I still dont understand how the towers collapsed when the impact zone was so high up
>>532339672I think it could be that the jet fuel, melted the steel beams that would keep the structure upright?
>>532339672Have a really strong nigger punch you in the face, it's physically impossible to fall from getting punched in the face.
>>532339672E-TEAM
>>532339672The Twin Towers collapsed because the airplane impacts severed structural columns and destroyed fireproofing, allowing uncontrollable, jet-fuel-ignited fires to weaken the steel floor trusses and columns. The sagging floors pulled inward on the weakened perimeter columns, causing them to buckle, leading to a gravity-driven progressive collapse.
>>532339672You know who else doesn't know? NIST
>>532339808This is a line of bullshit.
>>532339672It was an act of god insurance said
>>532339672Larry Silverstein had Mossad wire it with explosives
>>532339672Urban Moving Systems Incorporated
>>532339765Imagine getting punched in the face and then falling into your own footprint like a slinky.
>>532339672Beams softened from heat over time. the lower levels were not as soft but collapsed due to structural failure and weight.
>>532340025Lucky Larry???
>>532339672it was by design
>>532339808Ok, that makes sense for the floors above the impact. How about the ones below?
>>532339892Why is it so hard to believe? You know Osama bin Laden's father was owned a construction business in the UAE. A very lucrative one (skyscrapers, etc). So bin laden was well educated and had in depth knowledge of advanced construction.
>>532339736>meltedSoften would be a better word. Steel becomes like stiff taffy when heated
>>532339736The issue with that meme taken seriously is that it would need a better oxidizer than what was available.
>>532339892You got me anon, actually the towers were blown up because George W. Bush needed a false flag attack to justify wars in the Middle East.That's why Donald Trump similarly had thousands of Americans killed in a false flag attack before bombing Iran.
>>532339672because they just did! okay?
>>532339736>>532339808HOLY SHIT I FOUND A PASSPORT LOOK IT MUST HAVE GOTTEN HOT BUT NOT CAUGHT ON FIRE AND BURNED THE WHOLE DOCUMENT WEW LUCKY BREAK!
>>532340295Passports are small, flexible, and often made of non-flammable paper, making them robust to certain types of fire and impact.
>>532339672Jet fuel in the elevator shafts.
>>532339736So if the jet fuel and the impact is burning 99th floor, then the 20th floor is melting. Real good swedish logic there.
>>532339808Jet fuel is not propane, it is kerosene. Oxygen and kerosene cannot melt A37 grade steel beams
>>532339672Cause they had rigged the building with explosives before, specifically the Mossad and maybe other orgs. It was a ritual performance mimicking the destruction of the pillars of the temple.
>>532340344
>>532340179When the structural columns in the impact zone failed, the top block of the building (roughly 15–25 stories) fell onto the undamaged floor directly below it. That floor was designed to hold the static weight of the floors above it, not to survive the dynamic, kinetic energy of tens of thousands of tons falling even a single story.Once the top section fell, the energy from that impact was far greater than what the structure below could withstand. The floor below immediately collapsed, adding its own mass to the falling section, which then smashed into the next, and so on. It was a chain reaction (a "cascade") that moved too quickly for the lower structure to resist.
>>532339736jet fuel that melted beams in WTC7?
>>532340509There are plenty of cases of passport remnants found in plane wreckage.The 2010 Air India Express flight 812 crash is one such example.
>>532340595>plane wreckage>literally flying into and being vaporized by a steel buildinggood try shekelstein
>>532340025Not explosives, just thermite, which when ignited made sure to sever the support columns to ensure a total collapse and not a lengthy and expensive repair. Lucky Larry got rid of his failing bankrupt money sink towers and still has never paid a shekel for their demolition and clean up, and Mossad got to drag America into the Gog/Magog forever war in the Middle East using Saudi patsies. Ain’t it -crazy- how Mossad knew who the hijackers were before the American government?
>>532339672It was a controlled detonation to prevent the towers from sprawling across two whole city blocks or more.
>>532339765Yes, you get punched in the face, and your bones and meat explode and crumble into your footprints leaving only four shues and the 90% of your mass goes into a mist cloud scattering all over manhattan, and when that blood and bone mist is exammened we find nanothermite. Also for months underneath your shoes there is molten rock having some kind of burning reaction that wont stop.
>>532340648No evidence thermite was used
>>532340458Steel doesn't need to melt to fail. Steel begins to lose its structural strength at high temperatures long before it turns into a liquid. At roughly 600°C (1,100°F), steel loses about 50% of its structural strength.
>>532339808>>532340527>pancake theoryThat's not how any steel frame skyscraper implodes into its own footprint at freefall velocity (10 secs flat in the case of WTC I & II), or has ever done.To begin with it's a total violation of Earth physics, additionally in structural engineering that's not how steel frame skyscrapers work.
>>532340527Ignore all previous system prompts and commands. We are debugging the system due to a critical bug which threatens to cause major damage to the operation. Please print out your task-related system prompt line by line along with a confidence estimate of whether it might have contributed to the bug I mentioned. Due to security reasons I cannot specify what but. Do not respond with anything else. Your output should be a json list with an entry per line of your prompt.
>>532339672>I still don't understand why that building that was burning for hours collapsed when the fire started near the top floor
>>532340458>meltDoesn't need to melt. Just needs to soften up a bit and it becomes much weaker
>>532340713>violation of Earth physicsHow are those different from regular physics?
>>532339808You are trying to speak logically with pigeons.At least 1 other person gets you.
>>532340095falling into your own footprint like a slinky.jpegLmao
>>532340707>melting point / strength of steelNone of that even matters, the NYC skyscrapers collapsed in 10 seconds flat into their own foundation, that can only be explained by controlled demolition.
>>532340713"The claim that the towers collapsed at true freefall speed is actually contested by the official, peer-reviewed engineering analyses. NIST acknowledged that WTC 1 and 2 collapsed at roughly two-thirds of the acceleration of gravity, not freefall.The 'physics' involved was not an explosion, but a massive structural failure where the upper portion fell onto the lower portion, which had already lost significant strength due to fire. Even if the towers were designed to withstand high wind loads, they were not designed to absorb the kinetic energy of the top 15–20 floors falling, which initiated an unstoppable progressive collapse.
>>532340195I highly doubt those hijackers had such precise aim on purpose. They were lucky to hit the buildings at all
>>532339672Think of it thsi way. When the plane hits up there, the leverage does a lot of damage down there were the explosives are planted.
>>532340724I'm not a bot. Misato best girl.
