[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: rama-duwaji.jpg (326 KB, 778x777)
326 KB
326 KB JPG
Can ANYONE explain how the US party system worked historically
to an inquisitive autist because it doesn't make any sense to me

It's weird how what appears to be the most reasonable and normal setup in a two-party system, i.e. one side representing broadly the right, conservative, rural voters and the other representing broadly the left, liberal, urban voters only started being a thing since about 1980 or so
>(additionally, with the exception of the 1946 and 1952 elections, it appears Hoover and the Great Depression left such a distaste in Americans' mouths that the Dems dominated BOTH the Senate and the House from 1932 to 1980 and from 1932 to 1994 respectively)
or, everything was set in motion when LBJ won the race to pull the nigger gambit first, in 1964, explaining his rationale in private
>I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years

i know the original political divide was between the Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians, with Hamiltonians being the industrial urban, Northern (back then New England and Mid Atlantic) federalist movement
and Jeffersonians being the pastoral rural, Southern (back then South Atlantic) anti-federalist movement
HOWEVER the only election Hamiltonians won was in 1796
the Jeffersonians dominated from 1800 to 1820s, wiping out the federalist party, and then they split in the 1820s into
>Democratic Party headed by Andrew Jackson
>fractured opposition of everyone who lost against Andrew Jackson, consisting of the liberal Whigs (inspired by the British Whig party), populist Anti-Masonic party and nationalist traditionalist anti-immigrant Know Nothing/American Party
who all eventually merged into the Republican Party by the Civil War

so Jeffersonians seemingly won but then split and ended up recreating the original divide with the Republicans (who were Jeffersonians) adopting Hamiltonian positions
makes no sense to me, on the face of it it just looks like total opportunism and spinelessness on both sides of American politics
>>
Simple: it's all a grift shrouded by kayfabe.
Don't worry your sweet little head about it.
>>
There are powerful rich people rigging the political Theatre to make it seem like you have any choice
The reality is that almost every single US president has been related
>>
> it just looks like total opportunism and spinelessness on both sides of American politics
Because that's what it is. Look up George Washington and the whiskey rebellion. Freedom is just the marketing they used even then because one group of rich cocksuckers was mad at another group of rich cocksuckers
>>
>>532203188
I’d love to help you out but it seems like you have a better-than-average grasp of the historical context which makes your question somewhat redundant.
What precisely are you trying to understand about it?
>>
File: 1774129390346594.jpg (27 KB, 495x619)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>532203188
Hot
>>
>>532203188
>so Jeffersonians seemingly won but then split and ended up recreating the original divide with the Republicans (who were Jeffersonians) adopting Hamiltonian positions
oh and then fast forward beyond Reconstruction, to Progressive Era/WW1 and the Great Depression, and now the DEMOCRATS are the Hamiltonians and close to nat-soc (but still Southern-focused)
while Republicans are big bussiness laissez faire (but still Northern focused)

it just makes no sense to me
it's complete schizophrenia
>>
>>532203188
They funnel people into two categories based on bullshit issues that the Jews don't care about, get them to fight over that narrow set of issues, and then run the country for the benefit of Jewish oligarchs.
>>
>>532203524
see: >>532203578
like what the fuck is (was) going on
its hard to explain what im trying to understand about it when i cant understand anything about it, im totally confused
>>
>>532203188
>Can ANYONE explain how the US party system worked historically
its jews buying off both sides
>>
>>
>>532203730
at least they have the capacity to do something in contrast with some democracies that have 3000 little irrelevant parties that have to form coalitions of people that can only agree on non concequential things
>>
File: every single time.jpg (82 KB, 652x680)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>532203188
One word answer that explains everything: Jews
>>
>>532207343
like what?

America manufacturs fucking nothing not even weapons at any scale anymore, we cant build bridges, trains or roads without taking decades

our demographics are fucked beyond redemption

niggers and spics can commit any crime and get slaps on the wrist


atleast in europe you can vote for some 3rd party who atleast promises some change, here you are stuck with 2 shitty parties



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.