[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_8258.jpg (205 KB, 1241x1547)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
Why no stars?
>>
Daytime photo
>>
Fake as hell.
>>
>>532728877
Because niggers are blacking it up.
>>
>>532728877
>different type of lenses give different volumes
>>
>>532728877
you should learn how camera exposure works. im sure you will be fascinated to learn.
>>
>>532728877
Different cameras and lenses
>>
>>532728877
Why did they switch from Arab numeral to Roman numerals?
>>
>>532728877
>Went to the moon

yeah right
>>
>>532729083
Racism
>>
>>532729046
>>532729052
>>532729053
Enlighten me then faggots instead of tonguing eachothers’ anuses
>>
>>532728877
>nigger op thinks he should be able to see a streetlight from 250,000 miles away
sheeeeeeeiiiiiiiitttttttt
>>
File: 16541650416845014.jpg (7 KB, 387x203)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>532728877
Testical Earthers will believe this
>>
>>532729046
>>532729052
>>532729053
Also how did you all post that in the same minute?
>>
>>532728877
>What is dynamic range?
>>
>>532729167
Cameras don't recognize blacks as human people.
True story.
>>
>>532729167
The stars and electric lights are way too dim compared to the bright lunar surface or the bright sunlight the camera lens is positioned in so they don't show up. Sort of like how you can't see a candle flame outside in the sun.
>>
You would need a long exposure time for the film to capture the light all the way over on earth. Next time you take a picture set the film speed to like 125 and point it at the sky with like a 2 minute shutter speed and you'll see what I mean
>>
>>532728877
For the same reason you can't turn on a flashlight and expect it to shine 2 km away.
>>
File: IMG_8263.jpg (65 KB, 1200x1198)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>532729218
Thats literally what NASA (to deceive) tells us
>>
>>532728967
if you have eyes to see
>>
>>532728877
There's this cool new thing they invented a few years ago called ChatGPT. You can ask it all of your retarded questions instead of spamming threads here.
>>
>>532729306
>>What is dynamic range?
This.
>>
File: IMG_5988.jpg (440 KB, 1280x1280)
440 KB
440 KB JPG
>>532728877
STOP NOTICING
>>
>>532728877
So its fake because of no stars, stars which could be easily photo shopped in if it was faked.
Huh
>>
>>532728877
>long focal vs standard
One day, maybe, the US will learn optics, focus and such.
Dont everybody learn that in school ?
>>
cameras used in space are set to capture very bright subjects (bright side of the earth, people in white space suits, etc.). The stars (and lights on the earth) are too dim to be exposed with these settings. If you wanted to expose the dim stars, the bright things would wash out and be overexposed.

It comes down to camera settings. not some CG/ AI conspiracy.
>>
>>532728877
Better question, why isn't the moon flat anymore?
>>
>>532729388
>if i take a pic of a flashlight from a mile away and you can see the light the flashlight is real
>if i take a pic of a flashlight from a hundred miles away and you can't see the light the flashlight is fake
you pic is taken from low earth orbit please just stop being a nigger
>>
>>532729665
Th camera fags will say camera settings again probably
>>
>>532729486
How long was the shudder open?
>>
File: flat earth cameras.jpg (450 KB, 2144x2121)
450 KB
450 KB JPG
paid shill professional retards pretend not to understand cameras for the purpose of well poisoning
>>
>>532728877
Drowned out by all the other light I would guess, same reason you can't see them in the day time.
>>
>>532729547
If you include thousands of stars, chances are you’re going to get the placement of some of them wrong.
>>
>>532729750
jfl, if you think cameras have settings

those are just knobs the jews put there to laugh at you
>>
>>532729864
I’ve known this for years
>>
>>532728877
>instead of researching myself and challenging my biases, I will wait for /pol/ to tell me what I want to hear so I can have an excuse to be a retarded faggot
I'm gonna tell you what you want to hear so you can be a retard OP.
It's all fake. The moon landing, Artemis, you, your birth, it's all a PSYOP orchestrated by the FEDS who have been GANGSTALKING you for WEEKS because you're SO CLOSE to the TRUTH. Look outside your window. If you see a blacked out car, it's proof that they're there. If you don't see a car, then chances are they're using advanced camouflage and still there. They're coming OP.
>>
>>532728877
Above white majority Earth, below is nigger majority
>>
>>532728877
What sort of dynamic range are you expecting bro, you really think city lights are going to overpower sunlit surfaces of the moon and the earth?
>>
>>532728877
We should be concerned that the moon is getting too close to earth
>>
>>532729948
>spoken like a true normie
>>
>>532728967
What's wrong this time, chinknigger?
>>
>>532729486
Ironically if you actually had the skill to take this photo, you'd understand what's happening in the others.
>>
>>532729569
>first image, earth is smaller, less curvature to the moon
>second image, earth is larger, more curvature to the moon

Let's just say NASA is lying.
>>
>>532729336
>city lights are enough to mask stars from earth, but not enough to show even a contour from the moon.
>>
>>532729486
I notice this picture has a long exposure as indicated by the motion of the stars compared to the stationary horizon. I am also noticing anons in this thread with photography experience who have explained that a long exposure is necessary to capture stars on film. Can't stop, dont want to.
>>
>>532730120
Correct.
>>
>>532729407
I’m out of free credits today
>>
>>532729838
Wot? We have images of the stars both here and from space, what exactly would we be missing from putting them as the backdrop?
>>
>>532729486
To take photo like this you need long exposure. If the moon is on the daytime side, theres no diffusion of light through air. Exposure high enough to see the stars would make everything else blindingly bright.
>>
>>532728877
Why does the top photo look like it’s a model that is being illuminated from inside? If they lied about one, they lied about them both.
>>
>>532728877
wtf earth looks flat
>>
>>532729943
based
>>
>>532729046
that an being a lot more distance from the lunar surface.
>>
File: art002e000192~orig.jpg (3.32 MB, 3195x2131)
3.32 MB
3.32 MB JPG
oh fuck this photo has stars, how do we attack this one bros?
>>
>>532729407
they post here and then spam up their chatbot replies as oracular sources.

