[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


This looks fake as fuck unironically more fake than the pajeet moon landing video
>>
>>532595258
>memeflag
>>
>>532595258
i know you are too stupid and poor to send humans to the moon, but you don't have to seethe on /pol/ about it
>>
Is that the dark side of the moon?
>>
>>532596047
First link shouldnt be a 2 hour podcast if you expect anyone to click the rest.
>>
>>532596291
the schizo method is to dump as much garbage onto you as possible to confuse you
>>
File: 1745929317606672.webm (1.45 MB, 960x720)
1.45 MB
1.45 MB WEBM
>>532597259
I can't speak for everyone but that would not have convinced me years ago. I'd stick with simple stuff like this to sow seeds.
>>
>>532595258
Why is the earth so small?
Shouldn't it be way larger?
>>
>>532595258
Alright show me what it's supposed to look like
>>
>>532597259
I can't see this post, so I assume it's a memeflag.
>>532600048
More than an argument, evidence.
It's fake, but we knew that.
>>
>>532600170
They are 253,000 miles away from Earth bro. How big should it look?
You could replicate this in a 3d program if you wanted to
>>
>>532595258
Bro I've seen better graphics on ps1
>>
>>532600048
What are you zooming in on?
>>
>>532600474
Artemis was sent up before the PS1 even existed you fucking idiot
>>
>>532595258
What do you expect t to look like? Its a void.
>>
>>532595258
I must say, I'm not a fan of the rendering artifacts on the circle delineating the moon.
The fuck did they do, build it in Minecraft?
Fucking garbage "megapixel" cameras. Use real fucking cameras.
>>
>>532600048
What am I supposed to be seeing? Shadows caused by distributed light sources?
>>
>>532600454
It looks like the size of the moon viewed from earth. The moon is ~25% size of earth so earth should look like 4 times bigger than the moon seen from earth, right?
>>
>>532600528
>>532600647
Lack of shadow from the toy. Only her hands are producing shadows.
>>
File: Adam Green.jpg (171 KB, 687x495)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
>>532595258
This guy is crashing out so bad over the Moon Slop he can't stop promoting - together with the rest of his circle like Ryan Dawson, Devon Stack, Keith Woods, Gnostic Informant etc
It's actually hilarious.
Looks like the Greenbergians are vindicated!
>>
>>532600424
>Margaret Hamilton
that's a man
>>
>>532600662
Please go watch a video demonstrating a dolly zoom.
>>
File: IMG_7994.jpg (192 KB, 1123x1238)
192 KB
192 KB JPG
>>532600692
>fake and gehy
ever think that maybe yhats the point?
put out obvious slop
no one pays attention to politicians raping kids
corporations getting municipalities to pay for Ai datacejter infrastructure projects
jewish wars
destruction of purchasing power
commodity inflation
education being a joke
mass immigration
destruction of the family
ext
>>
>>532600692
Hmm. Maybe. But the cab is well lit up and the shadow could be on her knee just below frame.
>>
>>532595258
>This looks fake as fuck

Sure... Because you are a fucking expert with a degree in /pol/ spamming
>>
>>532600871
>dolly zoom
>"...But What About a dolly zoom"
Reminder - "But What About ..." arguments are a particular Talmudic form of argumentation known as Pilpul intended to confuse, cast you adrift in a sea of relativism and undermine your correct intuitions and common sense.
>>
>>532601106
I am baffled by the number of people that don't recognize how utterly SHIT the cameras are.
It looks shit because it's fucking shit.
>>
>>532601158
>you're not allowed to teach people about framing and field of view
Stop being retarded on purpose. Or stop being jewish. Whichever it is.
>>
File: 1744472671893305.jpg (139 KB, 1280x720)
139 KB
139 KB JPG
>>532600948
From my experience most people losing faith in institutions gravitate toward those beliefs. Someone who can accept that NASA is lying or the Holocaust being faked is more open to believing vice versa and that goes across the board with all of these topics. I think most NASA deniers, for lack of a better term, already accept that the government is evil and ran by pedophiles so I don't see how this distracts.

>>532600979
The toy is between her hands though. You can clearly see the extent of her hands shadows.
>>
>>532596291
This.
I fucking hate the YouTube video schizos the most.
>>
>>532600662
How do you know it doesn't? You don't know how zoomed in the photo is
>>
>>532600692
Because there are multiple light sources. Fill lighting does this. t.product photographer
>>
File: 1775364230097444.jpg (53 KB, 516x600)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>532595258
>"You can't just blow up muslims you filthy stupid Americans, you have to let them rape you to death"
>"How dare you blow up bridges and power stations? Only Zelensky is allowed to do that, how absolutely DARE you!"
>"Allowing WrongThinkers to walk free? Ve don't do zat in GERMANY"
>"If *we* are too weak, poor, and stupid to go to the moon, then everyone must be"

Yuropoors going from L to L these days, bathing this board in their tears and seethe
>>
File: Green GDL.jpg (170 KB, 656x360)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
Adam Green gets his 'nazi' schtick blasted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q44q74IikO8
>>
>>532601259
>deniers
exactly
the most socially corrosive of us are sø¥facing over obvious psyops instead of fomenting unrest over actual interests

"This antagonism is artificially kept alive and intensified by the press, the pulpit, the comic papers, in short, by all the means at the disposal of the ruling classes. This antagonism is the secret of the impotence of the (English) working class, despite its organization. It is the secret by which the capitalist class maintains its power. And the latter is fully aware of this."
>>
>>532596291
>see this post
>check out the list
>click first video
>it’s mother fucking archaix
Fuck yeah, this is what I’m listening to tonight. Gonna check out the rest of the list later.
>>
>>532600871
>>532601250
>>532601294
You're saying they made it look fake on purpose?
Let me get this straight - they flew to the moon on a spaceship ... but then they deliberately made it look fake by using a special camera lens?
Have I got the gist of your argument?
>>
>>532601829
Explain how it looks fake, and explain what it should look like.

Like I said, you could replicate this with a 3D program and it would look exactly like that.. if the ratio of their sizes it what looks fake to you
>>
>>532601829
That is, in fact, the most amusing way to read my anger. I was already pissed about the horribly spliced "launch coverage," so now all I'm getting out of anything is "...I GUESS???"
>>
>>532601829
His argument is you're retarded if you think that picture looks fake.
>>
>>532601933
The Earth as seen from the vicinity of the Moon would be massive. But mooon-sloppers here are saying they believe in the NASA photos, but they just used the wrong sort of photography.
This is really pathetic.
>>
>>532601259
Maybe the toy was made of a translucent space material that allows light to pass through without casting a shadow? It would be useful in space.

