Gorsuch directly quotes Elk v. Wilkins at 1:31:21https://youtu.be/RYecNCgwSfE?t=5481REMINDER THAT SCOTUS WILL RULE IN TRUMPS FAVOR ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP! IN A 7-2 DECISION!Wong Kim Arks parents were "Permanent Residents" who were "Domiciled" in San Francisco and held "Allegiance" to the United States of America when they gave birth to Wong Kim Ark. They were not Temporary Visa Holders/Sojourners/Workers, nor were they Illegal Migrants.To be protected under the 14th Amendment you need more than to be "subject to the laws of the united states" as was determined in Elk v. Wilkins (1884) where it was ruled that one must be "completely subject to the united states political jurisdiction" and "owing them (the united states) direct and immediate allegiance."This was later reaffirmed in 1898 with United Sates v. Wong Kim Ark in which the word "Domicile" was used 28 times, and the word "Allegiance" was used 114 times.
>>532260315They're going to cuck out like they always do. They're going to rule that Trump cand do an eo on citizenship, that it's a congress power or something. The final ruling won't actually address citizenship.
They're setting up this idea in your mind that you owe allegiance from birth because they want to conscript youDon't fall for itAllegiance is given freely and never owed
>>532260453>he never recited the pledge of allegiance at school becauase he is a brown shitskin who was in ESL classes
>>532260453If ? you're an American (citizen) by definition you pledge allegiance to the U.S. Constitutioneven if you never 'recited a pledge' as a schoolchild>conscriptHas nothing to do with being a citizen or U.S. Constitution. 1974 was the last year, forever, that military conscription existed in the United StatesIf you don't like America or subscribe to the principles of its Constitution and the first 10 Amendments to the Bill of Rights, get out.
does this means white people have to leave native american land?
>>532261005Obviously not. America as a country and idea came into being with the constitution. Why would that retroactively apply to a bunch of spear chuckers?
>>532261123Thanks canadian friend. I like that we both as nations worked together to mostly destroy native american culture and identity for our own betterment
>>532261005The tribes already have their own land with their own laws, the problem is not even they want to live under their rule so they all leave to do crack in the cities
>>532261177yea it was pretty based all things considered
You're gonna lose yet again and I am looking forward to your seething when it happens, because that was your last chance for another 30 years. Shoulda put your energines behind a constitutional convention but y'all are too much of control freaks to do that. You went all in and now you're gonna walk away broke despite months of wishcasting.
>>532260315lol, no
>>532261403They know they can't. That's why we need giga copium interpretations instead. Same shit with the 2A crap. More curious this "conservative" court doesn't really touch a lot of those cases either.
>>532261177Same but actually. Native Americans were retarded losers who failed to invent any technology in 2000 years of relative peace and isolation.
>>532261544Kek. They were always fighting each other
i wish. but realistically, they're gonna cuck out
>>532261403>>532261525Dobbs
>>532260315>7-2There is no possibility Sotomayor, Kagan, or Jackson would ever decide to kill birthright citizenship.Barrett and Roberts are clearly against this attempt too.
>>532261723>clearlyNot so.I could see Sotomayor voting in favor.