>>532729486
the norway shill also doesn't get cameras
>>
>>532729309
> Cameras don't recognize blacks as human people.
They have no souls.
>>
>>532730040
>getting called normie
You must know I have spent multiple years perfecting the emulation of normies. It wasn't easy.
>>
>>532728877
Because the sun's out. Do you think you'd see stars in the sky from Earth during the day if there was no atmosphere? And if stars were meant to be there, don't you think they could easily fake those? But if there were stars, that would actually point to it being fake. So the question falls flat from the getgo.
>>
>>532729864
people laugh at your knob?
>>
File: stars.jpg (238 KB, 1241x1547)
238 KB
238 KB JPG
op should be happy now
>>
>>532728877
Ironically it also shows the planet closer when according to science™ it goes farther away from us.
>>
light is fake and gay, eyes aren't real, and cameras are niggers
>>
>>532729799
updated. i added 2 more for the camera misunderstandings and then merged it with the refraction misunderstandings
>>
File: lens focus.jpg (41 KB, 700x373)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>532730118
>Dont everybody learn that in school ?
I guess no...
You can change the volume of object by using different lens and focus.
Do you really dont learn optics at school in the US ?
>>
>>532730987
here are some additional misunderstandings for gravity, vacuum, rockets, flight, perspective, and more
>>
>>532728877
>what is aperture?
Fucking retard.
>>
>>532728967
This. At least use the same models and sets or at least base your CGI on the old ones, incompetent NASA niggers.
>>
File: IMG_2659.jpg (244 KB, 2500x1406)
244 KB
244 KB JPG
Next person to not understand basic exposure is A NIGGER.
>>
File: round earth proofs (1).jpg (351 KB, 2452x1916)
351 KB
351 KB JPG
and here are some round earth proofs anyone can confirm to themselves without "trusting the science"
>>
File: IMG_5386.gif (509 KB, 479x497)
509 KB
509 KB GIF
>>532730909
Be careful the moon is getting closer! Brace for impact!
>>
>>532729336
>The stars and electric lights are way too dim compared to the bright lunar surface or the bright sunlight the camera lens is positioned in so they don't show up. Sort of like how you can't see a candle flame outside in the sun.

No reason to try and explain it to idiots that will not even read your explanation.

They are the same people as flerfers: trolls, grifters and useful idiots.
>>
>>532731066
just make one big one so you dont need to spam youre entire folder up over 20 posts in every thread when no one was talking flat earth yet? why not just talk about exposure instead of bring the rest of it with you and giving flerfs a nice way to get started?
>>
File: IMG_8276.jpg (190 KB, 1242x823)
190 KB
190 KB JPG
Camera fags btfo
>>
File: IMG_2661.jpg (146 KB, 1280x853)
146 KB
146 KB JPG
>>532731101
Oh and btw,
This new ”blue marble image” of the noght time side of earth is exposed 18 stops brighter than the 1972 ektachrome film photograph which was exposed for the daylight side of earth.
Just a fun fact.
>>
>>532728877
Have you ever heard about something called exposure?
>>
File: 1692137395977405.png (1.39 MB, 1729x1818)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB PNG
>>532731434
i made 3 big ones so i don't have to spam my entire folder. fuck you. also this is a flat earth thread, its the same shills, a lot of the same arguments and aggressive misunderstandings, dont pretend otherwise. every space thread is flooded by flat earth shills, you know that. and exposure is included in the image you're responding to. and flat earth and moon hoax paid shill professional retards will aggressively misunderstand exposure and everything else as well.

24 hours a day
every single day
every single hour
multiple flat earth shill threads
for years

same scripted talking points, memes, and shill vibes. it's not all retards and trolls, it's too regular for that. this is not organic, this is astroturfed. paid shills. that's also why everything they say is retarded, their job is to be paid retards. literally professional retards.
>>
This is why flat earth bs is quintessentially jewish
the same, tired old "arguments" again and again and again.

>faaake!
>y no starz?!
>diffrnt earth?!
>>
>>532731735
Show us where on the doll he touched you son
>>
>>532731066
>here are some additional misunderstandings for gravity, vacuum, rockets, flight, perspective, and more
very cool, but 'flat earthers' are not into actual 'understanding' anything, it is just trolling for lulz and baiting autists into making huge infographics, which I nonetheless enjoy
>>
File: earthfromthemoon.jpg (3.23 MB, 4096x2731)
3.23 MB
3.23 MB JPG
>>532728877
I see the stars.
>https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e000192/art002e000192~orig.jpg
>>
>>532728877
>Why no stars?
Too faint to be seen in the light of the sun.
>>
>>532731834
>actual bot response
>>
>>532729336
My Hero Autismania
I replied calmly and accurately to someone who called me a faggot and a retard the other day too, and it was strangely satisfying, knowing I ignored their jab, and they didn't actually get what they wanted. It felt good.
>>
>>532728877
moon looks photoshoped in lol
>>
>>532731785
Damn must have missed the check in the mail
>>
>>532729789
Oh, you think my lack of understanding of science is going to prevent me from making ignorant comments on the internet with a sense of authority? Well guess what pal, I watched a handful of YouTube videos. I know what's really going on.
>>
>>532731938
Boys tease you about being molested? AI is getting scary good
>>
>>532729336
prime example of overeducation
If that was the case, we would get .raw photo format and you could bring back stars and Earth lights while blowing up Moon surface and daylight Earth.
Lost technology as well right?
>>
>>532730890
those fucking jews
>>
>>532732087
They can’t silence us all
>>
File: IMG_8148.jpg (117 KB, 750x522)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>532729799
The deboonkers are the paid shills, they have to protect the space gibs. They had to skip the stars on the moon landing set because they knew it would be too difficult for continuity purposes.
>>
File: EV.jpg (16 KB, 695x111)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>532731785
just stay talking about a subject anon, instead of doing like the flerfs do and blasting out dozens of subjects all at once. focus is the thing flerfs hate most of all and you keep giving them exactly what they want.


>>532731482
yeah that it interesting. i like comparing EV scene lighting numbers in this context too: stars maybe -3-4....full moon maybe +14
>>
>>532732175
WWG1WGA
>>
>>532729306
>What is the zone system
Thanks Ansel…
>>
File: IMG_0243.gif (913 KB, 400x225)
913 KB
913 KB GIF
>>532730801
>>
>>532732231
Still trusting the plan
>>
>>532728877
You hold a turned on lightbulb in front of your face and try looking at the night sky to pick out stars anon.
>>
>>532732122
you could shoot that shot, but why would anyone bother? whats the point of having a massive white blob with no detail and then maybe a few of the brighter stars visible?

you could take that shot if you want but i dont know what it would prove to you

>muh lost technology
a big shill point recently.
>>
File: gaming.jpg (438 KB, 1179x657)
438 KB
438 KB JPG
>>532730945
This is the correct opinion
>>
>>532732328
>my eyes are a camera
then why can’t I remember what your mom looks like naked
>>
>>532728877
Day light is extremely bright compared to lights at night. The only reason you dotn notice it so much is because the human eye is very good at adapting to ambient brightness.
Try adjusting your phone's brightness so you can see the screen in your house at night. Then go outside during the day in that same brightness and the screen will be invisible due to being too dark relative to ambient light.
>>
>>532728877
electricity is fake and gay, like nuclear weapons of the spherical earth
>>
>>532729052
99% of flat earth/"space is fake" shit is dumb people just not understanding how anything works or caring to actually learn, so they just repeat the first retarded thing some schizo tiktok conspiratard told them or they ask uninformed, dumbass questions as if it's some deep insight that's blowing the lid off of the secret conspiracy. The camera exposure thing is a perfect example. They don't want to actually know why, they want you to give them explanations so they can say nuh uh to it. Another one of my favorites is "Gravity isn't real, it's all just density!" and then they can't explain why stuff falls down toward Earth instead of up in the same medium.
>>
>>532728877
DO YOU KNOW HOW TO SHUTTER SPEED, MOTHERFUCKER?

