Why do Iran's native Pagans and Muslims co-exist, but Europe's Christians destroyed all of Europe's native religion?
Persian Empire was not subverted into something else, they were outright conquered and exiled their pagan to India
>>532185306You lost. Cope.
>>532185306co-exist my foot
>>532185306Why are street shitters so fucking obsessed with pagans in other countries.
Iranian Zoroastrians were only in like 3-4 villages at that point out of a country of millions
>>532185306would
>>532185306Zoroastrians aren't pagans, you prick!
lmaoAlaviteanon can tell you about how he isnt been opressed.
>>532185401
>>532185306would both
>>532186261Pagan = native pre christian ethno religion
>>532187874Pagans are polytheists, dork.No sane Zoroastrian consider himself polytheist!
>>532185306>Why do Iran's native Pagans and Muslims co-existYou do realize how very few of them exist? There's are significantly more 'Pagans' in the UK, by a factor greater than 10, than there are Zoroastrians in Iran. Iran has a greater population than the UK.
>>532188505Are you stupid?
>>532188505they don't know what zoroastrianism is
>>532188817>Are you stupid?He's a literalist. Pagans refer to polytheistic European religions that early Christians viewed as uncultured and belonging to poor underdeveloped rural communities (basically calling them country bumpkins for not being Christian). Zoroastrianism isn't Paganism, it has defined clergy and scripture. It's a structured religion.
>>532188817Hes right though
>>532189093Was Rome pagan?You silly sausage.
>>532189401>Was Rome pagan?Yes? That's literally why the origin of the word is paganus, it just means rustic farmer.
>>532189702Bene, bene. Ecce vir elegans et urbanus curru Germanico adveniens.
>>532188505I think when you’re talking to a christcuck, a “pagan” is anyone who isn’t Abrahamic. So they’d count Buddhists and Sikhs for example.
>>532187874Abrahamic religions are based on Zoroastrianism, which shares commonalty with Judaism which initially had more differences as one would expect (the concept of YHWH was different, more of an arbiter of good and evil also, which may still be the case?). If you told a Christian in 1600 about the religion they might not find it offensive because it shares basic elements with Christianity. Not that I expect a peasant from 1600 to realise the semantic differences are semantic.
>>532185306>whybecause pagans could care less about sand monkeys fucking the goats
>>532188505This is actually correct.
