>not a single star >retards still believing nasa lies lmaoWhatever happens to light pollution whatever happened to no light pollution in space the stars should be everywhere I will tell you what happens theres a reason why ZERO nasa pictures show any stars and is because if the showed any stars it would be extremely easy for them to make a mistake and they're lazy incompetent government tax thieves that have nothing to show except cgi and ai generated slop like this webmthe reason why they dont put any stars is because if they did an autist like me would immediately do the math to their exact position and if the star make sense to be placed there
>>532632118>Claims to be so autistic that they would chart the star positions>Not autistic enough to even look up the concept of dynamic range in digital cameras
>WHERES THE STARS????1seems to be the new favorite shill post
>OP memeflag brainlet
>>532632284>muh cameras only work on earthlmao>>532632292explain why there are no stars right now jeetnadian
>>532632292the cope from Artemis II is deljcious
>>532632118>p-please pay attention to this American nothingburger camera view that even Indians can achieve nowadays>A-America is back guys!!!!>hehe if you respond I'll be so mad.... please respondeAmerican shills are so transparent. All fields
>>532632397>expose for detail in brightest areas>also expose for stars that are 1000x dimmer.explain to me why you post this shit while being ignorant (or pretending to be ignorant) about basic photography
The moon is the source of the light pollution you fucking moron. It’s a giant reflective surface. A bright moon = no stars.
meh
>>532632118Artemis proved the Moon is egg shaped which finally vindicates Einsteinian Jewish Physics! If you disagree kiss your bank account good bye goy! Enjoy paying your student loan debt then bitch! Muahahaha am israel chai! I’m also exceptionally glad that all crew members are jewish including the Kushi
>>532632397This is how I used to fuck
>>532632118I like how they always have the cameras behind some jutting piece of habitat. To make it more real.Built in ubstructed camera views to make it more real. Christ, it's so stupid.
>>532632630>>532632566lmao can you paidjeets agree in one argument so your bullshit is more believable
Wow my rangeban is over after a week, yeah no stars is a dead giveaway of fakery. I'm just not buying what they're selling.
>>532632292>>532632355>>532632566BEHOLD!THE MENTAL GYMNASTS ARE HERE!Too bad it isn’t the Olympics yet!SPACE ALBINOS releases in 2027
>>532632397A digital sensor has to distinguish signal from noise. There's only a certain amount of light that the sensor receives per exposure, based on aperture and shutter speed. The sensor then converts that information to an image, and as part of that has to disregard noise. Taking a photos of stars on earth that also captures useful information about the other surroundings (i.e. a foreground or background like some trees or a cabin or mountain) usually requires a long exposure and very specific post processing to make everything actually visible and intelligible, or requires multiple exposures and composting. Our eyes are incredibly powerful cameras and our brains are exceptional image processors, so we can see the stars and our hand infront of our face on a moonlit night. A digital camera just isn't as good, starlight is a very weak signal to a camera sensor, and they're already overexposing the moon and parts of the ship so increasing the exposure level to capture the stars would probably result in the moon being super blown out (this is what happens when you try to take photos of a full moon from earth as well btw, you're pretty much never going to see stars in those pictures unless they're composites)
>>532632867or you could find out for yourself and know that im correct while the other anon isn't. its just basic exposure levels anon. its that simple.
>>532633064the two word phrase you're looking for is 'dynamic range'.
>>532633064lmao nice chatgpt response retard completely stupid considering i can take pictures of the stars with my shitty Chinese phone so youre debunked forever >>532633218>j..just find outlazy jeet i hope the nasa jews dont pay you for this post
>>532633280Yeah which is what I said >>532632284 but memeflag anon clearly can't comprehend anything that isn't explained to him like a 5 year old.
>>532633064So you’re saying cameras got worse since the 1960s yea? Alright makes sense. Because those pics Buzz Aldrin and Neill Armstrong took were clear as fuck in comparison to the shit they delivered yesterday.
>>532633363>lazy jeet i hope the nasa jews dont pay you for this postshill cunt. you're useless.>>532633384true enough
>>532633408Pictures from the moon in the 60s and 70s including the famous earthrise image don't have stars in them either you dolt. >>532633363>ChatgptI don't need a computer to badly explain concepts I already understand. I'm sorry it's too difficult for you but perhaps that's a reason to remain silent and listen instead of loudly proclaiming that you don't get it and anyone who does is a liar or shill
>>532632118explain.
>>532633363Only NASA fails to photograph stars. Americans suck nigger dick at everything.
>>532633638he's clearly fucking around. the 'no stars' thing is real bottom of the pile tier shilling at this point
>>532633638I’m not talking about stars dumbfuck dolt. I’m talking about the image quality which was SHITE in comparison to the 1960’s. Don’t get killed, would be a shame to find your face on bestgore
You have to assume its AI.in AI age, with a fraud factory production from known fraudsters who’s sole job it is to produce clickbait for fedoras. They get their wages and fortunes are syphoned off on the basis of it. Academia is one huge fraud factory operating like this. Wokey day care. Explain the poo moonshot which was so hilarious that when it released its faked up scam monkey 2D retard animations images about 12 people texted it to me at once and the world was roaring with laughter. Maybe it was shutterspeed or something? On Poo’s arse. Check it as best you can to see if its AI. Until proven otherwise they are scamming. Poo let the turd out of the bag confirming all suspicions. All non poo fraudsters should punch poo fraud factory retards on sight.
>>532633781idiot shill/troll
The Canadian guy looks so dumb that he belongs on a framing crew banging with a hammer. I notice they never post a clip lasting longer than 1.59 min as well.
>>532633907Yeah IQ on digital will be hit or miss. Apollo also used medium format film which is higher image quality than 35mm generally and has comparable or better quality than a mid tier digital camera. On the flip side, that image is particularly bad because they've clearly got the settings wrong. Many of the other images are of perfectly fine quality. It also helps that Apollo astronauts were on the moon and so had potentially more interesting compositions, just being in space with nothing except celestial bodies kinda limits the pictures you can take.
