this is what the lunar module needs in order to land on the moon safely
>>532250482Except much weaker and slower, yes.
About 1/36th, it seems, compared to landing the same weight on the earth surface, although it will take roughly the same amount of time in that case.Could also fall like a rock and then use that sort of thrust for 5 seconds at the last moment to come to a complete standstill from free fall, but the g-forces involved may be unpleasant.
>>532250482uh yeah duh. that's what they did.
>>532250482That video is in reverse
>>532252482those are landings. there has been almost six hundred of them so far this year.
>>532251803but why do they have to since they didnt used them when they landed on the moon for the first time
