Shouldn't have sent the DEI hires
>>532318295Reentry from the break room next to their conference room?
>>532318295Will that be the first monkey to die in space?
>>532318367That honour belongs to Albert:Albert I (June 1948): Died of suffocation during flight.Albert II (June 1949): Reached 83 miles altitude, died on impact due to parachute failure.Albert III (Sept. 1949): Died in a V-2 rocket explosion at 35,000 ft.Albert IV (Dec. 1949): Reached 130 km, died on impact after parachute failure."Albert V" (April 1951): Died due to parachute failure.Yorick (Albert VI) (Sept. 1951): Survived the flight to 72 km, but died two hours after landing from suspected heat stress.Gordo (Dec. 1958): Survived a 300-mile trip, died after recovery parachute failure.Miss Able (1959): Survived space flight, but died a few days later during a medical procedure.
Ham survived, though
>>532318781Higher IQ than DEI hires.
Assuming the moon landing is fake they might die in the Van Allen radiation belt. Fantastic 4 symbolism. Christina Koch = Invisible WomanVictor Glover = ThingReid Wiseman = Mr. Fantastic Jeremy Hansen = Human TorchDon't know about last 2 the leaf and the tallest but not the commander but leafs are flammable.
>>532318295which one clogged the toilet?
A number of physiological sensors were used to monitor the vital signs of Ham. A commercial rectal thermistor probe was used instead of the probe used on the human Mercury astronauts. The probe was inserted 8 inches deep into Ham's rectum. The physiological sensors were placed on Ham about 10 hours before liftoff. Ham's ability to complete tasks during the flight were assessed by the psychomotor apparatus. The apparatus gave Ham a visual cue in the form of colored lights and required a response from two levers; if he succeed in his task, drink and food pellet would be awarded; failure would be punished by a shock to the soles of his feet.Due to a valve malfunction, the Redstone rocket delivered thrust higher than intended. The anomaly triggered the emergency escape rocket and subjected Ham to 17 g of acceleration. The jettison of the spent escape rocket also caused the retro rocket pack to be prematurely jettisoned. The lack of the retro rocket caused the capsule to reenter the atmosphere with excessive speed. Ham was subjected to 14.7 g during reentry. Ham's capsule splashed down in the Atlantic Ocean and was recovered by the USS Donner later that day. The capsule was damaged during splashdown and settled deeper in the water than designed.The post flight examination found a small abrasion on the bridge of Ham's nose; he was also dehydrated and lost 5.37% body weight; he was otherwise in good physical condition. His flight was 16 minutes and 39 seconds long. He would become agitated when the press approached him and panic when his handler would try to situate him into a capsule for photos.Ham's lever-pushing performance in space was only a fraction of a second slower than on Earth, demonstrating that tasks could be performed in space. Of the two shocks Ham received in flight, the one shortly after the launch was due to an error in the testing apparatus; the other one due to the lack of response after experiencing 14 g deceleration during reentry.
>>532318295>niggerthe USA is dead
>>532319080take a guessit might have been a tamponjust sayin'
>>532319080It broke on the way up. Nobody shat in it until it was fixed.
>>532318295It's all completely automated, anon. Those DEI folks are as much astronauts as Katy Perry was and have the same amount of controll over the ship.
when they come back and don't die, it will instead all have been fake and gay right?
>>532319073>Assuming the moon landing is fake
>>532319118Sounds like a great interview process
>>532319366we all really hope they die
>>532318295You're assuming they ever left to begin with, which I highly doubt.
>>532318295even the TLI burn was automated, but now thats complete, they don't need to do anything, gravity will do the rest including the descent to earth. Pretty amazing actually
>>532319432For or against the moon landing being real? I am admitedly somewhat of a fence sitter leaning towards real. Hoaxers have have a few good points the debunkers can't explain. But are overly retarded on everything else.