>>5326321189:00 AM. NASA publishes a photo of the moon.9:01 AM. Earth's schizo army begins to study the image.9:02 AM. The schizo's conclude that:-The moon is also flat.-The moon is fake.-The crew of Artemis are Reptilians.-Space is too black.-Artemis is in Hollywood.-Artemis's toilet is a nuke.-NASA is run by Martians.-
>>532633638shut up retard you've been debunked>>532633781>>532633408that makes sense considering cgi has gotten progressively worse you can tell by all the capeshit movies looking like complete ass , is not that nasa went to the moon but the origina fake moon landing looked better because white people produce better cgi than current Hollywood jews and mutts
>>532634187You Nigger kike “slava ukraini” tier suidical homosexual closet faggot don’t get killed would be a shame to find your face on bestgore
>>532632118Everything going on in the world and all you can fixate on is this retarded brainlet shit, actually kill yourself in real life
>>532634248>just being in space with nothing except celestial bodiesWe are always just in space with nothing except celestial bodies you dumb fucking tumor brain. DON’T Get mauled in the coming civil war would be a shame to find your face like that on Bestgore
>>532634340brain dead scum
>>532634526I'm not sure you've noticed in your tard rage but you just posted a pic with planets and stars.
>>532634314Retard.
>>532634959prove me wrong Manolo where are the stars why there are no stars
>>532634909kek>noticed!
>>532634526>MUH STARS
>>532635174Just because you don't like the explanation doesn't mean there isn't one. See, >>532634526 posted a picture where the exposure captured the suns corona and also several planets/stars (unsure which, the bright ones might be planets but without knowing the relative angle to the ecliptic I can't tell) because they were focused on the light/dark contrast and getting the corona exposed, instead of taking a picture of the moon (and object in direct sunlight when you see the bright side!) and hoping to also capture the equivalent of a night sky in the same shot.
>>532634822Projection. Don’t run across any serial killers would be a shame to read of you getting ultrakilled.>>532634909Yea I just posted one with stars but you said that’s impossible now you’re saying I’m the idiot even though you’re the idiot because you said there can be no stars in the pic?? Either you are bots or so dumb that we need a crime wave that eradicates you people>>532635220You’re so dumb I hope you get stabbed to death on your next trip to the supermarket or sometime in the future after that
>>532635752its a shill or troll. thats all it is. he'll perform any and every evasion to keep it going longer.
>>532635784just fuck off and learn about basic photography you absolute faggot. you'll be amazed at how a few simple concept will change your life.
>>532635752so you went from is impossible to capture stars with cameras from space to here are some starsas per your picture i can literally generate better pictures with some ai slop >>532634192kek they ran out of credits for their ai slop
>>532635784I'm not sure what point you're trying to make between all the whininess, the photos coming in are very sharp and high quality
>>532635926You need to go back to school and learn about basic photography and physics you dumb motherfucker. Also friendly reminder your country did not go to space you are nothing you are irrelevant and the PsyOps guys are laughing at your imbecility. Speaking of which I know some of them and it’s interesting that they respect me but would shit on your grave if no toilet was nearby.
>>532635752>the bright ones might be planets but without knowing the relative angle to the ecliptic I can't tellBrightest ones are planets, you can see lots of darker stars too.
>>532636231what do you think you're showing with this pic? do you even know?
>>532632118It's fake
>>532636170>the photos coming in are very sharp and high qualityJust don’t come anywhere near people during the coming cataclysm or you will be eating knives.
>>532636557LMFAOAdded to my collection of NASA fails.
>>532636556There is no point in arguing with idiots like you who couldn’t solve a crossword puzzle but are lecturing the rest of us on topics you have absolutely no clue about while using more logical fallacies than are listed on Wikipedia
>>532636686Wanna make any other impotent schizo remarks?
>>532636557Nice how the shadow just dissipates kek. “Science minded folks” here will have an explanation. Oh yea, coming to think of it this proves Einsteinian kike physics! It’s the velocity displacing the light hence why the shadow cannot keep up! Makes sense now!
>>532636996Fake image not from NASA like your retarded twatter screencap claimsYou are a gullible retard or a paid well poisoning shill
>>532632118Mainstream cosmology is kabbalistic nonsense.Research plasma cosmology/electric universe.
>>532636752>>532636996You can see the duper's delight on the face of the guy in the upper left corner
>>532637050>You are a gullible retard or a paid well poisoning shillListen you fucking disgusting fat dumb american rat. Your country is right now ruining the global economy on behalf of kikes (well poisoners). You are incurring extreme Sin niggerbrain, and that’s a good thing. I’m just telling you because you are blissfully unaware and you just referred to me as precisely what you are: a well poisoning fat kike slave. And you will soon find out why that is a bad bad horrible thing, for you.
Yup, well poisoning shill confirmed
>>532637380Keep the tardrage coming, it's pretty entertaining.
>>532636780yeah, didn't think so.
>>532637250Many of these people are trained stage magicians fyi. You should listen to Dr. Michael Aquino’s final interviews. He revealed a lot of it. If you don’t know, he was one if not perhaps the foremost PsyOps guy in the US.
>>532637380if you think it's bad now, just wait The past 150 years have been made bad by Great Britain, Germany, Russia, and China.Now the US is having its turn and we're going to do it oh so right. Fuck Europe. You fags should not have bitten the hand that feeds you.
>>5326374672nd’ddat boy loves to Reeeeeeeee!
>>532637901>The past 150 years have been made bad by Great Britain, Germany, Russia, and China.Lmao America has been shitting up the world since WW2. China did nothing wrong.
>>532632284Yeah and those cameras on the solar panel booms are literal fucking actual GoPros. Absolute dogshit camera. Props for standing up to the vacuum and crushing temperature extremes of space, though.
>>532633716
Artemis II has broken brainlet shills' brains.
Interior livestream is in 4KOutside livestream is in 360pYou can not explain this away.
>>532639500its driven them into a frenzy
Photographer here.Pic related.You’re welcome, newfags.
>>532637701>Many of these people are trained stage magicians fyiI sometimes wonder what it must be like to be somebody like youTo completely fabricate these lies, say them to others, and simultaneously believe them with zero evidence.What kind of mental illness does it take to do such a thing?
>>532640389id post one with both a full moon and stars in it, but the entire frame would probably be white.