The thing that convinces me this trip is a fake is that they're still continuing the original lie by making the Earth in the Moon's sky the same size as the Moon in Earth's sky. It was a mistake they made in the first fake landing, and they have had to repeat it ever since to avoid questions.
Either it's fake or the Moon is the same size as Earth.
>>
>>532602206
Alright show me exactly how big the Earth should look from 253,000 miles away if you were next to the Moon
>>
File: IMG_0827.png (339 KB, 1206x2622)
339 KB
339 KB PNG
>>532595258
The plushie that has no shadow? Here’s Groks “explanation”
Kek
>>
>>532602284
There's that Pilpul again!
>>
>>532595258
Wait, isnt that supposed to be the dark side of the moon?
>>
File: Science dask.jpg (322 KB, 1134x597)
322 KB
322 KB JPG
>>532602355
They've really got themselves in a muddle haven't they!
We better consult the Science Desk!
>>
>>532600528
The CGI add-in has no shadow on her pants., duh.
>>
File: 1746398862951470 (1).webm (3.72 MB, 720x480)
3.72 MB
3.72 MB WEBM
>>532601259
heres the webm
>>
>>532602349
That's a different person, dumb fuck.
And you were wrong the first time, because my comment was about the fundamentals of understanding what you're being presented. You'd know this if you engaged your noggin for a moment, nogbrain.
>>
>>532602485
Holy fucking shit, there's giants in space?
>>
The question that arises is ... are NASA deliberately trying to make America and Americans look stupid like the Israelis are doing?
Is it all part of the Great Takedown and transfer to Imperium Judaica?
>>
>>532602355
the dark side of the Moon isn't necessarily in darkness (depends whether it faces the sun or not, duh)
it's called "dark" because we can't see it from Earth due to the Moon being tidally locked to Earth
>>
>>532602997
It's called "dark" because some fuckwit popularized a misnomer when "far" already exists.
Yes, they are shit.
>>
>>532602997
So that's why they made the earth so small. To save them from having to coordinate their fake pictures with the moon's phases in relation to the sun and to the rotation of the earth.
The same reason they never include stars in any of their picture fakery. It would lead to too much scrutiny.
>>
>>532603156
>some fuckwit popularized a misnomer
prbly a fucking jewrnalist
kill'em all, realy
>>
>>532595258
Did they finally restore the video feed?
>>
>>532603235
Buncha druggie faggots.
>>
>>532602997
Ok but whatever you call it why is it so well lit if the sun never hits it.
>>
>>532600424
And yet the unsophisticated minds of young and gullible women in the United States will continue to imbue her with romantic power, making completely misinformed statements like "NASA is removing all mention of the women who got US to the moon, I'm seeing fascist patterns" among many others.
>>
>>532595520
Can't be. Don't you see how bright it is?
>>
>>532602997
>>532603156
>>532603235
It's called dark because it is the side that shadowed. This shouldn't be hard to deduce or infer for people, and yet here we are.
>>
File: 1658668777507374.webm (737 KB, 720x576)
737 KB
737 KB WEBM
>>532595258
(((Vacuum of space)))
>>
>>532603536
No, it's called dark because some druggy "musicians" wrote a fucking album in the 70s.
You have been influenced by drug addled retards peddling horrific noise to the masses. Cast it out. FAR. Not dark, FAR.
>>
File: hviMit.gif (3.57 MB, 480x270)
3.57 MB
3.57 MB GIF
>>532603318
Who said the sun never hits it? The far side that we can't see is lit up for 2 weeks every month
>>
NB: I don't even believe Humans ever landed on the Moon (machines landed, and we can prove it: Humans? we can't)

>>532603222
the relative size of objects, one close the other distant isn't so much weird: look at a boat from a beach
now hold a hand sized rock at arm length, and then to your nose
you should be able to understand that's not weird in itself
>they never include stars in any of their picture fakery
stars are dim, and planets very bright
to see stars, you'd have to overexpose Earth so hard it'd be white, and you'd still complain
you can't see stars either, in urban sodomite shitholes, desu
conversely, you can very much see stars in vids from the ISS observation window, that isn't pointed at Earth: actually, you can see a real fucking shitload of stars, from there
you can also take a picture of the ISS from Earth, fwiw

>>532603318
the side of Earth you can see it lit
so the Moon is inbetween the Sun and Earth
and the side you're seeing thus is lit by the Sun
you're a niggermonkey

>>532603536
>It's called dark because it is the side that shadowed
no, it isn't
>>
>>532603717
We call it the far side/shadow side. I would have imagined you would call it the dark side because it is the same meaning as calling it the shadow side, shadowed from our eyes, by Earth, so on.
>>
>>532603870
>Humans? we can't
This is the most pathetic take of the moon landing. At least the full blown schizos who think we live on a pizza because the desert book says so have conviction. Have some fucking balls to commit one way or another, you cannot fence sit a conspiracy.
>>
>>532595458
They wont understand you they just post from scripts. You need to post in Chinese
>>
>>532595258
They faked the footage of the far side of the moon because its smooth and has no craters. Only the earth-side has craters. When the flood happened, tons of water pushed up through the earth and blasted rocks out so hard, fast and far that it cratered our side of the moon.
If they showed the truth then itd blow the lid off their gay jewish evolution bullshit.
>>
>>532600424
Nina Hartley?
>>
>>532603318
>>532603536
>doesn't understand what moon phases are or how they occur
How much of this is the old pretending to be retarded routine, and how much is it genuine retardation?
>>
>>532604108
The average university student does not actually understand why we have seasonal temperature difference.
>>
>>532603963
No, I would get annoyed by laymen calling things something they clearly aren't. Especially when the term is propagated in the manner specified and goes unnoticed by users.
>>
File: 1707818346416817s.jpg (6 KB, 219x230)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>>532595258
>>532596047
flat earth is psyop to deter people from legit theories and paint them is dumb schizo behavior... only a legit retarded moron think earth is flat
>>
File: 1628002480383.gif (2.98 MB, 520x293)
2.98 MB
2.98 MB GIF
>>532603546
>>
>>532601597
Why can't you just stop raping kids?
>>
>>532600048
You know she’s getting gang raped by all of them on a regular basis, right? Those niggers are probably running an orbital only fans right now. The whole mission was to make porn content. It has nothing to do with the moon. Prove me wrong.
>>
>>532595258
Where's the european space program you retards gloated so much about in 2009? Where's your "advanced russian technology, european money?"
In a fucking shitter, where you all belong.
Seethe because it's all left for you, retarded German cunt.
>>
Space is fake and gay anyway.
It's funny how just a bit of media coverage can brain wash normal fags so easily.
>>
>>532605269
If it's fake then why is it real
>>
>>532596047
>First video
>Titled part IV
Are you so fucking retarded you don't know roman numerals?
>>
>>532604800
They had to have sex in space to understand what happens it’s for science or something
>>
>>532595520
This shitskin is so retarded that he doesn't understand how light reflection work.
>>
>>532603812
>WHAT IS TIDAL LOCK
did you even watch your gif lmao
>>
>>532602997
I can see the dark side of the moon, it's called a new moon for fucks sake
>>
>>532595258
Conspiracy theorists should all kill themselves. The only conspiracy theory that's true is that kikes run shit and are liars and want to destroy everything good and beautiful in this world.
>>
>>532595458
is the moon as studiously grey as depicted in Musk's high resolution video or is it colourful as shown in the "most detailed" moon imagery to date?
>>
>>532595458
not saying murca didn't do anything major space-related, but at least admit that the way it's (((documented))) is very weird.
>>
>>532606588
Those colourful ones have their saturation increased by like a bazillion % in photoshop to make the minute chemical compositional differences visible to the naked eye, and nobody has ever pretended otherwise.
>>
File: IMG_6926.gif (3.59 MB, 320x252)
3.59 MB
3.59 MB GIF
>>532601597
>Used fake and gay nu/MS/ flag
>Used old data as UK is now poorer than MS
Shitty infographic. You fail and should try again
>>
>>532606529
Smooth brains like you can vote and that's why our country is a shit hole.
>>
>>532595258
>This looks fake as fuck
tell me you are retarded without telling me you are retarded
>>
>>532595520
It's called the Far Side of the moon now anon as the previous term had potentially harmful connotations.
>>
>>532603870
>Humans? we can't
why? because you saw a thing on youtube that told you lies?
>>
>>532595520
Its Oppressed Moon of Colour side now, bigot.
>>
>>532607379
its a Moon of Color
>>
>>532595258
They don't care if you know
>>
>>532607410
Urban Youth sided Celestial Body?
>>
File: tard flag.jpg (170 KB, 974x1024)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
>>532595258
>>
File: 1769265402735549.jpg (131 KB, 1024x1024)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>532595258
>>
>>532607633
I refuse to believe people is this naive
>>
>>532595520
No that's the Earth
>>
>>532607619
Stellar Objection your honour
>>
It's fake, not a single image of it on a telescope anywhere. It literally doesn't exist
>>
>>532607619
this reminds me - did the blackout happen yesterday? i missed it. should be a lot more round inside the capsule after that.
>>
>>532608312
Im pretty sure it was supposed too. I work nightshift so I cant check until im home, just eating my cell data right now.
>>
>>532608432
well i just hope the black is out. thats the main thing.
>>
>>532603984
>you cannot fence sit a conspiracy
I don't
I don't believe Humans landed on the Moon, not one minute
be it because the original footage was "lost", the blueprints were lost, they hired Kubrick and Clarke, it reeks of freemasonry, and many other things
machines landed on the Moon: Humans, not yet
>>
>>532606125
that's not what the dark side of the Moon means
the "dark" side means the side that always points in the opposite direction to the Earth
what you see during a new moon isn't lit up, but it's still the same side you ever see from Earth
because of tidal locking
>>
>>532607100
>>532609102
doesn't concern you anyway
you're just a leafcuckian, not a Human
>>
>>532608582
im retarded.
Thats hilarious, I love you xD
>>
>>532602855
Israel got their teeth sunk into America BECAUSE Americans are retarded.. if a nation full of goyim are complacent and stand for whatever bullshit why not milk it for all it’s worth?
>>
>>532609553
>if I'm not milking the goyest goys, someone else will
isreali proverb
>>
>>532609102
>original footage was "lost",
no footage is missing, just the slightly higher resolution version of apollo 11. you can see everthing that happened.
there is higher res footage for all the other landings, though this never seems to matter once people think they've found the Truth.
>the blueprints were lost,
what do you mean? this isn't even nearly true in any sense
>they hired Kubrick and Clarke
Kubrick was the best directors and filmographer of the time and was advising on cameras and photography in general. Clarke was an experienced scientist and one of the best known science writers of the time.