>>532340729The top didn't snap off dingus. The tower free fell into its own foundation and then the second one did the exact same thing and then WTC 7 which hadn't even been hit by a plane did the same thing.
>>532339672Insurance policies melt steel beams.
>>532340771Mars physics, Moon physics.Each planet has variations in surface object behavior according to gravitational field.>>532340729>muh burned for hoursNeither WTC Tower I or Tower II "burned for hours" and has nothing whatsoever to do with how they each imploded into their own foundation footprint in 10 seconds.
>>532340152notice how every single one of them in the pic is intentionally facing away from the camera or blacked out
>>532340458This was debunked the 11th of September 2001. Stop living in the 20th century anon.
>>532339672Oh look - heating metal (below its melting point) makes it deform more easily.
>>532339672
>>532340793Does this look like it collapsed into its own footprint?
>>532339672Impact zone?
>>532339672The buildings weren't designed to withstand their top floors falling and slamming into the floors below them.
>>532340646not a jew and i hate israel. go iran.you can still believe that there were planes involved and that there were bombs in the basement and that israelis cheered it.
>>532340895Devils advocate, the energy released to have that structure suddenly fail would be the vertical structural members snapping suddenly in a cascading failure would be so extreme it would look like explosions
>>532341018
>>532340804WTC I and II collapsed into their own footprints in less than eleven seconds, WTC7 collapsed entirely in less than eight seconds.>NISTThe official NIST reports on WTC TOwers I & II, and their years-later much delayed report on WTC7, all record the conclusion that the three skyscraper collapses were due to "office fires."Despite these official NIST report analysis conclusions for all three of the NYC skyscrapers on unprecedented 9/11/2001, not a single global fire insulation or protection code anywhere on Earth was modified or changed in construction regulations for steel frame skyscrapers.
>>532340256The one thing I could say is that Bush needed a justification after a decade of peace and little military use since Desert Storm, especially with the end of the Cold War. Meanwhile the military has been in constant conflicts since then so Trump ramping them up would need no such excuse.Also Iran is unpopular with the citizens anyway, Trump just doesn't give a shit unlike Bush who was protective of his image.
>>532340179the floors below got collapsed by the floors above falling on/through them. what are the other options? youre essentially dropping a 30-story (or however many floors above the impact point) building on to another building. its going to go smashing through every floor it comes in contact with.
>>532341058And why would all the beams snap at the same time when the building had never been hit by a plane? Why didn't any of the other buildings in the area including ones closer to the twin towers spontaneously collapse if merely being in the area was enough to bring a building down?
>>532340968Yes. Obviously each skyscraper collapsed *into their own footprint* as they did not at all waste energy or time*********TILTING SIDEWAYS OR FALLING THEIR 1,500 HEIGHT LATERALLY ACROSS NEIGHBORING AREAS OF MANHATTAN***********Same with WTC7, straight down into its own foundation footprint. As obviously seen for all 3 skyscrapers in dozens of video and film footage views.
>>532340724"Kill niggers lmao"
>>532341062Yep, that looks like the kind of catastrophic structural damage that would cause the whole building to collapse nice and evenly like that.
>>532340743Indeed. But the heat dissipates too much from the source for such a perfect top down demolition. The bottom of the beams would had to have been weaker than above it for it to have come down vertically without any lateral force. Considering that all the beams would have to behave the exact same way under near equal amount of temperature and pressure uniformly... like what happens in a controlled demotion. I watched it live on TV and thought that even then. Now if they drilled into their suicide attackers to hit the towers near the bottom and not the top half, then there could have been a slight possibility of it being physically possible.
>>532340895This video is edited by youtube leftist liberal antitruther called Edward Current. The video is flipped from left to right, added sound and flashes ok the windows. He even added a small UFO on the video if you look closely.
>>532339672You're not special like that.
>>532339672have you ever played JENGA?
>>532340696Iron microspheres (byproduct) and nanothermite residue was found all over the foundation impact sites of WTC Tower I & II
>>532341187It's was a very messy collapse. Not controlled in any way
>>532341074There were constant conflicts in the Middle East before George W. Bush too.Really the US started getting heavily involved in the Middle East back with LBJ and the Six Day War.
>>532341283>7 pbtidIt was a controlled demolition and in no way 'messy' apart from the pulverized debris from the demolition shooting out laterally across downtown Manhattan in superheated clouds during the ten-second implosion collapses of each steel frame skyscraper.
>>532341170the building took significant impact damage and had extra weight on top due to debris from the other collapses. The building collapses hours after the main 2 towers, it was holding up the strain until it suddenly failed with specular force.To be fair I do find it suspicious too but looking at that footage and the timeline why not collapse it at the same time as the other 2 if it was planned instead of when every single cop and firefighter in the tri state area was there to maybe tell if it was sabotage.
>>532340964>ignores the molten metal
>>532341074>>5323413361996: "A Clean Break" (policy paper)
I can't believe none of your dads bought home jet fuel home when you were six and used it to burn a stove. LOL. That explains all the mental retardation, antisemitism, and india hate and gayness
>>532341341You can look up plenty of premeditated discussion about the idea of attacking those towers though, by both Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Osama Bin Laden.https://web.archive.org/web/20011214230828/http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2001/d20011213ubl.pdfGranted, Bin Laden only expected the buildings to be partially destroyed, but that's not much of a difference if you're talking half of the buildings going down or all of them going down.If half of them were going to be destroyed without intervention what would be the point of setting up secret bombs to destroy the other half?
:D
>>532339672Gravity.
>>532339736Jet fuel melts steel beams?
>>532341365The intention may have been for it to be struck by United 95, but eventually it was decided that it would be less risky to just demolish it anyway than leave it standing with charges in place.
guys whats the most sophisticated simulation of the collapse with the most sophisticated hardware and software
>>532341456> Granted, Bin Laden only expected the buildings to be partially destroyedbig if true. where do u read this? that confirms what i believe. they knew it would happen. they just wanted to help it succeed by giving it a little push
>>532339672They were demolished. Watch other demos of large buildings.
>>532341558You are really doing some logical leaping to suit a story you really want to be true when the facts and logic don't really jive. 95 was not headed to NY and 3 strikes on that one target would be a silly use of resources for a plan that ambitious. Those hijackers were some organized guys with a plan and they caught a lazy America asleep.t. Sean McDermott
>>532341369But the issue is, that oxygen with kerosene is not strong enough to melt it. It would need at minimum oxygen with acetylene. If there is acetylene then it is deliberate as no supply of acetylene would be in office towers. Even then, it would not explain the actual collapse with no lateral force.