>>532636557>It's fake(You)r altered webm is, yes 3 pbtid in-the-other-thread Croatia flag gaslighting shill.
>>532632118typical post from someone who's never used a camera for astrophotography.you are an idiot.
Only brown people actually think this is real
>>532632397he already told you what to look up, and you still haven't looked it up you fake "autist". and like he said, if there were stars you wouldn't even bother to check them, you'd probably just come up some other stupid thing to complain about.
>>532640614If you ever see such a photo, it is a composite. Our moon illuminated is about 15 stops brighter than the brightest stars. A good ”proffessional grade”camera has around 14 stops of dynamic range.
>>532641237Here's one that looks like it's a half moon, which might be more reasonable as far as typical cameras go
>>532632630>The Moon has alow, directional reflectivity (albedo) of about 12%, reflecting only about one-tenth of the sunlight that hits it. Its dark, porous, and dusty surface (regolith) is similar to old asphalt or charcoal in brightness, making it a poor reflectorWhen they were passing behind the moon with the Sun blocked you should've been able to see the stars dum dum.
>>532641237well sure. but you could blow out the moon in a serious way and maybe catch some of the brighter stars before your entire frame was white.
>>532634340Wait but it's not a tiny blue marble? The JIDF has assured me a thousand times that Earth from the Moon would look like a tiny blue marble because lenses.>still can't even render a sphere>inb4 muh pixelsOkay so Earth is completely round but the Moon's edges are pixelated to shit because let me guess lenses?
>>532636231So they didn't photoshop the clouds this time right? It's like the parable of the boy who cried wolf. NASA has lied so many times over so many years that even if they found an alien I would be skeptical.
>>532642616what was the lie about blue marble 2002? they never said it was a real photo of the earth. not once.
>>532642616That's a composite from 2001 or so which they never claimed to be a raw photo. The famous Blue Marble is from 1972.
>>532632118https://youtu.be/kzcJlbw4OXE
>>532632397>explain why there are no stars right now jeetnadianIt's daytime retard. I absolutly hate you niggers becaseu you don't bother to even know then very first thing about cameras; exposure
mods, can this be moved to >>>/x/ ?
>>532643112i cant decide if your answer is supposed to make any sense or not. just saying' its daytime' really does nothing to get at the real answer, while mentioning 'exposure' at least hits on the right subject area
>>532636231I appreciate that the camera people went with Kino pictures.
>post a bunch of bullshit for decades>believe it
>>532643414Long story short if you exposed for the stars the moon would look like a pure white circle. The moon is a actually a very bright object
>>532644563yes thats right. it might blow out even more. but saying 'its day' doesn't really make sense in space, thats all i was getting at.
>>532636557>>532636752>>532636996you people are, as usual, ignorant idiots. there are multiple bright light sources from all directions, plus the image is a bit overexposed, which is why when she has her hands close to her lap, the dark shadow underneath her arms is so thin. the lights from multiple directions are able to shin underneath her arm brightening the edges of the shadow. it's also why when she extends her arms you can still see the shadows from her arms on her thighs, but they are very faint, because as she moved her arms up, more of the multiple lights act as fill lights and ligthened the shadows to the point you almost can't see her arm shadows on her pants. that ball is floating out there very high up and the multiple light sources easily illuminate all of the area underneath to wash out the shadow. it's still there faint, but that coupled with the fact it's overexposed means the shadows will be thinner, fainter, and only very dark when surfaces are very near each other so that the multiple light sources can't get under them as easily. you guys are such ignorant morons. always commenting on photography, astrophotography, gravity, "special effects" even though you don't even have a basic understanding of any of it.
>>532640389>be in space>darkest void in the universe >still can’t see stars>jews claim it’s because the moon is so bright>go to dark side of moon where stargazing by physical theory is possible >still no stars >Jews claim they forgot to provide filters for the camera Hey they forgot about it this time. Shit happens. They’ll remember in 2076 when they go again. No big deal goys just deal with it
>>532643633
>>532646752takes real effort to post well crafted bullshit like this.
>go to dark side of moon where stargazing by physical theory is possible >still no starsArtemis II has caused the retards to resort to literal lies to defend their retardationhttps://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e009301
>>532647078Correct, what big brains they have.
>>532646752the dark side of the moon doesn't mean it's dark there, and light everywhere else, you fucking idiot.
>>532646450Do they pay Nasajeets per written word? So much text to defend the most obvious CGI.
>>532647231Mind circling where you aren't seeing stars in that picture?
>>532632118They did the rendering of those craters so nice , just couldnt manage random yellow pixels
>>532647231>>532647699Nevermind I didn't realize you were just quoting the other anon.
>>532647597try reading it, moron.
>>532647699>>532647812>NevermindNo worries anon - it's hard to keep track of the retards ever since Artemis II launchedLast week I did the same thing with a German flag, which I assumed was a flat earther but I was wrong.Have a good one
I was told this is the thread for retards? Looks like I'm in the right place.
>>532632825>put cameras on surface of spaceship>complain about surface of spaceship being visible>be special kind of retard who complains about it on 4chan.
>>532632118>Exposure Settings of the camera https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exposure_(photography)Pic random
Earth is always COMPLETELY covered with clouds to because it would be obvious it was fake without them
>>532647281The moon is not a light source. The sun reflects off the moon and creates the bright overcast. The dark side of the moon quite literally means that it has shielded the light source from the sun you fucking moron.
>>532646752They took a photo from the dark side of the moon and it has been published. Notice anything?
>>532646752>>532650431only the finest lies are good enough for /pol/
>>532632118You forgot to buy the super mega ultra refraction constellation expansion pack, dummy
>>532632292Canadian tranny has returned
>>532650844thats not me, thats another leaf flag that has been spamming flerf stuff and 'clouds are fake' since artemis launched.
>>532650697The date it was posted on X does not translate to the date the photos were takenHow many more times will you get corrected about your lie before you abandon it?https://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e000192https://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e000193
The Book of Genesis:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.To all Christians ITT I have a question. How can you call yourself Christians and still believe the propaganda from these devil worshiping Masons over what the very first paragraphs of the Bible says?