do you see a theme here? see how they are both going to help present the entire thing to the public in the best way possible?
>>
>>532609746
pilpul moar, faggot
>>
>>532607633
This is the most Jewish meme in existence
>>
>>532609815
oh i see, this is where you flee discussion about your retarded claims. got it. go back to watching american moon on repeat if it makes you feel better.
>>
>>532609619
It’s true. Which is why amerimutts need to stop being so retarded and evict the kike parasites. No one else will try it again afterwards
>>
>>532609888
you're not discussing, you're pilpuling
like when you carefully omit the "original" adjective
from then on, your squealing is irrelevant
>>
why are we landing on the moon in the middle of a war? what is wrong with these demons?
>>
>>532607709
Enjoy your cognitive dissonance!
>>
>>532595258
but they understand how retarded the average person is.
>>
earth is flat and the stars are painted in the sky. the earth is only 5000 years old and the moon is only 10000 miles away. Yes i am smarter than those stupid brain washed normies. also have you seen the youtube video i sent as evidence?
>>
>>532610063
>like when you carefully omit the "original" adjective
i explained exactly what the case is, unlike you and your absolute refusal to explain why you think its so important? we can watch everything that was broadcast so nothing was lost in that sense. just a slightly higher resolution version of what we can see......the resolution of which was exceeded on subsequent landings due to camera equipment upgrades
>>
>>532602206
Go to a park. Take a picture of a small item like a flower or a tennis ball with a building in the background on the far side and then tell me the relative "size".
>>
>>532610277
>i explained exactly what the case is
liar
what misses is the original media
why would you record over the supposedly greatest achievement of Mankind, lol?
why would you destroy that??
pilpul and kvetch moar, faggot
>>
>>532610262
Have you even been to space?
>>
>>532595258
>No link
Kys
>>
>>532610584
why dont you know this? the tv signal was embedded in a single transmission stream that had to be parsed out at mission control. when the live TV came down that stream was separated out and displayed on a special screen that could show the oddball format it was in. this screen was then filmed by a regular broadcast TV camera for transmission out on the TV networks. the tapes that were reused contained the entire combined signal, which was everything coming down from the spacecraft.

yes, it was stupid to mix up the tapes. but its not as if theres any other footage that we've never seen. just a slightly higher resolution version.

and, as if said, that higher resolution was exceeded on all other landings anyway.

why doesn't that matter to you? why is all that footage fake?
>>
>>532610153
I don't but is a good reminder of what's wrong
>>
Let me guess when you compare the size of previous pictures it’s nowhere close
>>
>>532595258
Literal uhd cameras live streaming, shooting every aspect, every rocket stage separation, the whole flyby, shots of the earth, the moon,...

>"looks fake goys"
>>
>>532610948
>it was stupid to mix up the tapes
not just stupid: cohenvenient
>why is all that footage fake?
because there are enough fuckeries to suspect it's all fuckery
that's the problem, with trust: hard to build, easy to lose
>>
File: 1774095988813329.jpg (64 KB, 1024x521)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>532607007
Hello, Unit 8200
>>
>>532611265
This
>>
>>532611180
It's just a fisheye lens, goy.
>>
>>532611265
>not just stupid: cohenvenient
why? you think that you'd see something in the slightly higher res footage that shows its fake? despite way more higher res footage from all th other landings exists?
>there are enough fuckeries to suspect it's all fuck
so now you have to shift to another talking point. its always the same, because nothing you guys have can stand any real discussion or examination. its always 'forget about that, lets move on to the next'.
>>
>>532611529
>be told to pilpul and kvetch moar
>indeed pilpul and kvetch moar
lmao
>>
>>532611633
and as usual, you will run away, because all you've done is watch american moon, which is full of lies and can't stand up to a moments serious consideration.
>>
>>532611766
only jaw gapping estronauts will defend the idea Humans landed on the Moon so hard
and you jaw gapping estronauts are faggots, and thus deserve to be impaled to start with anyway
no sense in discussing with you I'zluvmuhscience jihadi-tier fanatics, really
t. actual scientist
>>
>>532601559
And yet that doesn't explain why when her hands overlap with the toy, we only see the shadows from her hands.
Try again.
>>
>>532611995
Lol, what sort of “science” do they have in French Caliphate?
>t. actual scientist
>>
>>532611995
>t. actual scientist
just because you measure the dicks before you suck them doesn't mean you're a scientist.
>>
>>532611995
>waffle wafffle waffle
>t.retard who runs away
>>
>>532600048
Good catch whoever saw it
>>
>>532610948
> why dont you know this?
The best psyop tactic aislop can produce.
>>
>>532595258
ofc is fake but it generates views and money
>>
File: shrgdy.jpg (115 KB, 1024x1024)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
>>532600424
>here's the code men wrote to get us to the moon
>a woman was actually in charge
>a woman actually wrote all that code by herself by hand
>it was actually a black woman who got us to the moon
>>
>>532595258
Where are the stars?
>>
>>532595258
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Myf7oH0n9g&
>>
>>532612212
>you measure the dicks before you suck them
it always has to be about your love for dicks, with you estronauts, lol
tells more about you than about me