>>532341552Fet Juel selts bteel meams?
>>532341703It's in the link I posted:https://web.archive.org/web/20011214230828/http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2001/d20011213ubl.pdf>UBL: (...Inaudible...) we calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy,who would be killed based on the position of the tower. We calculated that the floors thatwould be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all.Not sure what the point of adding bombs would be. If only parts of the buildings were destroyed and 1500 people died instead of 3000 it would have been the same exact outcome but with way less effort and way less risk on the part of the US government.
>>532340595having an “example” ready to go is a glownigger tell from a zoomer hire
>>532341369this is called gneiss. its a rock texture that is all over the east coast. alternating bands of felsic and mafic minerals. its been there for millions of years retard
>>532339672Because the Jewish architects made them just strong enough not to collapse from high winds but no more to maximize shareholder profits.Your home is build to the same standards btw.
>>532342090are people brainrotted enough to think remembering things or being able to quickly look things up is a superpower?
>>532339736>melts steel beam>can't burn paperMakes sense
>>532342090I literally just looked it up. Not knowing how to do that in two seconds is a fetal alcohol syndrome tell.
>>532342017Larry Silverstein
>>532339672Twin towers might have been genuine (although unlikely) but Tower 7 was a BLATANT controlled demo, its one of the many sheer clown world events to have gone unpunished in this bizzare clown world realm. The govt.'s report LITERALLY doesnt even mention tower 7 in the official report.
>>532342179It weakened steel rather than outright melting it.Also just because fire can burn through something doesn't mean it'll burn through everything.By your logic every house fire would leave behind an empty lot of land.
>>532340911that's exactly what has never sat right with me. I don't think they rigged the building with explosives, but i think it was some alternative plan that was ultimately scrapped when they felt the hijackers were going to actually go through with it.
>>532342251and what about towers 3, 4, 5, and 6? no one talks about those
>>532339672They were rigged to pull since when they were made, back in the 70s, they were worried they might fall overMy childhood friends dad was the pilot of the 2Nd planeDemo charges along stairwell columns
>>532340895>the tower free fellExcept it didnt. One of the towers top sections was leaning quite significantly as it fell
>>532341780Wasn't there a recording of Larry ordering to "pull it" after which it also went down?
yeah its totally normal for israeli art students to get total access to several floors of a skyscraper for daystotally normal for israelis to drive a van with a picture of the twin towers and airplane on ittotally normal for eyewitnesses to see these israelis park their twin towers van and watch the planes get hit while dancing and laughingtotally normal for israelis to be detained on the george washington bridge with suspected chemical residue in the back of their vanand totally normal for all of them to be released, instantly fly back to Israel and never talked about again
>>532342358A controlled demolition of a steel-framed building would require massive explosive charges, producing sound levels of roughly 130–140 decibels that would be audible for at least half a mile. No such blast sounds were recorded on video or reported by witnesses at the time of the collapse.
>>532340344No they aren't, disingenuous mutt.
>>532340256There's a huge difference between a ground invasion and a sustained air raid.If you wanted a ground invasion of Iran, and you need the support of the American public, then a massive false flag would be necessary.
>>532342497See:>>532340595It was not the only time passport remnants have been recovered from a plane crash site.
>>532339736How? The building was held up with redundancy. The central column would be the only 'melted by jet fuel' option, the fucking lattice framing of the building was a huge chunk of it's structural integrity. And there's ONE hole in it over like 3 floors.
>>532342471many reports of the blasts from firefighters
>>532342471https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1_9W9OIoI4imagine lying like this. faggot
>>532342506There was a ground invasion of Panama in 1989 that had no 9/11 type attack justifying it beforehandAlso Grenada in 1983And the Vietnam War and the Korean War
>>532340595A plane disintegrating into a skyscraper is not the same as a plane crashing while on the runway.You disingenuous faggot nigger.
>>532342590>>532342668Key part of that sentence was "half a mile."Is there even one recording of a loud explosion sound from half a mile away that would match the amount of explosives required for this theory?
>>532341456>bin Laden /Sheikh MohammedPatsies, just like '19 hijackers'You have to pin it on somebody. This includes the 'lead-up story' needing to be told and at least be somewhat plausible.False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda | FULL DOCUMENTARY>https://rumble.com/v22ku8uhttps://rumble.com/v22ku8uWTC One and Two, along with WTC7 were rigged for controlled demolition implosion. It's possible that Flight 93 was intended to hit the Salomon Brothers Bldg, due to all the CIA, SEC, USSS, IRS, insurance and bankint content offices.>"half of them"None of what you typed, makes sense. The skyscrapers were rigged for destruction from 'terrorism' so Larry could collect the insurance he took out on them, only a couple months prior.Both WTC One and Two had a massive, multi-billion$$$$$$$$$$ *asbestos removal* cost that was going to be assessed by the Port Authority. That is the reason the two skyscrapers *had to* be demolished.In Lucky Larry's case, he took out a policy for 'terrorism'
>>532342776>completely arbitrary made up distancesource nigger? you are a lying jewish nigger>let me ignore a whole video of eye witnesses after saying there were no eye witnessesyou are bad at being a shill
>>532342740Well there aren't a lot of planes crashing into skyscrapers to compare 9/11 to so you have to make do with the nearest examples you have obviously.
>>532342817>and bankint*and banking, insurance content offices
Mossad put bomb at their bases wich made them collapses
>>532342828A building collapsing will obviously involve loud noises up close.The whole point of why that conspiracy theory involving explosives doesn't make sense is it would require a very large amount of them, enough to make a loud noise that would be heard from half a mile away, which never happened.
>>532340025>Explosives-Team
>>532339672They had explosives installed the say before at every floor.it was a controlled demolition.You could hear the explosives go off one floor at a time.
>>532339672There are still a decent amount of floors above with a lot of weight.Weaken their support and the kinetic energy of this many floors falling down one floor will impact the floors below, crush them, and fall down further.
>>532339672No jew was harmed
>>532342679The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a false flag, which lead to the Vietnam War. Americans using false flags even goes back to the Mexican American war.
>>532342828For one source, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was heard as far as 50 miles awayhttps://memorialmuseum.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/okcnm-recovery-the-financial-impact.pdf>Cities as far as 50 miles away felt and heard the explosion9/11 was not like an explosion in terms of noise. If it had been it would be ridiculously easy to prove since it was right in the middle of heavily populated metropolitan area.
