It pisses me off that the narrator is saying:>We need to be transparent.Then show the actual footage of the flight, not a fucking CGI spaceship. Does anyone else think this shit is fake, or am I being paranoid?https://www.youtube.com/live/Tf_UjBMIzNo
>>532159977Calm down, Miguel. I'm sure your people helped in some way.
>>532160101>Quit doubting you Mexican.If your so confident that this is real, what evidence do you have? I would like to hear it.
they wont even land bro
>>532159977/pol/ is a flat earth board
>>532159977that shit look so fake. The dust/clouds looks like those old Windows screensavers and the vessel look like some cheap 3D model from the 80's. Shit's even jagged.
>>532160471>yourESL confirmed.
>>532159977the live stream ended
>>532160926I had to look up ESL, and Federal Credit Union popped up first lol.English is not my second language you incompetent twat. I'll have you know I am well versed in the art of writing. My intellect can not be determined using your feeble means.
>>532159977No dumbass Apollo faked the moon landing wat three oft fourtimes they used the set the starless background different areas of the ball moon hoax
globies were so confident prior to launch and suddenly so quiet
>>532159977It looks fake, thats how you know its real
>>532159977Fuel to the fire, as usual.Gotta cut costs on equipment you already have that does a better job while somehow a digital camera that should display perfectly on a computer has artifacting.
>>532159977>not a fucking CGI spaceship.What do you expect them to do? Send an astronaut out on a tethered spacewalk with a gopro on a stick to get a shot of the silhouette of a black unlit ship against the backdrop of a black earth? There aren't any cameras just floating out there waiting for the payload to get into position.
>>532162033>Meme flag>wat, oft, fourtimes>They used the set theI can hardly understand this post, I assume you mean NASA faked the moonlanding 3-4 times.There is only one "recorded" instance of NASA landing on the moon. How did they fake it multiple times then?You can't fake the same event more than once.
the shitskin seethe from every rocket launch in the US is so insane
>>532162339>there aren't any cameras just floating out thereOne would think the capsule would have all sorts of equipment inside it.And a window.
>>532159977It’s fake anon. NASA is fake and gay
>>532160926>ur
>>532162339>Recording is too hard.This is billion dollar operation. They could have used a telescope to record the spaceship, recorded the flight from inside the spaceship or something else.They definitely could have recorded it.
copy houston, the view of australia from here was epic for the win. over.
>>532159977STOP FAKING THE MOON LANDING!
How does it feel to have less object permeance compared to a toddler?
>>532160926That's a native speaker mistake. ESL learn the difference early in studies due their native languages likely having non-homophone words for the difference.
>>532162451lol hilarious to see you mutts believe this shit is real and not just propaganda
>>532162593>They could have used a telescope to record the spaceshipThey did, until it got far out enough that it became unfeasible to continually track it.>recorded the flight from inside the spaceship or something else.They have cameras on the inside but one of the unglamorous things that doesn't get talked about much at the normalfag facing pressers is that when you are in zerog for extended periods of time, shortly after entering it most people experience fairly bad nausea for hours, sometimes over a day. It's why you rarely see any footage broadcast from any capsule or the ISS during the beginning stretch of a mission. The people up there are mostly sick as hell and barely in a state to do the things that need to be done for the mission itself let alone putting on a smiling face and a cheery disposition for the camera. Plus nobody wants to see astronauts puking and shitting and groaning for 12 hours straight in zerog.
>>532159977Who has the CGI jeet moon landing webm? They scam about everything else, why not lie about going to the moon as well?
>>532162899You're Scott Ferguson, aren't you?
>>532163086No I'm not a fuckin mick.
>>532159977>Does anyone else think this shit is fake, or am I being paranoid?It's not paranoia if they are really out to get you.
>>532159977This is an elaborate April fools right? Like for real, I haven't heard of this at all, now overnight we are seeing a trip to the moon? NASA has been completely useless for 20 years since Bush ended the shuttle program. And suddenly they have rockets?
>>532160471What are you doubting exactly? Do think everyone down at Cape Canaveral watching the launch was an actor and the launch somehow didn't happen despite launch viewing being open to the public?
>>532159977>second time If you're going to be a conspiracy nut get the facts straight.
>>532159977
>>532162853brapzilian monkey cope
>>532163291>implying these kike worshippers even know there was more than one apollo mission let alone more than one apollo mission that landed on the moonThey unironically think Apollo 11 was named Apollo 11 for esoteric numerology gematria reasons not because it was the 11th mission of an over 10 year long program.
