Why did the whole "Big three" races thing arise in the first place? Anyone should be able to identify at least 5 different races unique to Africa alone.
>>532502029Why does the asian male skull mog the others?
>>532502086actually the Europoor skull looks pretty aesthetic
>>532502086Whites always win, never forget that.
>>532502150Ah true I was overly focused on the jaw.
>>532502086the forehead is small and looks frail and identical to the asian female...which makes sense
>>532502086Out of these 6 skulls exactly 1 looks intimidating, and it isn't an asian or african one.
>>532502029>Anyone should be able to identify at least 5 different races unique to Africa alone.Wtf are you talking about
IDK man, 5 races in africa? that's a bit much. isi t really worth distinguishing horn and sub? To my mind you have EurosSemitesAfricansAsiansAustraloids and that pretty much sums it up, everything else is just a mix between these.
>>532502305>>532502411Khoisan, Pygmy, Niger-Congoid, Horner, Malagasy, etc. Those were who I had in mind.
>>532502411>PygmyLiterally just short niggers >>532502411This guy is right
>>532503079You're at least partially race-blind; non-admixed Pygmy's actually have different facial features and are more red in skin tone. The Khoisan meanwhile definitely aren't the same as niggers.
>>532503393
>>532502609There's more differences between these 5 groups than there are between Chugs and Euros, genetically.
>>532503486They'd still be very distinct even if you scaled them up to the same size as their niger-congo brothers.
It’s a question of what qualifies as a subspecies and where the lines between them are drawn. To me it seems like the big three are just the first three visible clusters when you start zooming into the species. We wouldn’t break things down any further if we were examining and naming some other species, but since it’s us, we go further and name every subgroup of the subgroup, considering them distinct if there’s even the slightest cultural difference or genetic divergence.
>>532502029There were 3 sons of noah, they absolutely correspond to the three races of man, even genetics have proven it as far as that kind of thing could be proven, ham africa, shem asia, japheth europe. Everything else is a mix or localized variation
>>532502411It depends how zoomed in you are. If the max range you’re looking at is just Africa, yes you distinguish. But if you’re looking at the whole species, you pretty much just have:>Caucasoids (that’s us!)>Negroids>Mongoloids>AustraloidsAnd I think native Americans are distinct enough from Asians to warrant their own group. I Forgot what they’re called though.“Caucasoid” is a broad category that also includes south asians. But nobody has ever confused a European for an Indian or paki, so perhaps Indians ought to get their own category?
>>532503980poos are australoids.
>>532503980> And I think native Americans are distinct enough from Asians to warrant their own groupAre they really? Also, I personally think any reasonable person should give the Khoisan their own group.
>>532504352Distinct skull shape. Barely prognathis.
>>532504352They look like blasians. If they are the oldest african group, which I don't know because who the fuck bothers to study niggers, then given that Out of Eurasia is true, then it's likely that they look like asians because that's where they come from. I don't think they deserve a category.
>>532504501They were pretty dark before slightly admixing with East-Africans; they gave them genes for light skin which ended up being heavily selected for (probably via sex).
>>532503980Native Americans chart, genetically speaking, closest to the Mongoloid group but significantly shifted in the Caucasoid direction. This is because they are descended primarily from Siberians, who are significantly derived from ANE (Ancient North Eurasians,) and another group with significant ANE ancestry are Europeans, a major group of Caucasoids as you know.
>>532504767Are you an actual nigger?
>>532503393These are just africans mixed with chinese
>>532504474I still stand by my stance that abos are literally the missing link.
>>532504501Just because niggers are all niggers doesn’t mean that individual groups of niggers aren’t distinctive races from each other in the biological sense. Capoid and Congoid are at least as far apart genetically as Caucasian and mongoloid
>>532503980>includes south asiansYeah, if you're a lying kike.>guys, our origin species is totally part of your group!Fuck off.
>>532505227Sure, but so too are european populations genetically disparate, does it really justify a whole new race?
>>532505316Haplotype and phenotype are really important, but a certain group immediately starts screeching about phrenology when you try to take categorization seriously.
>>532504773so native americans are part caucasoid? in all honesty some do actually look like red caucasoids if that makes sense
>>532505473But in lay terms, the category of, say, a mongoloid breeding with an african is far more severe than a capoid mixing with a congoid.
>>532505516Finns are snow indians confirmed
>>532505516Insomuch as you can call ANE Caucasoid, because like with many other early post-Ice Age human groups that would give rise to current Eurasians, many of the derived features you use to identify modern races hadn't developed yet. It's worth noting that blonde hair (in Europeans) is thought to have originated in a branch of the ANE.
>>532505193Kek.I think it's pretty funny how all of the false stereotypes attached to blacks in general are actually 100% true for australo-melanesians.
>>532505227Khoisan arent niggers to the point that nignogs IQ mog them consistently
>>532505755You should find everything you just said highly suspicious.
>>532505193Genetically much younger than niggers so impossible. The weirdest shit with Abos is how they look devolved compared to their racial cousins in Papua New Guinea or Sri Lanka
>>532505755call me crazy but I think he kind of looks like a very red caucasoid
>>532505316Europeans cluster genetically much closer than nogs do. Africoons are on a much broader spectrum of vaguely chimp-like to moderately evolved subhuman. Phenotype wise they don’t look that different from each other but genetically it’s all over the places. Europeans have genes that can express huge phenotype differences with comparatively little genetic variance
>>532505516NTA and I think they have some biological oddities that the East Asians also have. I want to say lactose intolerance?Speaking of caucasoid/monogloid hybrids, the Uzbeks and Kazakhs looks a lot like they are a similar hybrid. Like Baltic whites or Mediterraneans with semi-monolid eyes
>>532506022interesting
>>532505906I don't find it suspicious that groups closer in time to the Eurasian root are less derived than modern populations are. Mutations, and thus differences, take time to accrue. It's like asking yourself at what point a tree shrew-like common ancestor becomes recognizably something more like a monkey than a tree shrew.>>532505976I mean, I know what you're talking about, and it's something people have noted since the colonial days, especially in regards to natives in the eastern part of the US vs. natives in Latin America. But the question we have to ask ourselves is how much of this is a product of ANE ancestry and how much of this is a product of convergent evolution where these Natives lived in, and adapted to, environments similar to that of Europeans.
