We tried neo-liberalism last century and it didn't work. What's wrong with trying neo-fascism this century?
>>532203597Because our leaders are all kleptocrats now and that's the worst possible type of leader to helm an autocracy
>>532203597Ill bring it up next Illuminati meeting ok?
frognigger threadherbs
>Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the stateIf you want fascism just vote for a leftist
>>532203717*or move to china
>>532203597China is already doing it
>>532203597Neoliberalism seemed to be working perfectly fine from 1945-2000
>>532203597Paleo-fascism was tried last century and didn't work. What aspects are you changing in hopes of different results?
>>532203597because you still haven't cleaned up the mess you made with neo-liberalism
>>532203597why don't we just do whatever china is doing, it seems to work very well
>>532203597Because the state already fucking sucks and will inevitably fuck things up even worse, and we'll end up like post WW2 Germany.
>>532203666checked. fpbp? what alternative is preferable
>>532204602It's 20 miles to my office
>>532203597Stop using these menaingless words.We tried christianity and islam for the past 2000 years. They didn't work and there were still wars.Let'a try JUDAISM now for sll the nations. Kill all gays and remove the impetus for wars (gays are demons and push ethnic conflict to achieve emancipation).Let's try JUDAISM which will make proper sexual morality so that women do not abandon their breeding duties.
>>532203597Neoliberalis leads to neofascism.This is why Trump is here.
>>532204898what
>>532203597You tried neo fascism and neo neo fascism last century and it didn't work either. You'd be on like neo neo neo fascism at this point.
>>532203597Neo-liberalism is neo-fascism you moron, last century was full of fascism.>Bu-bu-buh you dont know what fascism is! fascism is when everything is good and not bad! the fascists told me so!
>>532203597>We tried neo-liberalism last century and it didn't work.it worked marvelously for the now entrenched ruling class, inflation detached the middle class so much from the top there's no viable mechanism to hit them. >the average person has absolutely no say or power >liberty is a commodity with a pricetag
>>532207117what is fascism?
>>532203597communism, unironically, has never been tried before.lets do it.
>>532203690Thanks Steve also tell Jennifer we're not doing the woke thing anymore.
>>532207193In practice. The merger of corporation and state under a totalitarian usually militaristic regime for the aim of controlling the entire society.>buh buh muh schizo idealism and hyperborea n sheitAll philosophical mumbo jumbo justification for the implementation of fascism.
>>532207519>The merger of corporation and state under a totalitarian usually militaristic regime for the aim of controlling the entire society.so, every society is fascistic US is like thisChina is like this Brasil is like this USSR was like this
>>532207965Most of them yes, to varying degrees, for instance Maoist china was probably more fascist than the Netherlands, freedom is an abnormality, which is why it requires so much effort to attain.
>>532208357if everyone is fascist, then no one is fascist.I will tell you what Fascism is: >it's a sign for "the enemy archetype"much like "jews" here on the board, it's a dogwhistle; nuspeak adhominem for any government the so called modern socialists don't like. the other definition is the historical government of Mussolini's Italy.Shrimple
>>532203597You got 60 million people killed the last time, your countries conquered and occupied and millions of your women raped, mainly by the red army. You are sounding like the commies, that have killed millions in famines over and over again, and to this day insist with trying their shitty ideology.
>>532208928>if everyone is fascist, then no one is fascist.Strawman I didn't say that, good try though. Your head is full of ideology.
>>532209197that's not a strawman btw>Most of them yes, to varying degrees>>532208357you said here and your definition of Fascism is: "The merger of corporation and state under a totalitarian usually militaristic regime for the aim of controlling the entire society."that's the modus operandi of every country. with the exception of Anarchy
>>532209503>>Most of them yes, to varying degrees>everyone is fascistThese things are not the same.You are either dishonest or stupid.
>>532203597hooman rights
>>532203597That's what China's doing.
>>532203942Because the rest of the world was africa tier. Neoliberalism works amazingly well when there's few rich nations and lots of poor ones. The rich nations boost their economies by using the poor ones labor, qhile the poor ones see a sit load of 1st world money enter their economies that they can use to The problem is that this can only work for so long because progressively poorer nations start to catch up and compete with the older rich nations for a smaller pool of cheap labor, causing both diminishing returns and international conflict as countries start butting heads.History is just a bunch of globalization -> collapse -> isolation -> expansion -> globalization cycles.Per example bronze age trade -> bronze age collapse -> local kingdoms -> greek and phoenician colonies and persian expansionism -> Alexander conquers the relevant parts of the known world.
>>532204375Sure. Only 50 million died transitioning from republic to people's republic
>>532203597i'm for based ethnic homogenous nazbol like china is doing
>>532204375instead of wage slave wageless slave?
Because it would be neo-facism run by jews.