>moon is bright shiny white in the nightsky>it’s a dull matte grey when you’re in no atmosphere and merely 1000s of km awayDo people actually buy this shit? I don’t give a fuck if the astronaut said some Christian stuff
>>532651005>"sunlight illuminates the limb of the planet">uhm ackshually the exposureSo what illuminates the planet in the first picture?
>>532648291What are you, retarded? They could put the cameras on that big piece of equipment jutting out getting in the view. It would then just be a picture of the thing they're taking. But some PR guy went "They won't know its on a cool rocketship if we don't also show the stupid utilitarian space junk."Fuck you, retarded memeflag fuck. You're so retarded you don't know you're stupid.
>>532651240like i said here >>532650893i expect this flerf shill to speedrun his spam folder of lying memes, the dirty filthy nigger
>>532651472may i complement you on such exquisite bullshit? truly remarkable and it is my honor to be in the company of greatness
>>532651472>flerf refuses to acknowledge his lies and pivots to another talking pointEvery fucking time
>>532651240There's no lying here. The Bible is 100% true and the pics the astronauts took are 100% real. The heavens declare the glory of God
>>532651757exactly the case. flerfs are shills pretending to believe the Bible.
>>532651472My favorite is how they can't decide if North America is huger then Asia or tinier then Europe.>>532651005Notice how none of them will respond to this pic that shows>>532650697this pic is just horse shit because they were taken at the same time. If it was real they wouldn't have to lie so much.It reminds me of all the retards that were so sure there was a "secret" to Stranger Things that they made all of these elaborate fan theories instead of just accepting the show was shit. NASA fags will jump through oops rather then acknowledge this obvious fuck up.
>>532651955>this pic is just horse shit because they were taken at the same time.19 seconds between the two, dimmer one taken first. what the hell does it matter when someone gets around to posting it online? flerfs are really scraping the bottom of the barrel for shit to whine about these days. like sending flerfs to antarctica, Artemis has broken their fragile little minds.
>>532651472>>532651955The full moon was lighting the earth, the two pictures are taken just 20 seconds apart with the brighter one having higher exposure settings as you can see in the EXIF data. The data is right there for you to check, why do you even have a problem with the timing exactly?
>>532651757>>532651623>>532651621All of Apollo 11's crew were 33 degree Freemasons.
>>532634340man the moon looks like shit. no wonder we never went back it's boring as hell looking
>>532652420evidence? no, didn't think so.
>>532651955you dumb shits just really have no clue how cameras work.
>>532632397There are no stars in the day on earth, they are in daylight in space. Why would a camera pick up such low levels of star light when it’s currently under daylight brightness.
>>532651955>they can't decide if North America is huger then Asia or tinier then Europe.muh light refractionmuh focal pointmuh exposurebut they will NEVER argue this pic.
>>532652589
>>532632118No wonder all you retards are also antivaxxers
>>532633363>considering i can take pictures of the stars with my shitty Chinese phone so youre debunked foreverNot in daylight and while pointing at the horizon you can’t
>>532636996try doing something similar on video with an object and with multiple angled lights sources around you. then observe and see how shadows can behave. you niggers are so fucking mind numbling dumb it's ridiculous. you are either brown, retarded or both
>>532639500American power and accomplishment has always drove euro's into an uncontrollable frenzy
>>532652979>we are the stupid ones for not believing this is real
>>532652860Retard
>>532652929Stfu op may be a retard but Covid wasn’t a threat and there was zero need to take hastily produced mRNA vaccines. Not all vaccines are bad but you can go fuck yourself if I’m being threatened into taking anything, least alone new dna sequencing tech for a nasty flu.
>>532652284They're claiming to have taken the second picture at night. Instead of 20 seconds before the first picture. At this point I don't think you're arguing in good faith or you're 10x dumber then the flerfers you mock.
>>532652836Stars, at night? I am shocked.
>>532653261Are you mentally challenged? You can se the city lights…
>>532653186Yes, for years they tried to pass it off as real until they couldn't deny it anymore, and the guy who created it admitted it was a composite.It is truly amazing to think that after 50 years we still don't have even a single photo of Earth from space.
>>532652717>You can alter a camera's exposure settings to make it look brighter or darker retardYes and they used that to fake a night pic what you camera fags call "day for night". I'll repeat if it was real you wouldn't have to do weird shit and lie.
>>532651484how do you operate the camera out there? your reasoning skills are going to have to come into play, then maybe you'll understand why they don't just mount a camera on a bar jutting out from the ship.
>>532652904ok, thats one
>>532653147>this is impossible to accomplishyes, if you are brown like you. brownoids can't into the white man's technology or science. which is why so many blacks are flat earthers
>>532653432So are you faking day for night or night for day? Or does it take 20 seconds in space to go from night to day?
>>532653543Their favorite thing to do is make up junk science terms to try and intimidate you into going along with what they're saying.But they can't debunk pic rel. Not with all their theorems and algorithms and paradoxes.
>>532652860i argue that picture all the time. it was never claimed to be a real photo. there. now you can stop posting it.>>532653261no. i think you are well aware that the scene was only light by light reflecting from the moon.>>532653524evidence that nasa passed it off as real?
>>532653432Dude stop replying to himHe's a legit troll who purposefully ignores logic and just wants more (You)s
>>532653627You think.. you think they only take pictures via astronauts peeking out of windows?Motherfucker, explain Voyager, explain any unmanned photograph. Explain the goddamn Hubble Telescope.Like I said, you're so retarded you don't know you're dumb.
>>532632118Do you not know how things work?
>>532632118Human eye can detect 50 photons. A camera pixel needs billions of photons to not blend in with other pixels.
>>532653711>>532653701My ancestors came over on the Mayflower and one of them was a Founding Father. (You) are a filthy Jew whose putrid ancestors slithered onto these shores in 1910 to infect us like you did Europe for 2000 years.
>>532633907Pretending to be retarded isn't trolling. It just makes you a retard
>>532653860>i argue that picture all the time. it was never claimed to be a real photo.Please give me your direct NASA source for this.
>>532632118if you think the moon is real you've already lost
>>532634526It's going to be so funny to see you dismembered and gang raped in your bullet holes
>>532654235>NASA never claimed it was a real photo>HURR SHOW ME A NASA SOURCE ON THATThey really are scraping the bottom of the barrel these days, aren't they?
