[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Artemis II under 100k.png (1.09 MB, 1432x891)
1.09 MB
1.09 MB PNG
The Orion spacecraft is now within 100,000 miles of the Moon, with less than 2 days remaining before its lunar flyby. Please come and join us to discuss all things Artemis II.

>Artemis II Mission
Artemis II NASA's first crewed mission to the Moon in over 50 years. Launched on April 1, 2026, the four-person crew is currently on a ~10-day lunar flyby mission aboard the Orion spacecraft. This is the first time humans have traveled beyond low Earth orbit since Apollo 17 in 1972. The flight is testing systems and operations for future lunar landings and Mars missions.

>Live Coverage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3kR2KK8TEs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RwfNBtepa4

>Mission Trackers
https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis-ii/arow/
https://artemis-ii-tracker.com/
https://issinfo.net/artemis.html

>The Crew
Reid Wiseman (Commander) - Navy test pilot and former ISS astronaut.
https://www.nasa.gov/people/reid-wiseman/
Victor Glover (Pilot) - Navy aviator, first black astronaut to live aboard the ISS, and Crew-1 pilot.
https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/astronauts/victor-j-glover/
Christina Koch (Mission Specialist) - Record holder for longest single spaceflight by a woman (328 days).
https://www.nasa.gov/people/christina-koch/
Jeremy Hansen (Mission Specialist) - Canadian Space Agency astronaut, fighter pilot and physicist.
https://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/astronauts/canadian/active/bio-jeremy-hansen.asp

>What is Orion?
Orion is NASA's deep space exploration spacecraft designed to take humans to the Moon and beyond. This is its first crewed flight.
https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/orion-spacecraft/

>Photos
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/artemis-ii-astronauts/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/journey-to-the-moon/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/artemis-ii-launch/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/artemis/

>Additional Reading
https://www.nasa.gov/mission/artemis-ii/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(spacecraft)
>>
File: jsc2023e016432-alt4.jpg (3.78 MB, 5878x5878)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB JPG
>>
File: art002e000192.jpg (3.46 MB, 5568x3712)
3.46 MB
3.46 MB JPG
>>
>>532399649
good idea and nice list of links. too bad we all know how such a general is going to work out.....
>>
it's weird how space travel is both fake and greatly detailled in elon musk brain
>>
>>532399649
This is /pol/ not /sci/; no one believes in space here
>>
>>
>>532399649
Very fascinating stuff OP.

I am still waiting for our first ever pictures of Earth from space. 50 years overdue. Did we still forget to bring a camera with us? Shoot!
>>
>>532399649
have to say im starting to really like the Orion module after seeing it in operation. so much damn room in there for 4 people, its great. im so used to seeing footage from inside the Apollo CM and LM that this thing looks like a giant space yurt or something. really good.
>>
This shit is even more fake and gay than the "war in iran" lmao. kys space faggots
>>
>>532399879
We brought a leaf onboard? What are we? Retarded?
>>
>>532400328
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/journey-to-the-moon/
>>
>>532399649
based
>>
File: 1775127850717367.jpg (33 KB, 330x314)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
It's happening!
>>
File: 1574344169068.png (364 KB, 1868x1602)
364 KB
364 KB PNG
>>532400462
Proof DEI isn't dead yet.
>>
File: 173409099400494874.jpg (74 KB, 474x499)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>532399953
Nice cgi lol, fuckin bullshit
>>
File: stanley kubrick.jpg (64 KB, 630x1200)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>532400478
>>532399953
Very fascinating. My favorite part is when the photo editors can't decide whether space should have stars or not.

Hopefully on our next visit to the moon in 2066 we can invent video cameras!
>>
>>532399649
when it pass by the moon will we get low quality ai renders of the flyby?
asking for a friend
>>
>>532400826
this stupid point has been answered 9000 times already and i dont believe you missed them all. you can't seriously be so ignorant of how cameras work.
>>
File: Fantaistic 4.jpg (31 KB, 474x266)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
So when is the Fantastic 4 going to pass through the Van Allen radiation belt?
>>
File: 1775174820345100.png (510 KB, 1340x874)
510 KB
510 KB PNG
UH OH STINKY
>A burning smell from the toilet is not something you'd want to experience on Earth, so when it happened to NASA's Artemis 2 astronauts on the way to the moon — well, you can bet Mission Control was listening.
>Late Friday (April 3), as NASA's Artemis 2 mission passed the halfway mark to the moon, the four astronauts on board reported a burning smell coming from their novel Orion space toilet.
>"For me, it was some sort of burning odor, and then it was definitely in the hygiene bay," said Artemis 2 mission specialist Jeremy Hansen of the Canadian Space Agency. "And when I opened up the hygiene bay, the rest of the crew could smell it pretty much immediately."
>>
>>532399649
"J'Quarium Jackson, HNIC reporting for duty!"
>>
>>532400957
I've seen multiple livestreams of "Earth" from "Space" where the stream glitches and the Earth becomes invisible, revealing the superimposed constellations behind it. Nobody "watching it" seems to notice it (because they're bots, not people).

But yes, go ahead and give me some scientific equation as to why stars magically appear and disappear depending on the competency level of the Masonic scum "filming" this shit.
>>
File: l-intro-1647456078.jpg (275 KB, 1600x900)
275 KB
275 KB JPG
>>532399649
BULLSHITTERS II mission...fly 52 circles in low Earth orbit...
>>
on board video?
>>
File: TrustNASA.jpg (290 KB, 770x433)
290 KB
290 KB JPG
>>532400627
Hey friend, I see you're enjoying this show too...
>>
>>532401646
fairly often yeah.
>>
>>532399953
I'm guessing this was a long exposure of the dark side of Earth, that's Venus in the lower right.
>>
>>532401404
What is the video in your post meant to show? It cuts from shuttle footage (which hasn't flown in a long time) to what (I assume) is a view from the ISS showing nighttime earth just after passing the terminator.

As to "maybe they'll invent video cameras!" there is a livestream you can watch where artemis transmits intermittently, as well as the entire launch event being livestreamed.
>>
>>532400478
https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/fd02_for-pao/
https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-art002e000193/

What's going on here?
>>
>>532400993
already did
>>
File: file.png (257 KB, 738x574)
257 KB
257 KB PNG
Anyone ever read up on how much more difficult Mars is to get to? Most people think that landing on Mars will be kind of like landing on the moon.
Mission duration:
>Moon: 8-12 days total
>Mars: 2-3 years total
Radiation:
>Moon: A few mSv
>Mars: 500-1650+ mSv
Communication delay:
>Moon: 1.3 seconds
>Mars: ~14 minutes
The Mars spacecraft will have to land within 7 minutes, and it takes 14 minutes for them to communicate with it from Earth. By the time we receive the message that the spacecraft is landing, it'll have already either landed or crashed.
60% of unmanned missions to Mars have failed thus far, although recent missions have better success. Though, even if the crew lives, there's a good chance they'll get cancer later on.
>>
>>532401404
My God! It's full of stars!
>>
File: 1775175626580802.jpg (13 KB, 319x319)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>>532401775
>injection burn
>>
SPACE IS FAKE
IT'S NOT REAL
“outer space” isn’t an infinite vacuum at all, but a carefully constructed illusion bounded by a firmament—an advanced barrier or field that contains our atmosphere and defines the limits of our world? In that framework, the precise movements of stars and planets wouldn’t prove a vast cosmos, but rather a highly ordered system—possibly fixed or projected within that boundary. Every image we’ve ever seen of Earth from orbit, every deep space photo, all come through institutions like NASA, meaning our belief in space is based on trust in mediated data, not firsthand experience. The question of how a pressurized atmosphere exists next to a vacuum without a physical divide becomes a central issue, one the firmament neatly explains, while places like Antarctica—heavily restricted and governed—raise further questions in this model about whether there are limits we’re not meant to reach. It’s not about saying it’s true—it’s about asking how much of what we accept is directly known versus carefully presented.
>>
>>532401912
How can space be real if our eyes aren't real?
>>
Let us know when DEI team mate crashrs
>>
Almost there, the moon sure is far...
>>
>>532401775
two different shots with different exposure settings. taken 19 seconds apart.
>>
What if everything we’ve been told about space is wrong? Not just mistaken—but constructed. The idea here is simple but unsettling: “outer space” isn’t an infinite vacuum, it’s a contained system bounded by a firmament, where the stars and planets are part of a designed structure rather than distant worlds. In that same lens, aliens aren’t travelers from galaxies far away—they’re something much older, non-physical entities that humanity used to describe as demons, now rebranded in a technological age. The patterns line up: strange encounters, paralysis, telepathic communication, reality-warping experiences—these aren’t nuts-and-bolts spacecraft behaviors, they’re something else entirely. And every image, every mission, every piece of “proof” we have comes filtered through institutions like NASA, meaning most people never directly verify any of it themselves. So the question isn’t “is it true?”—it’s why the modern story of space and aliens mirrors older spiritual frameworks so closely, just dressed up in science instead of religion.
>>
File: 1575952200095.png (118 KB, 680x544)
118 KB
118 KB PNG
>>532401813
One way trips are a lot easier, for the sake of planting a flag there are plenty that would sign up.
And yea, the radiation is the biggest issue with very long missions.
>>
>>532402014
they end up going soooo sloooow
>>
File: 1616889218333.png (578 KB, 678x619)
578 KB
578 KB PNG
>>532401765
>>532401822
It is remarkable how many times I've posted that clip and how the shills all can't seem to notice the stars clearly visible on the Earth.