>>532162899>It got too far out.You realize that it is a ten day trip back and forth and it isnt even close to reaching the moon. Do you seriously think we dont have the technology to record it at that distance?>The pilots got flight sick or something so they can't record from inside.I meant that they would record the earth or space from inside the spaceship making it obvious that they are leaving.Even that would be better than CGI.
>>532159977The coverage today was fucking atrocious. Every feed I saw had babbling fuckwits who never shut the fuck up about the most banal, obvious and inane shit. Every camera was like it was operated by some 15 year old who never operated a camera before and wouldn't quit fucking with the focus and zoom. Screens were cluttered with meaningless graphic overlays.They just took Apollo, made it 80 percent shittier and added smartphones and AI. $40 billion.
>>532163756Fail get with a retard post. kys loser
>>532163798you getting fired, ceo sar
>>532163299I looked on YouTube and it seems to be what I was asking for. A live video from within the spaceship leaving earth.https://www.youtube.com/live/6RwfNBtepa4Seems real more or less. Modern CGI, Is something else though, I'll probably just wait until the conspiracy theorists start talking before making a conclusion.
>>532163706>Do you seriously think we dont have the technology to record it at that distance?Have you ever tried getting a track on something in orbit? Obviously not. Even with extremely expensive equipment it's a crapshoot and even if you can get a smooth track you can only functionally get a few minutes of continuous footage per orbit from a given position in daylight. Atmospheric effects alone create enough of an issue that you can't see shitall on most launches past the first staging event let alone once its reached orbital insertion. Now this is for sea level and it'd be different if you were on a mountaintop where the atmosphere is thinner but how are you going to get those giant anti-aircraft gimbal setups up there to track a launch? Especially when launch sites specifically choose flat areas with coastlines to the direct east.Or what, were you expecting them to realign hubble or james web to try to take shots of the capsule on the way out?
>>532164053This has good information as well...https://www.youtube.com/live/m3kR2KK8TEs?si=QgYZXhZDFl5gVkSOWhat is your scepticism stemming from?
this is MESSANGER's departure
>>532159977>the actual footage
>>532163885I dunno what you beaners have against space development. No, the NASA budget isn't going to be given to you instead.
>>532164137This is not merely "something" you act as if we are tracking a meteor. NASA has DSN, they can very accurately track the location of the spaceship at any given moment.And even if they didnt use hubble, it is definitely within their capabilities to record the spaceship using a normal telescope during the low orbit flight.
>>532159977At 5:40:10, 5:41:42, 5:44:09 you can see the broadcast from a camera installed on a fin or on some periphery of the rocket as it's in space. You can see the earth's horizon from space in very laggy and artefacted footage, some of it even rendering backwards at times.At 5:45:24 you see high quality video, smoothless and without chop of any sort showing the final phase of the rocket disconnecting. Why the laggy footage from before? Why is the camera here better than the other cameras? The rocket is moving faster than ever before so why isn't it lagging as well?
>>532164712I meant normal satalite not normal telescope.
>>532164595lol, no amount of shilling will get you visa to usa, jeet.. you're stuck in canada at best and be sent back to poolandina at worse
>>532164335If you roll it back a few minutes it was recording the earth, i assume it would be looking at the sun right now, so obviously not a great view.
>>532162033No - there's a lunar orbiter satellite than can see at least one landing site.
>>532164712>it is definitely within their capabilities to record the spaceship using a normal telescope during the low orbit flight.No it isn't. That's what I was describing regarding a sealevel track. The night sky or a moon or even a large planet is easy enough because you can pick and choose the clearest nights with the best atmospheric conditions and use all sorts of post processing to reduce distortion but for a live broadcast you're stuck with the conditions you have and the footage you get, which isn't going to be very good. Webm related is the best conventional capture hardware available to anyone in the world capturing the VSS Unity topping out at around a third the height Orion is at during perigee. And this is with a ship that goes straight vertical only interested in passing a specific altitude, not achieving orbital velocity making it infinitely easier to track. This is the best result you can possibly get from the ground and this is only a little higher at the end of the clip than Artemis II dropped its SRBs at. These guys are the ones who record engineering footage for internal NASA/Spacex/Blue Origin use.
>>532159977Your post makes my head hurt.
>>532159977why the fuck can't we land on the moon anymore? why is everything "lost tech" even some things games did in the 90s to early 2000s is now "lost tech" wtf
>>532164890I'm not a jeet and Canada was involved in this anyways so I can celebrate for my own national reasons. You're just a mad shitskin that is experiencing a severe case of sour grapes because white people achieved something you subhumans could never do.
>>532165652>I'm not a jeetdenounce anus licking visha and buttfucked krishna
