[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Artemis.jpg (201 KB, 1080x1293)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
Why aren't they landing on the moon?
>>
>>532241819
They haven't built the new landers yet. They have two companies working on two different landers in the hopes that one of them will work.
>>
>>532241819
Cause amatuer astronomers can now confirm if they did
>>
The moon is flat and they are scared of tipping it over.
>>
>>532241819
Why arent you?
>>
>>532241819
why is it starting in antarctica? how did they even get into a polar orbit?
space is fake and gay
>>
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
This is how disclosure starts, the say they saw something on the moon and show us the cities on the back side of the moon.
>>
basically they wasted a bunch of money on a glorified joyride because the lander wasn't ready... musk is building the lander
>>
>>532241819
wait until you find out about the 10 missions before apollo 11
>>
The moon has not been real for a long time.
>>
File: Alps seen from Yr Wyddfa.jpg (3.46 MB, 4032x2306)
3.46 MB
3.46 MB JPG
>>532241819
You can not land on a non-physical plasma light.
>>
Just taking a look
>>
>>532241819
Lol i was thinking this
>>
>>532241819
because the cameraman died and they can no longer record moonlanding footage without him like they did in the 70s
>>
>>532242153
why are so many people on /pol/ like this?
>>
>>532241819
They have no toilet. You need a toilet to land on the moon.
>>
>>532241819
They are supposed to go back alive.
>>
>>532242201
It was destroyed by a kamehameha blast.
>>
File: 1681042964299010.jpg (142 KB, 720x835)
142 KB
142 KB JPG
>>532241819
1) because space exploration is fake
2) because their "mission" is to do a fly around to pretend to look for spots to land next time
3) to do each mission sloooowly like with Apollo, so the dumb cattle believe it's real effort and

The whole thing is fake anyway, and the crew are all secret society members.
>>
>>532242194
you mean because Stanley Kubrick died and there are no longer any directors good enough to fake a moon landing
>>
>>532241819
no lander yet
and trajectory is just a flyby, not a lunar orbit
>>
>>532241819
Because ladders are like 200 bucks at home depot
>>
File: 1774415351757125.jpg (214 KB, 1000x1000)
214 KB
214 KB JPG
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
>>
>>532241890
Why don't they just built what we had in 1969 but are a Bluetooth speaker
>>
>>532241819
Off limits
>>
>>532242132
Apollo 1 was kind of a let down
>>
>>532242481
They are building better ones. Because they are all custom built it still takes about the same amount of time.
>>
>>532241819
Because maybe the whole thing is fake?
>>
File: moonships.webm (1.43 MB, 1280x720)
1.43 MB
1.43 MB WEBM
>>532242543
>>
>>532241819
Because there is no outer space and you can't land on the moon. It's not a physical surface or sphere. Neither is earth. The moon is just a light in the heavens and the firmament. It's 2D. Same as the sun. They have convinced now 5 generations that this shit is real. Now they have AI and better computers, they are going to try and confuse you with better CG again. Imagine believes that we went there in the 60s and now we supposedly don't have the technology anymore... it's gaslighting bullshit.
>>
>>532241819
the landers aren't ready yet so they decided to just do a flyby to test the capsule systems
>>
>>532241819
Because we live in the worst timeline.
>>
>>532241819
If you haven't played KSP, don't even fucking ask such gay questions
>>
>>532242845
Why would they have landers?
>>
>>532241819
>>532241890
Because the moon has gravity, not as big as the earth, but it's still a big one.
You need another rocket to leave the moon, you need to send that rocket from earth and have it land safely in upright position.
That rocket needed to leave the moon has to be very heavy, you're gonna need an even bigger rocket on earth to send that moon launching rocket to the moon.
That's why the 1960 moon landing was fake and gay, it was impossible to launch back the crew.
>>
>>532242153
Blame piccolo
>>
>>532242003
What if they hit it too fast, send it spinning, and then women have their period like 18 times a day? Troubling stuff.
>>
>>532242843

>he punches his magical brick to poison the well and detract from American achievements