>>532612258
>you're still here, so that proves you're running away
most intelligent leafcuckian intellectual, lol
>>
>>532595520
A badass album
>>
File: covid-19-en.jpg (155 KB, 1080x1080)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>532604487
Based vaccine enjoyer
>>
>>532603471
The dark side of the moon is a misnomer, stupid. It should have been called the far side so that retards like you don't get the wrong idea but alas.
>>
File: 1754033750419356.jpg (286 KB, 1128x1420)
286 KB
286 KB JPG
>>532601158
This
>But what was the lens
>Apollo lens was 60mm, the normal lens that is "true to the eye" unlike wide and telephoto that make the distant object smaller or larger than they are seen by the naked eye
>BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PIC ON THE RIGHT
>It was obviously done with a normal lens because the Moon appears as seen by the naked eye, you've seen the Moon from Earth, that's how you know
>SO YOU DON'T KNOW THE LENS IN THE RIGHT PIC. YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE LENS. WHAT WAS THE LENS (posts some pic with a wide or telephoto lens, completely unrelated): SEE ? YOU'RE WRONG. ALSO APOLLO LENS WAS A WIDE LENS EVEN THOUGH IT'S A NORMAL LENS BTW.
>>
>>532610143
my theory is that the rocket we sent into space is actually a bigass missile that's about to hit iran, the moon mission is just theater
>>
>>532613269
funny that you're mocking me when you're still avoiding the questions and discussion of your own point. keeping running.

>>532613495
fuck you're still posting this AGAIN, no matter how many times you get schooled on it. unbelievable. you posted this not long since and several anons bothered to describe how you can know the relative sizes are perfectly correct.
>>
>>532613922
>fuck you're still posting this AGAIN, no matter how many times you get schooled on it
It shows how they are simply spamming shills and have no interest in discussion
They just want to destroy /pol/ by poisoning the well
>>
>>532613495
If "normal lense" or "true to eye" lense is such a normal, standard, term, what is the field of view for these lenses?
This should be an easy question if these are standard sizes.

Otherwise, that means those aren't standard sizes, and there's no reason to think both photos are the same FOV
>>
>>532595258
How dumb are you people? Do you believe airplanes are fake too?
>>
>>532613922
I'm not avoiding shit
I listed baffling things about the supposed landing of Humans on the Moon
and your "answer" (pilpul) just amounts to:
>yeah, but it's not so terrible, and if it is, so what?
or outright denials of things the nasa itself admitted, lol
you're not discussing anything, really, nor even honestly intend to
>>
>>532602312
Grok is such a fag when it comes to things outside of normiesphere
>>
>>532614065
mostly thats true for sure. not sure about croatflerf though. he's a very strange case and not quite like the other regular flerf shills.

the previous time he posted this started here

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/531873967/#q531894280


but he ignored the answers there and will do so here too.
>>
>>532614227
you started running after this post. how about picking it up back there now? >>532611529
>>
>>532602855
If you can blatantly lie to people and they still buy it you can do anything with them
>>
File: nasa_tattoo.png (1.03 MB, 1180x796)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB PNG
>>532614144
Not as dumb as people who think it's normal for the Earth to clip over the Moon.
>>
File: easter-island-stars.jpg (275 KB, 1280x853)
275 KB
275 KB JPG
>>532595258
Where's all the stars?
>>
>>532610948
Imagine believing this techweenie explanation
>>
>>532614648
>where are teh stars
posted over and over again in every thread
>>
>>532614333
that post is just pilpul, again, amounting to:
>yeah, but it's not so terrible, and if it is, so what?
you're not just dishonest, you're laughable
>>
>>532614084
>goes right into pilpul even though it's already explained
Remarkable
>>
>>532614759
keep running. you know you've got nothing and can't engage with the subject. you;'re just another one duped into thinking you know anything about this stuff because you watch a video on youtube.
>>
I saw someone mention that the "new" artemis footage of the moon is identical to the PREVIOUS artemis mission footage...
Something about Elon posting the video footage, but it being the exact same as the first time?
I can't seem to find anyone talking about this here yet.
They re-using footage again?
>>
>>532614908
>you've got nothing
wrong, as I clearly said, and you even recognized
>can't engage with the subject
not with you, lol
because you're just a pilpuling estronaut, emotionally invested in I'zluvmuhscience religious scientism
>>
>>532613495
you were told why you're retarded on this issue here most recently, though you've been posting this meme for years

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/531873967/#q531894280


you STILL ignore how the Medium Format film size changes what a wide angle lens is, and you still refuse to learn about it. why? why do this shit?
>>
>>532615071
if you're not running away, why cant you just engage with the questions ive asked you about this stuff? why keep dancing around like you are? its one of the most obvious signs of you either not knowing what you're talking about or that you're just another fucking shill.
>>
>>532615155
>you've been posting this meme for years
That statement works both ways. You have been here for years.
>>
>>532613269
>I like dick! Nummy Yummy DICK!
GaAaaAyyyyy!
>>
>>532615383
yeah, noticing that some kinds of posters keep reposting stuff over and over again no matter how many times people patiently explain why they are mistaken.
>>
>>532615270
the only "question" you asked is
>why is it cohenvenient? why is not enough for you, dirty goy?
which I had already answered, the problem being they destroyed the original proof, with just an "oopsie" as an excuse
which is laughable, same as your attitude
which proves well enough you're not even close to actually be discussing: you're just pilpuling
>>
>>532615530
>t. leafcuckian sodomite, and even estronaut
typical
>>
>>532615547
>they destroyed the original proof,
the slightly higher resolution version of the footage. you fail to make any explanation of how you think this matter, and completely avoid the fact that there is a lot more and higher res footage from all the other landings. all you do is keep expressing your incredulity as if its evidence of fakery.
>>
>>532600424
It's so funny how this is still an example of the female brain.
>man takes photo of thing
>woman takes photo of herself near thing
>>
>>532615717
>muh resolution
the resolution of the footage isn't the problem
>you fail to make any explanation of how you think this matter
no, I don't fail that at all, you lying cunt
they destroyed the original "proof" of the supposedly greatest achievement of Mankind
that it doesn't bother you, despite pretending to luvmuhscienss proves you're dishonest well enough
>other landings
unrelated to the matter
>as if its evidence of fakery
it's at least extremely suspicious, together with even those things:
>w-w-w-w-we lost the technology to do it again
>the hiring of Kubrick and Clarke as consultants
which you discarded, as if it didn't paint any very suspicious picture
because you're dishonest, and don't believe it out of logic, but out of emotion
which is both disgusting and laughable, particularly for an Iluvmuhscienss estronaut monkey, lmao
>>
>>532600048
key spill [her right hip]
>>
>>532615539
Are you also in every vaxx thread advertising for vaxxines for years on end?
>>
>>532596047
>DON'T BELIEVE THE DOGMA
>BELIEVE MY DOGMA!
You're just as fucking retarded and insufferable as the "trust the science" mongrels
>>
>>532616203
>the resolution of the footage isn't the problem
its the only difference at all. theres no other thing for you to complain about.
>that it doesn't bother you
of course it does. but something bothering me doesn't automatically mean i have to call it all fake, because doing that is retarded.
>unrelated to the matter
not true at all. you're calling the landings faked and as your argument you bring up the lost tapes of the higher res version of the TV footage. if better footage is avaliable for all the other landings why isnt that counted as evidence in support of them being real?
>it's at least extremely suspicious,
but its not....unless, as you are doing, you refuse to understand the context or even to think about what you're saying.
>e lost the technology to do it again
right, and now you have bring up other things (which you are also wrong about btw). 'lost' was just one way that one guy described how the entire Apollo production and operational system was dismantled due to the program being cancelled. thats all he meant, and you can tell that from how he went on to say 'and it would be a painful process to build it back up again'.