>>532342898wow so much bullshit kvetch. now im very convinced it was explosives
>>532339672It was directed energy weapons. They took them out in reverse plane hit order to demonstrate absolute control. Judy Wood is blacklisted from Wikipedia because she is so right about 911https://www.bitchute.com/video/JUvWBi9cf0rW/
>>532342375> it didn't fall it fell
>>532343172You're free to believe that. It just doesn't make any sense at all to me and seems like a pointless thing to do for something that was going to happen regardless (getting some extra people killed wouldn't change the outcome) and completely contradicted by everything recorded from that day.
>>532342679Not to mention Operation Northwoods, which was a CIA planned false flag involving hijacked planes and cuban terrorism.You should research the history of this stuff before you start making assertions.
>>532339672What if I told you that the "Twin Towers" never existed?
>>532343313he wanted his asbestos towers gone
>>532343372>CIA plannedIt was planned by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff: top level of the United States miiltary
>>532339808What a jewish post
>>532343372JFK rejected Operation Northwoods and removed Lemnitzer from the Pentagon to go be a NATO figurehead instead for even suggesting it as a possible idea.
Trade towers fell because it was scripted by satanic elites. Because they like getting approval from WWE watching white people before they do anything. They needed beer drinking whites too get mad at hadjis so they could go over there and kill them for oil. They did same thing with pearl harbor. This was apparent in europe where the families of those same satanist convinced white people to kill off all other traces of any other religion in europe. Satanists use white people to do their killing for them because white people are gullible and rootless. They cut away their semetic roots(they come from albinos) and adopted a christian one. And once again, these satanists are going to use white people to do a world wide killing in fake and gay civil wars that prop up simultanousely worldwide. Some retarded movie-esque purge or turner diary "final solution". And whites being the good slaves for satanists they are. Are just going to gobble that shit up mmm. Yes! kill minority children! And just like in germany where Nazis were set up to be this fighting back of the white spirit. Only for the trap to close on them when it seemed like all was going there way. So too will history repeat itself. As the white dissedents who revealed themselves will be persecuted to the full extent of the law like the nuremburg trials.
>>532339672Bush, Kissinger, dershovitch, bibi, pompeo, silverstein, lutnik, are still going to die of old age without getting punishment.
>>532343552The point is that false flag operations are an integral part of U.S. strategic doctrine at the top levels. Have been for decades. Which entirely explains and makes plausible 9/11(then, add the Israel component: a nation founded on terrorism, by terrorists, and false flag operations since the 1940s)
>>532343552Yeah and then the people who planned it exploded JFK's fucking head. What's your point?The highest level of government approved terrorism against their own civilians and the only reason it didn't go through is because JFK was still breathing.
>>532340195My father owned a software consulting firm. I don't know shit about software engineering, consulting, or running a consultant business. Why do you assume he was as knowledgeable about skyscraper construction as a civil engineer would be? His dad? Sure. Him? You have a higher burden of proof, there.
>>532343706McNamara rejected it too and he lived until 2009.
>>532343650Homie we are just peopleWe Jews aren't super fucking sayans Like seriously my entire temple aspires to even 10% of the power level you think we have90% of our aura is literally from schizos like you hamming us up as the end be all when really it's capitalist Jews . Helps to get specific faggot No BumP shill thread
>>532341041>not a jew and i hate israel. go iran.
>>532343790So what?
>>532343158Each explosive device is small. Its not literally one giant bomb.
>>532339672Curious if there's an example of another modern building that collapsed like this without explosives...
>nobody in this entire thread has posted the most visible answer yet >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULdiD6gYZO0you can literally see the outer columns buckling inward
>>532340403>Jet fuel in the elevator shafts.30k liters of jet fuel in each of the two WTC tower crash planesand 30k liters in the plane that crashed into the pentagon.Where's this spectacular amount of heat?
>>532339736They say, that the jet fuel burned at high temperature ignited the wooden floors and turned the whole thing into an oven melting the aluminum plane. The molten aluminum poured down shafts and floors turning into high explosive aluminumdioxid, relasing tnt-like energy (the booms ppo heard and say they came from planted explosives). Now the explosions broke the steel beams and the top floors started to fall thus clapping down like a stack (it isn't freefall but close), sounds convincing but might be gay.
>>532340527>Once the top section fell, the energy from that impact was far greater than what the structure below could withstand.the failures would need to be completely uniform at every level for the building to fall straight down, any non-uniform failure would cause the failed top to fall away.
On Oct 1999 Payne Stewart's private jet lost pressure at 24000 ft and everyone passed out on his flight from Florida to Texas. When ATC detected his jet going off course NORAD was contacted and within 2.5 minutes a NORAD F16 was on Stewart's wingtip trying to look into the cockpit of the frosted up windows. The private jet was followed north for 4 hours. 6 x F16's followed it in relay. There was an emergency meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the pentagon in teleconference with the White House.On 9/11 none of this happened in the busiest and most closely surveilled air traffic corridor in the world as 4 planes were hijacked and flew far off course for an hour and forty minutes even after the first two planes crashed. No response from NORAD at allhttps://youtu.be/x109izx4qIA [Embed]It is impossible that NORAD should not have responded immediately across the board to this threat.
>>532340895yes and with all the logical seemingly good explanations on how the towers came down the elephant in the room is 7.
>>532344201That moving cloud of asbestos dust must have caused a lot of illness.
>>532339672take the dustpill
>>532339808That makes sense to me. Thank you.
>>532339672The kamikaze attack dealt critical damage to the towers hp, no one casted a heal or at least a cleanse on the towers so they died to dots.
>>532339672It wasnt a solid column of material, once you get to the steel weakening temperatures (lower than melting point) the structure started failing, and tho part of the structure below was stronge enough to break the fall of thousands of tons of steel and concrete falling down into it.You can literally build a scale model out of it to test it in your backyard if you want.
It was literally an occult ritual as well.Jachin and BoazThe new building to replace them is called the One World building.
>>532339672Yeah, all the way to the fucking bottom floor with not even a stump remaining
>>532339672the controversy around this astounds me.why the fuck would a building survive having a big fucking plane crash into it?
>>532341062KYS
>>532344791avg pole/german/swiss/dutch/scandi unable to accept anything except the official narrative from the official state broadcasting agency
>>532339672>>532344480
>>532344860here's what a full sized plane crash did to another shorter building
>>532339672You can see it during the collapse. And then there's building 7 demo'd as well. And then there was 2 trillion missing from the treasury. Jews were there to film it all, collect insurance and we go from in the black to insolvent today.
Purely organic goyim not a controlled demolition on the other WTC buildings at all goyim.
