This changes everything. It turns out that the color pink doesn’t actually exist. If they have been able to convince us all that pink is real, what else have (((they))) lied about?https://www.businessinsider.com/pink-light-doesnt-really-exist-2015-8
>>532384030
>>532384030it's the genocide of colors
>>532384030>it doesn't exist>but we can still see it>DUURRRa thread died for this kike faggotry
it's just red but lighter, like how brown is orange but darker
>>532384030I HECKIN LOVE SCIENCERINO!
>"I fucking love science!"I dislike this retard fake science bullshit.
>>532384327BTW, Nye decided comedy was a better line of employment than Boeing engineer.
>>532384030>else have (((they))) lied about?7th colour of the rainbow (((violet))) isn't real either, Newton just wanted to find 7 colours
Anyone with even the most basic understanding of how light and colour work knows that this is horseshit.Not /pol/, in any case, and assuredly a slide thread.sage
>>532384030>can see pink in nature>can combine pink from blue and red paint and light>picture in the article literally contains pink>NOOOOOOO DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EYES!!!!!!!!this is a litmus test for goyimabilityif you fall for it you are the biggest goy
>>532384059No colors "exist" in an objective sense, it's just a perceptual phenomenon we experience. Visible light waves are "objectively" as "invisible" as x-rays or radio waves except for the fact that our retinas react to them and our brain parses that information as color
>>532384030There is no wave length that corresponds to pink or magenta or brown ..etc. When your eyes are purple and red light it resolves them as magenta. This also applies to blue and yellow light. Your eyes resolve them as a "fake" green. As opposed to true green which is on the em spectrum
>>532384030This whole thing is just dumb semantic nonsense. Not every color we perceive corresponds to a single wavelength of light, but so what, who gives a shit, this is not some profound thing. These non-pure colors still exist, they are just made up of a mixture of different wavelengths.
Color is the way the brain represents information coming from several types of light-sensitive cells, each type reacting to a range of wavelengths. So yes, there would be colors that don't correspond to one wavelength. Saying that a wavelength IS a colors is wrong.
>>532384030Science has gone mad
>>532384030Brown is actually orange.
>>532384763In theory, this could be a clickbait title for a reasonable article talking about perception of color. In practice though we know that popular science is cancer and it's impossible to learn anything useful on the Internet unless we have a specific learning goal.
>>532384611Too bad kike. I'm believing the opposite of what you want me to believe 100 times out of 100.
>>532384059brown is like this too. it's just a dark orange/red
>>532384205>>532384271>>532384611where is the pink on this rainbow?
>>532384059it's right there nigger
>>532384658Excuse me retard I can see colour
>>532384030If pink doesn't real then I just invented it and now everything using it has to pay me.
Same with brown
>>532384870Yes and no. When you see brown on screen, you see a combination of red and green dots, without any "orange" wavelengths involved.
>scientists say>studies suggest >experts find>87% believe that
>>532384030Your mother.
>>532384030>>532384059>doesnt know how human photoreceptor cones work Go back to school, retarded nigger
>>532384059>this color doesnt exist because it doesnt have its own wavelength!!!!!>reddit gold kind stranger!!!!When I go outside and look at the colors around me Im not looking for a wavelength Im looking for the colors hitting my eyes
>>532385718thats magenta
>>532385718this is artificial. in natural spectrums pink, purple, brown etc don't exist
>>532384030ive seen a vagina and can so confirm that yes, pink is real
>>532385169trvke
>>532384030Another day another psyop. Thanks (((Science!)))
>>532384278The left side of pic already has some jewedness to it
>>532384030Wait so I'm not nuts for perceiving pink and purple as the same color?
>>532386227did you seen it on the internet?
>>532386369not exclusively so
>>532384030Is this like how the sky isn't really blue and how your eyes aren't really green or some shit?
>>532385848Only ((Pantone)) is allowed to do that.
>>532384030Words for colours correspond to the sensation of the perception of colour, and differ from language to language; this is not science.It is a semantical game operated by a well paid imbecile.
>>532384030>color pink doesn’t actually existMaybe you virgins don't know this but vaginas are pink
>>532384658>no colours exist in an objective senseCOLOUR IS LITERALLY WAVELENGTH. IT IS AS OBJECTIVE AS YOU CAN BE.Dumb faggot.>but what aboutStop assuming your cones are telling the truth.
>>532387735Chat, is this real?
>>532384278> real science is what I want to hear and confirms my priors
>>532384030science being attacked by leftist nutters
