[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Artemis.jpg (201 KB, 1080x1293)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
They will circle the earth three times before circling the moon only one time
>>
>>532302095
This is alien disclosure, when they get to back side of moon, oh look a city with lights on, who built that?
>>
yeah that's how physics works.
>>
>>532303703
Wasn't china supposedly doing exactly that in headlines from like 10 years ago?
>>
>>532305578
>Wasn't china supposedly doing exactly that in headlines from like 10 years ago?

No.
>>
>>532302095
bro just play KSP
>>
File: 1770539892109682.png (157 KB, 1018x476)
157 KB
157 KB PNG
>>532302095
what do you mean by this?
>>
>>532302095
that's cause the nigger flying it thinks he's stealing hubcaps
>>
File: 1775243563753242.jpg (5 KB, 227x243)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>532302095
>cropped Gemini AI watermark
>no one notices
The average IQ on this board keeps dropping.
>>
>>532303703
why would they live on the dark side retard
>>
>>532306856
DEI graphics design.
>>
>>532309644
clanker graphic design
>>
Humans aren't going anywhere beyond Moon, that is for sure.

They lack the propulsionand the energy generation tech to do it.
Look at how they have to do all these retarded Swing-by maneovres and other tricks to save every possible fuel and weight.

Flying to the moon should be a matter of maximum 10 hours, but over 60 years later it's the same shit and worse.
>>
>>532309782

Shut up elon
>>
>>532309942
I wondered why you were talking about humans in 3rd person but then I saw the flag and it all made sense
>>
>>532302095
How did it not hit a satellite on the way out?
>>
>>532309942
It takes 3 days to get to the moon. It's farther away than it appears
>>
>>532310074
How come you didn't get struck by lightning today?
>>
>>532309942
The Orion drive can do it, but the Jews buried it
>>
>>532309987
the AI watermark is right there retard
>>
>>532309942
its clearly possible to send craft to mars. its just not going to be very fast.
>>
>>532303703
>28.900
>800K miles
My dad had that car in the 80s
>>
>>532310074
How come planes can take off without crashing into other planes in the air?
>>
>>532310077
That's because they are going at a piss slow rate and still decelerate and only accelerate again when the gravity of the moon wins over the gravity of earth.

It's pathetic that humans still do not have the tech to at least constantly travel at 40000 km/h.
>>
>we will still never get pics of the dark side of the moon
So tired of the jews hiding that shit
>>
File: flerf-moon-transit.gif (2.64 MB, 720x700)
2.64 MB
2.64 MB GIF
>we will still never get pics of the dark side of the moon
>>
>>532303784
bitch you don't even know what gravity is and no, you don't get to use old discarded theories from white people and then add something pretend like dark matter and call it a theory

you non-whites aren't smart enough to know you're dumb
>>
>not even landing
What the fuck is even the point?
>>
>>532310243
can't believe i didn't get hit by an asteroid today
>>
>>532310144
Traveling from 7000mph to 18,000mph
>>
>>532310249
I mean we can have the tech if the world wasn't so fucking brown and zogified. Only a white communist space faring nation can achieve solar system colonies
>>
>>532310077
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Myf7oH0n9g&
>>
>>532310414
Satellites are like 100,000 yellow rubber ducks floating in the pacific ocean. The chances of running into one is extremely low.
>>
>>532309942
Flying to the Moon or flying to the Mars is basically the same energy requirement wise. One just takes much longer.
>>
>>532310614
>Flying to the Moon or flying to the Mars is basically the same energy requirement wise
For an unmanned craft, yeah, but wouldn't the additional life support requirements add a significant amount of mass?
Or am I overestimating the mass in comparison to the capsule itself?
>>
So crazy we can account for every piece of space debris we probably launch out of the ozone layer hole that's how they do it
>>
there’s a nigger on the moon
we’re off to catch that coon
so snort a fat rail
no way we’ll fail
we’ll be back some time in june
>>
>>532310773
Yeah, It would weight more and you would absolutely want much bigger craft for long journey. But even then Orion and SLS are incredibly weak.
>>
>>532310249
>It's pathetic that humans still do not have the tech to at least constantly travel at 40000 km/h.
It doesn't take any technology to constantly travel at 40000 km/h, just Newton's First Law. The hard part is accelerating up to that speed, but then you will keep moving at the same speed in the same direction forever, or until acted upon by some other force.
Fun fact, if you had a spacecraft with some sort of propulsion technology that could maintain a constant acceleration of just 1G (9.8m/s^2), the passengers in that spacecraft could travel across the observable universe in much less than a single lifetime, ~25 years due to the effects of time dilation. They wouldn't ever be able to actually reach the edge of the observable universe, since the universe itself is also expanding but much faster at ~3x the speed of light.
>>
>>532311396
>much bigger craft for long journey
I've heard Orion's size compared to a minivan
I wouldn't do 1 month with 3 other people, and definitely not the 6+ needed to get to Mars
>>
>>532309942
grim
>>
>>532311686
yeah, its really just a matter of having enough fuel for the chemical rockets we use. a large enough rocket assembled in space could easily boost to 40k mph and then slow dow again at the target planet. simply a matter of tank size
>>
It's really unfortunate that this entire lunar mission has caused so many people to out themselves as fucking retards who proudly know absolutely nothing about physics or astronomy or, like, basic common sense.