>>532653775No, you capture images because it’s interesting. And exposure is an artistic interpretation, since you can’t capture the dynamic range we ssee with our eyes. Would you rather they’d exposed for the city lights? I’m sure they did that as well and well see that published as well. I bet he took 50-100 pictures just there and then. But most people find it amazing and awe inspiring to see some details.
>>532632118>the only thing they can't fake is stars>the very thing that any ordinary space sim game manages with ease>but not NASA>because reasonAre you guys even trying?
>>532650431holy fuck you're retarded
>>532650628you're stupid too you dumb indian>>532654485
>>532653147Totally fake where's the black kid taking the video?
>>532632118You can't be serious. This has to be a troll post. Do you guys think this is a real post and this guy is genuinely retarded? Or is he a troll pretending to be retarded? So hard to tell in 2026.
>>532654356>NASA posts doctored images as "photos of space">Canadiantranny: uhm they never said its realSo you're asserting that NASA purposely posts fake images of space?
>>532654609
>>532654680Thanks man, don't show the video without giving Jamal at least some credit.
>>532632118We never have gone to space.
>>532654792>inb4 how can 200 countries be in on the liethey are not ready for the truth
>>532635784>but you said that’s impossibleThey are behind the fucking moon which is blocking the sunlight increasing the exposure time you idiotic troglodyte.
>>532654096soo only Adrin, is that your final answeralso, your ancestors would be ashamed of you.>>532654235you want evidence of something that never happened? >>532654581thats not what i said at all. i was disagreeing with that claim
>>532654960Matthew 4:8-98 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
>>532654680Someone had to film it
>>532654621Ask David Weiss about that claimed mars image.
It's amazing that the internet has dumbed humanity down into a race of flerfers
>>532632118>we can fly a satellite and camera around the moon but the windows 11 start menu bar is too scientifically complex
>>532655156the flat earth shill continues his campaign of trying to make people think that Christians are flat earthers.
>>532655156Amen brother. "Space" is fundamentally a Jewish lie. They can't stand to have people believe that the Earth still has its foreskin (firmament). It is a very fundamental defeat to them that the earth is not circumcised.
>>532655184>Someone had to film itthat someone was a camera, retard.
>>532655828>memeflagshalom
>>532651261When looking at the moon from earth your eye is seeing all the light reflected at once, about 6 petrawatts of energy. The moon's surface is similar in reflectiveness to charcoal. When you are close you are only seeing the light reflected off that small portion.
>>532655935Christ is King, retard
>>532638614Heat transfer through radiation is the slowest of all three, mutt. Only in movies you instantly get cooked when you face the sun.
>>532656095your dick will never grow back cuckstein
>>532655356>race of flerfersI'm glad the shills have decided to now label us as "flerfers". Makes it easier to identify the bad actors.
>>532656422you must be new, maybe a new hire for the Artemis 2 shilling rush, but thats a terms been around for many years now. i tried to get Flard used more but sadly i never caught on.
>>532656592have you tried getting a job?
>>532656993you offering? not sure you could pay me enough to pretend being a flerf. what do you make a day?
>>532657109>immediately starts fishing for information
>>532657324like you then i guess, with your personal question. so is that all you have to do - post lying memes all the time and avoid questions?
>>532632397>explain why there are no stars right now jeetnadianIt's daytime See the daytime part of the earth and moon?
>>532657661What about his video? Can you address how/why Scuba Steve is filming one of our glorious totally real astronauts in space and not in a swimming pool like where they train?I'm describing the video to you because I'm not sure of your computational ability to parse the video.
>>532657661i bet you get paid really shit or (gasp) nothing for selling your soul
>>532658105Can you please redline what this scuba diver is supposed to look like?
>>532658215Oh so you're not actually capable of watching the video he linked got it thanks!
>>532658105its just another stupid flerf meme. yeah, incredible that another guy in a suit was holding the camera i know>BUT ITS A SCUBA DIVER!!!1no its fucking not.>>532658185whats the going rate for your services to flerfdom? my only payment is laughing at flards
>>532658684>>532658363So you're telling me globohomo is spending trillions on "space" but can't afford to get real humans as shills?
>>532658963just so you know, the way that you post a video about a completely different flerf talking point with every post is very obvious. you guys should quit doing that because the fact that you're baiting as hard as you can for replies couldnt be more clear
>>532656353btw, you forgot to change your vpn. In case you didn't understand from my last post, I'm Christian, you indian shill retard. Is this their new directive now? The Israelis are telling you to call others jewish?
>>532659118Maybe your programmers were shit-for-brained morons but saying "flerf" isn't a substitute for an argument.
>>532659361yeah but keep my point in mind all the same.
>>532643333checked
>>532656993kek, look who is talking
India colonized california and texas.Space is fake >>532659138
>>532632118Do you actually believe that or are you just saying shit?
>>532659361That video is fake. Why is the sky dark when the sun is shining?
round earth proofs
flerfs don't understand how cameras work
flerfs don't understand refraction
flerfs dont understand gravity, the vacuum, perspective, and more
>>532659127>In case you didn't understand from my last post, I'm Christianhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto-Judaism
well to be fair many flerfs do understand, they are just paid shills pretending not to and posting around the clock every single hour and every single day for years. with the same arguments and shill vibes and memes, all scripted, in every thread. you would have to be a completely oblivious retard not to notice this is inorganic astroturfing.
The Flerfs yearn for peasantry and the state to be all-powerful and for nothing beyond the state to exist like the commies they are.
>>532660133>what is the upper atmosphere
>>532661168Space terrifies ideologies of all stripes, their narcissistic ego is bruised by the existence of there being a whole universe that earth is but one of countless realms in an eternal void totality. Some cope by fantasizing about colonizing it, but the flerfs try to deny its existence instead as they are terrified of there being layers of reality outside the one they directly interact with. Arguing the truth is pointless because the goal is to destroy the truth as the truth makes their narcissism afflicted minds feel worthless.
