[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9665.png (9 KB, 899x784)
9 KB
9 KB PNG
If Trump/Elon/Vought wanted to get all/most federal employees fired, why didn’t they come up with some fake report saying 90% of them are at the lowest level of productivity? It would be fake but it sounds real, especially to conservatives, republicans, neocons, the Tuesday crowd, neoliberals, libertarians, classical liberals, and an unfortunate truth to leftists and regular democrats. Like I’m sure most people would believe it and they could then easily justify firing like 85-90% of the government. Then they could replace everyone with (H1-B) contractors and the work would still be getting done and their friend’s companies would be getting money.
Why didn’t they do this?
>>
you seem very confused, go to sleep



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.