all you're doing is accepting a very narrow collection of half truth little talking points and arranging them into the pattern you want to see. you dont let anything else in.
>>
>>532609852
There's another version where they clumsily drew a jew nose on the glownigger, cause I pointed out the meme portrays them as Chad.
>>
>>532616345
ah right, the usual shill ploy of associating themselves, and their retarded garbage, with being against the covid vaxx. you fucks do this every damn time.
>>
>>532600424
Apollo 8 orbited the moon. Apollo 11 landed on the moon. It's not the same maneuver or the same software.
>>
File: file.png (721 KB, 1116x791)
721 KB
721 KB PNG
>>532600424
When you lie about the facts of when she was hired, and do zero research on your own, then you are nothing more than a religious zealot
>>
File: 1587560178390.jpg (289 KB, 1120x630)
289 KB
289 KB JPG
>OP memeflag 1 pbtid
>>
That image is fake. The earth is supposed to look like a plate not a sphere
>>
>>532616345
>>532616345
Funnily, he was in a thread about a woman who committed a "suicide" by stabbing herself 10x in the back of the neck (in addition to 10x in the chest) and his position was that it happens and nothing weird about it.
He was calling anons flatearthers for disagreeing, that's how you know it was him.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/531906590/#531912855
>>
>>532618882
lol. you remember that but not the reason i explained why i was taking that side of the debate.
pity you cant remember all the times your retarded talking points have been thoroughly exposed as being wrong.
>>
>>532616693
>theres no other thing for you to complain about
there is: that they destroyed the original proof of the supposedly greatest Mankind achievement
makes it very suspicious, at best
>doesn't automatically mean i have to call it all fake
no, and I've never said any such thing
again, at the very least, it makes it suspicious
and together with many other things, makes it very, very dubious
>not true at all
but it is: destroying the original proof, again, of the supposedly greatest Mankind achievement is baffling, and makes it suspicious
>why isnt that counted as evidence in support of them being real?
how does it prove it's any real?
the original that was "recorded over" wouldn't either, btw
at best, those are just clues: and that they made one disappear is a clue too
>but its not
but it is
among many other things
could also add the supposed moon rocks which were proven to be fake, and many, many other things
>and now you have bring up other things
not now: again, you're being as dishonest as you can
because I told about that in my first post about the things making it all laughable
>you are also wrong about btw
>'lost' was just one way that one guy described how the entire Apollo production and operational system was dismantled
>so, you're wrong, depsite being right, m'kay?
Kek
>a very narrow collection of half truth little talking points and arranging them into the pattern you want to see
those aren't half truths: they are full truths, which is the only kind of truth
and they don't need me or anyone to arrange themselves in an obvious pattern
let me guess, pattern recognition bothers you on many topics, eh?
again, how cohenvenient
>>
File: 324678949566455883.jpg (11 KB, 375x330)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>532595258
This picture proves they are hiding vast quantities of land using cartography tricks and stitched together satellite images, btw
>>
>>532619248
>that they destroyed the original proof
the slightly higher res footage. there is no missing footage. what do you think it would have shown? do you think they got rid of it to hide stuff that only a few months later they would be broadcasting in even higher resolution?
>, it makes it suspicious
why? you've not explained what difference it makes.
>among many other things
each of which you are wrong about if you got them from american moon. you need to spend time looking into each and every point and then you'll see that the only way for you to hold on to this idea that there are 'many other things' is if you know nothing about any of them
thats how this whole thing survives - in a vague cloud of unknowing where each point only seems meaningful because of the presumed weight of evidence.
>you're being as dishonest as you can
nope, because you're doing exactly what i said. when pressed on one issues you reference the 'many other things'. when one of those things is talked about in detail, you again shift away to 'the many'. you have to do this because you dont know anything about any of it.
>>
>>532595258
>THIS LOOKS FAKE AS FUCK
i bend to your superior expertise, i'm a flat earthfag now, gonna don my aluminum foil hat and yell at the clouds
>>
>>532601259
>>532602485
That's not a green screen, you fucking morons. That is two different videos of Tim Peake on the ISS, one (on the right) where he's doing a live demonstration of water physics, and one (on the left) where he's recording a demonstrating motion of a fucking wiffle ball in front of a measuring grid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxIgvOyVnME

Holy shit the average /pol/ user is staggeringly fucking dumb. Truly a miracle that some of you subhumans survived infancy.
>>
>>532619248
>Kek
right, thats all youve got.
>they are full truths,
no they are not. american moon is stuffed full of half truths and outright lies, which you have never looked into and simply dont want to know about.
>obvious pattern
the obvious pattern is that no single point gets a detailed examination by you, meaning that you have the mistaken idea that there is a cloud of witnesses about the landings being fake. there is not. each of the little points that you believe create the weight of evidence are nothing of the sort. each one is as full of mistaken ideas and/or outright fabrications and ignorance as any other.

thats how lying pieces of shit likie american moon work - the quickly lay out dozens and dozens of wildly different points, make up or leave out certain things, and move on to the next in a breathless outpouring of nonsense that leaves you with the feeling of having learned something when in fact you have not.
>>
>>532620351
its an older lying meme but it checks out as fake.
>>
>>532603546
>>532604613
>>
>>532620780
stop quoting fucking chatbots would you? that flag has been posting the same stupid little video for years anyway so it doens't matter what anyone says to it
>>
i hope Artemis gets some nice photos of the light show over Iran on their way back
>>
>>532621358
they have a secret nuclear missile on board and they will nuke it from orbit. its the only way to be sure.
>>
>>532595258
>t. seething non-White memeflaggot
>>
File: pixels.gif (83 KB, 220x220)
83 KB
83 KB GIF
>>532619531
>>
File: 1775536461865053.mp4 (3.98 MB, 1280x720)
3.98 MB
3.98 MB MP4
>>532621697
>>
>>532615736
Anon, I agree that it's a thing, and I hate how fake and gay things are, too, but let's be fair. The photo was clearly taken like that to compare the height of the code to the female. It's possible it wasn't even her who had that idea
>lol lmao it's so tall go stand next to it it'll be a fun picture
>>
>>532595258
He says Artemis, not Artemis 2, nigger

This is old footage, but yeah, it does look studio fake
>>
>>532616763
>with being against the covid vaxx
If you are trying to tell me that there is not a major overlap of your position and being pro vaxxine then you are being totally dishonest. To be clear your position is no the normie-anti, you specifically have that derangement like a redditor or twitter user

>>532618882
>>532619158
Nice find. Pretty much confirms it.
>>
>>532618445
You’re literally just trying to poison the well. You’re a feminist shill with no interest in discussion
>>
>>532621697
holeeeeeeee fukkk
>>
>>532622158
>Nice find. Pretty much confirms it.
notice how the dishonest flerf and the disgusting croatflerf can't be bothered to read the bit where clearly explained that i was playing devils advocate/defense lawyer position?
none of them could be bothered to read anything about the case anyway which was also funny.

gotta lie to flerf
>>
>>532613278
I listened to it the other day and I'm convinced PF made a deal with the devil because it's impossibly good. Same with Wish You Were Here.
>>
>>532622355
I can see that you are obsessed with this topic, and probably lurk these threads every day for years. You didn't dispute my point, you just ran off in to your derangement
>>
>>532622698
what point did you even make? the one about the vaxx? i dont think its a reasonable point to make, mostly because its irrelevant to if the moon landings happened or not. try sticking to the subject instead of trying to waffle your way off into something else.