Plenty of things to actually care about there, Bill. This ain't one of them.
>>
>>532241819
This is basically the same idea behind Apollo 8.
We didn't land on the surface until Apollo 11.
>>
>>532242970
>That rocket needed to leave the moon has to be very heavy, you're gonna need an even bigger rocket on earth to send that moon launching rocket to the moon.
Half of the delta-V budget for a return trip to the moon and back is just getting out of the Earth's gravity well and into orbit. Getting from the moon back to the Earth is a fraction of that.
>>
>>532241819

Apollo 7 didn't leave LEO but was meant to do a mock mission for the lunar trip duration. Apollo 8 was an out-and-back to the moon. On Apollo 9 they brought the lunar module to space but stayed in low earth orbit. Apollo 10 they took the LEM to the moon and did a dress rehearsal for the landing mission, beginning a descent and then returning to the command module. Then finally on Apollo 11 they landed. It'll probably be several more missions before they actually land.
>>
>>532241819
>why
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_8
>>
>>532242742
Interesting.
>>
>>532241819
Because only white male astronauts can do it without fucking things up.
/thread
>>
>>532241890
>They haven't built the new landers yet.
lol
imagine 1969 and they say we can't beat the soviets cuz no moon landers
Meanwhile China can land shit on the moon?
Are you retards okay?
Did you lose your magic toaster technology from 1969 that tells you how to make a moonlander out of some steel and tinfoil?
>>
>>532243534
>Did you lose your magic toaster technology from 1969 that tells you how to make a moonlander out of some steel and tinfoil?
Yes, it was called having an organization and leadership composed of 100% White male engineers.
>>
>>532243611
>muh is the browns fault!
Whites are the women of the races. They just cannot take responsability for anything.
>>
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
Because they do these things and stages, and this mission is to go orbit the moon and come back without landing. If everything goes according to plan, the next Artemis mission is supposed to take the next step and land on the Moon.
They did the exact same thing with the Apollo missions. Apollo 11 wasn't the first mission in the Apollo program, it was the 11th. Apollo 8, 9, and 10 were similar to the Artemis II mission profile, and had crewed flights to lunar orbit without landing.
>>
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
They want to test the shit works instead of YOLOing it since dead astronauts is cringe
>>
>>532243805
Good luck with your space program.
>>
>>532242970
The moon isn't even that far away
>>
>>532242543
>starts recording and zooms in on exact spot a good five seconds before they appear
How did he know to film this?
>>
>>532243980
because it's fake
>>
>>532243968
You'd probably want something bigger than that pissy little rocket to get there.
>>
>>532241819
Why are they even flying there? It makes no sense. It only costs precious shekels that could be given to Israel instead.
>>
>>532241890
yes, reynolds wrap shortage, very unfortunate
>>
>>532242201
More critical thinking than you're capable of.
>>
>>532243534
>Did you lose your magic toaster technology from 1969 that tells you how to make a moonlander out of some steel and tinfoil?
You are massively simplifying the technological marvel that was the lander, the companies contracted out to built them are defunct and all the specialized equipment needed to create them no longer exist the knowledge still exists the infrastructure does not. This means creating new equipment and if you're starting from scratch why reuse something 50 years old and not design something using modern technology
>>532243611
you're dumb
>>
File: IMG_0451.jpg (135 KB, 1080x1072)
135 KB
135 KB JPG
>>532241819
Fun Fact:

The original Apollo 11 landing was the first actual attempt to land on the moon. They YOLO’d it and nailed it the first time.