>>532506022Might the environment be more or less uniform across vast swaths of subsaharan Africa? That would explain the genetic distance but the absence of externally visible differences.
>>532505954Yeah I know but they look like someone actually fucked a gorilla. Its so fucking weird.
>>532503807How did one Jew have black, asian and white sons?
>>532506121You didn't even stop to consider the statement.Shut the fuck up and use your brain, halfwit.
>>532502029There are exactly 3 kinds of hair strands. Caucasian, Mongolian and African. Personally I draw the distinction between cro magnon and neanderthal however, because of course they’re as different as Jupiter and Saturn which they worship.
>>5325061903 wives and impotence, obviously.
>>532506121Apparently native americans have 1/3 ANE on average and the rest being Ancient East Asian. Turns out native americans were the original hapas, no wonder a lot of latinos look like mongoloids
>>532506049>the Uzbeks and Kazakhs looks a lot like they are a similar hybridIt's not exactly a secret that they are hybrids, the Steppe has been a huge mixing pot of Mongoloid and Causaoid types since forever.>>532506190I've participated in enough of these arguments to know that you're probably going to say something about Solutreans or whatever and should thus be ignored.
>>532506153Australo-Melanesians are currently believed to be some part homo erectus via the particular strain of Denisovan the mixed with. They also have a ton of private alleles from their archaic ancestors, which isn't true for any other race. Doesn't really explain why Abbos in particular look so primitive though. Perhaps they have more archaic private alleles and erectus admixture than melanesians?
>>532506273Yeah it's all very interesting when you dive back into these post-Ice Age groups and their genetics. A lot of very unexpected genes ended up in some unexpected places before our current territorial sorting was solidified.
>>532506133>>532506133What’s interesting is that the wider phenotype variance that is observed in black Africans often occurs among groups that are less genetically distant from each other. For example, Sudanese look a lot more different from other congoids than certain other congoids look from Khoisan. Environmental factors certainly play a role
>>532506374Papuans in particular are like, 1% Erectus at most.
>>532506294>x hadn't emerged yetImagine looking in separate populations for the origin of a trait in a different population.What's the dominant eye colour in Europe?
>>532506391any idea where do latinos (mestizos) cluster? Given that they are like 50/50 and given that natives are proto-hapas, how would they cluster compared to an actual hapa? would they be closer to the hapa or closer to the europeans?
>>532506470>Imagine looking in separate populations for the origin of a trait in a different populationANE are not a 'separate population', they're a major genetic contributor to the Indo-Europeans, who are a major genetic contributor to the modern European. They (ANE) just also happen to be a major genetic contributor to modern Siberians and American Natives. This shouldn't surprise you when the northern range of PIE peoples neighbored with the western range of Proto-Siberian peoples.
European genes came from the stars. Non-Whites on Earth are made up of various hominid fauna, some already here and some the result of experiments by splicing European genes into them. Then Earth went through a cataclysm which reset everything.The original human template and direct lineage of man consists of those making up the European species. The traits which are generally considered to be "human" amongst the bipedal primates come from them and their predecessors who seeded this planet.
>>532506606Theoretically they should cluster closer to Europeans than someone who is 50/50 Chinese/European because of the ANE component a Chinese person won't have much, if any, of. But good luck testing that these days, you're looking to find a Mestizo who is exactly 50/50 and not some more likely and messier mix of like 44/50/6 African.
>>532506607Answering the question I asked is vital to determining whether you are capable of digesting the presence of misinformation.You avoided it. Why?Follow up question.Why do you insist on classifying Empire based gene exchange as "migration" or "a single population group?"
>>532506763Because blue eyes didn't originate in ANE, while blonde hair is theorized to. Blue also isn't as dominant as you think if you're including all of Europe as one category.>Empire based gene exchangeThere were no empires in existence at the time we are discussing.
>>532502029>The European ones looks like the most aesthetically pleasingWhat a shocker
>>532506935Dodges with the same fucking statement because it's too retarded to infer that it is ignoring information vital to it understanding of genetics.Has never fucking heard of Babylon or the Indus River Valley.Seriously. Did you check out at "global flood" because "there's no way that ice settling in the northern reaches could have a global effect on sea level?"You are not smarter than your ancestors.
>>532507091>Has never fucking heard of Babylon or the Indus River Valley.One, both of them post-date the ANE mixing in European ancestry (the EHG) and Native American ancestry (pre-Bering crossing.) Two, both Indus Valley and Mesopotamian civilization began with a long city-state period that never transitioned into an imperial period for the former.>Global floodOh, I'm talking to some idiotic 'biblical scholar' type? Pathetic, evangelicals are such a disease.
>>532507279>still won't state what the dominant eye colour in European populations isNo. You're talking to someone that thinks you're full of shit and knows that equilibrium is possible at multiple points on the scale.Stop regurgitating other people's words. You sound like a fucking bot.
>>532507416Regurgitate any position at all.