>obsessed with this topic
im not the one posting moonhoax threads and lying memes all the time. i can tell that you'd prefer that nobody bothered exposing those lies though.
>>
>>532606683
when your shithole country goes to the moon you can document it however you want
>>
>>532613119
It's technically daytime. The sun is too bright. You would have to adjust the cameras.
>>
Threadly reminder that Earth is 4x larger then the Moon so it should never appear as a blue marble from the Moon it should be fucking huge in the sky like a scifi movie.
Now the copers will tell me how they only use shitty lenses in space.
Yes like the skydive from space video where even when he landed the Earth was super curved because muh fish eye lense.
I'm not saying it's flat I'm saying you guys are lying niggers and I just don't think you could tell the truth if I had a gun to your head. You have a weird fixation on satanically inverting reality because you get off on it. Secular people can't understand fundamentalist freaks.
>>
>>532597259
Holy shit
This memeflag posted quite possibly the worst meme ever.
Depicts punching a German for asking too many questions, so he's probably a jew
>>
>>532621697
>video compression looks weird
And why would this happen if it was fake?
>>
>>532600979
>>532601559
The toy was casting a shadow she moves it a few inches then it no longer casts any shadow. If you're just randomly taking video at face value you're not a serious person.
>>
>>532624743
>it looks bad so it must be real
>>
>>532595258
I'm willing to believe this might be real, but if it is, then why does it look like an N64 asset? Why is the Earth in a higher resolution? Make it make sense... Are they jus taking shitty, out of focus photos to troll people? What's going on here?
>>
>>532624897
Why would it happen in a CGI video? Explain the mechanism.
>>
>>532625274
thats the scary part
if this is real why is it fucking low def

and i mean that seriously thats a reality problem hombre fr

we might have realistic mf problems

"the moon looks like a 483p potato"

"yea thats not great it shldnt"
>>
>>532602485
Thank you for this. I spent more then an hour looking for the NASA video at 0:35 It used to be EVERYWHERE because this was supposed to be the 1st manned space walk. It was a big deal. For some reason it's extremely hard to locate this wonderful totally real piece of history now. Of course the moon cucks could never explain hiding away their own evidence so it must not be true. Boomer Claymation Slop.
>>
>>532624746
because of the multiple bright light sources the shadows are a little confused, thats all. you can see how the shadow of the ball starts right up near the best of her pants and then flicks quickly across her legs then mostly fades out and flicks off screen because another light become dominant.
>>
>>532625461
and then, once all the HD footage gets uploaded that till will be called fake, because that all some people want to do
>>
>>532625567
>the best of her pants
BELT of her pants
>>
>>532604800
>"raped"
>Oh no that woman is having sex with multiple men that must be against her will! Yes my fantasies all involve harems of lolis but she's getting RAPED!
People understand women are a problem but we'll never figure out the Woman Question until we deal with the Simp Menace first.
The only reason women can vote for this hellscape is losers 100 years ago thought they'd get their dicks wet (they didn't).
>>
>>532605523
Already happened on skylab.>>532605665
>>
>>532609746
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes
>The researchers concluded that the tapes containing the raw unprocessed Apollo 11 SSTV signal were erased and reused by NASA in the early 1980s
So the original footage was lost then?
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/26/science/hunt-is-on-for-scattered-blueprints-of-powerful-saturn-moon-rocket.html
Oh so they don't have the blueprints or know how to do it anymore? We're totally advancing as a nation though right?
Friendly reminder there was a time when America could build the Empire State Building in 1 year and 45 days. Now "fast build" pedestrian bridges built by women take 3 years to build and fall down sooner then that. A theme you'll find in all the NASA is righteous shills is none of them will ever admit that America is a shithole filled with brown retards.
>>
>>532624746
>not le serious
This disgustingly cringeworthy cliche came from a mediocre tv show. What is “serious” about getting your talking points from HBO? So stupid, you’re a total clown and have genuinely zero awareness.
>>
>>532611253
>blocky atari graphics that can't even make a sphere
>looks real to me guiz
Why does my kids fucking iPhone have a better camera then NASA? Serious question.
>>
>>532613495
Thank you for making this I tell people about the 4x thing all the fucking time but people are retarded visual monkeys so this'll help. See there they go with their film shit. Yes goys if you use the wrong film your children will appear tiny in photographs you take! Everyone experiences this daily! Fucking. Pathetic. Kike. Niggers.
>>
>>532627048
>So the original footage was lost then?
the slightly higher resolution version of the footage we have was wiped, yes. too bad, but why does that mean all the landings were faked again?

>and article from 1987 means ALL the blueprints were lost
lol. pathetic.

and sure, in some ways there has been a lowering of capabilities in how well the US can design and construct super heavy lift rockets and their engines. but thats not been much of a demand industry has it. the US still leads the world in terms of heavy lift rockets though.
>>
>>532615717
>Some of the only proof we have is the physical footage woops we destroyed it
>It's okay we have moon rocks woops they're fake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmftFV_xr5c
If you're making a big claim you need big evidence. If your source is the government that lies about everything and they lost the evidence and the evidence they didn't lost is fake then what should a rational person think?
>They lied to me every other time they opened their mouth but I really like space I grew up on space so this HAS to be real because it's central to my identity
Look buddy. I grew up thinking we'd all get to go to space as well. I'm not even one of the people who thinks it's fake. I just know they lie about it and it makes me furious and curious about why.
If you really gave a shit about space you'd be curious as well instead of doubling down on a broken narrative.
>>
>>532628407
>the government 100% lies about everything
wrong. are missiles fake and gay? weather reports? GPS? any one of a thousand other things? no, its just you're retarded and cant think straight.
>they lie about it
where? no they dont.
>>
>>532606933
Would every single day for the rest of my life
>>
>>532627714
nigger please, you cant be seriously believing what the croatflerf is waffling on about with that dumb meme, can you? fucking go figure out the amount of each frame the earth and moon are taking up and you'll see that its perfectly correct.

ive linked to a thread where two different ways of doing this was explained to the croatflerf, but he ignored them and then reposted the same damn thing a few weeks later.