(BUY BUCCEES)
>>
>>532241819
Can't let the monkey loose on the moon
>>
File: jsc2023e016432-alt4.jpg (3.78 MB, 5878x5878)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB JPG
>Christina Koch (White woman, Mission Specialist)
328 days in space + 6 spacewalks (42 hours 15 minutes EVA). Holds the record for longest space flight by any woman. Bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering and physics and a master's in electrical engineering. Selected as NASA astronaut in 2013. Conducted hundreds of experiments on her 328-day ISS mission (Expeditions 59/60/61). Spent 3.5 years in the U.S. Antarctic Program, including a winter-over at the South Pole and firefighting/search-and-rescue teams where she endured -111F/-79.4C temperatures.
>Victor Glover (Black man, Pilot)
168 days in space + 4 spacewalks (~26 hours EVA). Piloted NASA’s first operational SpaceX Crew Dragon mission (Crew-1). U.S. Navy Captain and elite test pilot (U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School graduate) with 3,500+ flight hours in 40+ aircraft, 24 combat missions. Holds multiple advanced degrees (MS in Flight Test Engineering, Systems Engineering, and Military Operational Art & Science). Selected as NASA astronaut in 2013. Married father of four girls..
>Reid Wiseman (White man, Commander)
165 days in space + 2 spacewalks (~13 hours EVA). Former NASA Astronaut Office Chief, ISS Expedition 40/41 flight engineer. Navy test/fighter pilot with combat deployments. Holds BS and MS in systems engineering. Selected as NASA astronaut in 2009. Strong overall record, but slightly behind Glover.
>Jeremy Hansen (White man, Mission Specialist)
0 days in space + 0 spacewalks. Royal Canadian Air Force fighter/test pilot (CF-18) with physics background (BS in space science + MS in physics) and extensive analog training (NEEMO, CAVES). First Canadian to lead NASA astronaut class training. Selected by CSA in 2009. No orbital experience.
>>
>>532243456
The white men are less qualified than the woman and the nigger this time around
>>
>>532244649
lmao the leaf is a DEI pick and not the black or woman
>>
>>532241819
to prove earth and the moon isn't flat
>>
>>532241819
They need to make sure that Orion is able to work
>>
>>532242481
they literally can't.
by the time they figured it out again they could've built a new one (which is what they're doing).
>>
>>532244705
So let them try lol
>>
>>532241819
Ever wondered how astronomically lucky and convenient it is that we only see one side of the moon? What are the odds in the universe of that happening and then on a planet with life on it. Once you ask yourself those questions you'll soon realize we've been told fairytales.
>>
>>532245492
>What are the odds in the universe of that happening and then on a planet with life on it.
100% because it happened here
>>
>>532241819
They're fags
>>
File: IMG_20260119_234815892.jpg (2.25 MB, 4080x3072)
2.25 MB
2.25 MB JPG
>>532242166
I concur with your proclamation of what the moon is/isn't. It's a cathode to the sun's anode. It disappears from view every twenty-eight days for God's sake!
>>
>>532242742
>nikon p1000
Why the fuck are flatkikes so obsessed with monolithic allinone camcorders? Do they really see the "NEW AND IMPROVED 50X OPTICAL ZOOM" and get sold on that shit alone? Do they not know about teleconverters or reflex telescope adapter mounts? This shit is baffling to me.
>>
>>532246489
I’ve got a Niiiiikon camera
I love to take phoooooootographs
>>
>>532242481
Old engineering projects like the Saturn V obviously weren't done on CAD, and many adjustments were made uniquely to each rocket, they were essentially hand crafted. The people who crafted these rockets are dead or retired and their knowledge went along with them. Sure they could probably figure out how to rebuild a Saturn V given the funding and will to do so, but it'd be a pointless endeavor. They're vastly inefficient and unsafe when held to modern standards, it's much easier, safer and more efficient to just design a new launch system from scratch.
>>
>>532242481
Those didn't have toilets. Women are going on these missions.
>>
>>532241819
They landed on the moon the first time to collect rock glass formations caused by the last flare-up and micronova. They don't need to do this again.