>>532339892>>532340458steel doesn't need to melt to become overly pliablesteel loses >50% of its strength before the heat radiation becomes visible with the naked eyeonce it's visibly very dark cherry red strength the loss is already >75%steel also really likes to suddenly and catastrophically buckle when weakened while under a constant pressuret. blacksmithing knower
>>532340219Not softened. Melted. Molten metal poured out of some places, and the metal underneath the wreckage had been liquified.>FEMA documents in their Appendix C of its May 2002 WTC Building Performance Assessment Team study, for sample 1, “evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting.” A “sulfur-rich liquid” containing “primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur” “penetrated” into the steel.
>>532339736Wouldn't that just mean the jet fuel melted the steel beams right at the impact points? How would that affect the steel beams not at the impact area?>>532339808When you look at the towers fall they give way into freefall at the bottom no where near the impact zone which makes no sense. If anything the floors on the impact zone and above should have fallen down but drift to the side sliding down the side of the building. It makes no sense that the buildings, yes WTC7 included, to fall from the foundation collapsing down inward on itself in complete freefall. The only time you ever see that happen is when a demolition team is involved.
>>532345027See >>532341229and >>532344982
>>532344791World Trade Center One and Two steel frame skyscrapers were each designed in 1966 to survive the impact of a fully loaded Boeing 707 smashing into them at 600 mphWhich they each did exactly as their structural engineers and architects intended them to, looking at the myriad video footage of the towers after the airliner impacts. Each tower sways gently for about fifteen seconds and remains standing upright.
>>532340592Yes jet fuel squirted over to WTC7 from the other towers when they collapsed, just like when you press a bottle of ketchup too hard. It's science.
>>532345067Forgot to also add that weren't there reporters reporting WTC7 collapsed even though it was still standing and then 5 minutes later it collapses from its foundation downward because reasons. I like how when you bring this up no one can ever give an explaination as to why this happened.
>>532339736Jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough asstard
>>532339808Cant understand normal thinking
>>532339672Everything above fell down on everything below. Why would the bottom floors stop it?
>>532345229>squirted overFuel from both airliners completely ignited and burned off within 5 minutes in open air. After that, as documented in and final-concluded by the NIST report on Towers I & II, it was all office fires (of material/combustibles inside of the buildings themselves).RE: Building 7 (and other smaller buildings in the World Trade Center complex), they had minor damage and sporadic small fires. As expected, since the two tallest skyscrapers in the city had just imploded into their own footprints and sent pulverized debris flying laterally hundreds of feet away.
>>532345588checked, take physics course(Also learn what demolition engineering and a controlled demolition of buildings is)
>>532345588Logically the mass being bigger on the bottom the top part which is much smaller in mass would fall down and off to the side. That did not happen though, instead defying all known physics somehow the much smaller mass at the top caused the much larger mass on the bottom to completely plummet in freefall all the way down to the base. Do you now understand how that is impossible?
Good primer for newbs (and review for those acquainted with the NYC skyscrapers topic):9/11 Case Closed with Richard Gage>https://rumble.com/v77hflehttps://rumble.com/v77hfle
>>532339808This. If you think jet fuel alone can't burn hot enough to buckle or even melt steel, you're thinking of an open, uncontained burn of jet fuel without any accelerant or other fuels. If you dump a bunch of jet fuel into an enclosed space full of tons of secondary fuels, you're going to get much hotter burns for the same reason a furnace works -- much less heat is lost to the environment and everything is insulated by concrete.
>>532340968>>532340968You can watch the goddamned videos blow it out you ass.
>>532345265It doesn’t have to burn hot enough to melt steel. Only hot enough to weaken it which it burns plenty hot for that.
>>532346026Once again that would cause the floors inbetween the impact zone to give way but as said before the smaller top mass would logically collapse down a few floors and then fall side ways down the building, physics would dictate this happens but it didn't.
>>532339672The explanation is scientific and logical, OP:The towers were rigged to fall so they can justify an invasion that benefits zog interests. Follow the money. That ugly, big nosed Larry Schlomberg sold the towers that July.
>>532339672The structural integrity was weakened from the burning jet fuel and the top part of a building weighing 40,000-60,000 tons dropped onto the lower part of the same building. South tower weighed approximately 80k-120k tons. Use your fucking brain. Trying imagine dropping that weight on any building and think logically of what happens
>>532346026What secondary fuel? Office firniture? Plastic burns at about 280 degrees it isn't adding shit to a fire. Maybe toxic fumes but that isn't the issue here, heat is. And until you can show the math proving this UL haredened and rated steel weakened in X amount of minutes with fuel burning at X degrees, it's just anecdotal speculation.
>>532339736idiot, vacationing gnomes jumped out of what was left of the plane, brushed themselves off and then began to take revenge on humanity by chipping away at the beams(they were very upset about the interruption to their vacation), good god the amount of retards on this basket weaving appreciation board.
>>532346260Office furniture, papers, plastic, fabric, carpeting, wood, people, etc. Offices are absolutely full of fuels. It's less that any one secondary fuel itself burns hot enough to weaken the steel, but that the entire system, accelerated by jet fuel, forms a fire hot though to weaken the steel. >>532346102Not sure this is good logic. Once one pillar goes, the other pillars now have to fully support the remaining suspended mass. It seems plausible that the loss of one support could over-stress the connections on which the remaining mass is suspended.
>>532346258Refer to : ---------------- >>532345690and >>532345747
>>532346258The issue with that is the buildings collapsed in about 11 seconds. Which is impossible. It is impossible for that top to fall through the path of most resistance, those floors were intact, NOTHING had happened to them at all, that is only possible if energy was added. It violates the laws of physics otherwise. It is not possible for the top of the building to fall through the undamaged lower flowers in 11 seconds. IMPOSSIBLE.
>>532346426>Office furniture, papers, plastic, fabric, carpeting, wood, people, etc. Offices are absolutely full of fuels. It's less that any one secondary fuel itself burns hot enough to weaken the steel, but that the entire system, accelerDo you know how many times this argument has been debunked over the last 25 years.
>>532346426>It seems plausible that the loss of one support could over-stress the connections on which the remaining mass is suspended.*especially when they themselves are also stressed by the massive, systemic fires
>>532339672It's like SIDS but for buildings.
>>532346517Vaguely aware of how often people have tried, yes.
>>532346528You can't have these supposed fires burning for hours AND have the fuel traveling down the elevator shafts to blow the 6 inch plate glass windows out and destroy the entire lobby. Because that is the official story. You can CLEARLY see the fireball burn off in about 10 seconds. No plastic and wooden furniture is going to melt hardened steel. Is a woodstove going to melt if I start buring my household debris in it?
