>>532712539Because they no longer get raped for doing itIf sluts get raped, then no more slutsSimple
it's just reality now. the only thing you can do is passively discourage it by refusing to initiate communication with them or looking at them. that is honestly the best way to do it, just don't give any attention or reward it.in theory, life if there are two girls you could speak to at an event right. one is dressed normally while the other looks like she's at a softcore porn shoot; you just give the girl who's dressed normally the better chance.
>>532712539the final reading solution: why would we let women read? you do not need to read to be able to read, and she will always lean on you when she cannot read, birth rates will go so high after banning women from reading, economy and science are just fine without women able to read, and she will not be able to use social media, take any influence from anywhere.
better question is why do we continue to let your goat fucking ass into white countries?
>>532712539https://youtu.be/kzcJlbw4OXE
>>532712539Is it really your problem?>they arouse meIs that really a problem?>I don't wanna be aroused, I hate themThat's not a problem, that's a dilemma.>they have to change for meThat won't definitively conclude your dilemma.Don't choose weakness, anon.
>>532713855Human Zootechnics is far more efficient and rewarding than selective deprivation which possibly increases the defective condition of the specimen, still arbitrarily maintained in a human condition.By becoming part of the civilizational infrastructure as bioreactors, women transcend humanity and become a pillar of technological continuity. Like railways, the internet, or industrial agriculture.Ensuring a guarantee of proliferation and the interest of the system to maintain their biological existence to the highest quality and efficiency. Staving away every risk of obsolescence.