Landing people on the moon could expose it's hollow nature.
>>
>>532241819
They have to test the woman getting fucked by bbc in orbit before they do it on the surface of the Moon
>>
>>532241819
Artemis 3 was originally going to be the moon landing mission but it seems to have been changed to an Earth orbital docking mission next year and instead Artemis 4 around May 2028 is the new target mission for a moon landing.
>>
>>532241819
DEI. They hired a bunch of lactose intolerant astronauts. The can't land on the moon because everyone knows it's made of cheese. We can't have astronauts shitting all over the moon and introducing non native bacteria.
>>
>>532241819
They might as well land, they ain't coming back
>>
>>532241819
WTF is with this retarded AI infographic? The arrows don't make sense and the capsule is facing the wrong way.
>>
>>532242153
How can moons be real if our mirrors aren't real?
>>
Did they AI generate that image? Several of the arrows go against the supposed flow
>>
>>532241819
>Why are DEI hires subpar?
It's a mystery anon...
>>
WHAT
I THOGUHT THEY WENT TO THE MOON YESTERDAY
>>
>>532241819
The same reason Apollo 8 didn't. This wasn't a mission to the moon, it was a test of flying to the moon and back.
>>
>>532245492
>What are the odds in the universe of that happening
100%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking
>>
>>532241819
First because they are testing out Orion with a crew on board so they can shake down all the life support, lights, plumbing, and the manual flight controls, as well as Mission Control on the ground on a free return trajectory so that if something goes wrong they will still come back to Earth. Secondly because the lunar landers aren't ready yet. SpaceX and Blue Origin both have a design they are working on but neither are moon ready yet.
>>
>>532241819
It's way too risky and we don't have the tech for a moon landing quite yet.
>>
File: 1740341118684899.jpg (75 KB, 900x597)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
>>532244649
>wiseman

hes a kike. Its just like netflix race swapping bs. Sounds pretty fucking fake and gay.
>>
>>532253152
Could be prograde and retrograde. Which direction the planned burn will be pointing. That's just a guess though.
>>
>>532245492
It's more common than not, it's actually inevitable given enough tidal forces.
>>
File: 1727384199930391.jpg (31 KB, 680x680)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>532245492
happens a lot actually.

>pic related. The apolla reboot.
>>
>>532242201
Your not autistic or smart enough to be on this board.
>>
>>532245532
>>532253387
If the odds were 100% then it would be like that on every "planet". They're not sending their best.
>>
File: file.png (52 KB, 976x535)
52 KB
52 KB PNG
>If the odds were 100% then it would be like that on every "planet".
It is
You didn't even glance at the Wikipedia article that directly answers both of your questions

But you know that, because your only purpose here is to keep the thread bumped to poison the well of /pol/
>>
File: 1743987612134781.webm (954 KB, 1024x1400)
954 KB
954 KB WEBM
>>532254056
All 20 large moons in the solar system are tidally locked, this is 4th grade stuff my man.
>>
>>532242543
I was thinking the other day. if demons can't do shit on earth unless you make deals and shit. on the moon they can do whatever they want
>>
>>532241819
cgi can't land on the moon
>>
>>532241819
Because the moon is made of cheese and America needs to own it.
>>
File: IEhvR00.jpg (39 KB, 720x480)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>532241819
This is the hard part, not the landing.
>>
>>532255688
That's our cheese. Ain't no Old Croc gonna let their toes dribble down on our sweet Cheddar numnums
>>
>>532241911
/thread
>>
>>532241819
Why is there no 24/7 video? Do we not have the tech for that either?
>>
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
Because the SLS is a shit design. It's basically a two-stage rocket with solid boosters which provide a ridiculous amount of lift-off thrust, but once it's in HEO orbit of earth, it relies on a a really weak rocket engine to accomplish a TLI. Main problem is you don't have enough power in the RL-10 upper stage to accomplish a low orbit of the moon and launch a lander. Future Artemis mission will have some kind of upper stage that should help with this, but NASA just cancelled the exploration upper stage so in truth, we ain't landing on the moon anytime soon. This is what happens when you remove the Nazis in charge of NASA and replace them with DEI.
>>
>>532254270
>All 20 large moons in the solar system are tidally locked
Hmm how do we know that?

>It was discovered that Saturn's moons are tidally locked primarily through long-term telescopic observation, most notably by Giovanni Cassini in the 17th century.
>By observing that specific moons, especially Iapetus, appeared significantly brighter on one side of Saturn than the other, astronomers concluded that the moons always keep the same face toward the planet, similar to Earth’s Moon.
Sounds like horse shit to me, and YOU will never own a telescope to prove I'm wrong.
>>
>>532241819
(((technical difficulties))) goy. stop asking.
>>
>>532241819
because we never landed the moon, as humans, we had probes and all thrown there, but humans means launching again from there and since it was all fake before, now they need to do an actual engineering to figure that out.
>>
>>532242201
Extreme contrarianism to the point of absolute stupidity. Retards will post any garbage for the sake of appearing “interesting” and “based”.
>>
>>532256132
>Hmm how do we know that?
By observing them.