My guess is LLMs. They really can't interpret images let alone videos well.
>>
>>532401667
I really when they launched did their roll how they were dam near horiztional in their trajectory lmao, sloppy job as always but, the space goyims are fuckin retarded niggers who believe it all lol
>>
>>532399649
>risking the crew just to get some pics of the moon when this mission could have been easily done going around the earth
big oof by NASA
>>
>>532402251
“Mars” isn’t a physical planet you could travel to, but a visible object within a contained sky system—part of the firmament—appearing as a wandering light with predictable motion rather than a distant world; all the imagery and rover data attributed to Mars comes through institutions like NASA, meaning the public never directly verifies its existence as a place, only as a visual phenomenon in the sky, so within this framework Mars becomes less a destination and more a component of a controlled celestial display, consistent, observable, but not necessarily what we’re told it is.
>>
File: AFRC2026-0068-02~orig.jpg (3.55 MB, 6195x4130)
3.55 MB
3.55 MB JPG
>Reid Wiseman (White man, Commander)
165 days in space + 2 spacewalks (~13 hours EVA). Former NASA Astronaut Office Chief, ISS Expedition 40/41 flight engineer. Navy test/fighter pilot with combat deployments. Holds BS and MS in systems engineering. Selected as NASA astronaut in 2009. Strong overall record.
>Victor Glover (Black man, Pilot)
168 days in space + 4 spacewalks (~26 hours EVA). Piloted NASA’s first operational SpaceX Crew Dragon mission (Crew-1). U.S. Navy Captain and elite test pilot (U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School graduate) with 3,500+ flight hours in 40+ aircraft, 24 combat missions. Holds multiple advanced degrees (MS in Flight Test Engineering, Systems Engineering, and Military Operational Art & Science). Selected as NASA astronaut in 2013. Played college football and wrestled. Married father of four girls.
>Christina Koch (White woman, Mission Specialist)
328 days in space + 6 spacewalks (42 hours 15 minutes EVA). Holds the record for longest space flight by any woman. Bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering and physics and a master's in electrical engineering. Selected as NASA astronaut in 2013. Conducted hundreds of experiments on her 328-day ISS mission (Expeditions 59/60/61). Spent 3.5 years in the U.S. Antarctic Program, including a winter-over at the South Pole, where she endured -111F/-79.4C temperatures. Participated in firefighting/search-and-rescue teams.
>Jeremy Hansen (White man, Mission Specialist)
0 days in space + 0 spacewalks. Royal Canadian Air Force fighter/test pilot (CF-18) with physics background (BS in space science + MS in physics) and extensive analog training (NEEMO, CAVES). First Canadian to lead NASA astronaut class training. Selected by CSA in 2009. No orbital experience.
>>
>>532399649
the earth is flat bud.
>>
File: 1775125913805654.png (1.02 MB, 900x1012)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB PNG
>>532402332
Yep. Wouldn't want it to end up like their last disaster where all victims conveniently resurrected and went on to live comfy lives.
>>
File: Orbing.png (1.66 MB, 1920x1080)
1.66 MB
1.66 MB PNG
>>532402362
Well I don't have a rocket so yea all I can see is that big red ball in my telescope.
>>
>>532400826
>>532401404
look closely and you can see the lights on the ground in the artemis pic.
thats because its the night side of the earth, with the exposure cranked up.
thats why you see stars in it.
quit acting like a dumb nigger will ya?
>>
>>532402369
That's very great and all, but what about their REAL qualifications:

>masonic degree (33 preferred)
>blood drinking specialist
>moloch/baal burnt offerings
>trips to Western Wall
>baby cannibalization rituals

This is the important stuff. Let's stop with all that fluff. Do you even Epstein bro?
>>
>>532402369
The leaf is literal dead weight, kek.
>>
>>532402369
Saves your mission by emergency landing the shuttle
>>
File: 1493107791337.webm (2.9 MB, 1280x720)
2.9 MB
2.9 MB WEBM
>>532402541
>you can see the lights on the ground in the artemis pic.
And?
>thats why you see stars in it.
Last time I checked I didn't see any massive spots of star light radiating down on the Earth which would be visible from space.

Quick!
>invent a scientific equation that sounds smart to deboonk my eyeballs!
>>
>>532402591
Apollo crews often had a rookie along too. im still not sure why exactly the leaf was selected but its a nice flight to be on. good for him
>>
>>532399649
i just cant bring myself to care
>>
>>532402369
>three american chads
accomplished. competent. diverse
>canadian chud
yt soi boi who was never to space before

canada is so pathetic
>>
Why won't they land on the moon
>>
>>532400957
>this stupid point has been answered 9000 times
You can't photograph stars?
>>
>>532402737
Ok hoser
>>
>>532402790
You'd never say that to a Canadians face
Little bitch boy
>>
>>532399649
>>532399953
Artemis II is sci-fi related, it's politically correct government psy-op nonsense, has nothing to do with /politically incorrect/.

Go to >>>/x/ with your computer graphics, faggot
>>
>>532402831
sure you can.
>>
>>532402725
That's not a chroma key, retard.why would you have a blue screen with white lines that would just ruin the effect? I'm not scientist, but the grid would be so you can determine size and distance and also make things more easily visible against that backdrop than a bunch of shit in the craft.
>>
File: 1661227604719150.webm (2.81 MB, 700x392)
2.81 MB
2.81 MB WEBM
>>532403080
Why are you asking me? That's NASA's footage.
>>
>>532402369
You're calling a jew 'white man'
>>
>>532402725
>Last time I checked I didn't see any massive spots of star light radiating down on the Earth which would be visible from space.
im not really sure what you are trying to say here
basically you're see the night side of earth being lit by a full moon.
its not very complicated.
the high exposure makes the stars visible.
why is this hard for you to understand?
>>
File: NASA High Command.jpg (430 KB, 1159x637)
430 KB
430 KB JPG
>>532399649
The guy on the Xylophone there has the most important job on the overnight shift.
>>
>>532402737
Yea, he sure is a lucky bastard.
>>
it gets really tedious reading discussions on this with every teenager saying xD its fake

you should build a time machine to 2011 when this was even a slightly hot take online

like yeah yeah i get it. is it necessary to spam every thread with the same pictures and shit? fucking schizo mutts jesus christ
>>
>>532402976
Where are they then?
>>
>>532399953
so now we have two suns huh?
and you retards buy into this?
>>
File: moon shart.jpg (131 KB, 1152x635)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>532399649
There are no stars because that there's the moon they're headed to, and the stars are a lot further away.
>>
>>532402432
I saw a website that said the 7th guy died in a car accident in the 90's. This was back in 2014 when it was posted.
>>
File: 1635510906344.webm (2.54 MB, 1280x720)
2.54 MB
2.54 MB WEBM
>>532403161
>you're see the night side of earth being lit by a full moon.
Nothing to do with it.