BECAUSE THEIR LIGHT I
>>
>>532728877
Grabity
>>
File: 1766847180880489.jpg (477 KB, 2024x1024)
477 KB
477 KB JPG
>>532732191
>muh tracks
debunked, like every other moon hoax theory if you do even a basic looking shit up, there's a rational explanation for all of it. if you're too lazy to look it up just ask an ai. it can all be explained perfectly.

they had to skip the stars because of how exposure works already covered here >>532730987

>>532732197
i have been arguing with these professional retards for years. try it your way see where it gets you, you underestimate their capacity to weasel around everything and change the subject no matter what you do. in the end you'll just realize i was right and spamming an image that shows how wrong they are 3 dozen times over at once is what actually pisses them off.
>>
>>532728877
>60 year old photo is better
Why did they choose to use an overprocessing modern slop camera to take the picture? Why didn't they use a Canon IXUS70?
>>
>>532732435
The picture clearly says “earthset” it’s not 12 o’clock noon on the moon famalam
>>
>>532728877
Looks like the western coastline of North America visible, so that's the Pacific Ocean in pre-dawn darkness.
>>
File: 1775227083277544.jpg (107 KB, 1024x1394)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
Remember, kids, all this talk of cameras is pointless.

What they lost in the 60s wasn't the technology to go back to the moon, it was the lack of oversight that made the grift possible to begin with. Now it's just sunken cost, but they can wheel it out anytime they are losing a war or need to promote DEI or some shit
>>
>>532730867
cameras suck the soul out of you
if you ever had a photo taken of you, even security camera, you're now soulless
>>
>>532732565
? I'm adressing why you can't see light on the night side of earth. It is too dark relative to the day side.
If you are wondering why the moon appears darker in the 2nd image, it's due to dynamic range and exposure. The 1st image was taken in low lunar orbit using an analog film camera, 2nd taken far from the moon on free return using a modern digital camera.
>>
>>532728877
>Why no stars?
because the sun is shining basically at all times not blocked by anything
>>
>>532732549
no, i dont underestimate that. i just know that when you pin them down properly that their evasive tactics make themselves obvious to everyone else, and thats the point. you're not going to change a shills mind anon. what you do is for others.
you're just acting like they do anon, and it looks retarded. you make both sides look like folder spamming shills endlessly flinging out as much stuff as possible. is that your goal?
>>
I once saw a picture of the NASA HQ where a bunch of astronauts were acting in front of a "green screen" in the background. I think that Rockefeller fellow was in the picture as well, and he was sitting in a wheelchair.

I know some of you other schizos know what I'm talking about.

Anyway, ever since I saw that pic, I don't trust any pictures taken in "outer space" anymore. Also the video where a fucking rat or something was casually walking around on the end of an active rocket. And the Elon Musk car-in-space video where the green screen appears for a split second. It's all a bunch of baloney if you ask me.
>>
>>532732676
>but they can wheel it out anytime they are losing a war or need to promote DEI or some shit

The black Artemis pilot was shutting down talk of race and any attempt to make this "black history," and was praising Christ on Easter.
>>
>>532732865
be good to see the shot you mean and whatever they made using it.
>space rat
no, just slushy ice build up from a liquid oxygen vent
>green screen
cant remember what this was is about. post it if you like
>>
>>532730120
You got it.
>>
>>532732418
Because she was probably dead before you were even cum in your dads ballsack?
>>
>>532733163
he's definitely got the making of a good troll or shill.
>>
>>532732828
their evasive tactics are obvious anyway
my goal is to not have to spend hours in each thread. i pop in, drop off my pics, and fuck off. ez and done. and anyone can read my pics and then they won't be fooled. they want to fool people so they can get some useful idiots doing their work for free and making /pol/ an attractive place for retards.

and whatever i do you'll attack me for it in every thread desperate to get me to stop. thats why im not stopping.
>>
>>532733114
>no, just slushy ice build up from a liquid oxygen vent
How do I get paid by NASA (to deceive) to say these kinds of things on 4chinz
>>
File: 1769340030589.jpg (160 KB, 1226x1280)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
>>532733114
>>532732865
Prolly one of these obvious photoshops made as a joke. But schizophrenia and low IQ are a lethal mixture.
>>
>>532733314
Who said anything about her being alive
>>
File: iss greenscreen.jpg (212 KB, 1080x1080)
212 KB
212 KB JPG
>>532732865
next time look it up and see if there's a rational explanation for it (there is)
>>
>>532733340
And yet you are still here, with us. Thank you for keeping me company leafbro
>>
>>532733491
i'm also in a couple other flat earth threads at once. i could expand to post in as many flat earth threads as i feel like with little effort so spamming threads wont stop me.
>>
>>532733378
this was clearly taken in space and made to look like it was in a terrestrial studio, never believe "earth pictures"
>>
The dumbest thing about muh stars is if it was all fake why would they forget to add the stars into it. You think they would spend billions to manufacture this hoax just to forget that stars exist?
>>
>>532733163
>>532730120
Light pollution hides stars on Earth because of atmospheric scattering and exposure, not because city lights are some giant beacon visible from lunar distance. In a shot exposed for sunlit Earth and Moon, stars and city lights both vanish for the same reason. They’re too dim relative to the bright stuff in frame.

Take a few minutes to learn about exposure and dynamic range. It's something you constantly have to manage as a photographer if you want usable shots.
>>
>>532733340
>you'll attack me for it in every thread
you're full of silly exaggertaions, ive noticed that. i mentioned this to you a couple times several days ago then left it. now you come into thread that culd just stay about exposure and cameras but you cant help but vomit up all the other stuff with it, acting just like a flerf, then instantly call me a flerf juts because i think your lazy tactic is crap.
just remember - you're helping the fucking flerfs and shills.
>>
I have no concept of what a photo from space should look like, my opinion on the subject is worthless.
But pics like these below still look like overprocessed cheap crap to me.

>>532728877
>>532730801

Would it kill them to publish camera raws since these were apparently made with handhelds?
>>
>>532733352
watch some launches and you'll see its pretty common that theres some build up in that area. its not a fucking rat, you moron.

