if the merchants are the most powerful now. The peasants are still slaves tho.
>>531841582Yep lol i don't know that until recently, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, Toshiba.
>>531841764The merchants actually made things, ran businesses, risked their live in the new world.The old money invested in the East India company and went on safari in Africa.Even today the richest men might have the title CEO but if you see all their side hussles like managing DOGE it becomes clear they aren't actually working, just owning.
No but jews were very influential for the current system US is using. Both Keynesianism and Neo liberalism for example, were pushed by jews, and then we also got marxism. What kind of capitalism hasn't been pushed by jews?
>>531842009You want to know what the jews hate, Islamic banking & Saudi Aramco being state owned.
>>531829698It was invented by spanish jews exiled to netherlands, so…
>>531830409Communism never been tried. Yes, unironically
>>531841619I mean the American revolution was quite literally a rebellion against a feudal king, they got rid of all the guild structures etc and didn't even have a central authority. You're doing reductio ad absurdum, of course some of what you're saying happened but the system also changed a lot regardless of your opinion of it.
>>531842177>the American revolution was quite literally a rebellion against a feudal kingBritish economic feudalism was replaced with mercantilism 100 years before US independance. Monarchy and Feudalism are not the same thing.
>>531839864>true in a system free from government interventionSo once again, state bravely fights problems it created and would not appear in capitalist setting before goverment regulation.Shocking, we clearly need more government activity as response.
>>531842371Bullshit they were still heavily feudalist, all the guild structures remained even to this day with various lords of this and that.
>>531842519>Bullshit they were still heavily feudalistWhatever you say boss.>all the guild structures remainedGuilds were just the first unions and survive to this day in skilled trades.
>>531842490It's worse than that, the state actively creates more problems on purpose in order to justify expanding itself, it always implodes in the end.
>>531842704>Guilds were just the first unions and survive to this day in skilled trades.Oh you're a feudalist kek, you should have just said so, the endless red tape, zoning restrictions, class structures, licences, it's exhausting to even think about
>>531829698Capitalism has not existed in generations. The modern world operates under financialism (Judaism). So, yes, the system we operate under is Jewish, but its not capitalism.
>>531842977>Oh you're a feudalistI'm a socialist largely radicalized by house prices, why would I support an economic system that made land ownership illegal for the serfs?As someone that has spent a decent amount of time reading about the history of economic systems I have to ask, what do you think feudalism was?
>>531843018you remindme years ago when people said the same but with the word "corporatism" instead of financialism. Is just capitalism.
Why do people who pay taxes call it capitalism?Do they not even understand what capitalism is?
>>531843686it seems you don't understand what capitalism is.
>>531843686Post a link to any definition of capitalism that says no taxation.
>>531843147>>Oh you're a feudalist>I'm a socialistLol.>largely radicalized by house prices, why would I support an economic system that made land ownership illegal for the serfs?You know capitalists were the first and only ones to advocate for actual private property rights don't you? The same is true for modern Libertarians, it's all about private property rights, you, your home, your assets, the fruit of your labor.You didn't own any land under feudalism, nobody could, you rented it from the local feudal lord, everyone was a tennant, that's where the fucking term landlord comes from you fool, what a stupid historically illiterate post you just made, youre making me angry that I even have to explain this to you.And by the way you dont own anything under socialism either, let alone a house, you cant own any private property at all, everything is taxed, your home is taxed, your car is taxed, everything you 'own' is taxed.Abolish ALL property taxes, abolish the central bank.If you're mad at house prices, the first thing you need to look at is inflation and how it's caused by the governments central bank via fiat toilet paper money.Why did a house cost 10,000 dollars 70 years ago and now it costs a million? oh yeah because they stole the value of all your money throught the states central printing toilet paper and handing billions to the state and its cronies, which it always inevitably does, that's the socialist 'wealth redistribution' you love so much. And then the state takes your house when your money is devalued enough that you cant pay their bullshit property taxes anymore.
>>531844270>You know capitalists were the first and only ones to advocate for actual private property rights what capitalists ? lol the ones that expelled people from their farms during the industrial revolution to wageslave in their factories?
>>531844529Yes exactly, what capitalists? I don't remember capitalists doing that in the 1800's, however, SOCIALISTS did do that in the early 1900's, and then they started a bunch of world wars with industrial weapons they forced people to create in slave labor factories. they took the mothers and daughters out of the family homes and put them to work slaving away making weapons for the state ton slaughter their peasant serfs with.
>>531843797it seems you don't understand what capitalism is.>>531843826You think capitalism means a portion of your labor belongs to the government?
>>531844270>You know capitalists were the first and only ones to advocate for actual private property rights don't you?Dude we talked about mercantilism just a few posts ago, what do you think changed to land ownership laws between feudalism and mercantilism?>The same is true for modern Libertarians, it's all about private property rights, you, your home, your assets, the fruit of your labor.That would be true if I wasn't bidding on the same houses as Blackrock and Musk, capitalism favors the rich and they are returning us to serfdom without any hope of owning land by simply outbidding us.>You didn't own any land under feudalism, nobody could, you rented it from the local feudal lordThe Lord could and did own the land, mercantialism private sale became possible.>eyour home is taxedWe rename it rent when it's going to blackrock instead of the lord.>And by the way you dont own anything under socialism eitherDepends, new deal socialism in the US retained private property, same here in Australia when we had state owned banks and utilities 30 years ago. In "communist" countries like Vietnam and China you can get a 100 year lease, you never own it but they can't kick you out for a century. I would take that over the current situation.>Abolish ALL property taxeAgreed but only after banning investment in residential property to avoid it being used as a tax haven, maybe a 3 house limit per person.>abolish the central bankNah, I remember nationalized banking and would just renationalize it. Having a centeral bank and leans to other banks is a useful economic lever if you want to retain some free market functions in a mixed market economy.>the first thing you need to look at is inflationI'm going to do some quick and dirty math with AI results because I'm not a clap but here is the US housing market>1960 median house price $11,900>2025 inflation adjusted $131,376>2025 median house price $405,300Why is it over 3 times the inflation rate?
>>531844529this, it should be illegal to work for yourself, ONLY working for the government should be legal
