we did it before 60 years ago. nasa didn't have the balls to go for it again? this fucking 'test flight' is useless and makes me think we didn't even land on the moon 60 years ago. fucking hell, with advancements in technology, landing on the moon should be a fucking layup.
>>532284181>why not just land on the fucking moon?new tech.>this fucking 'test flight' is uselessthen you volunteer to be strapped to a rocket and blasted into the surface of another celestial body.personal accountability and planning aren't your strong suits, are they?
>>532284181Nigga, the rocket was made by BOEING
>>532284181We lost the technology goy, only Gameboys had enough computing power to repeat the og flight to the moon and scalpers got them all
It is because the moon is fake. Those who claim you can see it if you go outside are part of the conspiracy.
60 years ago they hardly gave a fuck if astronauts got blown up or fried in radiation.they also had like 5% of the gdp to build all the shit to beat the russians. now it's like 0.1% so they're doing pretty good imoit is still the furthest mission from earth in decadesalso it's a shitty boeing that keeps breaking in dumb ways they gotta debug and iron out the kinks
Remember when these guys got stuck in space? It was a Boeing spacecraft.Boeing can’t even make planes that don’t fall apart mid flight.1 hour after the Artemis II takeoff they couldn’t get the wifi to work, and then the toilet broke, and now there’s a cabin leak.
>>532284647>also it's a shitty boeing that keeps breaking in dumb ways they gotta debug and iron out the kinksEvery single Apollo mission had hardware glitches or something that went wrong during the flight.
If they tried to land on the moon it would probably crash and blow up.
>>532284181they want to do it without spending 15% of the federal budget on it this time?
>>532285003Yeah but now the rockets are designed by Indians.
>>532284647>it is still the furthest mission from earth in decadeshere's the cope
>>532284181 Even new car models get tested, and sometimes they barely change anything. It’s an entire new spaceship.
>>532284181>we did it before 60 years agoYep. Absolutely. All the hightech stuff used (with the equivalent and power of a simple calculator) you did it. Strange. Right?
>>532284181They gave Musk the contract for the lander and his jeets failed to deliver.
>>532284181>going in blind without any reconnaissance and not testing the hardware What are you, fucking retarded? >we did it before 60 years agoAnd they literally had test flights. What do you think Apollo 8 and 10 were