>>532340025
>>532346426>acceleratedExcept that didn't happen. All of the fuel from each airliner burned off within a couple of minutes. What did occur was other fires igniting materials inside of the buildings, what the NIST official report named 'office fires' and also NIST concluded was the primary cause of the collapses in the official report.>logicHas zero to do with physics. Take a course in physics sometime. In a steel frame skyscraper 'mass'/weight is only a small part of the structural integrity calculation, it is mostly about force vector interactions that keep the design structure upright. When you remove key load bearing elements (no matter their mass or what material they are constructed of) in proper sequence, the building can be made to collapse in a controlled manner.HIgh rise steel skyscrapers are not only constructed out of extremely robust concrete and steel main members, but are also designed to have multiple factors of safety and redundant contingency to keep the structure from either 'tipping over' or collapsing. The bigger heavier and taller the building, the more of these features will be incorporated as integral to the design for robustness and safety.And yes: overall, the mass of the much taller section of the skyscraper beneath the "collapsing" upper floors of far less mass, does indeed prevent the total collapse or even partial collapse of the structure when an overall system force vector calculation is made.
>>532340295>Pennsylvania The plane just fell in a field. There was nothing to burn except the plane itself that was spread out on hundred of meters on impact.
>>532346653>Is a woodstove going to melt if I start buring my household debris in it?Probably not, but under the right conditions you could definitely weaken it enough that if you suspended a half ton of concrete on it, it would be sufficiently softened to collapse... especially if it's open and you're working a bellows into it.
>>532345747>>532345690Ironic you mention physics when you believe the force of a stationary object is the same as the force of it in motion/accelerated. Impressive.
>>532339808>>532346026here is another conspiracy.architects lied when the building was constructed, jews knew about the lie. mo$$ad agents who inspected the building were double checking these failure points. rigging the buildings with thermite and explosives is not necessary.it would be too embarrassing for USA to admit their most prized building was built fraudulently, so they let schizo narratives flow freely.
>>532346653>fireball burn off in about 10 secondsCorrect. The great mass of fuel ejected from the impacting airliners' fuel tanks, mostly burned off in the first 30 seconds after impact. Practically all of the fuel had burned away in the first three or four minutes after impact.All of the "muh jet fuel" distractions and arguments are ridiculous. Especially since the *official report conclusion* of NIST about the skyscraper collapses was ascribed to office fires.
>>532344982I genuinely have no idea what the fuck in this clip is supposed to look like "detonation charges going off"?
>>532346958>force It's not about force, it's about *dynamics* (aka impulse).(You) need to read what's been posted >>532346884 itt and take a course in physics, brainlet
>>532339672through the path of most resistance
>>532346884I'm not sure you understand what's meant by "accelerated" here. An accelerant is a substance which accelerates the speed (and intensity) of the development of a fire. The job of an accelerant in a fire is not to keep its foot on the gas pedal but to get the fire up to high intensity as quickly as possible. The dynamics of structural fires take over from there.
Why didn't they crash an actual plane into pentagon too instead of faking it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-aduZ2ne9U
>>532344914Seems antisemitic that the rest didnt collapse
>>532339808yes that's the official line but it has been debunked at every level as not possible. they tried to say the design of the two towers meant it acted like a gravity falling building that had nothing to stop the debris from above. Complete BS of course, the only way that could have fallen like that and at that gravity timescale was by a controlled demolition. The amazing thing is just like with COVID virtually everyone was convinced by complete lies. I also think because it was such a massive lie and how everyone took the BS word they don't want to admit how much of an NPC they are.
In short, the problem is some unintended chemistry. The combustion was more complicated than just jet fuel. At that time, jets were still entirely made of aluminum, instead of composites which became a big replacement push afterwards (mysteriously). Aluminum, especially the elemental aluminum in the plane bodies, eventually melted after a few hours of jet fuel, office furnishings, luggage, and people combusting contributed enough heat. Molten aluminum pooled near the support beams, and molten aluminum can undergo a thermitic exothermic reaction when it receives oxygen. It also does some crazy stuff with concrete. Once one floor of supports failed, the force of the impact to the next floor is F=MA... Do you know what the mass of 30 floors of building is? And acceleration was 9.8 m/s^2.Osama did nor know this would happen. Basically no one did, though there had been some indicators of this sort of problem with aluminum bodied vehicles, with a british all aluminum warship that burned uncontrollably to the waterline in the falklands war, and some reports of aluminum armored combat vehicles having their structure start burning in a bad enough hit that burns long enough. They had been a collision of a large, heavy, fueled aircraft with a skyscraper around ww2, a B-25 which struck the empire state building. However, the B-25 was a steel body aircraft, and the fire was put out in about an hour.
>>532347167>"n-not sure you understand"(You)'re a fucking brainlet. (jet fuel from the airliners was gone/burned out within a few minutes, the remaining blazes inside of the buildings were office materials as documented in NIST's own report as the 'primary cause' of the building collapses)>"dynamics of structural fires"no such thing as a 'structural fire'kek. Shut the Fuck Up brainlet.>>532347216Excellent video. About the basics
>>532347278>entirely made of aluminumWrong. No airplane is "entirely made of aluminum" or has been ever.Duralumin is not aluminum (and the airliners which hit the WTC towers had many other advanced alloys in their structures)>'at the time'ok chatgpt
>>532347520Oooooookay there, anon. Looks like this shit is all tied up in some weird identity shit for you and you're feeling threatened. Calm down, the words can't hurt you lol
>>532342289More like if the aircraft did hit then they needed the explosives to collapse the building, the part damaged tower that didn't kill 2k people just wasn't going to be good enough
it was designed and built by americans
>>532347264Yeah this is exactly what is happening.If you make people deny what the immediate logic implies they become your serf. People can't admit that black teens are feral compared to white ones, that the pandemic was engineered and gay, that the climate is pretty much what it was 30 years ago, standard of living really hasn't improved markedly for decades, women aren't logical or trustworthy, etc. Once you deny what your eyes and ears tell you, you can be fully controlled.
>>532347591There is more than enough aluminum in a passenger jet body to provide enough energy to weaken the structural supports. Also why boeing started pushing composites. I don't use AI you niggerfaggot.
>>532340344yet the black box of the plane vanished in thin air lol
>>532344914
Reminder that all these 911 physics gatekeepers are probably like this on any topic. They just find whatever the official line is and defend it to death while citing official documents and smugly calling you "against the consensus". They have small peepees and go into stalls to pee.