>telescope
I personally took pictures of Jupiter's major moons with a cheap digital camera, it doesn't really take much, just a camera with zoom or a cheap telescope, it's pretty cool.
>>
>we're doing this very expansive, dangerous and important space advances
>our focus however is hiring the right lineup for racial politics, making a pre launcher show of also identity politics
>let's put an all females pop stars crew in a spaceflight
Motherfuckers will still keep believing.
>>
>>532255779
>This is the hard part, not the landing.
No it isn't. The Apollo missions had the third stage of the Saturn V for Translunar Injections powered by a J2 which produced about 230k pounds of force. SLS has a RL-10 which produces about 24k pounds of thrust. This approach is fundamentally flawed which is why NASA just killed it's present exploration module plans and is trying to build a module that will work (these won't work because the concept is inherently flawed).
>>
>>532256357
Correct. NASA was employing literal Nazis in the 1960s which is why they got to the moon. 65 years later, the present crop of DEI morons basically reinvented the Space Shuttle without the Shuttle (the SLS that was just launched).
>>
>>532242471
I love the guy who sings these shorts on YouTube, he does a great job
>>
>>532242179
a cheeky gander
>>
>>532256392
You don't need a huge TWR when you are already orbital, ISP becomes more important
>>
>>532256297
This.

And jews. Don't forget how much jews hate this place and want it to look stupid.
>>
File: ufo vs hellfire rocket.webm (3.68 MB, 1038x480)
3.68 MB
3.68 MB WEBM
>>532242201
jew psyop to keep your goy ass demoralized and ignortant
>>
>>532255894
>Future Artemis mission will have some kind of upper stage that should help with this, but NASA just cancelled the exploration upper stage so in truth, we ain't landing on the moon anytime soon.
What. I thought they were getting into some kind of wacky orbit because of this, but that they would still be able to dock with a lander (even without the Gateway station).
>>
>>532242045
>because the lander wasn't ready... musk is building the lander
I believe Musk is building a lander to be used with the Starship Heavy launcher. ULA (Boeing and Lockheed) are developing a new lander for the SLS after the planned exploration model was cancelled this past February.
>>
>>532242970
>That's why the 1960 moon landing was fake and gay, it was impossible to launch back the crew
It wasn't. The math on the Saturn V works out. Three rocket stages is what you would need for an HEO of the earth and TLI to the moon with a lunar command moduel. The Artemis mission seems like a clusterfuck in comparison.
>>
>>532255200
>Demons are going to fund their own space program to fuck with us on the moon
What a time to be alive
>>
>>532241819
This is the first time they've gone past the van Allen belt
We never landed on the moon
>>
>>532244310
>This means creating new equipment and if you're starting from scratch why reuse something 50 years old and not design something using modern technology
Because the 50 year old design worked and the new design with new technology doesn't because you are relying on jeets with fake engineering degrees being managed by girl bosses.
>>
>>532241819
It's VERY hard even though we did it in 1969 with no personal computers, no gpu chip fabrication labs, no internet, no data centers, no AI, etc.