>>532733378
yeah probably. always its something they half remember but are 100% it was fake, have you noticed that? thats how these dumb memes work in many cases.
>>
>>532733640
its been a few threads now. you spent enough time and effort attacking me in each thread for me to know im doing something right.
>>
>>532733757
they have. you can get them.
>>
>>532728877
>WHAT IS EXPOSURE TIME.
>WHAT IS ALBEDO
I MISS WHEN 4CHAN WAS SMARTER THAN MOST OF THE INTERNET. NOW IT'S FULL OF BROWNOIDS TOO DUMB FOR COLLEGE
>>
>>532733582
If it doesn't look like literal goyslop science fiction CGI from kids movies then it must be fake. Why doesn't the Apollo LEM look like an X-wing? Clearly fake.
>>
>>532733395
Weird flex but ok.
>>
File: 153652727572.jpg (156 KB, 1017x716)
156 KB
156 KB JPG
>>532728877
People who believe in space exploration are mentally ill.
>>
>>532733757
no, which is why they're posting all raw pictures like they've always done with all missions
https://images.nasa.gov/
still a lot to upload though, they said there's about 170gb of photos just from the close approach
>>
>>532733636
Yep. The Reflection of tbe Sun on the Earth and the Moon is brighter than our street lights. If you want to see the street lights the moon and the Earth would basically be white due to over exposure.
>>
File: Toroid Hole 3.jpg (492 KB, 2168x914)
492 KB
492 KB JPG
>>532732087
this, so much this, fellow expert truster
>>
File: IMG_8285.jpg (9 KB, 281x460)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>532733552
Bro is roundearthmaxxing. NASApilled Shutterframemogging
>>
>>532733798
we're on the same side you idiot. i understand that making a point of opposing flerfs requires a bit of autism but come on, im clearly not trying to help the flerfs. in any of the threads ive talked to you about this, you go fine me doing anything that makes that seem to be the case. im just questionning your self declared lazy tactic of spamming up your anti-flerf memes, when nobody was even talking about most of the subjects....its as if you want to get them started.
>>
>>532733378
I was wrong. It wasn't a Rockefeller, it was George Bush senior. This was the best pic I could find since Google is so cucked nowadays.
>>
File: file.png (2.65 MB, 1920x1280)
2.65 MB
2.65 MB PNG
>>532733898
>they said there's about 170gb of photos just from the close approach
Goddamn that's gonna be great for the scientists to comb through
I'd bet most of them will wait and they'll just be copied from the SD cards
Only the best of the best are getting transmitted now

And they are pretty goddamn great, I must say
>>
Because Camera Sensor Dynamic Range and oceans exist... This is a morning shot of Oceania (you know the area of the planet with the most ocean)

or maybe Space is Fake and Gay...
>>
>>532733889
people who think that meme makes a good point are shills, like you
>>
>>532733437
Now explain the Elon Musk video
>>
>>532729167
No one explain let his dumb ass seethe and look stupid forever
>>
>>532733437
Also explain the video where a guy is literally pulling on an invisible wire to balance his colleague
>>
>>532733818
So theoretically we could adjust the photo
To show the stars and city lights then right?
>>
>>532734009
there have been threads already full of flat earth posters where you freak out and attack me across a dozen posts for allegedly inviting the flat earth conversation that was already there. they have spammed thousands and thousands of space threads and that is not hyperbole, they always show up and flood every space thread because that is their job and they are paid to do it and will continue to do it whether i am here or not. ive already explained this to you, you keep pretending you dont understand, much like a shill
>>
>>532734042
thats just a guy doing a presentation in front a a grid that helps people better understand whats going on. its a reference, thats all. you can watch the whole thing, or look at a video talking about why its not fake


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEkp1y3OQ4k&t=140s

https://astroacademy.org.uk/
>>
>>532732191
>no tracks: deboonked!
how they wheeled it onto the fake moonset without leaving any tracks?
>>
>>532728877
right? you should see a bazillion gazillion stars like you see them in the desert night?
Gay and very much homosexual, faggotly even
>>
>>532734217
who cares, they spam exactly because they have no argument, it's just background noise
>>
>>532731042
mutts learn fuckall in school
it's just daycare for niggers
all they do is single choice tests, even for graduation, even at university. the correct answer is literally given to you
>>
>>532733773
>its something they half remember but are 100% it was fake
Good point.
Yeah I've noticed that. The main way people build up these ideas in their mind is definitely stiff like Facebook memes or mindlessly watching a conspiracy video with no introspection. They quickly forget it because their mind wa snot engaged to begin with, but schizophrenia causes them to subconsciously develop an absolute conviction.
>>
>>532730423
Astronauts in the early missions in the 60s spoke about seeing all the stars. Astronauts in the 80s onward say you cannot see them. This isn't an issue that can be waved away with muh cameras
>>
>>532734191
depends. modern digital cameras have a pretty wide dynamic range so you might be able to pull out some of the brighter ones, depending on how original shot was taken.

i mean, you can see venus in several shots taken on the lunar surface during apollo, and they were exposing for the brightness of full sun
>>
>>532728877
Last year I went camping with my nephews, there was a fuckton of fireflies around. Boys wanted some photos near the campfire but no firefly appeared in them. Guess there was no fireflies after all.
>>
>>532728877
Camera is too bad to capture faint light. Simple as . No need for your big brain to overthink it.
>>
>>532734146
how will I ever recover. Wtf I got rangebanned
>>
>>532730987

Just silliness. They had to come up with the refraction angle to explain why you could see 20 miles with no curve. Anyone could prove there is no curve just by walking to a water front and looking at an object. No fancy math required.

I have a nice view of the CN tower from 20 miles away. I can zoom in on the boats in the water with a lens. It does not matter if it is sun, snow, rain, winter, summer, humidity up, humidity down, it is the same view. I should only see buildings over 40 stories tall but I see the first floor of everything. There is no curve Dr. Shillner.

Your shrinking of the CN tower is due to vanishing point perspective. We have all seen the shrinking lamp posts that all converge to the center of your view. We can easily zoom past this and bring the objects back. If an object went 'over the curve' you can't bring it back.
>>
>>532729486
please learn how to take this picture.
thanks.
>>
>>532734366
astronauts during the current artemis mission talked about stars all the time, wtf are you talking about?
>>
>>532729588
>plan to take pictures of earth
>don’t bring a camera for it
>exposure bracketing doesn’t exist

Yeah totally believable
>>
>>532734217
i just dont agree with your lazy tactic. its better to focus on a subject instead of flood a whole bunch up. thats exactly what the shills do because they hate getting pinned down about anything in detail. if you want to act like them then carry right on.
and you can call me a shill as much as you want, dummy, but you'll never see me trying to help them out as much as you are. i notice you cant find a single post of me doing so....other than the fact that i disagree with you which must obvious mean im a shill lol. what a dunce.
>>
>>532734220
I'm not too proud to admit I was wrong. I used to be into astronomy a lot and I loved space shit, but there's simply too much disinformation going on for me to trust anything besides my own eyes.