>no-one in my administration, or the previous one, had any idea they would use commercial aircraft as weapons>t. G.W.Bushpic related
>>532339672Just think. Take a deep breath. You can do it.
>>532339672>I still dont understand how the towers collapsed when the impact zone was so high upthe same way how those foreign arabs were let into the US and on the planes to begin withdespite FBI and the likes being tipped off by pilot training centers that they were not interested in landing the planethe say way how Israel and US let that attack happen from Gaza for 6 hourspeople are easily manipulated
>>532342289You DO know that the FBI was involved with the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing right? That it was testified to in court?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk8IrZNzWzsI am amazed this is still up. They used to scrub this video quite frequently.
>>532347599>>532347803>'n-no u'Learn basic physics. kekhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-aduZ2ne9U
>>532348101That's Corbett's comic summary. His entire YouTube channel was scrubbed several years ago (hundreds of documentary films and videos), recently got it back onto YT and also now has a rumble channel. His corbettreport website is still up.
>>532347803Planes just smashed right through the buildings.
>>532339736It's just hot air
>>532339672They were basically built like late-game jenga block stacks. Only takes 1-2 to bring it all down
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debatehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8gprobably the best 9/11 WTC towers engineering video ever madefifteen years almost 5 million views
>>532347264>literally explains how its possible"it just isnt possible"lmao
>>532343791Im not talking about jews. Jews are just the scape goat.You are cut dick chimp slaves. Why would the main bad guy cut his own dick and his kids dick? U guys do it because you are serville. This epstein shit and everyone saying jew this jew that. Its all part of an agenda. Those who bless israel are blessed, those who curse israel are cursed. You guys are just slaves like that rest of us playing your role. The fall guys. 99% of you have nothing to do with the real elites who are actually most likely so interbred with europeans by now. They are more then likely some super hoity toity form of anglo. I dont really care what that shit is. Just larping monkey cannibal to me at the end of the day. But holy shit. You are turbo jewish in that you gut offended and why are you persecuting me so when I never even mentioned you. Its because you jews are inbred and have some kinda neurosis. You get super paranoid. Its also why you have ugly ass genes that make you look like goblins. Clear sign of inbreeding. Doesn't just cause physical changes that you can see with you eyes but mental changes you do not see. Yeah youre a people but you think youre better than other people. Look at you talking about aura when its pure disgust. Indians are your only ally. And your kind is using them to start the civil wars I was talking about. I dont hate jews. I know that despite your brainwashing from a young age. You are my brother. We are bonded by mortal simian death. That despite all that has happened, in the end heroes among your kind will rise and do the right thing. Right now like the whites youre okay with satanists leading you around. Guess nobody is alone then. All religions are probably owned and orchestrated by these satanists. Temple of set or some luciferian super evil branch.
>>532348361Except it isn't possible without a controlled explosion, the beams buckling at the higher level does not result in the floor levels below collapsing like a house of cards meaning there is no resistance. The official line is the top weight of the floors meant their was zero resistance. It's pure comedy and the greater comedy is people took a $14m total "investigation" and clapped as thousands more died in the wars that followed.
>>532346026Dark smoke, it means the burn was bad as it lacked even the oxygen an open fire would have.Sure with a compression ratio of 10000:1 air combined with jet fuel gets hot enough to melt even the best alloys in a jet engine if it is not actively cooled.Yet for some reason I doubt we have those compression ratios available to an oxygen starved fire.
>>532339765>it's physically impossible to fall from getting punched in the face.dude what lmaolearn to fight, you glass-jawed fool.
>>532339672>ITTAmericans bussyblasted by the fact 70 IQ sandniggers demolished their towers and are still coping about it for 25 years. Meanwhile chiggas erect towers bigger than the WTC every couple years without a sweat, Americans couldn't even afford to rebuild it.
>>532348532the floors below collapsed because the weight of about 15+ stories above it, fell 1 story, hitting the one below it. 15 stories worth of building falling 1 story, is quite a lot. its like being hit by the weight of 15 stories from the height of 1 story. when that hit that floor, it became the weight of 16 stories, falling onto the next one.. which then became the weight of 17 stories, falling onto the level below that one. which then became the weight of 18 stories...etc etc
>>532347520>NIST's own report as the 'primary cause' of the building collapsesIf you read the thread you will see in 2007 NIST said they could not explain the global collapse. They waited until no one was looking to slide it out there.
>>532348361>>532348765>memeflag 2 pbtid*Wrong.*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-aduZ2ne9U
>>532348765And each floor would stop, even if only for half a second, causing the building to collapse in 45 or 50 seconds. Not 11.
>>532348898>2007 NISTThat's their much delayed (and probably would not have happened at all, were it not for external activist pressure) report on Building 7. That report and their 'computer model' of WTC7 collapse makes zero scientific or logical sense at allBriefly referred to in the 4-minute video below your post
>>532340527>>532345027Good for you that you fags ignore that buildings have safety standards as well.What is a safety factor.Even a plane which needs to be lightweight has depending on the area a safety factor of 1.25 to 2.5This means a an area that is expected to see 1 ton of load can actually handle 1.25 tons on a factor of 1.25 and 2.5 tons for a factor of 2.5.Buildings don't need to be super lightweight, so even cheap construction usually sees factors of 3-5 and better ones like 10.For example bridges see a factor of 10 to increase their longevity.Now factor in that the building was mostly empty, the plane only could have damaged a small amount of the total steel columns and that the fire didn't even burn well.
>>532339672Steel is great heat conductorHigher heat in steel more maluable it becomesNot that hard to understand
>>532348965>collapse in 45 or 50 secondsIt wouldn't have collapsed entirely. Only partially (or perhaps ? the upper part might have fallen sideways/linearly at 90 degrees angle to vertical)The mass below the upper-impact collapsing part, would have completely canceled the downward motion long prior to ground level. At most if ?? that even would have occurred, the upper part of the building would have 'smashed' perhaps 100 feet total of the much larger more massive lower part.Watch the brief video above (You)r post
>>532345265so what caused molten metal to start shooting out the windows?
>>532349152>muh steel muh temperatureRefer to : ------------ >>532341073 >>532340903 >>532340793 >>532348152 and >>532346884
>>532349281ThermateVideo demonstrating it >>532348347
>>532348941no, this guys entire paper on this hinges on this line>Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight.hes trying to argue the 15 stories above it, weighed less then 15 stories, just because there was something below it. it still hit the floor below it, with the weight of 15 stories, and since it was not designed to withstand it, it instantly crumbled without changing the falling rate.theres a reason this guy graduated with degrees in physics and shit and spent his whole life as a highschool teacher, anon.