>It's 2026 they MUST use 4k high res live stream, that's what my favorite simp does and I can see every pore on "her" nose. So why can't I see any stars here?Classic case of spoiled teenager that doesn't understand the destruction vacuum and that it needs to sacrifice your 4k high res video to protect the camera so you could bitch about not seeing stars..
>>532632118this flat earth psyop shit is so tiring. i love space, its so cool, and seeing this disinfo shitpost campaign grinds my fuckin gears
>>532661668>we can't use decent cameras we have to use special space cameras that look like shit stop complaining!https://investor.gopro.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2026/GoPro-Cameras-Onboard-Historic-Artemis-II-Mission-to-the-Moon/default.aspx>6 days ago — And according to National Geographic, the four‑astronaut Artemis II crew is equipped with GoPro cameras to document daily life on the missionI accept your concession.
>>532632118where are the space stroads and space bike lanes? totally fake
>>532661781they are really going full steam ahead during the Artemis flight thats for sure
>>532661781Leftists flipping out about colonizing the moon reek of psyop as well. Of all the things to colonize, the moon is easily the least harmful thing to colonize in reach. Earth's ecosystems aren't hurt, local cultures aren't getting subject to genocide, mass suffering and slavery also is avoided. Issues like exploitation of the workforce or coming up with bullshit scarcities to keep the scam economy going are issues no matter what.
>>532632118AI says it's because of camera settings (exposure sensitivity).>The lack of stars in the video is due to standard camera exposure settings. The sunlit Moon and spacecraft are so intensely bright that the camera requires a fast shutter speed to film them clearly. This fast exposure does not give the camera sensor enough time to register the much fainter light coming from distant stars.
>>532632397>explain why there are no stars right nowStars are craters projected onto the Firmament, our crater is Sirus, the crater Sulpicius Gallus M on the MOON. Yes, the Moon is a plasma projection of our Realm.
>hurrr urf flat muh joobook sez so!crossniggers really are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth and perfect golems for their jewish masters. the mass produced man writ large, all 2 billion of them.
>>532638614Vacuum is only -1 atmophere. The fact is any camera that can go more than 67foot deep in water (2 atmopheres) can probably handle it, and can definitely handle it if you pump out all the air before sending it into space.The heat is negligible as long as it's not directly sat baking for hours and hours with no form of heat transfer (they probably have a copper heatpipe connection)
>>532660537Did I stutter?
>>532662881If I was god, I would be so fucking insulted by flat earthers and YECs. Does it not occur to them that god simply came up with a better means of creation than building people from clay? Flat Earth makes even less sense, why would god have any issue with earth being a spherical realm? Why would you believe god only could make one solar system and just fake everything else?Who are you to say what god is capable of? Because of some books written by mortals ignorant of the heavens?Literalism is satanic as it makes god look like a retarded creator just due to following the text of a book that is a monument to humanity's failure to understand higher forces than themselves and proclaiming it as the objective truth.
>>532653924No, you're the retard. You didn't even bother to use reasoning skills to consider why you don't put a camera there. Think about the environment and the logistics of design of how you have to make that work. Then post.
>>532632284>Not autistic enough to even look up the concept of dynamic range in digital camerasLiterally any smart phone from the last 10 years will pick up the stars on earth.
>>532661203okay the earth is flat, you've won. now what?
>>532632118>>not a single star >>retards still believing nasa lies lmaoYou're right, I too must have forgotten to put the stars in when I took this pic of the moon
>>532663526possibly, but likely not while being able to retain any detail in something bright like the full moon, unless they are doing some kind of HDR routine or something. phone cameras often have all kinds of stuff going on to produce their images
Why is round earth the biggest most important lie of the elites that needs to be combated right now? How does it effect our lives? Aren't there bigger things to focus on than a tuna can with a couple monkeys on board?Is this board that retarded?
>>532663382Is this an esl moment or are you too young to be on here?
>>532663887They want to drag people down to the prison planet. They are the crabs in the bucket seeking to do the work of oppression, part of that is destroying any notion of anything beyond the world we inhabit.
>>532632118HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>532663526at what exposure settings?
>>532632118How do you remember to breathe? Take a pic of the full moon with your phone you dingus.
>>532663969If it's flat you ain't going no where. If it's round you ain't going no where. There's plenty of people out there that understand rockets and propulsion and they'll figure it out. But we are stuck here for another handful of decades before anything actually commercially feasible is available. Having a thread on it every week is absolutely fruitless.
>>532663654now you have to worship and grovel before him as you confess how smart he is and how wrong you were to question his greatness. this is what flerfs dream of.
>>532632292This fucking guy again...>it's Focal Length, stupid!!>it's the Exposure Time, dummy!!>It's the incorrect Lens, retard!!>It's the Dynamic Range, assmunch!!Come on.We can't deploy A SINGLE FUCKING PROBE, with the appropriate gear to record the Star Fields?Inb4, just because the HUMAN EYE can do it, even on the surface of the earth, with ambient light nearby, doesn't mean that trillion dollar equipment can..Fuck Off
>>532663678Widen the Field of View.Bullshitter.
>>532663892You're the one that it's not getting through to.
>>532664636They aren't happy with that material barrier alone. They want to also destroy the very dream of it in of itself.
>>532663678Nice picture, Anon.
>>532665230Ok, rereading, annnnd no, it's actually you.
>>532664921>Inb4, just because the HUMAN EYE can do it,You don't even have a basic understanding of a camera.
>>532664921i guess you still know nothing about camera exposure. its pretty simple stuff.>We can't deploy A SINGLE FUCKING PROBE, with the appropriate gear to record the Star Fields?well yeah, obviously thats been done quite a lot over the yearsand yeah, your eye has amazing dynamic range. cameras still struggle to exposure for a bright thing like the moon while being open enough for relatively dim things like stars. HDR photography helps to address that limitation.its not complicated stuff anon. seriously
>>532665388No, it's you, retard.
>>532664921>We can't deploy A SINGLE FUCKING PROBE, with the appropriate gear to record the Star Fields?yes they're called Hubble and James Webb.Artemis mission is primarilly a shakedown of the craft
>>532664921the only way is to take two pictures at different exposures and blend them together, which you would call a composite or photoshopped and say was faked.
