Libertarianism would actually be appealing to the masses and win elections if:>A. They had actual principles other than “fuck da roolz and fuck da government maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan”>B. They could agree if they dislike or like the military and police and want both defunded, more funds, or stay the same (hopefully like for the sake of them getting votes)>C. Had more shared views that all libertarians have rather than just agreeing “fuck bureaucrats” and not agreeing on anything else >D. Getting rid of their autistic technocratic politicians >E. Building on A B and C, actually had a platform that resembles a platform like Republicans and Democrats do >F. Started actually policing members I.E no tolerance for pdf files and>G. Showing they can actually put forward legislation and action that both is effective and is for the benefit of the people and not some elite group (the second part eliminates Javier Milei)But they won’t because they’re Jewish slaves and don’t actually care about anyone but themselves and the Jews + Saudis + Chinese + Russians + whoever will give them monies
>>532336628Libertarian Party's statement of principles:https://lp.org/platform-page/Do none of you /pol/tards bother to read anything at all about the stuff you hate?
>>532336628Lolberts are being proved right so far in 2026.
>>532336960This doesn’t matter, it’s pencil pusher bs Everyone knows what matters is what the common retarded lolbert says If you ask 10 republicans and 10 democrats the same questions, they’ll for the most part answer the same wayIf you ask lolberts (not “not real libertarians!” but every person who has that label in their ideology or simply is a “lolbert”) 10 different questions, you’ll get 10 different, drawn-out, mid wit answers, but most importantly it’s different for each answer and each lolbert. One could say police are the most important aspect of a functioning society and the other will call them losers who are worthless. And so on.
>>532337235Being anti war isn’t a stance. Thats a psyop by lolberts (and the CIA probably as ending the government would remove red tape from the CIA, like they would allow some retard to abolish them) to point fingers at ideologies. No one is pro war unless they are mentally ill or trolling. They are just trying to justify what they think is “defense” in their heads. As for the Zionist death cult shit that’s mental illness, no one is naturally pro war or seeks conflict unless they are mentally ill like Hitler or mentally ill also like Hitler in the sense that they seek conquest for glory Also lolberts for some reason love glorifying war when it’s on their terms and when they look badass, it’s all a game of politics and postioning and the only difference between a career red/blue politician and someone like Massie/Ron Paul is that Massie/Paul is naive and doesn’t realizing they’re like this.
I know it's wrong to rape all niggers but I do it anyways. You'll never stop me.
>>532337237What would your questions be?Let me submit one:>Should the government ban the individual possession and/or use of marijuana?Do you really think that libertarians could agree with one another on an answer to this question?
>>532337454I mean do you really think that no libertarians could agree
>>532336628I wish real life libertarians were like metal gear libertarians.
>>532336628There's no money in being a libertarian politician or libertarian voter, that's it.(you are morally right skipping taxes by any means necessary tho. Millions of people - all people? - would be libertarian if they didn't also like to steal from others by political means)
>>532337454I thought about that The funny thing?Weed is being legalized now even if Trump pulls it back some dem will come in and legalize it again because people can’t live without that shitAnd guess what? weed being legal benefits the government. They get taxes from people buying legally and also don’t have to divert money towards drug enforcement as much. They won. Liberals also won because they adopted your stance without your retarded baggage. Also the only reason libertarians agree on weed is because they’re lazy right winged hippies. Libertarians hate rules and love weed. You’re literally a right winged hippie. And a liar because you have to pretend to people you aren’t a racist.
>>532337536You mean like Big Boss/The Boss, who where actual competent military leaders and innovators of combat, and cared about humanity, and had an actual vision (even if it was very idealistic), or like Armstrong who is basically a white nigger social Darwinist who flew over everyone’s heads?
>>532336628Leaving this kino herehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZk6ia1vFAchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd1nSBOG6VA
>>532337631>libertarians agree on weedSo you admit that they can agree on at least 1 policy.Here's another question:>Should the government ban the individual possession and/or use of firearms?Now that surely no two libertarians could ever come to a consensus on, right?
>>532337560Not to knock you down, but you can from a white nigger country. I feel bad for you but niggers are not good at government. Asians are okay if they are civiliized. White men have the best government if they are free of corrupting influences. And those are RIGHT WINGED, and involve STRUCTURE. And A CHAIN OF COMMAND. And alot of the times, UNPOPULAR RULES. Most white niggers like you can’t resist the cookie jar.