>high exposure makes the stars visible.
No, the "high exposure" does not cause the Earth to become invisible with superimposed stars in the background shoop replacing it.
>>
File: 1620898844499.jpg (238 KB, 796x1200)
238 KB
238 KB JPG
>>532403793
>survive spontaneously combusting in a rocket ship
>taken out by a drunk driver

damn thats rough.
>>
File: moon sight.jpg (112 KB, 1165x631)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>532399649
There are no stars because you can't actually photograph stars. You can see them with your eyes because your eyes adjust to the light but cameras can't adjust like that.
A lot of people don't understand how science works.
>>
>>532399879
are these zogbots or just DEI fags?
>>
>>532399649
Reporting for duty on Shartemis II, saar!
>>
plebbiters have too many generals now, this, ptg, uhg, chug,... yikes
>>
>>532403822
>No, the "high exposure" does not cause the Earth to become invisible with superimposed stars in the background shoop replacing it.
huh?
>>
>>532404112
A chairforce and navy guy, the cunt spent a lot of time in space and the leaf is just a pilot.
>>
>>532401404
the "stars" in this clip are dead pixels from radiation hitting the CCD over time
>>
>>532404146
Just don't spam "CANADA NUMBER 1!!!!!"
>>
File: 1775348993716797.jpg (84 KB, 1070x661)
84 KB
84 KB JPG
>>532404362
>>532404444
>be NASA
>>
>>532399649
Hope they dont die.

If this was the 90's they'd get their own animated series/ saturday morning cartoon after all this.
>>
>>532404552
That one is a night time HDR photo with a (nearly) full moon and high exposure. Different versions with different post-processing.
>>
>>532399649
They had a pre-launch press conference in which they underscored the most important points of the mission
- Progressive social politics
- Unracialisms
- All American Hopium
- Africans can operate machinery
- Women can do more than just put make-up on everything
- Canadians are diverse

Then - in the words of the TV host - it was "coffee and donuts and off to the moon".
>>
>>532402284
It's really curious how he stopped replying to you.
>>
>>532403141
The astronaut was doing an educational demonstration about orbits. The flat background and the grid make it easier to measure the movement of the ball. The video has been posted a million times.
>>
>>532404552
those were taken like 30 secs apart with different exposure settings.
how fucking stupid are you to think when they tweeted it is when they took it?
>>
File: 16111290846011.jpg (59 KB, 960x540)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>532404826
>>532405118
>>532405021
>LLMs
>>
>>532404552
>"Even in darkness, we glow"
Based Dark-NASA glowniggers.
>>
>>532405326
Your response makes no sense regarding my post. You're clearly some kind of retarded troll.
>>
File: makes you think.jpg (78 KB, 1024x576)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
>>532401404

So you retard can't tell apart stars and dirt on a window? Look at that fucking video at 0:40, the upper right corner, there you can see actual stars moving and the dust being still.
>>
>>532400446
Cope and seethe more, brainlet. You're being replaced by indians in your own country.
>>
You've got to remember that with NASA you're not just doing science. You're doing science with people who lie about EVERYTHING.
It's Science PLUS!

This is Americanism's Special Sauce apparently.
>>
>>532401987
Deep cut Nigerian
>>
File: 1623618531805.jpg (120 KB, 1024x509)
120 KB
120 KB JPG
>>532405408
>LLM can't sarcasm
>>532405481
Is it "dirt" or "exposure"?

Maybe you guys should have a meeting at the Epstein HQ for blood drinking and raping kids in the name of Moloch to decide what story you're going to gaslight us with.
>>
>>532399649
>Lunar fly by
Wait.. are they not actually going to the moon, they're just flying near it? Why is this space trip getting so much attention?
>>
>>532402284
You can see when the camera is being moved that there are other stars relative to the horizon. It's two feeds overlapping. You've never edited video before so how could you possibly understand what you're looking at?
>>
American-Jewish Lies Destroy Everything of Quality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp7ULjb7S4Q
>>
>>532404444
>>532405481
So is it pixels or dirt? It only took you guys years to come up with those excuses, wow. And in that last part the whole video is shaking for some reason, and the glow of the sun doesn't match the curvature of the earth, almost as if somebody was fucking around with the setup they're using to record this...
>>
>>532405326
>dumb nigger brain cant understand how a camera works, or that the time they tweeter the pics might not be the time they took the pics
>hurr you must be chat gpt
kek
it's like im trying to explain a carburetor to a mouse
>>
>>532399649
Finally, an actually good thread on /pol/.
>>
>>532405722
They put some people in their tin can this time unlike artemis 1 to set some records like distance from Earth and reentry speed.
More or less to demonstrate the capsule is safe unlike the shartliner.
>>
>>532405722
>Why is this space trip getting so much attention?
They're going to look at the moon's backside. It's a first for CGI and AI video.
>>
>>532404552
>two different accounts screenshotted by two different people at two different times in two different timezones
Wow you'r
Are you going to explain how nukes aren't real and the earth is flat next?
>>
>>532405864
Wow, never mind. Various shills and astroturfing campaigns have really done a number on this dogshit board. Thread is full of the same retard schizos as all the rest.
>>
Was that a bunch poop flying into space just now?
>>
File: 1725692665741001m.jpg (131 KB, 971x1024)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>532406265
Imagine the smell.
>Artemis 2 astronauts — now halfway to the moon — report 'burning smell' from toilet, but everything's fine
>Mission Control isn't concerned about the Orion toilet smell, but is looking into to it.
>>
Poop blizzard? WTF was he talking about
?
>>
File: 1595333100387.jpg (61 KB, 640x570)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
>>532406106
>>532405857
I noticed you conveniently ignored the posts where I candidly stated "you guys should have a meeting at the Epstein HQ for blood drinking and raping kids in the name of Moloch"

What's the matter? Don't like being exposed for the demonic filth you really are?
>>
They're telling you that various unmanned probes have been sent around the moon before - but no one has seen or photographed the dark side of the moon?
>>
>>532406265
Marking our territory.
>>
>>532406447
this one?
>i tell you why the artemis pic isnt fake
>UR A JEW LLM FUCKIN EPSTINER!!!
fucking kill yourself kek
im not interested in arguing all your stupid fucking flat earth shit.
i have been specifically talking about the artemis pic.
retard.
>>
>>532400225
Why is the foid always closest to the nigger during their live streams?
>>
>>532405805
The camera is inside the station looking out a window, so yes someone was adjusting it.
>>
>>532406589
And on the current trip, they are somehow incapable of filming snything.
They only managed to take one quick snapshit of earth through a porthole, on a 21MP D5 from 2016, at an ISO above 50k. NASA didn't have the budget for a decent camera, sadly.
>>
File: 1694277810737192.jpg (64 KB, 679x960)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>532406827
>Earth light up
3 hours later
>Earth dark, sunlight on other side!!
>clouds exactly the same

Yes, I'm sure it's all "exposure" and "post-processing".