The Elon Musk video, for example, where the entire green screen + studio appears for a split second. It could've been a troll, or maybe Elon Musk is just a fag. I just simply don't know anymore, and that's probably part of their gay retard agenda.
>>
>>532732191
That rover was light enough that it was often carried by hand. That's how it was unloaded and moved into position for driving.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=refX-SHBYac&t=147s
>>
>>532728877

The Moon should have more sunlight on it, or highlights and shadows. The light is too flat. That pic is fake as fuck.
>>
>>532734589
you sound like a very gullible and dull person, hopefully you snap out of it
>>
>>532734322
>causes them to subconsciously develop an absolute conviction.
thats the exact way propaganda works - no real engagement other than a quick dose of the feels, then forgotten until something causes the feel to be recalled. thats exactly what the dutch poster is doing.
>>
>>532734567
well i disagree with your tactic of attacking me for my tactic in every thread. because i know it wont work im just going to keep doing it. so give it a fucking rest, you spend more effort attacking me then the flat earthers. im going to ignore you now
>>
man

this crater structure has changed so immensely over just a couple of years
>>
>>532734695
You're the one blindly trusting government institutions, my guy.
>>
>>532728877
The curvature of moon though...
>>
>>532734780
fuck off bot retard
>>
>>532734589
>too much disinformation going on for me to trust anything besides my own eyes.
how do you know its that in this context? the lying memes youve seen saying X is fake and gay? thats the disinfo youve got to be careful of
>The Elon Musk video, for example, where the entire green screen + studio appears for a split second.
think you can find it again? i cant remember which one you mean
> I just simply don't know anymore
fair enough. thats why you have to carefully work to understand what you're seeing before assuming 'its fake and gay'
>>
>>532729486
how do i see that with my naked eye
>>
>>532730120
Yep. The sun is also brighter than any light made by humans, and the brightest star in the sky by virtue of being the closest.
>>
>>532734366
Fuck it must be lunar warming. Mods keep rangebanning me for being too based
>>
>>532734424
Did you use a Nikon D5 DSLR like fart fartemis??
>>
>>532732352
As proof
>>
>>532734589
>there's simply too much disinformation going on
Yeah and one of them is denying the Moon landing. You fell for it.
>>
File: 1608733479076.jpg (825 KB, 1304x1710)
825 KB
825 KB JPG
>>532728877
Making technology cheap and accessible to the retarded masses was a mistake.
>>
>>532734780
>in every thread.
i dont. thats simply a lie. stop doing this shit because its as if you're trying to look bad as one opposing the flerfs.
like i say, carry on if you want. you're just helpig the flerfs. look at this >>532734475 that flerf is only bringing that shit up because you started it. its as if you want to help them get flerf topics started instead of focusing on something like camera exposure, as this thread could be.
>>
>>532734054
>Sorry goy the SD card got corrupted and there won’t be any new moon photos
>>
File: IMG_0706.jpg (57 KB, 606x713)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>532730053
It’s fake kike. Worship nasa all you want and post 40 replies ITT like you always do but it’ll always be in vain. It’s fake
>>
>>532729388
>>532729693
Not only that but the dark picture is exposed for... the dark side of the planet, not the half bathed in sun (which would be overexposed).
>>
>>532734836
uh oh, the demoralized "ex-believer" is suddenly getting very feisty about his mythology
here's the source of the ISS blue screen by the way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEkp1y3OQ4k
I wonder how your mind will cope with this new information, will you double down on the mythology?
>>
>>532728877
>video cameras dont work in space
Every single time
>>
>>532728877
pacific ocean
>>
>>532734316
This is literally true. I slept through grade school and spent all my time learning on my own on the internet through the 90s/2000s making dragon ball z websites, fucking with software, etc and none of my peers knew shit about shit.
>>
>>532735044
Give it a rest, leaf.
>>
>>532728877
Jesus christ how are you so retarded
>>
>>532734902
be in super dark area and the right time and let your eyes adjust for several hours. still probably wont be quite as good but it can still be amazing. one time in a desert i just laid there and the stars were so bright and all around, it was like being surrounded by stars.

>>532735025
of what? that the rules of camera exposure are true? you can take shots like that from down on earth if you want. and anyway, they have been taking shots with stars in during the current mission. they keep getting called fake.
>>
File: w9ifzojix7dfffrkqw0e.jpg (849 KB, 1564x1432)
849 KB
849 KB JPG
>>532728877
NASA faked 6 moon missions...
>>
>>532735104
You have poor reading comprehension
>>
>>532728949
>American education
American education might be the greatest crime the kikes have committed yet
>>
>>532728877
>HOW COME FLAME IS INVISIBLE IN SUNLIGHT?!
Nigger, not only do you not understand how basic photography works - focal length, exposure etc. etc. (and that's fine), but that you don't even understand the basics of light..that's fucking retard tier. Genuine retard tier
>>
>>532728877
Because it's fake
>>
File: fler.spam.shill.jpg (51 KB, 706x526)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
the flerf spam bit should give it a rest after all these years
>>
File: covid-19-en.jpg (155 KB, 1080x1080)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>532729799
>>532730987
>>532731066
>>532731155
>>532733437
Based vaccine enjoyer. Don't worry all the science deniers will die during the next Winter of death.
>>
>>532735104
What exactly is "every single time"? What are you talking about?
There was a live stream camera on the outside of the spacecraft streaming live on YouTube for almost the entire mission
>>
>>532735100
...
>I wonder how your mind will cope with this new information

The fucking first post you replied to was my reaction.

And you call me dull? Maybe read my entire post next time before you make an ass out of yourself, monkey boy.
>>
>>532735308
This asshole is in every thread arguing with people in bad faith. Just ignore it.
>>
>>532728877
>>532733889
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krzOUUryfXU
>>
>>532732191
Fuck off chiang.
>>
>>532729336
Way to bright on the dark side of the moon?
>>
>>532730909
The penis is pointing the wrong way on the other photo
>>
>>532728877
>Why no stars?
For the same reason we don't see stairs in the daytime.
The light of the sun is way stronger to the point where you can't see other lights.
>>
>>532735480
What do you think "dark side of the moon" means, exactly?
>>
>>532735399
another vid with the blue screen being used for some other experiments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgVyABju3Vg
what made your dumb ass even think it was meant for VFX anyway? blue screens don't look like that
don't reply until you watched the first video btw, I'm seeing through your innocent facade as you suddenly got very invested in defending the hoax
>>
>>532734894
>how do you know its that in this context?
I don't. That's the whole point. But to me it makes more sense to distrust those who have been lying to us our whole lives.
>think you can find it again?
Sadly I can't. I've only seen webms of it on 4chan. I've searched for it on youtube but I couldn't find it.
>thats why you have to carefully work to understand what you're seeing before assuming 'its fake and gay'
Don't worry, I question everything, and that includes my own thoughts. The moon landing, for example. Could be an amazing achievement of mankind, or the biggest lie ever told. All I know is that I know nothing.