dont be like him
>>
>>532601559
>532601559
look at her hands when she places the toy
they cast shadow as soon as she is not touching the toy there's no shadow produced by the toy but there are from her hands in the same position to be affected by the light sources
>>
we went to the moon in the 1960s because White people were behind it. the indian one was faked. denying the original moon landing is antiwhite brown coded though and I consider you my enemy deserving of a traitors noose for denying it. niggers deny the moon landing because their monkey brains cant comprehend the math and equations behind it
>>
>>532627216
I haven't seen whatever HBO slop you're talking about I'm just aware that there's AI everywhere and it's a pain in the ass because real photos get dismissed as AI and clearly Doctored clips like this get assumed as real just depending on whatever side of an argument someone is on. The shadows under the toy are sus and years and years of NASA especially ISS video has looked really weird and fake and that was before AI fucked all video in the ass.
>>
moon landing denial and flat earth conspiracies were made to discredit all other conspiracies and make conspiracy theorists look retarded. anybody with a White iq can see it was a psyop by the jews to dismantle White achievements
>>
>>532629144
>the indian one was faked
why do you think that? please dont tell me its based on the animation they used to visualize the landing in the absence of any other kind of video.
>The shadows under the toy are sus
maybe because basically no one is used to looking at video shot in a small capsule that has bright strip lighting all over the place at unusual angles and it creates unusual effects.
>>
>>532625418
The wrong layer (Earth) in the background on the software was prioritized over/on top of the other one (Luna) in the foreground??? Hello??????
>>
>>532629536
the indian one was fake because it was "built" by indians. its bollywood level cgi in theirs. notice the people who deny White people going to the moon, never deny the indian one almost like the original moon landing deniers are all niggers
>>
Ask yourself why they always must have "floaty" things in the broadcasts to the gullible. And why they need that floaty king size dildomicrophone when they all have Headphone with Mic for everyday communication. Its to re in force the delusion that they are in zero gravity. Never forget the space station footage where the woman astronaut picks up the plushy toy that actually materialized out of thin air like star trek beamed it up there along with a gorilla suit, an acoustic guitar, and dozens of football shirts.
>>
>>532600662
Is the camera standing on the moon? Or is the camera very far away from the moon, so you can almost see its entirety?
>>
>>532623315
>what point did you even make
Is this how you normally engage? Just pretend to not comprehend? The person who spends hours in threads of a specific topic probably almost daily for years and for free is a total outliar of normal society or a shill
>>
>>532629783
>because it was "built" by indians.
they do launch stuff though. probably getting a lot of outside help too
> its bollywood level cgi in theirs
what was? the landing animation? sure, that was cgi. no one said different.
> never deny the indian one
i see them doing that all the time by posting the silly clip of the cgi animation that no one said was real. they do this because they are usually flat earthers.
>>
>>532630060
shocking to think but yes, sometimes they do silly TV effects when talking to groups of kids etc.
>>
>>532630168
was it the point i went on to address or are you just trying to fuck around now?
>>
idk if the dumb niggers ITT are just low level trolls or if they actually believe what they are saying. if space didn't exist we wouldn't even have internet in the first place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEH8iLjlodM
>>
>>532630339
thse faggots think its all balloons and stuff.
>>
File: nazis-wooden-doors.jpg (196 KB, 910x920)
196 KB
196 KB JPG
>>532630169
indians arent even capable of having clean countries or working sewers, they arent building rockets that fly to the moon. moon landing denial should be for the indian one cause that one actually makes sense. denying the White moon landing is retarded though because imagine thinking people who built this wouldnt have the knowledge required to fly to the moon
>>
These meme flags have been working all day to shit up the board with 0 IQ fodder. You’re boring bitch. Even your wildest lies are fucking boring.
>>
>>532630339
>instantly cuts to in space then back to earth

>>532630434
>Internet connections on the seafloor are provided by a vast, global network of over 500 submarine fiber-optic cables that carry approximately 99% of international data traffic, including internet, phone, and financial transactions. These cables, which span over 1.4 million kilometers and are often only about an inch in diameter (the size of a garden hose) in deep-sea sections, allow for high-speed data transmission at the speed of light, acting as the physical backbone of the global internet.
>>
File: 1245533.jpg (46 KB, 1280x720)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
Overtime you realize there is no space it's a psyop

I used to be a huge imaginary space lover from the Next Generation series to Mass Effect but it's a lie, why do people have trouble coping with it well they've been programmed since they were little children not only by the education system but by their grandparents and parents it's not a trap easy to escape
>>
>>532630569
well, i think you're being quite unreasonable about that point.

>>532630658
>STARLINK is FAKKE!!!1
>>
moon landing deniers can say what they want but denying the original apollo missions is spiritually brown and leftist, pic related
>>
>>532600048
Imagine if this shit was real. You could use a screwdriver to stab the nigger in the neck then use the screwdriver or a wrench to smack the other fuck in the head and crack his skull open.
Then you're left all alone with that whore in zero G. You'd break several records: first person to have recorded sex in space, first rape in space, first rape in zero G, first man to crash into the moon or die in outer space etc.
>>
File: xwop6tozekib1.jpg (231 KB, 2048x2048)
231 KB
231 KB JPG
>>532630795
They're afraid of being the center of existence itself as much as can be comprehended. Many of them are atheists and space is essentially the backbone for every single argument used to disprove God, creationism, singularity, etc..

>>532631112
Not fake, misleading just like the entire satellite lore. Feel free to post an single image of a satellite suspended by the earth's gravitational field.
>>
>>532630795
Flerfers never say
>I was into astronomy and orbital mechanics and rocket history, but then I realized it was all bullshit
They say
>I was into Star wars and mass effect and Funko pops and halo reach, but then I realized it was all bullshit
>>
>>532631112
the basis to being a moon landing denier is the person denying it has to accept that White people are not smarter than all the other races and arent capable of building rockets that fly to space. this is no different than globalism where so many of those people believe all races are equally the same in intelligence and the only thing that is different is skin color. they believe niggers in the jungle are capable of building cars if they were just given access to math textbooks.

this is why moon landing denial is brown coded and I will repeat it 1000x
>>
>>532631555
so every starlink sat is actually going around the flat earth attached to a balloon. understood.
>show me a photo
>FAKE!
>>
>>532631728
it would just be nice if you had some evidence that it was faked instead of just assuming it was.
>>
>>532631142
And when all white men are gone there will never be another mission to the moon.
>>
>>532631951
the apollo missions werent faked but the indian one was because it was "built" by indians. indians cant even build working sewer lines meanwhile WHITE rome was able to do it 2000 years ago but youre telling me they built a working rocket that went to the moon? good laugh
>>
>>532632326
like i said, they are likely getting a lot out outside help. also, strange to think it but, like with every races IQ distribution, there are a few smart jeets.
>>
flatties are the most retarded psyop
fuck you and kill yourself
>>
>>532631728
No.. The basis is that there is no such thing as space at least in the construct it has been purported to behave in. It's not that we can't do it because of a lack of whatever and faked doing so, rather it is not possible to be done because it is not a 3 dimensional space which can be navigated. It would be like claiming to have broken through into heaven or hell and walking around, it's not a lack of white ingenuity.

