/pol/ - They are doing this to attack China. We can not ha - Politically Incorrect

Anonymous (ID: bItuv3XL) Archived

04/02/26(Thu)07:26:15 No.532194425

File: file.png (2.37 MB, 2560x1707)

2.37 MB PNG

Anonymous (ID: bItuv3XL) 04/02/26(Thu)07:26:15 No.532194425 Archived

They are doing this to attack China. We can not have a day of peace.

Anonymous (ID: UhCiXp3Y)
04/02/26(Thu)07:28:17 No.532194508

Anonymous (ID: UhCiXp3Y) 04/02/26(Thu)07:28:17 No.532194508

File: Fm1CIcZaYAMv96e.jpg (30 KB, 524x329)

30 KB JPG

i hope so that would be great

Anonymous (ID: uOyFwqys)
04/02/26(Thu)07:34:10 No.532194772

Anonymous (ID: uOyFwqys) 04/02/26(Thu)07:34:10 No.532194772

>>532194425
No that is called a NASA rocket.
China is not going anywhere.

Anonymous (ID: fXUHSXti)
04/02/26(Thu)07:34:20 No.532194778

Anonymous (ID: fXUHSXti) 04/02/26(Thu)07:34:20 No.532194778

They launched a moon mission on April fool's day, a day of pranks, lies, and trickery.

Anonymous (ID: RDwaFCZp)
04/02/26(Thu)07:36:21 No.532194860

Anonymous (ID: RDwaFCZp) 04/02/26(Thu)07:36:21 No.532194860

File: yellow1.jpg (1.18 MB, 800x7800)

1.18 MB JPG

>>532194425
>attack Chyna
B
A
S
E
D

Anonymous (ID: uOyFwqys)
04/02/26(Thu)07:37:39 No.532194924

Anonymous (ID: uOyFwqys) 04/02/26(Thu)07:37:39 No.532194924

Look I'm just going to point out some important facts.
China has an economic focus and is trading with many many countries.
Attacking China is detrimental.

Iran was actively initiating terrorist attacks and planning wider terrorism.
Iran was restricting trade.
Attacking Iran was not detrimental.

It's very simple, China will not be attacked and has nothing to fear.

Anonymous (ID: KXOyFeeX)
04/02/26(Thu)07:39:27 No.532194995

Anonymous (ID: KXOyFeeX) 04/02/26(Thu)07:39:27 No.532194995

File: IMG_3189.gif (170 KB, 360x346)

170 KB GIF

>>532194425
>launching a rocket full of western karens AROUND the moon so they can take photos for their instagram
and they called it the next lunar landing haahahahahha

Anonymous (ID: 6gEPOCpq)
04/02/26(Thu)07:41:34 No.532195083

Anonymous (ID: 6gEPOCpq) 04/02/26(Thu)07:41:34 No.532195083

kek they're not even landing on it
what a waste of money lmao

Anonymous (ID: mfXw6qI6)
04/02/26(Thu)07:44:44 No.532195221

Anonymous (ID: mfXw6qI6) 04/02/26(Thu)07:44:44 No.532195221

File: Screenshot_20260402-044335.png (339 KB, 674x1072)

339 KB PNG

>>532194425
If we were attacking China we would be launching a giant can of Raid.

Anonymous (ID: XVe+28HA)
04/02/26(Thu)07:46:39 No.532195294

Anonymous (ID: XVe+28HA) 04/02/26(Thu)07:46:39 No.532195294

>>532194772
Its true purpose is to test the viability of the rocket they used for ICBM development.

Anonymous (ID: mfXw6qI6)
04/02/26(Thu)07:50:00 No.532195444

Anonymous (ID: mfXw6qI6) 04/02/26(Thu)07:50:00 No.532195444

File: Screenshot_20260402-044846.png (640 KB, 1035x621)

640 KB PNG

>>532195294
This is the last thing you will ever see. Insect.

Anonymous (ID: w1jKuznQ)
04/02/26(Thu)07:51:20 No.532195513

Anonymous (ID: w1jKuznQ) 04/02/26(Thu)07:51:20 No.532195513

>>532195294
>Its true purpose is to test the viability of the rocket they used for ICBM development.
>the rocket that's made of bullshit and leftover shuttle parts after that platform got shitcanned
what the fuck are you talking about? Damn near every other rocket that's ever been associated with nasa constitutes an icbm with range to china. Why would the frankensteined artemis platform be the one?