God bless.
>>
MIGAtards will say space is fake and gay while slurping Zion Don semen. Hilarious stuff.
>>
>>532728877
it's so fake
and the people defending it are worse than the people claiming earth is flat etc
>>
>>532735613
kinetic experiments with the screen used for scale: https://astroacademy.org.uk/resources/kinetic-theory/
>>
>>532735613
Again, I wasn't defending the hoax? I literally admitted in the post that I was wrong.

Nice reading comprehension. Don't @ me again.
>>
>>532735319
Belgium is a nacrostate like columbia. You're already 45 percent brown or african.
>>
>>532735382
Covid doesn't make all of science wrong you knuckle dragging caveman. I guess you shouldn't be using your computer since it was created with science.
>>
>>532728877
>why no lights
Sun very shiny (its day)
>Why no stars?
Sun is very shiny (why no stars during day?)
>>
>>532735267
that is not shoped
>>
>>532728877
>they even used le epic Hollywood filter
kek
>>
>>532735624
>>532735720
I'm posting direct proof that the blue screen hoax is complete bullshit while you ignore it, you are doing the complete opposite of questioning anything. You are very clearly invested.
>>
>>532729245
gee i dont know.. maybe they have been on internet once or twice and seen this same retarded thread and convo a hundred times
>>
>>532735624
>I've searched for it on youtube but I couldn't find it.
too bad. could it have been the one where you're seeing the car against earth and then it all of sudden goes back to when it was inside the protective cowling, which then equally quickly blows off to reveal earth again?
does that sound familiar?
>>
>>532735760
you wouldn't call the photo with stars in it shopped? why not?
>>
>>532734054
One of those craters near the center right was my fault, sorry about that.
>>
>>532735786
You are a fucking retard.
Can you read my post please? I'm not giving you another reply until you get your head out of your ass.

The Canadian I replied to posted the EXACT same fucking video, and after I watched it, I ADMITTED that I was wrong. Do I have to spell it out for you?
>>
>>532735916
Its next to impossible to fake raw data in image
>>
>>532735867
>the protective cowling

I don't really know what you mean by that. What I saw was the car floating in space, and a literal green screen + studio lights appeared for a split second, before going back to the original video again. I know it could've just been a good troll, but it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't.
>>
>>532728877
Sloppy job, NASA
>>
>>532728877
Is this AI-generated?

Most likely: partially.

The top image:

Based on the real photo known as Earthrise photograph (Apollo 8).
It may be a cleaned-up or color-corrected version, but it originates from a real NASA photo.

The bottom image:

Almost certainly a computer-rendered simulation or composite.
Reasons:
The Moon surface is extremely clean and evenly detailed.
Lighting is cinematic and perfectly balanced.
It matches modern NASA-style promotional renders used to illustrate future missions.

That doesn't necessarily mean AI like Midjourney, though. It could be:

3D rendering
scientific visualization
photo composite
AI-assisted illustration

Space agencies and science media often use renderings for future missions because no real photos exist yet.

Hunn bros
>>
>>532735723
Maybe stop sending muritards into the meat grinder and stop sending the shitskins to Europe, schlomo.
>>
>>532728877
jewish physics, jewish space, jewish nuclear weapons, all fake and gay.
The jews must be destroyed, utterly and to the last.
>>
>>532733915
>North Pole looks like a giant ass gap.
So .. Santa .. is he coming out of that each year ?
>>
>>532728877
Because we're winning WW3.
You've had a slight impact to your living standards the past few weeks.
Thirdies have had a massive decline in their living standards over the past 15 years. To them we are literally in a war. Leaving lights on overnight? A luxury for westerners.

Go take a trip to China. Even Beijing is incredibly depressing. WW3 started a decade ago and they're losing and they know it.
>>
File: 1751049739398388.png (1.05 MB, 962x641)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB PNG
>>532736147
>>532734114
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBr2kKAHN6M
Here's the full stream of the car launch, you will not find a green screen shot anywhere.
Hoaxers also use pic related as "proof" of it being fake and even sometimes 'shop a green screen in there, but that's just the inside of the Falcon rocket fairing. You're an idiot for even being that credulous and no I don't accept your backtracks, don't post nonsense again.
>>
>>532736161
Yeah I'm sure the billion dollar space agency just forgot stars were a thing. You sure are smart.
>>
>>532729167
Let me explain it in terms you might understand given your faggot worshipping nigger country flag nobody expects you to be intelligent.

If you gape your asshole for a long period of time you can get lots of cum in there. If you gape your asshole for a short period of time, you get less cum in your ass. But your asshole can only take so much cum so you have to gape it for an appropriate amount of time to achieve the desired outcome. If your desired outcome is to get a good DNA sample from a nearby nigger then you need to gape your asshole a lot less than the time you would need to gape your asshole to get a DNA sample from a nigger 10 miles away.

If you really want to get a sample from the nigger 10 miles away you have to gape your asshole for a long time, and block out the closer niggers so that they don't fill your asshole with DNA that you weren't looking for..

Simples
>>
Oh shit. The intern is really going to catch hell for this fuckup
>>
File: images.jpg (11 KB, 182x277)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>532728877
Where satellites?
>>
I'm so fucking sick of the disingenuous questions from the retards
>HURR WHERE STARS
>HURR WHERE SATELLITES
>HURR WHY SIZE DIFFERENT
The entirety of human knowledge is literally a click away, and they choose to remain retarded
>>
>>532735319
He's right though. You can't see the stars because of the sun. If you took a picture of space where the sunlight was blocked like nighttime on earth for example, you'd see stars otherwise from space everything would look like day.
>>
>>532736366
Admit you can't read for shit and apologize for calling me dumb even though you are illiterate yourself, and then maybe I'll read your post.
>>
File: NASA occult.jpg (82 KB, 564x564)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
https://youtu.be/0514L2QwOBE
https://youtu.be/GwkqLv-fOjg?t=2209
https://youtu.be/m7ZpvLu_tFE
https://youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4
https://youtu.be/p-BFmn2S_jU
https://youtu.be/BVJgObFHLY4
https://youtu.be/ru5fdfovkGI
https://youtu.be/74KRZt5oJME
https://youtu.be/tdwy-hxS-ts
https://youtu.be/UAx5cl9VpTE
https://youtu.be/JlFnJPFjcc0
https://youtu.be/XetG30_YOeo
https://youtu.be/ziVLbEoQ4Sc
https://youtu.be/7H_1ZbuA9HI
https://youtu.be/UbYtkrTquXE
https://youtu.be/1WHIr-IFqAo
https://youtu.be/WcqKUhU0WDc
https://youtu.be/wPrDg0CtWnk
https://youtu.be/hoGTBdu7dMc
https://youtu.be/mcLwr86emds
https://youtu.be/U_bJYXS9p4A
https://youtu.be/JOqc63Pp9OA
https://youtu.be/X-w8acuxF6w
https://youtu.be/nGLJ5XJP3uE
https://youtu.be/olbyJDou4qQ
https://youtu.be/0Q18iSz6mus
https://youtu.be/aFFM3YJAs4Q
https://youtu.be/Stft_t48Hxc
https://youtu.be/QWa7lTxhrKI
https://youtu.be/Zc_J2k4Cdp8
https://youtu.be/DdLLamniSyg
https://youtu.be/udjk_FB80kM
https://youtu.be/4nKIN_eHYxw
https://youtu.be/fDBRhxryfZM
https://youtu.be/-rmDj1MJyaY
https://youtu.be/Kv9-JuLRpg0
https://youtu.be/7Eeo-82Eac8
https://youtu.be/0Vv62PFFsNU
https://youtu.be/CDG4oiCx_is
https://youtu.be/wz68Q2Nz05A
https://youtu.be/WffliCP2dU0
https://youtu.be/uUuTAflN1rU
https://youtu.be/lkmY_4PKMlY
https://youtu.be/McdMMmclGVc
https://youtu.be/Cm7fBZq-8T4
https://youtu.be/4SlRsbQ3nfM
https://youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHw
https://youtu.be/XhIwZuPGfss
https://youtu.be/CATklVkPEMw
https://youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxA
https://youtu.be/WXaXnAvEpB8
https://youtu.be/gWnFMWqDRQE
https://youtu.be/EvnrD49RmAY
https://youtu.be/3wU8_jT61eE
https://youtu.be/lMhheDWThxE
https://youtu.be/hG_sv5SWi3Y?t=507
https://youtu.be/UOLLMkAHHQI?t=2477
https://youtu.be/d_h5tupEdn8
https://youtu.be/jDKfJROVHJE
https://youtu.be/maBf0H3UNJI
https://youtu.be/Jm7nBn7RxhU
https://youtu.be/BEV2SAL8z5g
https://youtu.be/Qse5Jc8jgSk
https://youtu.be/zMAa5Ir7IHU
>>
>>532736042
ah ok. good to know. they usually do makes raw images available, so be sure to keep an eye out for when they land and everything gets uploaded.