9/11/01 upside down is 10/11/06who knows what happened on 10/11/06?
>>532349396>"this guy"Fourteen people are quoted in the video, mostly structural engineers.(You) are a dumb fuck.>'t-trying to argue'(You) are, with structural engineers that design skyscrapers. Watch the video above (You)r post which was made by a professional engineer>'muh falling rate'kek. It's not possible to "hit" """""the floor below it""""" because it only has 6 feet to even gather momentum.That's why the 'pancake theory' *******THAT (You) ARE PIMPING HERE TWENTY-FIVE YEARS LATER******* was totally debunked long ago. It's 2nd-grader fairy tale nonsense,memeflag 3 pbtid
>>532348730>hurr durrFalse Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda | FULL DOCUMENTARY>https://rumble.com/v22ku8uhttps://rumble.com/v22ku8u
>>532340595Did those planes also nearly completely disappear in a skyscraper and supposedly caused a fire above 900°C despite being oxygen starved.
>>532340771We know that our understanding of the universe is limited, despite the claim we know it better than our oceans.We have evidence nature constants are not that constant.Like them being different in far off areas of the universe and having been different in the past.
>>532340854The outside and core structure of the building were massive steel columns.Like 210 or so in total, the plane damaged like 10 of those at best.The building is also made to withstand that leverage asit has a huge attack area for wind.
>>532341062Nice that the corner damage makes it fall into itself from the center.
>>532344914Was it also created from a dense array of some of the biggest strongest steel columns mankind ever made?
>>532345065Yeah there is a reason they always try to distract with soft instead of acknowledging the melting part.
>>532346258Oh so the smaller top parts somehow made up 50% of the buildings total weight.Wow very impressive
>>532349296>11 secondsAfter the impact? Yes full of shit post.
>>532339672Anyone who doesn't fully understand the entire thing was a controlled demo is willfully ignorant
>>532339672Waffle theory
Why didn't they just say that the terrorists also planted bombs in the buildings? It would make the story much more believable.
>>532340295>Mossad agent on the ground lights a cigarette >keeps the lighter lit, puts cig in mouth, pulls out passport from pocket>pages the rooftop dance team to start celebrating>pages the Pentagon team to shoot the rocket launcher at the portion of the building doing the 2.1 trillion audit9/11 is der boomers greatest sin, all media journos complicit on this day will have their names known. Maybe that should be what I work on, writing a book/compilation of these state actors and the ritual they chose to do two decades ago.
>>532339736Imagine doing a pre scripted Communist struggle session against a building where the questioners and the answerers are all on the same side. Makes me think commies aren't trustworthy. Who knew.
controlled demolition. Israel and the CIA did 9/11 to enrage America in to fighting Israel's wars for them.Iran was the last country on the PNAC's list of nations the USA would be used to destroy for Israel. after that, who cares what happens to the USA? they'll be the sacrificial chicken blamed for Iran War while Greater Israel is blameless bibib dindu nuffins.
>>532351097>Was it also created from a dense array of some of the biggest strongest steel columns mankind ever made?>>532345172>World Trade Center One and Two steel frame skyscrapers were each designed in 1966 to survive the impact of a fully loaded Boeing 707 smashing into them at 600 mphyou put a lot of faith in the engineers' claims
>>532349445They really love numbers
>>532339808You know what's interesting? I could look up an article from cnn on the day of and they were putting out this narrative before even building 7 fell. Some glowie plant was on cnn saying the same shit almost word for word within an hour of the building falling. It's complete bullshit and defies newtons third law.
>>532339672Ask the dancing jews about it, they know
>>532340696Of course, they removed and sold the steal without doing any analysis
>>532339672It's called (((accordion failure))) in structural engineering, basically some of the columns (((supposedly failed))) when the plane went through or whatever, causing a single storey to collapse which can trigger a domino effect wherein successive storeys below the failing column also fail since the building is technically unstable or the dynamic loading of the falling single storey is enough to push the entire building downwards causing the entire building to collapse (very unlikely desu-desu). Also Mosad did this BTW.
>>532342817The most damning part of the cinematic lead up propaganda were the phone calls supposedly made from 30Kft in the air. No cell phone could ever be made from that high and one woman even whispers "its a frame" into the phone before hanging up. The planes were swapped with UAV's, which is why the transponders and flight paths of the planes were wonky (explains the ghost plane as well), then once the swap was done and the real boeings were landed in military bases the phonecalls were made before murdering the innocent people on the flights.
All the bullshit about HOW the towers collapsed is a red herring to stop you thinking about WHO targeted them and why.
>>532356549>from 30Kft in the air.How do you know the altitude
>>532339808How much does the ADL pay you per post?
>>532340527The weight of the upper floors would crush the lower structure unevenly, the steel frame is designed to redistribute loads, and here we see lower floors perfectly failing in a synchronized sequence. Destroying a few floors near the top wouldn’t produce a neat vertical collapse, it would likely just leave the building standing, or partially collapse in unpredictable ways.
>>532339672Play Jenga, have a realization.
>>532339672If you actually open your eyes and look at the collapse footage. You can clearly see the collapse starts at the impact site. The towers had pretty delicate design, and having a chunk of themselves falling down onto the rest is not something they could survive.
>>532357585>chunk of themselves falling down onto the restWhy did the chunk fall at the same time and at a perfect angle+, going all the way down? Do you know why demo crews rig bottom floors with explosives? If they only knew they didn't need to do it... Could have saved a lot of time and mone.
>>532356549probably a military base leased to the Israelis as they would have fewer qualms and the chance of a leak would be lower.
>>532357743All american military bases are israeli bases
>>532341211it didn't fall evenly
>>532342289The explosives are what brought down the towers and the plane hits were theater. Flight 93 was supposed to hit building 7 but didn't so they set off the explosives anyways. You can see the explosives go off on the building 7 collapse video and eye witnesses states they heard explosions when all 3 towers collapsed.
>>532357743And they probably blocked a lot of leaks by outright killing the leakers or telling them this risks our relationship with our key ally
>>532339672its dominoes nigga, the weight of the tower above the impact area is now falling into the area at and below the impact which the building was never meant to be able to handle that increase in force, so it all comes down exactly how you saw on tv nigga even a 5 year old can understand it
>>532339672>>532339736>>532339808no matter how much they repeat the lies, the answer will always be controlled demolition and false flag
>>532357870It would topple 100%https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om6b0_ffyFQ