>>532337863Again this is because it’s a means to an end against DA ROOLZ. But chuds believe in the same shit and lefties are starting to be pro gun now so this is another “core tenant” that is just being adopted by everyone else. No one wants to fire the whole government and replace them with H1-B visa holders and AI because it’s “cheaper” Silverstein
>>532337863Okay how about thisAsk a libertarian this >what should the age of consent be Shouldn’t they be able to universally agree on something that’s reasonable?
>>532337964I didn't see an answer in that reply but I assume you meant that libertarians actually do generally agree on an answer to that question.It really seems like your thesis that libertarians can't agree on anything is very flimsy. We can keep going if you want but it'd be funnier if you yourself could list a few more things that ackshully you think libertarians might agree on, because if we're being honest we both know there's a long list.
>>532338117Hating government employees That’s it I’ve seen libertarians who are pro regulation for Christ sake. Ive seen libertarians who hate guns (same as the pro regulation ones but they hate government employees and they put “libertarian” in their label so that’s enough for me)
>>532337235They are better than rightoids because the bar is so incredibly low and how many of them claim to be leftist anyway. The problem though is that many that call themselves libertarians just believe in no rules and regulations in general (even if that isn't their offical principals) and use that as an excuse to do whatever degen shit they want. In actual practice their hands off desires only hurt themselves because you need regulations and taxes or nothing get done. Libertarians are born from an extremely failed federal government where regulations are corrupt and taxes are unfair to the working class. Instead government should be held more accountable, taxes use righteously for the betterment of their community, while also respecting people's private liberties. Believe it or not you can make a more fair government body but to do that in America as one example you will practically have to clean house entirely.
>>532338103That one I'll admit is a little tricky because it's arbitrary, which is why it varies between different countries so much. There's not many arguments you could make in favor of that age being 18 that wouldn't apply just as well to 17 or 19.But that does presume that there should be some limit, and I've never heard any libertarian deny that.
>>532336628Libertarianism is unworkable until the overall IQ of the population goes up somehow. It requires a person to think from principles instead of just emotionally reacting. For example, you have to be intelligent enough to not vote for someone who lies even though they are promising you something you want. People are literally not evolved enough for this yet.
>>532338330That’s right, libertarianism is born from corruption, not freedom. It’s a product of a failed society and failed government, where the government works to empower elites rather than the people. Libertarians are just people who give up. People who don’t want power like people nowadays just don’t want responsibility and don’t know that good leadership is. We just live in weak times and libertarians are a symptom of it.
>>532338264You can't think of anything?Try this:>Should the government spy on their citizens' Internet activities?It would impossible for more than 1 libertarian on Earth to answer "No" to that question, right?
>>532337735Like Big boss.Not the boss because she was a globalist retard.Armstrongs fun for memes but not for real life.
>>532338653I bet you can find some schizo in the CIA or NSA who is a “libertarian” and thinks so. I saw someone in a YouTube comment section about South Park and the NSA say that the NSA is more justified in South Park than in real life (with thousands of upvotes), isn’t the core chronically online fanbase of South Park super liberatarian and also the creators and show back then (maybe not as much now)
>>532336628Any political system works if there are no Jews involved
>>532339131Well why don’t we pray for the next Big Boss? Maybe he’ll make a REAL PMC and we can all be like outlaws pew pew ha ha
>>532336628>they have to agreewhy
>>532339172Oh sure you bet that maybe 1 hypothetical person who calls himself libertarian would answer "Yes".But no other libertarians can agree, right? You'll get 10 different answers to this question even though it's a yes/no question and therefore has only 2 possible answers. That makes sense to you, right? And most importantly there are no general trends in libertarian thought, if someone says they're a libertarian then it's impossible to predict literally any of their opinions on policy, is that it?
>>532339421There are trends but for the most part they just take the position that’s the most popular
>>532339867Can you describe any of these trends?Let's consider the government from the novel 1984. Take a guess: would most libertarians describe the setting of that novel as good or bad?They can't agree on anything, right? Only on marijuana policy, and maybe some other things. But what's your guess?