>>532631730
Yeah basically. They occasionally fire some kind of rocket propelled lights below the satellites to substantiate their claim, a good photo op.
>>
>>532632528

I'll just wait around for you to you can't help it you know it's coming
>>
>>532632852
this is all completely retarded horse shit. come back when you've found the dome (and dont need to post the usual lying memes about it)
>>
>>532628907
Nobody should take seriously someone who has posted more than 30 times in a thread.
>>
>>532627216
No, what he said was true. You're arguing against a strawman of your own invention.
>>
>>532595520
BREATHE
BREATHE IN THE AIR
>>
>>532633189
>nooo dont oppose the shills and retards
i should change my IP then like most of the shills do.
>>
>>532632852
but thats exactly what the 3rd worlders want. denying the moon landing is denying White achievements. the fact our people achieved such a feat in 1969 and it took browns 50 years just to catch up shows our level of intelligence is much higher than theirs and its hilarious that they try and compare the two. indians, chinese, etc. werent able to do it in 1969 because they are all retarded and brown. we would have people on pluto right now if jews hadnt opened the floodgates to those same 3rd world mouthbreathing parasites to try and dismantle White progress and try to pass off our achievements as their own
>>
>>532633419
>47 posts
nah you are just a schizo who got brainwashed from an early age
>>
>>532633552
>implying they caught up
>>
>>532633037
Private citizens are not authorized to venture beyond the poles. I would get shot in the head before I even stepped food off a ship.
>>
>>532633644
real anon
>>
>>532633552
>denying the moon landing is denying White achievements.
I've heard this one before, and it fails the common sense sniff test in like 2 seconds.
Whites are superior even without walking on the Moon. It's self-evident. Every ancient empire was White, and today there are browns living in the hollowed-out shells, shidding and farting all over the ruins and pretending their ancestors built the place they can't even maintain.
>>
>>532633419
You should. Then maybe you'll learn consistency.
>>
>>532633552
No you wouldn't there is no such thing. It's an entirely fantastical concept of the highest levels of Judaism. If you can't understand the motive it is pointless in continuing this conversation.
>>
>>532600871
Nigger it's 253000 miles away what does some Jewish camera trick have to do with that besides it being fake and gay?
>>
>>532633682
>beyond the poles
what do you think that even means?

>>532634021
explain. with examples please.
>>
File: BREATHING OUR AIR GOY.jpg (58 KB, 585x453)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>532633348
I can't afford Air.....
>>
>>532634299
Travesering the area which would mark the ends of the earth on a flat and or larger model.
>>
>>532634004
>Whites are superior even without walking on the Moon.
Youre right anon but it angers them the most because the apollo missions are seen as the greatest "humanity" feat and absolutely zero brown people worked on it. They can say "we wuz original europeans" or "we wuz egyptians" and try to destroy history, but they can never say they were the first ones to the moon like White people can
>>
>>532630317
You really have no comprehension, and I can tell you're not an LLM. If I bothered to explain you would just get confused by the next thing I said. Carry on and believe that your response was a proper answer or whatever.
>>
>>532595258
Does look really fake
>>
>>532634548
which is real in your mind i suppose. no one else has ever found what you're talking about.

>>532634600
3rd time is the last time im going to bother with you. what point? you are free to continue fucking around of course.
>>
File: Oh Vey.jpg (57 KB, 465x316)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>532595258
>psyops

kek

>>532595448
jew shill not aloud to where pol flag
>>
>>532601933
notice how the anti-NASA retard has only five year old child complaints. Wahh, it looks fake. What looks face, retard. It just does look fake. It should look more real. The anti-NASA retard has *literally* no argument. God, I've been putting up with this SHIT for years now. I got two of these retards I have to deal with in my life. Neither one can spell or do math worth a fuck... but they sure can watch videos of bullshit and remember every word like a parrot. They actually think they're winning flat earth arguments, and anti-NASA moon arguments. Both have important jobs, or it wouldn't be half as funny.
>>
Shouldnt regular people be able to see the ship with a telescope?
>>
Smell the gigacope Brainlet Chimpouts all over the internet from Artemis II
>>
>>532634736
How would you? The government's of the world decided to band together for once in the history of geopolitics and restrict access entirely to government personnel with the odd tourist permitted to walk around a guided tour zone.
>>
File: moon-landing-chads.jpg (184 KB, 1024x790)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
blue eyed ARYAN chads were first ones on the moon and no amount of "we wuzzery" will ever change photographic evidence. Get fucked NIGGERS
>>
>>532634736
Try reading >>532615383 >>532615383 >>532616345 >>532622158 Saying you're not deranged and an outliar because you didn't make the threads themselves is your invalid explanation, you here for hours and you are deranged, no one should listen to insane people
>>
File: Family tradition.jpg (280 KB, 1078x1600)
280 KB
280 KB JPG
>>532600048
it is real bros ... kek
>>
>>532602264
translation. I get to say how big something should be, and declare it fake. On my arbitrary word. now when it (really) happens again? Look, its fake again. On YOUR logic, I could declare videos of (you) to be... fake. Then the next video they show me, I just say, oh, its the fake guy again. Looks the same as the first fake guy. You have no argument, beyond "trust me bro". Its pathetic.
>>
File: 1690261549019758.jpg (192 KB, 800x800)
192 KB
192 KB JPG
>>
File: 1681342713047813.jpg (398 KB, 1081x1379)
398 KB
398 KB JPG
>>
>>532602355
>Wait, isnt that supposed to be the dark side of the moon?
where were you when you learned that the dark side of the moon is not, in fact, dark. We call it that, because its the side that is always facing away from us. Retard.
>>
File: F.E.MapJFKdesk.png (520 KB, 727x899)
520 KB
520 KB PNG
>>532603546
>(((Vacuum of space)))

It is real, exist between peoples ears .

Trump said that Greenland is under ice...

https://youtu.be/0FLJVJk8KPc
>>
File: IMG_0170gg667.jpg (133 KB, 750x665)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
>>532613430
>>
File: 1645629049894.png (2.43 MB, 1620x1098)
2.43 MB
2.43 MB PNG
>>532635139
>>
>>532634938
oh i see. so everyone that goes to south pole is really either in on the fakery or not as smart as you because they got duped. interesting.

>>532635074
i think it would be better to talk about the various subjects instead of focusing on me as you seem to be so interested in doing.
>>
File: Covid.jpg (293 KB, 1275x1650)
293 KB
293 KB JPG
>>532613430
>vaccine enjoyer

ask your Jewish doctor if get vaxxed is good for you
>>
>>532635626
You don't "go" there. You are stationed there and follow a strict chain of command, otherwise you are shot dead or placed in military prison.
>>
File: JFK on the plainejpg.jpg (198 KB, 960x955)
198 KB
198 KB JPG
>>532614697
Believe = be lie with

5 Facts That Shatter the Globe
https://youtu.be/CW7eyDaIYz4
>>
>>532635898
yes, you do go there. you can pay for a tourist trip to the south pole where theres a nice base to visit etc. you can hike across the full width of the entire continent if you can afford to set it up. you never will. you'll never do anything apart from post your fantasy shit and lying memes.
>>
>>532635626
I think the opposite, I don't think anyone should even engage with you. 50 replies in this thread alone, you are probably in the several other threads too. You point blank admit to doing this for years. Your objective is to be a time waster of people. I am sickened to even have replied this much to you already, but the lurkers all witness so its not entirely wasted time. I'm leaving now because I'm not deranged.
>>
>>532600048
The string is concerning. The end of it seems to be paused until she releases the ttoy.
>>
>>532636062
my objective is to provide a bit of push back against the endless flat earth and moonhoax threads and spam. for some reason that really bothers you. too bad.
>leaving
perfect, since you've had nothing to say about the subjects of interest.
>>
>>532636029
Look at the map in airplane. That is the land admiral Richard Bird talking about
>>
>>532636076
You should look up full videos instead of the carefully curated clips the flat earthers like
Here is 20 minutes of them in microgravity and they are on-screen the entire time
https://youtu.be/QOtpHvHWZ_I?t=1704
>>
File: Great Yeyr.webm (3.55 MB, 640x360)
3.55 MB
3.55 MB WEBM
climate change explained
>>
>>532636060
That is a lie.
>>
File: Polaris.mp4 (3.27 MB, 540x940)
3.27 MB
3.27 MB MP4
>>532595258
Lines Really Harvesting
https://youtu.be/y6XpCpbOYD8#tag:link:\n\nPower



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.