Do you people ever get tired of lying? Holy shit I don't know how I'd live with myself if I were as dishonest as you.
>>
File: moon crew.jpg (418 KB, 1152x764)
418 KB
418 KB JPG
>"covfefe and donuts and then it's off to the moon"
I gotta point out that no one outside America believes this shit. It's quite embarrassing really.
This is final stage imperial delusion.
>>
>>532407049
>Kosher hand signs
So sad and pathetic.
>>
>>532403953
its impossible to photograph stars
lol
>>
File: 1666356300751550.jpg (210 KB, 726x1001)
210 KB
210 KB JPG
>>532407049
>2 different nasa twitters post 2 different images 3 hours apart that means they were taken 2 hours apart!!!
you're not even trying retard.
retarrrrd
how fucking stupid are you LMAO
>>
File: 1619504053164.jpg (141 KB, 760x543)
141 KB
141 KB JPG
>>532407404
>>
>>532407049
>reeeeeee why are these llm's lying to me
>either a liar or didnt even go look at the nasa's post
so were you lying or just fucking actually thought the time they posted them is when they took them?
>>
>>532399953
It looks so peaceful, bros.
>no wars
>no borders
>no crime
>no nig- *turns around*
sheeeit
>>
>>532406589
anon... it's dark on that side
>>
>>532407736
Why didn't they give the drones flashlights?
>>
>>532402541
>thats because
>thats why

This is that, and that is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-6jyIwHuyQ
>>
File: 1595345636290.jpg (129 KB, 679x960)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
>>532407703
>NASA caught shooping again
>tries to backpedal

Year 57 of waiting for NASA to release their first photo of space. I'm tired bros...
>>
>>532407794
that'd be a big flashlight
>>
>>532407656
wow that really got me anon im a flat earther now shit you're right.
>>532407939
>actually thought they were taken hours apart because they were posted hours apart by 2 different accounts
>n-no y-you are backtracking!!!!!!
which part is shooped in the artemis pics gorilla nigger?
>>
>>532399649
[Intro]
We have a poem here, it's called "Nigger On The Moon"
It was inspired by some nigger on the moon
So I wanna give credit where credit is due

[Verse]
A pajeet touched my sister Nell
With nigger on the moon
Her face and arms began to swell
And nigger's on the moon
I can't pay no doctor bills
But nigger's on the moon
Ten years from now I'll be payin' still
While nigger's on the moon
The Jews just upped my rent last night
Cause nigger's on the moon
No hot water, no toilets, no lights
But nigger's on the moon
I wonder why he's upping me?
Cause nigger's on the moon?
Well I was already giving him fifty a week
With nigger on the moon
Taxes taking my whole damn check
Junkies making me a nervous wreck
The price of food is going up
And as if all that shit wasn't enough:
A pajeet done touch my sister Nell
With nigger on the moon
Her face and arm began to swell
And nigger's on the moon
Was all that money I made last year
For nigger on the moon?
How come I ain't got no money here?
Hmm! Nigger's on the moon
Y'know I just 'bout had my fill
Of nigger on the moon
I think I'll send these doctor bills
Airmail special
To nigger on the moon
>>
File: 1616652652248.jpg (127 KB, 720x1007)
127 KB
127 KB JPG
>>532408213
>which part is shooped in the artemis pics
The part where they claim they are separate pictures despite being completely identical in everything except lighting.

The fact that you are damage controlling it with the zeal of 1000 satan-worshiping mason-kikes
>>
>>532408527
they arent identical dumbass.
load them up in gimp and look for yourself.
>>
File: 1616528087105.png (1.96 MB, 1620x1098)
1.96 MB
1.96 MB PNG
>>532408765
>don't trust your eyes!
>trust us satan-worshiping pedophiles!

How about no. You're going to Hell btw
>>
>>532401797
>already did
What are their resulting super powers?
>>
>>532408948
>wont even load 2 pictures into gimp to prove me wrong
yeah whatever faggot.
im pretty sure you are the llm at this point.
>>
File: 1616604428334.png (362 KB, 608x533)
362 KB
362 KB PNG
>>532409114
I should do that so you can ignore that just like you're ignoring the Challenger Disaster "victims" all still being alive?
>>
What created space and planets the way they are ? Why ? Why are there so many star systems and so much space between each?
>>
File: 777492194296.webm (2.89 MB, 600x336)
2.89 MB
2.89 MB WEBM
>>532409309
God.
>>
>>532408154
4u
>>
>>532409260
yeah sure they are bud.
you'd think they would at least change the names right.
>>
>>532402966
Based.
>>
>>532409363
Outrageous that they're allowed to go cutting strips in the firmament like that.
>>
>>532399879
why is this picture making me think of 80s gundam?
>>
File: 13477642.jpg (223 KB, 848x1216)
223 KB
223 KB JPG
How's it going globe's
>>
File: round earth proofs (1).jpg (351 KB, 2452x1916)
351 KB
351 KB JPG
some proofs the earth is round
>>
That feel when you just live in a giant world of Satan's cope
>>
File: flat earth cameras.jpg (450 KB, 2144x2121)
450 KB
450 KB JPG
some proofs that flat earth shills don't understand how cameras work
>>
File: flat refraction.jpg (478 KB, 3129x2031)
478 KB
478 KB JPG
some proofs that flat earth shills don't understand how light works
>>
File: 1692137395977405.png (1.39 MB, 1729x1818)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB PNG
flat earth shills. every hour of every day, 24 hours a day, for years. the same scripted arguments every thread. how could you possibly believe that's organic? its paid shill astroturfing.
>>
>>532402284
why would white people lie about the moon landing, are they jeet scammers
my respect to the western man has fallen
>>
File: 1766847180880489.jpg (477 KB, 2024x1024)
477 KB
477 KB JPG
you can debunk any moon hoax theory by spending a few minutes looking it up or asking an ai if you're lazy
>>
>>532409309
Someone farted basically, gravity and electromagnetism did the rest.
>>
File: 1671504322267627.webm (2.29 MB, 320x240)
2.29 MB
2.29 MB WEBM
>Sparkle Thrusters: Engage!
>>
>>532407708
kek
>>
File: 1775097170472729.webm (2.86 MB, 640x480)
2.86 MB
2.86 MB WEBM
>>532411411
>Cope, seethe, and dilate
>>
File: 1772840799497409.mp4 (429 KB, 1440x1080)
429 KB
429 KB MP4
>>532411780
I MUST GO BACK TO MY HOME PLANET
>>
>>532411780
When the Apollo 11 Lunar Module lifted off, its engine didn’t produce a visible flame like rockets on Earth. On Earth, rocket exhaust glows brightly because it interacts with air and oxygen, and the hot gases scatter light. On the Moon, there’s no air at all, so the exhaust expands instantly into a vacuum and becomes mostly invisible.

The “sparkly” effect you saw wasn’t the engine flame. It was lunar dust being blasted away from the surface. The Moon’s soil is very fine, and when the engine fires, it kicks up particles that catch the sunlight and look like glitter. Because there’s no air, the dust doesn’t swirl like smoke. Instead, it shoots out in clean arcs, which makes it look even more unusual.

The engine itself used hypergolic fuel, meaning the fuel and oxidizer ignite automatically when they come into contact. This creates a steady, efficient burn without a big fiery plume.

So the liftoff looks odd because your brain expects flames, smoke, and turbulence. Instead, you see almost no flame and only dust spraying outward, which gives it that eerie, unfamiliar appearance.
>>
>>532411780
Hilarious, none of their math adds up. Moons (((gravity))) is supposedly 1/6ths of the Earths but, to escape the Earth they need to be going 17,000MPH, meanwhile on the moon they escape with a party popper and some confetti lol
>>
>>532400462
We are frens :) thank you for taking us on your ship
>>
>>532409260
>>
File: 1666916684978231.webm (2.78 MB, 700x392)
2.78 MB
2.78 MB WEBM
>>532411968
>Please believe me bro it's definitely real bro they definitely perfectly panned the camera remotely from earth as this fake ass looking bullshit sparkled its way to the heavens Free Masons would never lie to us bro
Enjoy this video of a space craft made of aluminum foil.
>>
>>532411997
It links up with the command module which propels it out of orbit, some math required.
>>
>>532400993
They did that on day one
>>
>>532412172
can you think of a better lightweight insulation than aluminum foil, kapton, and mylar for reflecting radiant heat? yeah neither can anyone else, that's why they use it. and there's no wind to rip it off so its fine.

