[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Space.jpg (227 KB, 1080x952)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
Prove to me the moon landing did or didn't happen.

I don't just mean a robot driving around on the surface, or putting some equipment on the moon. I mean humans actually walking on the surface of the moon.

I'm actually being serious.
>>
>>532352889
I cant. I dont know. I am honest.
>>
>>532352889
the man walking there had a phonecall with your president
they have their names written inside stars in the place where actors are celebrated
the actual spaceship looks like a third grade alluminium science project
we never went back again
your president had a phonecall with one of the guy walking on the moon
the guy walking on the moon had a phonecall with your president
a phone call
on the moon
moshi moshi ? ah hai mr presidento estoy en la luna, como estas ?
>>
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The claimant needs the proof. The default position is nothing happened.
>>
>>532352889
All the arguments against it are retarded and can be falsified with 5 minutes of looking it up.
Like the Van Allen Belt objection you hear from guys like Rogan is completely retarded once you look at the trajectory of the rocket, the exposure time and the construction of the cockpit vis-a-vis the kind of radiation the astronauts were exposed to.
>>
>>532353196
what about the phonecall? and why we cant see cameras now.
>>
>>532353196
I'm still 50/50.
>>
>>532352889
Just like nukes - why wouldn't the us fake it? Its easier, cheaper, and who's gonna do anything about it?
>>
File: 1581101688545.webm (2.85 MB, 1280x720)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
>>532352889
arguments against:
- NASA means "deception" in hebrew (i cannot find any evidence of this claim)
- pic related. it appears that people in those vids are at best in 0g (low earth orbit. such as those experiments with water standing still in the air), and at worst attached to strings like in a movie set
- buzz aldrin (and possible others) was a freemason, and was once asked to swear on the bible that he went to the moon. instead of doing that, he punched the guy in the face
- the USSR was first to launch a satellite (sputnik), first to launch an animal (dog, laika) a man (gargarin) and woman (i don't remember her name). they were the first to orbit the moon i think, and a few others. for example even the modern "international space station" is the russian one, as the american one crashed, so the USSR just shared. clearly there was propaganda and backroom deals, so it's possible the USA was allowed to "win" the cold war, in exchange for geo-political soviet interests etc.
- the earth is flat (i cannot find any evidence of this claim)
- basically all the data relating to this mission (how to build the rocket, the computer data, etc etc) was deleted it "routine record keeping", as in, the knowledge was lost
- the films from the moon landing appear to be filmed in a desert / movie set. with no stars, but a camera somehow following the rising space ship etc

1/2
>>
>>532353543
arguments for:
- there were some kind of antena / receivers or whatever placed on the surface of the moon, and they have been used to reflect lights or something like that
- a popular white nationalist (black pilled / devon stack) claims to have calculated the delay time (from the official videos) it took for the phone call between richard nixon and apollo 11, and says it matches what it should be (the guy has experience with radios or something)
- the USSR / enemies of the USA are mad for losing the space race, so they spread propaganda for something they couldn't do
- "it's never been done again" because there's no point and it's too expensive and risky, not because it can't be. the old shuttle etc was scrapped because nobody makes such shitty electronic parts anymore anyway, not to hide that it was a lie
- some of the moon footage WAS fake, but that was clearly marked when it aired. there was no way to get a camera up there, so they pre-filmed it to simulate for TV. people today who "prove" it was fake do so out of ignorance or bad faith
- i don't really know either way, and some of the stuff i've listed is likely me misremembering. so either ask chat GPT to fact check me, or watch some youtube debate on the subject.

but it was done by christians, so i use it to dab on the pagans / infidels either way
>>
>>532352889
40 this year, all i can Tell you is i don’t Even Trust my own Memory.
Technically speaking it probably happened, with way more deaths and Not what they Showed us

Anon, i‘d be scared if i couldn‘t leave this planet
>>
They went to low earth orbit, but never actually landed on the moon. There are continuity errors in the official record. The original film has been destroyed. Armstrong wouldn't swear on the bible. The moon landing propaganda was designed to bankrupt the USSR and it worked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvxw_OKQWDg&t=19s



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.