Without sounding mad, calmly explain how automatic draft registration is immediately possible but automatic voter registration is completely impossible.
>>532809880nazis won ww2 and the US is a fake truman show of a countryspace lasers are real and its how they keep us so numb and stupid
>>532809880Well, you see, White men are the most dangerous threat to the powers that be, therefore they must be tracked, controlled, suppressed, and murdered to the greatest extent possible.Totally innocent brown masses are not a threat to them, so they must be allowed to move in and replace White men.Race mixing, at every level, is a vile and abominable sin, which is why our satanic overlords love it.
>>532809880The Select Service or whatever it's called already does this. I think the manual-enrollment is just a vestige of a prior era. Voter registration is a State matter, not federal, unlike the Draft. The main argument for manually registering to vote is that it shows intent. Organized voting fraud is as old as the concept of voting and having everyone automatically registered creates extremely fertile ground for it. If you can't be bothered to register to vote your opinion shouldn't be taken seriously anyway.
>>532810249Thinking about it a little bit the manual enrollment into the draft makes some sense. If someone does NOT do so, even though it just involves returning a postcard, it is a good indicator that they are not enthusiastic. This is useful information for the military in the event something is needed. Usually if you are avoidant of being drafted they stick you in less important (and usually shitty) roles rather than ones that depend on loyal soldiers who care about the cause.The reason the gov is talking about this now is probably to avoid some judicial mutiny (ongoing) that would make it hard to actually run a draft.
>>532810249>automatically registered creates extremely fertile ground for itWhy would this be fertile ground for fraud?
>>532809880Do you think that people who pay no attention to and have no real interest in science, economics, law, philosophy, history, or current events should be voting, anon?
>>532810728In any election there are at least 20-25% of people not voting. If you know who these people are and they are registered you can confidently vote in their name. This is the main reason why democrats are so obsessed with this issue as that is one of their major voting fraud vectors.
>>532810772It's super funny how the USA system was designed with discernment about who could actually vote in mind. Then after we dismantle that set of criteria people act shocked that the system isn't functioning well.
