>boomers believed this thing was in space transmitting TV signals
>>532172010Is it a dalek?
>>532172295It might as well be.
>>532172010retards in the 21st century also believe that. They believe there are currently 10,000 metal boxes with solar panels attached to them flying around the earth without propulsion or steering in an imaginary Space realm that defies all physical reality.
>>532172010yes
>>532172010no I didn'thttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1YIigfNXOI
>I can't understand chemistry, electricity, physics, or mechanical engineering because I went to college to learn programming, so this must be magic.>But I also don't believe in magic, so none of this happened and it's all a conspiracy!
>>532172496>INDOCTRINATE!>INDOCTRINATE!
Satellites are one aspect of space that is actually real. Otherwise you have to explain satellite TV, satellite phones, satellite internet, etc. The only actually fake aspects of space are those involving humans in space, such as the Moon landing and space stations.
>>532172010Beep
>>532176655no no you see billions of people are all in on it just to fake those things work at the cost of trillions upon trillions of dollarsso they can, uh, take a couple of bucks from OP's paycheck in the form of taxes, or something
>>532176168>I can't understand chemistry, electricity, physics, or mechanical engineering because I went to college to learn programming, so this must be magic.At the same time science tards will say that light is a wave…a wave of WHAT? You can’t have a wave without a moving for that wave to move through. People with advanced PhD’s literally gloss over this simple fact because the institutions know that if they admit the Ether is real, that our science will leap forward almost instantaneously.
>>532178081>without a moving without a *medium*
>>532172587they do have propulsion and steering
>>532178081>a wave of WHAT?A photon moves through space-time, and its energy potential dictates how much momentum it has through space-time. The more momentum, the shorter its waveform and higher its frequency. Outside of this, humans are not intelligent enough to discover what exactly is the underlying force that generates the wave, but rest assured, it has to do with the spiral.What is the spiral? Well when you find out what it is exactly, tell us.Or are you foolish enough to think humans can figure out the makings of the universe and God with a paltry 500 or less IQ?Humans think 200IQ is intelligent. A very naive estimation. It's high for a human. But it's nothing. 200IQ, out of what? 1000? 100000?
>>532178081Google QFT.
>>532172587you can literally see artificial satellites in the night sky.
>>532178975nooooooo those are heckin chips in yhwh's firmament from rockets hitting it my talmud says so >:(
>>532178863>underlying force that generates the wave, but rest assured, it has to do with the spiral.If you convert the work Tesla did regarding the repeating number patterns of 3,6,9 but in Base-12, all of the numbers add up to one “E” digit instead of multiple which is clearly an indication of everything being mathematically connected to a singular source that is talked about in spiritual communities. Again, you’re not as smart as you think you are. I figured this shit out on my own with a piece of paper and a calculator.
science tards will say that clouds are real because reddit and the government tell them this. but if clouds are real then why do they dissapear when you approach them? nobody has ever touched a cloud, its all cgi and holograms on the dome
>>532172010?why couldn’t it be? it’s all inorganic matter.
>>532172587>I am ignorant of how space works>therefore its not realWhat logical fallacy is this? Retard fallacy?
nasa wants you to think this is a real image but its cgi and clouds aren't real
>>532176655All of those are ground-based transmissions. Did you know that there are parts of the world where "satellite phones" don't work?
>>532176655what's more real le soience or elites accessing demonic magics to brainwash us
>>532176655
>>532178422>>532179359>>532179412
>>532178975Show me
>>532179317>connected to a singular sourceYou mean the eye of the spiral? The great eye of God? Like a hurricane.
>>532179499show me one picture or video of a plane colliding with a cloud, you can't because clouds are fake
>>532179499Being ignorant and making bold claims only makes you look retarded. But I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand exactly what you're talking about.
>>532179552No. Something akin to a sin wave with E being the source of it. It would imply our Universe is more akin to a hologram with everything emanating from one infinite point and “distance” being an illusion created by frequency.
>>532179483Google maps isn't a gps you fucking tard. Its a glorified website that uses location data.
if clouds are real why come nobody has ever brought one down to earth to use as a pillow stuffer or mattress filling when it would be super soft and comfy. trust the science cloud-tards don't want to answer this.
>>532172010Serious question. Why was this Artemis 2 launch unable to transmit a clear, stable video feed from the rocket considering we have modern starlink internet connection? Why no video feed from the cockpit?
>>532179764Probably afraid it was gonna blow up
>>532172587goto bed turkroach. Space is the white man's plane
>>532179764>Why no video feed from the cockpit?There were a couple shots of the interior during the ascent and they spent like an hour and a half showing the crew fucking around while they did 6dof hardware tests once the initial burns were done to prep for tomorrow's TLI. That was about 3 hours ago at this point.
>tfw i'm posting via satellite
>>532179923Ok I'll see if I can find that. But what was up with that external camera feed? It was not only very low res, but it kept cutting out.
>>532179764NASA uses TDRS not Starlink. It's older and slower but considered more reliable for critical applications. Being way out in geostationary orbit it doesn't need to switch satellites constantly.Eventually they will probably switch over to a commercial network like Starlink, but I imagine they are hesitant because it looks a bit like favoritism. Also they have to keep TDRS running anyway to support all the legacy spacecraft that are still out there and can't communicate with Starlink.
>>532180452Oh and you also have to consider that within the available bandwidth, they have to prioritize critical stuff like voice comms, biometrics, telemetry, and engineering camera feeds first. Getting nice views for the public always comes last, unfortunately.
>>532176655this anon gets it
>>532172010>>532172587>Brownoid seethingYou're just pissy at pure Anglo supremacy on display once again.
>>532179483are you fucking retarded? GPS works everyhwere
>>532180627it's a trap so you try it and get a forced circumcision in the middle of nowhere
don't look into NASAs use of helium and balloon program. glownigger Musk's "star link satelites" .... guess what?
>>532180183>But what was up with that external camera feed?I can't give you a good answer for that one. Maybe they run direct data through their satellite uplink with basically no buffer or error checking and a slight reduction or loss of signal causes all those pframe drop artifacts. Or maybe like >>532180554 mentions the public facing video feed is totally deprioritized and any bandwidth bottleneck results in public video feeds getting tossed until the bottleneck ends. People have gotten spoiled by Spacex's Starship IFTs over the last few years. The quality, consistency of video, and quantity of angles being broadcast in damn near real time is completely unprecedented in spaceflight, especially during the plasma phase of reentry.
>>532172010Real eyesRealizeReal lies