And somehow in 1969 we were able land and return, with full color live streams transmitted from the moon to the Earth. And we could even live stream the spaceship leaving the moon from the perspective of the surface of the moon.
>>
>>532244705
>The white men are less qualified than the woman and the nigger this time around
Which is by design. I'd love to see the actual pool of candidates from which these selections were made.
>>
>>532241819
The moon isn't real and you can't leave the atmosphere of Earth. But what I don't get is why they just don't pretend to land on the moon again
>>
>>532256636
It's working. I sure has hell feel demoralized at the terminally low IQ and brownified state of this board.
>>
>>532242201
They are, in fact, the most vulnerable to propaganda.
>>
It would be too close to Iranian moon bases and they would be able to hit the rocket.
>>
File: 1724378097269598.jpg (131 KB, 500x333)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>532241819
Afraid the nog will steal the spaceship while the other crewmembers are on the surface.
>>
>>532242481
maybe they want to add functionalities
>>
>>532249441
>They're (Saturn V) vastly inefficient and unsafe when held to modern standards, it's much easier, safer and more efficient to just design a new launch system from scratch.
Except modern designs don't exist. In order for something to be safer and easier, it actually has to function in a similar manner as the Saturn V. Nothing in the U.S. inventory can function like the Saturn V did. And the reason why the Space Launch System is basically a rehashed version of the Space Shuttle using literally the same engines and literally the same solid boosters is because all the jeets that know CAD can't make rocket engines that can function and do what Von Braun did.
>>
>>532242201
normal people dont take this site seriously
>>
File: 1775077626487535m.jpg (87 KB, 1024x737)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>532242543
Further evidence of Titan being an exoplanet. Total Recall was a documentary, not science fiction. 404 and clean it up.
>>
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
Why do we have to do such a thing, there is no purpose, we have everything on the earth; the ecotecture, structures that interact with the environment.
>>
>>532257615
That's not even an actual photograph
>>
>>532257652
>the ecotecture
Replaces power lines, they do not like that.
>>
>>532255200
theyre getting us to space to make deals with demons?
>>
>>532257732
Bean soup theory
>>
>>532241819
because you test the equipment on a simpler mission first you nincompoop. Swear the lot of you couldn't pass first grade logic.
>>
>>532257751
>Replaces power lines
The big company owners get upset, and say; they cannot be allowed to use energy like that.
>>
>>532257823
>The big company owners
They want people to forget about, effective ways to distribute energy. They want to make it difficult to understand the truth. They create narratives and will limit the understanding of infrastructure.
>>
>>532256773
>I thought they were getting into some kind of wacky orbit because of this, but that they would still be able to dock with a lander (even without the Gateway station).
They don't have this shit figured out which is why Trump tried to cancel the Artemis program. The entire moon pass is being done by the Orion MPCV operating by itself with a main engine delivering about 6k pounds of thrust. Originally, Artemis II was supposed to have an Exploration Module and Stage, which would have been more similar to the third stage of a Saturn V and Apollo Command Module, but the Exploration Module was cancelled this year and they decided to roll with the Orion MPCV and do a pass of the moon. The Artemis Program literally has no idea how they are going to land on the moon and what equipment they will use to do it.
>>
>>532242970
Apollo was optimised as fuck. The reason they need to do seperate launches for the landers is because they are much bigger and Artemis is a disjointed mess.
>>
>>532257932
>limit the understanding of infrastructure
That was something they did during the 1800`s.
>>
>>532258076
We today, forget about the purpose of the infrastructure; we use it for lesser purposes, but the former people used it for gathering energy, in some way that interacts with the earth and the atmosphere.
>>
What happened to the radiation that makes it impossible to leave earth orbit?
>>
>>532258245
>radiation
People speculate something happened during 1812-1816 around that time, with a sort of weapon like that, not sure but it might have been an impact event.
>>
>>532257208
>It's VERY hard even though we did it in 1969 with no personal computers, no gpu chip fabrication labs, no internet, no data centers, no AI, etc.
It is amazing what the uncluttered mind can accomplish
>And somehow in 1969 we were able land and return, with full color live streams transmitted from the moon to the Earth
If you understand anything about RF propagation, this does make sense. In space, there is very little to interfere with slgnal propagation, particularly if the signal is analog. Not sure what they are using now, but I would assume its some kind of digital multiplexed signal carrying tons of data in addition to a audio and video stream. In microwave signals we use on earth, no problem. Using an HF or VHF signal, you would start having bandwidth issues.
>>
>>532242003
No it's not, it's hollow and they would just pop it like a party balloon.
>>
That guy napoleon, did some strange things; honestly that was some world war, before the world wars.
>>
>>532258245
>What happened to the radiation that makes it impossible to leave earth orbit?
You are talking about the Van Allen Belts and it depends on the type of radiation. This isn't like Gamma radiation from a nuclear blast. It's mostly solar radiation and the only concern is beta radiation, which is pretty easily shielded against, although it can fuck with instrumentation.
>>
Because of napoleon, modern society created, but the older society was forgotten. Cosmology was different, the clothes different.
>>
These space agencies, created to distract people from the true cosmology.
>>
>>532258245
There is radiation but the likely dose for the mission is within safe limits. They measured the radiation on Artemis 1 unmanned to investigate it and it came back OK for that mission (though that's only a single data point so may not be typical). Spaceflight generally, especially when pushing out from Earth orbit, is rather a seat of your pants endeavour where they learn as they go.
>>
>>532243035
I like to think Mr popo recreated it
>>
Read wagging the moondoggie
Here is the audiobook version
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UN3XHxQQIhiK
>>
>>532258777
>Mr popo
What is going on with that dude? He was like a black man, or something.
>>
ayys dont want us there, better get the hint fuckos
>>
>>532258777
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3tfjcvFB7c&t=46s
Honestly that guy is funny.
>>
>>532259030
This guy mr. popo, seems like a demon, or ifrit.
>>
>>532258986
Are these "ayys" doing party rituals as we speak?
>>
>>532259259
You could ask them if you wanted to.
>>
>>532241819
Basically they spent 20 years trying to make a new rocket out of old shuttle parts and forgot to build a lander.
>>
>>532259259
>ayys
The jinn, read 1001 nights; beware of the ifrit; they like black smoke, they have metaphysical powers.
>>
>>532259030
>he is funny.
But, he a demon from Hell.
>>
That show, ma jinn; it talks about some dark stuff, it saying there some occult dimension that operates, some metaphysical realm.
>>
Do not open the sealed containers, with the black smoke in there, the ifrit will confuse the person.
>>
There will be some strange events during this particular time.
>>
The society cannot be sustained by the policy of influx of taxation, it will retrogress to fuedalism.
>>
>>532242201
Funny?
Whimsical?
Silly at times?
The world's sad enough as it is.
Let us clown around, and laugh at the fire.
>>
>>532241819
This is the scouting mission.
>>
I honestly believe they will try to reset the society.
>>
>>532259365
>>532259417
>>532259630
>>532259653
>>532259699
>>532259871
Chatbot designed to flood threads with boring schizo nonsense.
>One such tactic would aim at gradually making these boards less interesting for their users
>>
>>532259927
I am not a bot, I simply look at certain factors that you do not understand, if you have a problem with that your the problem.
>>
>>532259927
Understand brazil, lesser culture; they designed to do political subversion.
>>
>>532259990
>>532260019
Note how utterly pointless, vague and illiterate every post is, they're intentionally designed to drive posters away.
>>
File: 1755254999152867.jpg (34 KB, 700x400)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>>532260100
worse, the bots reply to each other now and just ignore you.