>>532665508i assume he means a picture of the moon and stars together seeing as how pics of stars are everywhere and thousands of such pics have been taken. but he is a shill pretending to be retarded for the purpose of well poisoning so maybe he does mean there are no pics of stars. you could show him one and he would just say its fake even though he knows its real. they're paid for this
>>532632118>ZERO nasa pictures show any starsPlenty stars in this one.Plus Venus as a bonus.Almost as if stars are only visible at night...
>>532665508>yes they're called Hubble and James Webb.Post some Starfield Photos, with either Earth or the Moon within them...You can't.Thus, why we're having this discussion for trillionth time
>>532633363>i can take pictures of the stars with my shitty Chinese phone so youre debunked foreverThis
>>532665528>the only wayNo it's not, retard.light travels at the same velocity, right?dickfuck
>>532665245The dream of what, a rocket exploding against the firmament. It's a fake conspiracy like many others design to distract and busy minds from real ones. And now it's been hijacked by who?
>>532665757>Post some Starfield Photos, with either Earth or the Moon within them...but...thats whats tricky for cameras to do. thats the whole point. really, you might want to go read up on dynamic range of cameras and why theres this issue.>>532665913oh, you're just being a fucking troll. got it.
>>532663654>the earth is flat, you've won. now what?- There should be mass expeditions livestreamed to discover what lies beyond Antarctica. It should be televised and broadcast on every media source available and spoken of regularly by the president. - We should launch rockets into the mesosphere at various locations to determine the dimensions and nature of the Firmament- We should immediately stop teaching heliocentrism in schools and begin teaching the flat earth model as is used in flights and rocketry- We return God to the forefront of our daily lives (in practice and as a natural consequence)- We emphasize the Satanic nature of the globe earth theory Society would rapidly begin to heal. Take away all the atheism and return people to God = Everything else would naturally fall into place.
>>532665716>moon and stars togetherThe moon is bright as fuck.So if you expose for the stars the moon will be blown out into a white blob and if you expose for the moon the stars are too dim to see.But maybe you can do it with a half moon, exposing the dark side which is only lit by sunlight reflected off the earth.
>>532665173>Widen the Field of View.Wouldn't change anything, you're still getting all the moonlight onto the camera sensor, ya dingus.Here's your stars.... Silly me, I fogot to put the moon in.>>532665343Thanks lad :o)
>>532665977Proof of the firmament?And I want actual proof, not some shoddy desert farm society's scribbles of what the divine tried to explain.
>>532632118You may not know this, but the moon, reflecting light from the sun, is bright as fuck. Even from Earth you have to put a filter on your telescope if you don't want to blow your fucking retinas out.
>>532665757>Thus, why we're having this discussion for trillionth timeGee I wonder why.... Mothers still keep pushing out retards I guess
>>532666459Mortal interpretations of divine revelation are too flawed and sin addled to be trusted.
>>532665757>Post some Starfield Photos, with either Earth or the Moon within them...It's like asking for a daylight picture with stars in it.Why do you imagine you can only see stars at night?
>>532663678Care to explain?
How are they getting signal from way up there but I lose signal the moment I step in a target and need to use wifi?
>>532653811Don’t trust your eyes, trust science.
>>532654621Brought to you by the same people who went to the Moon (tm)
>>532666698Helium emission spectrum
>>532665913EXPOSUREyou can expose for the bright moon but then the dim stars cant be seen. or you can expose for the dim stars but then the moon is too bright.you cannot seriously pretend not to understand this, it isnt complicated. the only way to get a pic of the moon and the stars together is two pics taken at different exposures and blended together.PERIOD THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE TECHNICAL LIMITATION OF ALL CAMERAS your iphone stacks pics of different exposures to compensate for this, its a new feature in newer high end phones.
>>532666801I trust my eyes plenty
Its 2026, american hillbilly niggers never heard of exposure, probably camera more complex than iphone with 1 button is magic to them.Also no idea how compression works and jpeg artifacts it photomontage to them.Allowing you online was most horrible mistake known to humanity.
>>532666794their sending and receiving antennas are a bit bigger than yours
>>532663887>Why is round earth the biggest most important lieIt is the lie that enabled each and every lie they have taught you since. >that you are an inconsequential speck of dust living a meaningless life in an infinite universe>a product of pure chanceIf you TRULY (not in name only) believed in God, you would not tolerate the indescribable desecration of His creation that you see every single day on this Earth. You would not tolerate being ruled by pedophiles who worship Satan. You would not tolerate sodomy, feminism, atheism, transgenderism, nor the Synagogue of Satan. >(You)r life is a product of round earth.
>>532665716>i assume he means a picture of the moon and stars togetherYeah, to take pics of the moon you're lowering your iso to around 400 - 800, and you aint picking up stars with that.Same with Jupiter, you need to lower your iso to get any detail, thus Jupiters moons start to dissappear from view, and the background stars completely vanish
>>532667204The goal is asserting their delusion with violence and force, the delusion being wrong is irrelevant compared to badgering people into believing what they believe so they can make you believe anything they want you to.
>>532664015They've never been very good at photo editing.Back in '69 they just copy pasted entire images onto a black background. They had no clue we'd invent the mighty paintbucket.
>>532667315The YEC movement is an agent of the antichrist, a mockery of god's creation, vandals who want to make us believe god is a pathetic, petty being who has no means to use evolution as a means to the birth of humanity and that they lack the integrity to actually make a whole universe. Satan loves the literalists.
>>532666948Chromatic abberation from missaligned optics and/or due to an increase of colour saturation to bring out the Iron and Titanium colouration on the lunar surface
>>532632118That shit was pretty funny when the NASA public HR lady said the astronauts were told to, "look for extra solar planets" when they were on the dark side of the moon.
>>532667315You do not believe God is capable of producing a round earth and the entire universe surrounding it?
>>532667332you just need to take multiple pics at different exposures and blend them together. like i keep saying. i found one but it was taken from earth>>This is a composite image of the moon that I captured this morning, 9 Sep 2023. It consists of 3 images: one for the light side of the moon, one to get enough exposure for the dark side of the moon, and finally one to capture the stars for the background.https://www.reddit.com/r/astrophotography/comments/16eey2i/composite_image_of_earths_moon/nasa isn't blending multiple exposure pics like this from space because they have fucking autism or something and there's no scientific reason to. or at least i cant find one, very annoying.