>where are the satellites
>why can't you see the stars
>why is there so much ocean, where is the land
>why does this photo look different than the one taken 60 years ago
>it's a flat disc
>it's CGI
>it's AI
>I am very smart
>>
Is there a reason for this? Not nay saying. I know other liberals are kind of anti-space now because Trump is in office. But I still like outer space and we should absolutely push new boundaries into space. For instance we should at some point land on Mars. But what's the goal with this? Haven't we been to the moon already? Are they planning on putting more stuff up there? Like what's the plan.
>>
>>532310549
I drive a jeep and can't make it out of a parking lot without hitting a rubber duck
>>
File: IMG_20260403_232543.jpg (3.06 MB, 4839x4957)
3.06 MB
3.06 MB JPG
CREDO IN UNUM DEUM,
PATREM OMNIPOTENTEM,
FACTOREM CAELI ET TERRAE,
VISIBILIUM OMNIUM ET INVISIBILIUM,
ET IN UNUM DOMINUM IESUM CHRISTUM,
FILIUM DEI UNIGENITUM,
ET EX PATRE NATUM, ANTE OMNIA SAECULA,
DEUM DE DEO, LUMEN DE LUMINE,
DEUM VERUM DE DEO VERO,
GENITUM, NON FACTUM, CONSUBSTANTIALEM PATRI:
PER QUEM OMNIA FACTA SUNT.
QUI PROPTER NOS HOMINES ET PROPTER NOSTRAM SALUTEM DESCENDIT DE CAELIS.
ET INCARNATUS EST DE SPIRITU SANCTO
EX MARIA VIRGINE, ET HOMO FACTUS EST.
CRUCIFIXUS ETIAM PRO NOBIS SUB PONTIO PILATO;
PASSUS ET SEPULTUS EST,
ET RESURREXIT TERTIA DIE, SECUNDUM SCRIPTURAS,
ET ASCENDIT IN CAELUM, SEDET AD DEXTERAM PATRIS.
ET ITERUM VENTURUS EST CUM GLORIA,
IUDICARE VIVOS ET MORTUOS,
CUIUS REGNI NON ERIT FINIS.
ET IN SPIRITUM SANCTUM, DOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM:
QUI EX PATRE FILIOQUE PROCEDIT.
QUI CUM PATRE ET FILIO SIMUL ADORATUR ET CONGLORIFICATUR::
QUI LOCUTUS EST PER PROPHETAS..
ET UNAM, SANCTAM, CATHOLICAM ET APOSTOLICAM ECCLESIAM.
CONFITEOR UNUM BAPTISMA IN REMISSIONEM PECCATORUM..
ET EXSPECTO RESURRECTIONEM MORTUORUM,
ET VITAM VENTURI SAECULI

AMEN
>>
>>532309942
Because a majority of the fuel is spent getting out of earths atmosphere, if we had fueling stations in space we could much farther and faster
>>
>>532311962
>But what's the goal with this?
Officially it's to test out Orion for the future Artemis missions, and gather data for eventual missions to Mars
They have also announced a potential moon base, which could be used to extract natural resources like Helium-3

I think it's mostly because China said they are planning for a 2030 landing, and the US (Trump especially) needs to beat them back there to keep pretending we're not losing to them in tech
>>
File: 1771571015327071.jpg (3.74 MB, 3341x2228)
3.74 MB
3.74 MB JPG
Flat Earth/space is fake and gay 'tards eternally, irrevocably BTFO
>>
>>532311962
the plan is to land there and stay there and keep staying there because its new territory with new challenges and rewards
>>
>>532302095
Who made this image and fucked up the direction of two of the arrows?
>>
>>532313117
>>532309494

Here's a better look into how the Artemis II is flying. https://x.com/NASA/status/2039826459141820573
>>
>>532306312
KSP is based
All you need to go to space
>Cockpit
>Engine
>Fuel
Which is pretty much just like IRL.
NASA-niggers will tell you otherwise, but they're wrong.
>>
>>532311962
>Like what's the plan.
Artemis II's primary mission is a lunar flyby, to test things and prepare for an eventual lunar landing. This is basically the same mission profile as Apollo 8, which also did a lunar flyby as part of the lead up to Apollo 11.
Artemis III is currently planned to be a crewed mission that will probably stay in low Earth orbit and will test out the lunar lander(s), docking procedures and EVA spacewalk/moonwalk equipment. This is similar to Apollo 9.
Artemis IV is planned to be a crewed mission in 2028 with a lunar landing, similar to Apollo 11.
Artemis V is also planned to be a crewed lunar landing mission which will include the first stages of constructing a permanent Moon base at the south pole of the Moon.
After that, the plan is for a mix of manned and unmanned missions about 2X per year focused on building and expanding the moon base.
Also in the roughly 2028 time frame, they are planning on sending an unmanned mission named Skyfall to Mars using a new type of nuclear powered engine. This mission is expected to release a swarm of helicopter type drones to explore the Martian surface to scout out ideal locations for a future crewed Martian landing mission and eventually a permanent Mars base.
So yes, the current plan is to return humans to the Moon and build a permanent Moon base, then take the next step to Mars.
>>
>>
>>532312268
We should be testing the OTHER Orion. The nuclear propulsion Orion
>>
>>532314768
They can’t build the sails or cables required for Orion.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.