>>532736147
ok, it might be the same one. not sure. in the one im talking about, its just a clip of when the ejection of the payload shrouds was played back. you see a moment when the camera is washed out before it manages to dial down the exposure
>>
File: 1775527885569463.png (217 KB, 951x737)
217 KB
217 KB PNG
>>532736253
Superstitious Jews are the ones that came up with flat Earth while Europeans were using logic to measure the circumference.
>>
>>532729052
I'm not letting a camera steal my soul
nice try jew
>>
>>532729336
>sort of like how you cant see a candle flame outside in the sun
Is this nibba frfr? Ethanol flames yes, but a candle you can see
>>
File: tenor-3392983626.gif (1.53 MB, 498x210)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB GIF
>>532729046
>>532729167
Anon I...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uwp-xksCAc
>>
twice in one thread now from the flerf spam bot. impressive
>>
>>532736634
The shit you posted takes 1 minute to verify and that's what disillusioned you? And you didn't even check yourself but had others doing it for you? Sorry but that only happens when someone is being willfully stupid and no I'm not giving you any satisfaction for spreading stupidity and making others waste their time correcting you.
>>
>>532735319
He's right and you're retarded
>>
>>532736366
I read your post anyway because I was curious if you'd post some dumb shit again. It could've easily been edited and you aren't very discerning if you don't realize that.

Now that I've surmised that is you who's the dullard, I can finally shower in peace.

Btw, see how I responded with respect to the Canadian. It's because he treated me with respect as well. He didn't call me dumb, he just provided evidence to prove me wrong. Next time, maybe you should do the same without resorting to name calling like some fucking child.

Have a nice day, monkey boy.
>>
>>532730801
I never realized how "thin" the atmosphere is.
>>
>>532735738
>reddit: the post
embarrassing take neil degrease tyson
>>
>>532736831
Nice cope, dull and impatient fool.
:^)

learn2read and stop being a retarded autist
>>
>>532736221
based waffle fistbump
>>
>>532736169
The clanker has no info about any ongoing space mission. If anything looks like a space photography and doesn't match any existing image, it's going to be classified as a CGI.
>>
>>532730801
>yes goy, the atmosphere is perfectly defined and visible everywhere
>>
>>532737028
Say stupid things, get stupid prizes. I hate your "neener neenner NOW EXPLAIN THIS!!!" type of posting. Burden of proof lazy nigger, and if you continue being that retarded I know you'll also be a waste of time regarding any other thing you are too lazy to check yourself any given day. No one's gonna congratulate you for your retardation.
>>
File: file.png (970 KB, 904x830)
970 KB
970 KB PNG
>>532737076
>I never realized how "thin" the atmosphere is.
The common analogy I hear is that if the Earth was an apple, the atmosphere would basically be as thick as the skin of the apple
>>
>>532735382
I died because I didn't vax. You should be fearful. And stop disbelieving what you're told.
>>
>>532735044

Nothing to do with his post. I have known the Earth is flat for over 20 years. I owned a company that laid sewer and storm mains. Basically ran the lines that drain rainwater and shit. These are all gravity drains that rely on a couple degree slope to run to sewage treatment plants in every town. We would get drawings that show a whole city's water system and the carefully calculated slope over 10-20 miles. It is all highly calculated so contractors can tie in at the proper height to drain streets of water and people's toilets.

At the end of every person's driveway are sewer lines 8'10' below the road. These slope at 1-2degrees to the sewage treatment plant. These are not sloping and bending around a curved earth. If the lines were sloping and dropping at 8"/mile^^2 they would be hundreds of yards deep which can't be dug by contractors.

You won't have a debunk infographic for this one. Just keep trying to confuse people with cAmErA sEtTiNgS. I can take a shoreline picture of the CN tower with every f stop you like at every speed you like, in any weather you like ... I walk past a look out every day and see the same view of the CN tower. It is not growing and shrinking based on humidity refraction and temperature.
>>
>>532728877
Thinking space is fake is anti white
>I can beleive white people can make a flying machine but going up into space is fake
A Nazi put a man on the moon, a kike came up with the the (likely incorrect) theory that going super duper fast makes you travel through time
>>
>>532736516
they're all chinese so they moved out of the way for the picture out of politeness
>>
>>532737028
was it this one anon?
https://youtu.be/zvX9VOaCxpE?t=33
>>
>>532735396
If you don't know what that phrase refers to, then you're not a regular user of this board.
>>
File: 1340552312502.gif (1003 KB, 402x301)
1003 KB
1003 KB GIF
>>532736800
>>
>>532737487
>>532736516
better pic
shy satellites uwu
>>
>>532737452
im sorry anon, but thinking that the run of drains proves a flat earth is ridiculous. i take it you reject any concept of gravity at this point?