>>532632118Too bright. Stars need it to be dark or they don't come out.
>>532667669Meant for >>532666698
>>532667669I tried
>>532665755aside from the green screen, anyone else notice how tiny South America is? Guess that's why they tried to hide it with clouds
>>532667618You idolize books made by people without the ability to properly interpret divine interpretation. By acting as if it is the objective truth and not a mess of revisionist bullshit translated across two millennia far removed from what beings we can't even gaze upon without burning our eyes tried to convey to our flawed, arrogant minds.
>>532632118damn that footage is incredible
>>532667490developing technique to get deeper blacks. would want to check the raw scan of the film.
>>532666459>>532651240This one has them scraping against it. There is water outside of it.With Operation Fishbowl (lol) we tried nuking it. I'll see if I can dig up the reports because they basically showed it's real and nigh impenetrable.
>>532632968this kraut is brutal
>>532666933Buzz Aldrin would never lie.
>>532667738Yeah, as you likely know the NASA pics are all single-shots shot on a DLSR.Like you said, they could make a composite pic, but what's the point?!..
>>532667738i think it was taken from earth but it doesnt say. pic is from nasa though>>Explanation: Here's something you don't see too often ... a detailed picture of the full Moon surrounded by a rich field of background stars. It's true that bright moonlight scattered by the atmosphere tends to mask faint stars, but pictures of the sunlit portion of the Moon made with earthbound telescopes or even with cameras on the lunar surface often fail to show any background stars at all. Why? Because the exposure times are too short. Very short exposures, lasting fractions of a second, are required to accurately record an image of the bright lunar surface. But the background stars (and galaxies!) such as those visible above are much fainter and need exposures lasting minutes to hours which would seriously overexpose the surface of the Moon. So, of course this stunning view really is a combination of two digital images -- a short exposure, registering the exquisite lunar surface details at full Moon, superposed on a separate very long exposure, made with the Moon absent from the star field. The final representation of Moon and background stars is very dramatic, even though it could not have been captured in a single exposure.https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap010906.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com>>532668356the point is for human interest
The deranged narcissism of the Evangelicals and Islamists and Zionists compose an existential threat to humanity. They want to force an Armageddon into existence, the sheer hubris of this will leave but a humanity in rubble that god will not save. The modern Literalist interpretation of these texts is the greatest act of fraud in human history. May they all be damned for it.
>>532667097>fishbowl lensniceis that hoth btw?
>>532667880It " could" be Helium emission" I should send the pic off to Nasa and give you the credit, lol.
>>532667204>tfw an artifact just conjured a squirrel on my rocketdamm those artifacts and them exposures
>>532668515angular resolution tard>>532668704its iceFUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF
>>532667895South america is not there, retard. You just zoomed in on the south pole.>add to list of things flat earth and space deniers don't know>geography
>>532668477They will say it's been through image manipulation.
>>532668149How does that prove it is a firmament? Why were voyager 2 and new horizons able to go past Pluto?>>532668515Proof that it is a fishbowl lens? What about all the other ISS pictures and videostreams? Where is the proof it's fake? You don't provide anything convincing at all.
>>532668860Guess where the sun is.
>>532669013technically they are right, but that obviously doesn't mean its fake picture in the sense that the moon is flat and gay etc
>>532669165The 8th circle of hell awaits you, literalist demon
>>532668032>would want to check the raw scan of the film.You forgot they lost all the original footage. Guess mankind's "greatest achievement" wasn't worth preserving.
>>532669316What is Steve Lookner doing talking about NASA?
>>532632118>exposure>shutter-speed>focus>basic understanding of how cameras workAnon, please don’t do this
>>532669316they only lost the telemetry tapes for one of the apollo landings, not all of themand its been explained to you 10,000 fucking times what "they lost the technology" means
The literalist wants us to see the retarded desert people scribbles of their shit understanding of higher beings trying to explain creation to them as the objective truth. It mocks god's creation in ways an insufferable postmodern artist putting a cross in a jar of piss could never even come close to.
>>532669297What does a brain fart like you know about the 8th circle of hell.
i am fucking DONE WITH THESE PAID FLAT EARTH ASTROTURFING SHILLSTHIS IS FUCKING RETARDEDENOUGH
>>532669630It is the circle of hell where frauds like you belong.
>>532669155>How does that prove it is a firmament?It is scraping and releasing water vapor.>Why were voyager 2 and new horizons able to go past Pluto?It is almost as if they might be lying.>Proof that it is a fishbowl lens?I've posted multiple videos where evil flerfers sent balloons into space way beyond where NASA would see a curve (some of them were livestreamed btw) and saw absolutely no curve.>You don't provide anything convincing at all.The webm you directly replied to just proved that the curve was fake. That shoreline would be impossible to see using globe earth math. Here's another one (and Canadatranny's personal most hated webm)
>>532669698Define fraud
>>532669316more lies from the flarf. the apollo 8 hasselblad film is all safely stored and has been scanned. here:https://tothemoon.im-ldi.com/gallery/apollo/8/6#AS08-14-2383knock yourself out with the 1.2gb raw scan of the film positive if you like.
>>532668834Burning hot rocket in outer space. Enough to instantly vaporize you... And there's still ice?
>>532669758its refraction retard see >>532660309but you already know its roundyou are paid to shill this garbagewho is paying you and why is it the jews?this shit makes me so fucking antisemitic
>>532669758>They are lyingJust like the literalists lie about everything and waste people's time on their shitty little scams. >But the videoAtmospheric medium you retard>Fishy bowlCope
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009301/art002e009301~orig.jpgWhy are the stars visible through the moon itself in this picture? How sloppy can they be? It's ridiculous lolIt's literally just an overlay. As a random spectator of this thread I feel like they aren't even trying anymore. Doesn't matter who they have arguing here in their favor.
>>532669758what a great example of the basic flerf shill running their usual routine. on and on he keeps dumping his lying meme folder with some lying commentary to go with some of them. this one is a bit more chatty than some, so there is that.
>>532669885yes. the vacuum of space does not transmit heat easily