freemasons also believe in clouds and heavier than air flight, are those also fake? sure they lie but stop being a retard.
>>
>>532411997
It's not linear, how much thrust you need depends on how much weight you're carrying, and the lander was as light as possible and didn't have to carry nearly as much fuel.
>>
>>532411968
>It's a problem with your brain, goy.
>>
File: 1706676581006286.webm (3 MB, 750x422)
3 MB
3 MB WEBM
>>532412172
>Move over wooden doors in gas chambers, we've got a tarp on the space shuttle hatch coming through.
>>
>>532411780
but who was camera?
>>
>>532400446
Brown mindset.
>>
>>532412326
How fast is that piece of shit moving as it escapes the moons surface? Is it anywhere near 2,800MPH which is 1/6ths of what the Shartimus Jew 2 speed was when they "left the Earth"?
>>
>>532411780
>pop
>>
It's fascinating how any positive mention of the space program brings the well-poisoners out of the woodwork.
>>
>>532412587
yeah they really don't want us talking about this
>>
>>532412172
Their launch times are calibrated down to the precise moment. The delay time is knownas well, and the target speed of the vessel is known, so what exactly is supposed to be the impossible part about coordinating a camera to pan up? They didn't even get it right on their first try. Of all the things you could complain about, pressing a button at the right time is not a strong point.
>>
This is some Kerbal Space Program ahh shit.
>>
File: 1705460567680244.webm (2.23 MB, 720x576)
2.23 MB
2.23 MB WEBM
>>532412476
>It was real in my head: The post.
Fun game anons. Look up "real pictures of satellites" on Google images. The first one to post a non cgi render wins.
>>
>>532412480
>>532412535
see
>>532412541
Answer this retarded niggers
>>
>>532412496
its just a cover, probably for insulation. you think this is proof that space is fake? you think they're trying to convince us that fabric flap is an airtight door?
>>
>>532412496
>Air Lock sealed. Commence Decompression.
>>
File: 1666916733003438.webm (723 KB, 854x480)
723 KB
723 KB WEBM
>>532412677
>false
>>
>>532412587
You know, I'm willing to believe there are legitimate flat earthers here, not just glowies. If we just treat it like no one can seriously believe it, it's just as bad as the flerfs claiming everyone promoting space is a shill (as if the majority doesn't actually believe these things) or that every movie about space is funded to keep the lie alive (as if no one wants to write about space). Real people are capable of believing these things. I believe in responding in good faith, and if they really are shills they will fall apart easily.
>>
>>532412910
Everything I wrote was entirely accurate.
>>
>>532412541
Half the weight of the ascending stage was all fuel so minimal weight helps it accelerate to the speed it needs.
No atmosphere also helps it get up to speed as well.
>>
File: 1671504535588352.webm (3 MB, 490x370)
3 MB
3 MB WEBM
>>532412971
Everything you wrote is midwit cope at best, glowie propaganda at worst.
>>
>>532412846
a) satellites are far apart from each other by design
b) they're not trying to take pictures of other satellites, they're not designed for that
c) here's a picture of a satellite taken from another satellite, its rare but they do it sometimes
https://x.com/NASA_Landsat/status/1642954595377750027
>>taken on October 7, 2022. In them, we see Landsat 8 approaching WorldView-3, initially at a range of around 80 miles (129.9 kilometers) in the first image, with the final image showing a range of just over 56 miles (91.4 kilometers).
>>
>>532412587
I really don’t understand it, are we just not allowed to like something cool happening? Is it pure demoralizing, or are they just faggots?
>>
File: captcha1.png (182 KB, 1385x781)
182 KB
182 KB PNG
>>532399649
lol they forgot to add the stars
>>
I wonder who will be the first to goon their brains out on the moon.
>>
>>532413154
I specifically said "not cgi render" anon. Try again.
>>
>>532412913
yeah buddy i've tried that, they don't argue in good faith, you can prove them wrong by all shadow of a doubt, and they never admit they're wrong, and will come at you with the same shit you've already debunked a thousand times every thread. but by all means try it and you'll realize they're actually almost all shills
>>
Space is fake and gay
>>
>>532413166
You're worse than the dumbest migger.
>>
>>532413247
case in point. i responded in good faith here >>532413154
and this was his response >>532413231

see what i mean? these aren't organic people, they're shills. their tools are bad faith arguments, fallacies, pilpuls, and never admitting they're wrong
>>
>>532399649
That ""spacecraft"" full of ""astronauts"" is dropping onto Iran within 48 hours
>>
>>532413166
explained here >>532411549

but maybe they also have a special desire to discredit any space related theories that may come from here.
>>
File: 1671503704565831.webm (2.86 MB, 1280x720)
2.86 MB
2.86 MB WEBM
>>532413247
You are trying to explain how special effects from half a century ago are real. You can debunk any concept you want with a (((logical explanation))), but that doesn't make it real.
>>
>>532413034
How fast was it going?
>>
>>532413324
Wild to think we might be in a nuclear holocaust soon because of this blood-crazed homosexual.
>>
>>532413108
Everything I wrote about them knowing everything ahead of time - why would they NOT know that? Launch time - obviously they need to coordinate to dock with the orbiter and they're not just leaving at a whim. Launch speed - obviously it has been planned out well ahead of time so they can escape the moon's gravity and match the speed of the orbiter. Communication delay - will vary with atmospheric conditions and time of day but they would synchronize before launch.
So again, why would they not know any of this ahead of time? Or do you just not understand how they could coordinate a radio action with a delay at a specific time if they know the time, delay, and speed?
Concerning them taking multiple attempts, you can find footage of the failed pan from the previous mission.
This is all just me guessing what you're calling inaccurate because you won't actually say. Are you worried about being proved wrong?
>>
File: spacex-mouse (1).webm (2.07 MB, 640x480)
2.07 MB
2.07 MB WEBM
>>532413502
it's ice. also mice don't even look like that, with the big round mickey mouse cartoon ears. but you know thats ice, your job is well poisoning so all your arguments are retarded on purpose
>>
File: 1678362193505014.webm (2.94 MB, 486x360)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB WEBM
>>532413329
There is no good faith argument to be had. You're literally trying to convince people that paper mache is space worthy. You're so completely convinced that nothing could prove anything else. You see what you were taught to see and there is no evidence that could demonstrate anything else to you. The only option is to make fun of you because there is *nothing* that could convince you otherwise.
>>
>>532412480
>the lander was as light as possible
and yet dragging a 1000 pound jeep chassis up there for this retarded photo op when every OUNCE needed to be accounted is totally plausible for midwits.
>>
>>532413619
get ready for his response to your good faith argument. it will prove he's a shill. and that i'm right to be a dismissive asshole towards these shills
>>
>>532411968
AI kikebot)
>>
File: 1695921313108286.webm (270 KB, 600x336)
270 KB
270 KB WEBM
>>532413663
I bet you believe this is real too
>>
>>532413700
Holy shit, ever heard of something being covered by something else? This is some of the worst shilling I’ve ever seen
>>
File: 1769472948070107.webm (2.64 MB, 1000x720)
2.64 MB
2.64 MB WEBM
>only going 2000 mph at this stage
earth's gravity well is a bitch, huh?
>>
File: 1725242474475133.webm (1.9 MB, 800x450)
1.9 MB
1.9 MB WEBM
>>532413619
No one is arguing that a thing could not be timed with mathematics and foreknowledge of an event. The argument is the image itself. It's clearly fake. There is nothing you can say that will make this less obviously fake. Of course people can make plans and send radio signals, that's not being debated. Any luck on the real photo of a satellite?
>>
>>532413731
Yeah but we're talking about ascent. They didn't leave with the rover or the descent stage. The thrusters in the descent stage are more powerful (and for missions with the rover they had to descend starting from a lower orbit). That's how rocket science works, you start with a big rocket with lots of fuel and powerful engines and you can shed more and more for efficiency.
>>
>>532414127
the green screen is edited into this. what's your point?
>>
>>532413731
It was less than 500 pounds and they left it there. Saving every possible scrap of weight is important for getting off the moon more than for getting down
>>
File: imgg.png (72 KB, 600x600)
72 KB
72 KB PNG
>>532414127
sure, there is a whole community of amateur satellite photographers.
>>
>>532413731
they drove that rover many km that would have been too far and dangerous to moonwalk bounce to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2sjqmKeM5g

>>532413700
its just the lightweight insulation its not structural, the structure is underneath.