> It is not growing and shrinking based on humidity refraction and temperature.
so the many videos showing that this does in fact happen are fake too? does air have any effect on light at all, or is that fake as well?
>>
>>532737076
The crust of the earth is so fucking fragile that a sufficiently large asteroid impact would cause it to splash like a pebble hitting water, except instead of water it would be a tide of liquid rock washing over the planet. Fear not, you'd be long dead before before the ground beneath your feet liquify, your lungs would have already been burned and you would have long since been converted from biology into physics. The entity of the human race, everything we've ever done, everything we've ever said is little more than Cheeto dust on the surface of the planet, which itself lives in a roiling ocean of trillions. On a cosmic scale, the entire existence of humanity is no more than a single grain of sand floating in the ocean.
>>
>>532737121
>everything I don't agree with is Reddit
/pol/ has gone full retard with science denial. You look like retards to everyone with common sense.
>>
>>532736639
>magical thinking
>>
>>532737316
>I hate your "neener neenner NOW EXPLAIN THIS!!!" type of posting
It's all they have, and it's all their script will allow them to do
Again, their goal is not to gain knowledge or find truth, their goal is to poison the well to prevent any meaningful discussion or allow /pol/ to gain any momentum
>>
>>532736639
>Not mixing a Rickroll into that
>>
>>532736433
Nothing in that comment about stars. You sure are smart
>>
>>532736516
>>532737680
Earth big, satelite no so much.
>>
>>532737680
Hey retarded nigger bot, you can literally see satellites with your naked eye.
https://james.darpinian.com/satellites/
>>
>>532736738
Nobody educated in Europe has ever questioned the globe theory.
Medieval Christian imagery featured a sphere with a cross on the top, "globus", symbolizing power over the world.
People were skeptical about the success of Columbus' expedition because the circumference was calculated incorrectly and the distance was expected to be way greater.
Ptolemaic system was used for star navigation and astronomy only because it was a legacy system working well for its purposes.
What's interesting, it was Protestants who were first to oppose heliocentrism.
>>
>>532735720
>Don't @ me again
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>532738000
I can see your brown eye from space.
>>
>>532736803
I'm just wondering what caused the jannies to actually delete his retardation the first time around
Or maybe he deleted it himself
>>
>>532728877
THE EARTH IS FAKE. WAKE UP SHEEPLE
>>
>>532730801
Uhhhh... the radiation in Van Allen belt should fry the SD card. Because shielding hasn't been invented yet.
>>
>>532738108
doens't happen very often from what ive seen
>>
>>532738000
Holy shit, that's a great site
Next clear night I'm gonna give it a shot

Also checked
>>
>>532734316
Kinda sad ngl.
But i herd things are going south fast here too.
>>
File: 1772823537397317.png (587 KB, 1123x833)
587 KB
587 KB PNG
>>532738224
There are lots of dead pixels in the Nikon Z9 pics, I can see why nasa is autistic about what cameras they allow.
>>
>>532737749
ok reddit man. space is gay af.
>>
>>532737750
you sound like a redditor

you might be more happy over there
>>
>>532738424
yeah, ive been reading about the D5 and Z9 and despite its age the D5 still seems to win out in a few important areas. i still want one in fact.
>>
>>532738512
I have probably been here longer than you
>>
>>532738424
No Brazilian has ever been to space. Cope.
>>
>>532738540
You two faggs never quit. I think you're the paid shills.
>>
>>532738844
Marcos Pontes did, he was the >science minister for a while and now a senator.
>>
>>532739032
You don't get it. Nobody has been to space.
>>
>>532738953
im just a bored anon into spaceflight and several of the subjects that tend to get lied about a lot, including photography. you'd prefer that the flerfs endlessly spam their lies and get left alone?
>>
>>532739332
ah ok yes, i guess you would prefer that the flerfs were left alone. lol
>>
>>532739387
There you go assuming again. Just because people believe that NASA is a money laundering scheme that fakes space flights, you jump straight to flat earth. You're fucking obsessed.You're in every goddamn thread with that fucking retarded spic screaming about flat earth when anyone dares question the narrative.
>>
>>532739616
so why has no one ever been to space?
>>
>>532728877
The close star to Earth, aside The Sun, is 4 million light years away...
>>
File: 1760000839335666.jpg (2.59 MB, 5000x3333)
2.59 MB
2.59 MB JPG
Reminder that space doubters are brown
>>
>>532739654
The logistics make it impossible right now.
>>
>>532739816
Reminder that brits are traitors to thier own race.
>>
>>532737749
yep, life is very rare and carbon is one of the rarest resources in the universe. And we exist as carbon based lifeform humans which is even rarer and we are here paying taxes to pedophile cannibals. literal antichrist, antihumanity ego driven animals
>>
>>532730801
Thats not a stars its Venus.
>>
>>532739846
more detail, please. you make a big claim.
>>
>>532737555
No, bro. It was like a glitch and it appeared for just a second.

I searched the archives for the video but I couldn't find it, but there are multiple Anons that claim to have seen the same video.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/green%20screen%20tesla

Sorry for the late reply, I was taking a shite and a post-shite shower.
>>
>>532740009
We can't make it out of low earth orbit. The release from the gravitational pull from the planet suddenly stopping into nothing would shred any craft we have to pieces. Not to mention the intense radiation that would bombard anything that did make it out.
>>
>>532737985
Not even one balloon out (hundred) thousands reflecting light?
>>
>>532740218
>No, bro. It was like a glitch and it appeared for just a second.
then i find no mention of it and everything i read in your link only says what you say...and that sounds a lot like the thing ive shown you. i see no mention of other such 'green screen' stuff.

maybe the brazil anon was right to doubt your sincerity after all. next you'll be passing this off as an example of them deleting it all or mandela effect

>Sorry for the late reply, I was taking a shite and a post-shite shower.
how did you manage to cover yourself in shite?
>>
>>532740232
so its just made up stuff then, that you will not even try to defend.
>>
>>532740237
Do you think you could spot a 5m wide object from a distance of 384 000 000m?
>>
>>532740805
That's how I spotted your mum, mahamed.
>>
>>532740688
We can't even explore our own oceans fully. We can't go to the bottom of the deepest parts. So what would make you believe that we can blast off into outerspace in tin cans held together with duct tape and aluminum foil? Use your brain. Exploring the ocean is way more important than space as well. There is no benefit from looking at rocks with telescopes we can never reach. If we can't conquer exploration on our own planet, there is no way we are on the moon. Think about it.
>>
>>532740636
Yes, me and several Anons are part of a disinformation conspiracy that goes back several years. I've been fooling you this entire time.

Who's the schizo now? I thought you were a genuine dude, bro.

> next you'll be passing this off as an example of them deleting it all

Well, why not? You know how much the Tesla stock would plummet if people found out the video was faked? Things have been scrubbed from the internet before to protect the pockets of shareholders. I don't know why you'd think that is such a ridiculous notion.

I know what I fucking saw. Believe me, don't believe me. It's no sweat off my balls.

>how did you manage to cover yourself in shite?

I have trained my body to have its bowel movements before my daily shower. Get on my level, shit-ass.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.