devious
>>
>>532241819
>Why aren't they landing on the moon?
Stanley Kubrick died
>>
File: 1775195081226800.gif (2.79 MB, 476x480)
2.79 MB
2.79 MB GIF
>>532241819
it's 2 hard. they could do it 6 times in the early 70's with basically a calculator but today shit's too hard bro also who cares what's the point etc.
>>
David Icke talks about the moon control matrix which somehow works together with Saturn
Maybe they're doing something to that
>>
It's because space isn't real nigga
>>
Btw /pol/
>What is the 'Presence' space walking Astronauts talk about and panic, so they only do one space walk in their lifetimes?
>>
>>532259363
>and forgot to build a lander.
They didn't forget to make the lander, they contracted it out to SpaceX and Starship has hit delays, so they expanded the contract to include another company and Blue Origin is making an HLS too. The idea was to use Orion and SLS to launch a crew to lunar orbit, then rendezvous with a separately launched HLS to head to the surface of the moon. The concept is fucking batshit. Instead of having the entire mission contained in one mission launched by one rocket, SLS/Orion will launch the crew and SpaceX or BlueOrigon will launch the lunar lander and this will probably require about twenty separate refueling launches to refuel the HLS and get it to the moon. Modern technology and efficiency at its finest.
>>
File: sddefault.jpg (44 KB, 640x480)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>532255779
>>
File: moon_drawing_ships_crater.jpg (657 KB, 1079x1588)
657 KB
657 KB JPG



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.