>>532413899
its an animation, it was never intended to fool anyone into thinking its real. it is very visibly on purpose an animation so that nobody would think it was real.

>>532413981
its not at all bad shilling. since their goal with well poisoning is to appear retarded, its working. they want the dumbest arguments possible
>>
File: 1686463961131253.webm (2.64 MB, 640x640)
2.64 MB
2.64 MB WEBM
>>532413981
>it has to be real, it just has to be
>>
not to mention the ISS.
just go buy a 3.5" questar and you can see it yourself lol
>>
File: zhalrppf9zdg1.jpg (338 KB, 2048x1435)
338 KB
338 KB JPG
>>532410104
With all of those launches smashing into the firmament, where's all the flaming debris that would be raining down on populated areas? Checkmate
>>
>>532414127
i already gave you a real photo of a satellite and you just called it "cgi" and moved on as i knew you would. you will have the same response to anything you're shown
>>
File: Experts.jpg (74 KB, 700x693)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>532399953
>image gen ai develops to the point of being near-indiscernable
>suddenly we are going back to the moon
Yeah ok nice pictures NASA, let's see some proof
>>
File: 1675567333103412.webm (1.04 MB, 640x360)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB WEBM
>>532414225
Lol man. That's all you can find?
>>
>>532414127
Forgive me for not knowing that if someone quotes my post and says "false", they don't actually mean anything I said was false.
I'm not really talking about the image. There's some shots that look like fucky claymation of the lander and Gemini missions, I don't have a response for that. I was only responding to this:
>they definitely perfectly panned the camera remotely from earth
That always irks me when people talk about it like it's impossible. It's a very rudimentary operation.
>>
File: LRV.webm (2.88 MB, 960x720)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB WEBM
>>532413731
>posting dogshit webms
schizos pls post high quality images and videos
>>
3 names on the chip in the craft on the trip. Wonder who else is on it and what it meant to them. It meant everything to us.
>>
File: dark-side (1).jpg (215 KB, 1080x1080)
215 KB
215 KB JPG
>>532414270
>>
>>532414463
"claymation"?

https://apolloinrealtime.org/17/ please point to the claymation in any of the 3 days of surface operations.

oh, you mean because people don't realize like the gemini cameras ran at 3fps or something?
>>
>>532413522
It only needs to get up to 1600m/s.
>>
File: 1705460111530703.webm (2.16 MB, 720x480)
2.16 MB
2.16 MB WEBM
>>532414344
I'm sorry but it's not a real photo anon. You provided a pixelated cgi video.
>>
>>532414463
just call him a faggot paid shill and move on, you will never in a million years get through to him or get him to admit anything. because he already knows you're right, he's just a lying shill.
>>
>>532414592
you can see his face passing in front of the shuttle, is her a ghost? or is it two separate videos superimposed on each other? faggot paid shill
>>
>>532414572
>>532414572
>It only needs to get up to 1600m/s.
>Only needs to be going Mach 4.8
LMAO, fuck off nigger
>>
>>532414562
Yes, Gemini videos look like claymation at first glance. So does the rover video in this thread. I don't really think they were claymation I just don't have any evidence of how they should look and I have to admit how they look at first glance, so I simply wasn't trying to defend them.
>>
I can tell these are all trolls because they aren't posting bible quotes
>>
>>532399649
So Artemis 3 is landing on the moon and Artemis 4 is building a small base on it, right?
When are they scheduled to start? I respect the Artemis 2 mission for what it tries to research and solve, but it's not super exciting to just fly around the moon.
>>
>>532414751
Not that hard with rockets and no air
>>
File: IMG_1355.jpg (82 KB, 1003x370)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>532414491
The rover is such kino, I am glad they aren’t using this dogshit design, looks so lame
>>
>>532413619
>>532414127
holy shit boys this fuckin flat earth bot is still here?
i went and got drunk and fucked a vagina since ive been gone, and you'll niggers are all here arguing about the earth?
apollo 15 - the clutch in the motor system failed so the cam didnt move
apollo 16 - they parked the car too close so the lunar module went out of frame
apollo 17 - the one they got er proper, the haters will say its fake cause even tho its about as good as you would expect in the fuckin 70s live streaming from the moon.
>>
File: 1678475115127751.webm (2.65 MB, 1280x720)
2.65 MB
2.65 MB WEBM
>>532414629
I'm posting footage from the alleged events themselves. I don't even need to say anything.
>>
>>532414820
You are a disingenuous cocksucker, you are trying to say that this thing>>532411780 was going Mach 4.8? Fuck off silly cunt
>>
>>532413899
kek, get debunked faggot
>>
File: IMG_0565.jpg (222 KB, 1024x718)
222 KB
222 KB JPG
Look at the shills out in full force. Globeniggers cannot stop losing. The moon isn’t even a solid object you retards. 43m a day of taxpayer money and this is the best you can muster… Sad! I hope you guys trust the science, get your vaxx and go die on mars kek
>>
File: bokeh.jpg (186 KB, 1080x1080)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
>>532414942
>>
>>532413731
>a 1000 pound jeep chassis
barely 460 lbs in Earth's gravity, nearer to 75 in the moon's.
>>
>>532414963
Lol obviously not in that video you retard, it's just launched. Might have got to 100mph by the time the video ended
>>
>>532402014
only 1 second? i swore it was longer than that.
>>
File: LRV.jpg (3.84 MB, 2700x7433)
3.84 MB
3.84 MB JPG
>>532414849
yeah the rover is maximum comfy
>>
>>532415021
anon, if you think that image is what the earth is, why aren't you mad at false flat earthers that believe in the UN-map type earth? What proof do you have of that random drawing versus other ones?
>>
File: 1770326544040073.gif (1.99 MB, 400x354)
1.99 MB
1.99 MB GIF
>>532414966
>>532414963
>>532414875
>The Free Masons are good guys
I'll give it to you guys, you are sticking to the script. Still waiting on those real satellite photos.
>>
>>532415135
his proof is that he distorted the shape, size, and position of the continents to map the dark spots on a single photo of the moon and then draw in the rest of the continents on his fake earth map from that. with the wider implication being that the moon is not a rock (despite very visibly being so to even the cheapest telescope) but actually a reflection of the earth on the dome
>>
>>532415096
>>532415096
>Might have got to 100mph by the time the video ended
And this was enough to escape the Moon which supposedly has a "gravity" 1/6ths of the Earths? Math isn't adding up again same as always. Get fucked retard
>>
File: 1662832498793586.webm (1.77 MB, 480x360)
1.77 MB
1.77 MB WEBM
>>532415037
Funny this only happens when you record images of planets.
>>
>>532415205
you won't accept any tho. can I recommend you join your local astronomy club and ask to borrow someone's like 8" Dob telescope?
>>
>>532415103
it's double since the data has to go there and back
>>
>>532415205
I'm curious tho, why do you do this
how much do you get paid to lie?
can i have your job? seems easy
if you are doing it for free though, you genuinely retarded and should kys now
>>
>>532415021
Why does a flat earth need such a bizarre projection, where if it were flat it wouldn’t even need one since it’s essentially 2d anyway?
Related, man, I hate Mercator
>>
>>532415205
>The Free Masons
just say jews or kikes
also judaism doesn't bother with space and shiet, that's a western man exploration spirit thing so idk why would you mention freemasons
>>
>>532415289
or any bright and small object on a dark background
>>
>>532415205
whats hard for you to understand about that gif retard?
>>
>>532399649
I had a terrible dream last night. The sling shot around the moon was miscalculated and they were on a one way trip to the outer solar system. Slingshot calculation was done by a black woman.
>>
File: IMG_0073.jpg (81 KB, 640x640)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>532415135
Why would I be “mad” at other flat earthers? I have nothing to gain yet the government takes 43 MILLION a day for this game and gay shit and can’t even provide a single image of proof.
>>532415324
It’s the moon you retard lol.
>>
>>532415284
The fuck are you talking about? There is no minimum speed you need to go to lift off the surface, just like on earth. You think the big earth rockets are going 7km/s at launch?
>>
>>532414963
Why would it need to be going Mach 4.8 immediately on launch? Does the Falcon X immediately hit Mach 10 the second after launch?

Do you know what acceleration is?
>>
>>532413187
lol based
>>
>>532415508
have you ever even looked at the moon through like 12X binoculars?
>>
File: IMG_0702.jpg (80 KB, 1024x596)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>532415436
lol you guys are literally roomtemp IQ. Go back to reading your middle school textbooks and agreeing with all the other NPCs
>>
File: IMG_1318.jpg (119 KB, 671x675)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>532415436
How the stars could stay in a fixed position with a predictable repeating chronological astrological procession for a thousand years.
>>
>>532415480
This is not possible, they don't have close to enough velocity to escape earth's gravity well. The worst that could happen is getting bumped into a really high elliptical orbit and dying of thirst before getting back to earth
>>
>>532415508
It’s clearly the earth enveloped in the moon yes, which required this bizarre misshapen projection to fit
>>
>>532415409
Because the astronauts are free Masons anon.
>>
>>532415609
>permanently
come back in 10,000 years and let us know if it's still fixed.
>>
>>532415516
>>532415554
So what you are saying is that little confetti fart was enough to escape the moon and accelerate to mach 4.8? So now explain to me why it would take 4 days to reach the moon on fartimus 2 if they are travelling 17,000MPH when the moon is supposedly 238,000 miles away? You retards always fuck the math up
>>
>>532402014
BTW the return trip to be captured by Earth orbit is the real difficult point of the mission not the launch or the slingshot around the Moon. It would estimate it's about 100 times harder to make sure that the craft is recaptured by Earth's orbit.

Since Apollo missions, assuming you believe that really happened, we have never been that far outside of Earth's orbit, so if there's anywhere that dei and loss of accumulated knowledge will hit, it'll be at that point.
>>
>>532415609
>he thinks a hole drilled in a monument built in 1980 proves were not moving on a 230 million year orbit
KEK
haha ok
fuck me my nigger you got me
>>
>>532415623
Isn’t that capsule designed for longer missions than the current one? Surely it has enough capacity for water, though if they brought enough is another question
>>
>>532415733
just say jews
and yes plenty of astronauts are jews, jews are over represented in your fucking country, just look at your government
>>
>>532415742
>It's moving
>It takes 10,000 years to notice it
Wow anon, convenient that your beliefs cannot be proven by observation. It's almost like you have faith in your beliefs rather than an evidence based idea of what is happening.
>>
>>532402284
>It is remarkable how many times I've posted that clip
It really is
>>
File: 1774826745826557.png (474 KB, 552x566)
474 KB
474 KB PNG
>>532415896
Free Masons work for the Jews, yes. Jews.
>>
>>532415789
The fart was just the decouplers blowing up, to sepratet the return stage from the lander. You can't see the actual rocket exhaust

Artemis is going barely 2000mph now, it slows down as it gets further away because it's being pulled by earth's gravity
>>
File: arow.png (739 KB, 1954x1126)
739 KB
739 KB PNG
>>532415789
they're going ~2k mph right now. the trajectory to the moon has it slowing down until it is flung back around https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis-ii/arow/
>>
>>532415423
Yet it's only something that happens when viewing planets. Show me another example.
>>
>>532415789
you know what would be crazy is if you did the math.
look up the rocket equation, and fuckin do the math.
the math doesnt lie does it?
>>
>>532415892
Honestly I don't know, they would run out of food first since water is recycled but it would take a while to die of that. My point was that it's possible end up on a week's long return trip but not possible to shoot off into space
>>
>>532415623
>doubting the ineptitude of black woman math
my nigger...
>>
>>532415924
Hey retard, have you ever noticed that the stars are different in the southern hemisphere? How could that be if the earth was flat? Surely if you looked far enough down the horizon (if that could even exist in a flat earth) you would eventually see the same stars right?
>>
>>532415985
if I were you I would be killing them instead of arguing on 4chin
>>
File: 1774896742754227.jpg (44 KB, 379x360)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>532415314
I just like to post archival footage of bad special effects from half century old propaganda made by free Masons and watch idiots scramble to defend it. That's all the pay I need.
>>
>>532416170
apparently stars are just like little pixies or something? >>532414942

I swear these trolls once posted a version of that gif where when they zoomed in it was a swastika. I wish I saved it lol
>>
>>532400462
You needed one White man on the mission to make sure things go smoothly.
>>
File: 1770743834176.png (195 KB, 643x537)
195 KB
195 KB PNG
>>532408948
Don't you understand bro? It's a REAL picture of a fake image!
>>
File: 1663841311023302.png (279 KB, 1080x560)
279 KB
279 KB PNG
>>532416170
Why would they be same exactly? If the firmament is an overhead dome of lights that makes perfect sense.
>>
>>532416162
Well... that's fair. It would be impressive to do math so badly it violated physics though
>>
>>532416170
Are they different? I was born in the south. To me it looks like the stars are the same but they are aligned different in the north. Like constellations turned.
>>
File: (you).webm (875 KB, 450x800)
875 KB
875 KB WEBM
>>532415995
>>532416018
>it slows down as it gets further away because it's being pulled by earth's gravity
LMAO, then it should be accelerating as it gets closer to the moon due to the Moons (((gravity))) now.
>>532416133
You know what would be crazy? If you stopped trusting kikes so much lol
>>
>>532416364
Eventually if you zoomed in far enough from the south to the north you could see the North Star on the firmament if that’s how it works, but you can’t. You should be able to see all parts of the dome unless obstructed by a mountain or some shit
>>
>>532416478
you're trying too hard to be a flat earth schizo now. it's not even fun any more.
>>
File: 1769957113978241.jpg (158 KB, 966x1024)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>>532416198
Zesty
>>532416246
More like geometric energy forms that emanate patterns of light.
>>
>>532416531

Why dont you answer my question?
>>
>>532416478
Yes that happens too but the earths gravity is still stronger than the moons. When it gets close to the moon it will speed up again and keep speeding up as it falls back toward earth
>>
>>532416371
You can see some of the same but not all, just because the earth is in the way, I am too lazy to look it up but I’m pretty sure the North Star disappears pretty fast south of the equator
>>
>>532416478
>i tell him to do the math himself
>hurrrrrr i shouldnt trust the kikes!
what does that even mean dumbass?
i said do the math, dont trust anyone.
other than the mass and thrust they claim which you can pretty much estimate to be correct based on the dimensions.
>>
>>532408213
>The picture is fake
>>Yea but we knew it was fake when we faked it
>Right, so it's fake
>>No it's real
You clowns will believe anything I swear to god
>>
File: apu_pizza.png (154 KB, 785x847)
154 KB
154 KB PNG
>Away for a few hours
>Almost the entire thread is a flat Earth argument
I don't get why you guys don't just ignore the "space is fake", "earth is flat", "we never went to the moon" stuff. Most of them are seen as crazy if they say that type of thing irl.

You'll also notice that the schizos deny or despise some of the greatest achievements by white men. The Apollo Moon landings, nuclear weapons, the theory of evolution, the understanding of a globe Earth, climate science, vaccines, antibiotics, dinosaurs. Is it really a coincidence?
>>
live Art2 video btw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3kR2KK8TEs
>>
>>532416504
Maybe, but light bends over distance which means that there is a limit to how far you can zoom before that bend obstructs your view with land.
>>
>>532416730
it's been like this since right after the zimzam trial.
I see it the same as like the MLP spammer (not Lee, the person that has pretending to be him for the last 15 years or whatever).
it's just some weird obsessed loser
>>
>>532416652
I believe that. North star was never something that people pointed out when stargazing in the southern hemisphere. Southern Cross they would point that out.
>>
File: qso2237_wiyn_1024-2.jpg (55 KB, 1024x680)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>532416835
that takes billions of miles, anon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens
>>
>>532416730
>You'll also notice that the schizos deny or despise some of the greatest achievements by white men.
Indeed. It's almost like the brown brain can't comprehend the things we can accomplish.
>>
File: me.jpg (38 KB, 482x336)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
>>532416728
>art002e000192.jpg
>art002e000193.jpg
oh yeah sure bud yeah sure thing bud im sure they just didnt take any pictures for 3 fuckin hours in between them huh huh huh
>>
>>532416883
Yeah we can't see Polaris down here
>>
>>532416898
Not necessarily
>>
>>532417002
I love how your AI slop doesn't say what you think it does, and it also cites reddit.

god damn I hate these new age trolls, it's so stupid.
>>
>>532416652
>speed up
>slow down
>because of "gravity"
But still no actual numbers, just hurr lurr muh gravity does it
>>532416679
Keep spinning with your space fantasies retard
>>
>>532416835
For light to bend like that over the short distance of the earth gravity would have to be insane, you would not be alive
Also that is hilarious, thanks for laugh
>>
File: 1671896717944019.webm (2.42 MB, 720x406)
2.42 MB
2.42 MB WEBM
>>532416898
The belief in flat earth also dictates that the sun is much closer than we are told and that it hovers a few thousand feet up. It also disappears over the horizon and cannot be zoomed in on from anywhere on earth. This is not proof of curvature, rather it is a property of light and perspective.
>>
File: IMG_0703.jpg (113 KB, 785x703)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>532416730
lol they’re sending the shills with the rest spacing trying to make vaccines look hecking based now? lol at this point I’m happy you retards trust the science and are injecting mystery juice gene therapy shots. Good riddance. These retards literally think dogs went into water one day and became dolphins and fish randomly decided to breathe some air one day.
>>
>>532416574
The lunar lander feet would only exert around 0.45lb psi. For reference a human on Earth standing on one leg exerts 3-4lb psi.

The astronauts in their suits did about 0.84lb psi, which is why their footsteps are more visible than the lander. Not to mention that the astronaut feet have textured grooves which apply even more pressure on those particular areas.
>>
New thread:

>>532417425
>>532417425
>>532417425
>>
>>532417200
>Keep spinning with your space fantasies retard
>jeet cant into space or math
its ok just go shit up the park
>>
File: 1751839923657053.webm (2.87 MB, 576x1280)
2.87 MB
2.87 MB WEBM
>>532417208
Laugh all you want but >>532417002 is from a simple Google search. What do you think a mirage is?
>>
>>532417420
Wow. Well since you've said all that it must make sense and be true. A multi ton spacecraft touching down just doesn't have as much pressure as one of the men in that craft stepping onto the surface by himself.
>>
>>532416679
Here's the thing: the average person out there struggles to calculate a 20% tip let alone with a problem like 1/6*9.81 applied to reverse thrust dynamics vs. fuel capacity. It's pointless to think the masses will suddenly begin understanding how it's all a big sham.

How did they even know the supposed "lunar gravity" is 1/6th that of what we observe here on Earth before departure? I know, I know... the period of the moon vs. the earth's supposed orbit and relative distance x:y tells us it's a big ball out there.

Point is that outer space stuff is good for regular people to believe in. (((They))) know that (((we))) know, and we now know that they know that we know and THEY don't care that we know! It's all a megasham, but it's a rather fun and interesting one at least.
>>
File: 1765208975260022.webm (1.47 MB, 904x900)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB WEBM
>>532417803
Correct. It's obfuscation by information overload.
>>
File: 1768510676024824.png (56 KB, 400x397)
56 KB
56 KB PNG
>>532414792
Psalm 19:1
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
>>
>>532417479
Refraction, where photons are bending due to changes in medium
Honestly, this isn’t a terrible argument for why you can’t see the North Star from the south, unfortunately if you were nearly parallel to the edge of the dome I seriously doubt it would refract enough to no longer appear. I am too drunk to figure out if this would be actually the case
>>
File: Chandrayaan-2_Apollo.jpg (229 KB, 755x572)
229 KB
229 KB JPG
>>532417641
Be aware that in the photo you provided we can't see under the landing feet to see the indentation. There is probably a sizable mark beneath it.

The lander typically came down around 3mph. Probably slower than an astronaut jumping off the last ladder rung.

I find it fascinating that you don't believe we landed on the moon, and that this footprint is somehow considered a smoking gun. Other countries like India and China have independently verified the Apollo hardware that's still up there.
>>
>>532415789
The Ascent Module with cargo and crew was about 4800 kg. To reach orbital velocity for a Command Module in an orbital altitude of 100 km you need to reach a velocity of about 1.63 km/s (Mach 4.75). The rocket consumed propellant and oxidizer at a rate of about 5 kg/s at nominal output.

From the ideal rocket equation, the change in velocity, Δv, as a function of exhaust velocity, ve, initial mass, mi, and final mass, mf is
Δv = -ve ln(mi/mf)
For a constant loss rate, R, over a time, t, the velocity then is
v(t) = -ve ln(mi/(mi - Rt))
The Ascent Module consumed about 2200 kg of propellant and oxidizer, on ascent. So for an orbital velocity of 1.63 km/s (ignoring propellant consumed while circularizing the orbit and altering the course to rendezvous with the Command Module), the exhaust velocity works out to about 2400 m/s. At that exhaust velocity it would take the Ascent Module about 7 minutes and 20 seconds to reach its orbit. The reported average time for the Ascent Modules to reach orbit was reported as being between 7-9 minutes for the six missions that landed.

Differentiating with respect to time, the initial acceleration would be about 2.7 m/s^2 and the peak acceleration before thruster cutoff would be about 5.2 m/s^2. This is consistent with the average nominal thrust for the rocket of 15.6 kN, which translates to about a 3.25 m/s^2 average acceleration.

If we integrate with respect to time, taking the initial displacement and initial velocities to be 0, we get that the Ascent Module would only take about 1.5 seconds to cover its own height (about 3.5 m), which closely matches the video in >>532411780 (give or take half a second).
>>
>>532417803
you faggots are trying to say the math is wrong without actually doing the math though.
so your argument is fucking retarded.
>>
>>532418689
If they actually took the time to research the topic in depth and do the math based on the best data humans have gathered this far then they would come to the conclusion that we actually did land on the moon (multiple times) and everything checks out.
>>
File: 1662746100315429.webm (1.96 MB, 640x640)
1.96 MB
1.96 MB WEBM
>>532417992
Thank you anon. It's hard to believe that it could be the case but from what I can tell it is entirely plausible that the earth is flat and that space is not real in so far as we cannot go beyond the "dome".
>>532418218
The collusion of the other nations in this lie indicates that they too have been Jewed. Many such cases.
>>532418632
I find it fascinating that clearly intelligent people with a real depth of knowledge can be convinced by the trappings of their abilities, believing that mathematical equations equate to real world historical proof. The math can be sound and the event can still be fake. These things are not mutually exclusive.
>>
>>532419119
>The math can be sound and the event can still be fake.
Sure, but the math checks out with the observations, so either the event is real, or the event put so much effort into making itself believable that they accounted for shit like how much distance the Ascent Module covers in a video clip to match the math on rocket flight...

... which is contrary to the assertion that they did such a sloppy job that there are millions of obvious errors that any lay person can root out.
>>
>>532419119
Math is the only thing on Earth that one might call "spiritual" and here you go slandering it.
>>
File: 1770603294389985.mp4 (2.36 MB, 576x1024)
2.36 MB
2.36 MB MP4
>>532419333
Except for the fact that they did do a sloppy job. The images look fake. They lost the telemetry data and the technology to go back according to nasa (Artemis is doing a fly by of the moon, not landing). Hell, they even lost the original film. The only thing they have are images of sparkly craft ascending and math claiming that it's possible.
>>
>>532399649
Space toilets outlook
>>
>>532419547
>The images look fake
muh feels
>They lost the telemetry data
They lost a copy of the telemetry data
>and the technology to go back according to nasa
The old shit got phased out for the shuttle and infrastructure was significantly retooled or phased out to accommodate it, same deal with SLS.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.