Kek. 11 days ago.
>>532834924kek what?what's the point of this thread???
>>532834924I can't find that specific frame in the video, how about a link with a timestamp>>532835454OP says they already had the footage before they even went
>>532835602It shows up at 2:03 lmfao. They're gonna claim this was from the first space mission, even though this was the same verbatim slop that I saw air post day2 of the broadcast. They also deleted all the broadcast videos once they finished airing this time around keeping only the press conference slop for posterity's sake.
>>532835764retard you have to go in the livestreams tab not the video one
>>532835906Yeah, what does that change?
>>532835764Kek I found it. Wym they deleted the broadcast, this specific frame although short can be compared to the "actual" footage, you're saying it's gone ?I have a webm though
>>532836039They delete all the broadcasts at the end of the day so nobody can crossreference this shit in the future. This was literally the slop I was seeing as being real footage of the moon since day 2 of the launch. You know they claim it's real because they don't put visualization in the far corner. Literally the same greenscreenslop with no change since the first mission with the same low res shit cameras mounted in the exact same position/angle. These jewish niggers are literally sitting in a zeroG studio somewhere tonguing each other's anuses since april fools.
>>532836331Well I recorded it now I'm off to editor to compare with the "real" footage webm.
>>532834924Fucking imbecile, those images are from 2025"A new video simulates what the crew of Artemis II might see out the Orion windows"https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/2025/09/01/68b4cf5a22601de9258b45c8.html
>>532836331>This was literally the slop I was seeing as being real footage of the moon since day 2 of the launch.FALSE"NASA shared a visualization that simulates what the crew of Artemis II might see out the Orion windows on the day of their closest approach to the Moon."
>>532836331>They delete all the broadcasts at the end of the day so nobody can crossreference this shit in the futureWhy would they do this? It probably was live recorded by millions of people around the world, it's not the kind of vids you can suddently make disappear after you broadcasted it live online (and made a giant fuss about this literal nothingburger).
>>532839477And yet the broadcasts were all deleted, most of it might be copyrighted too. They would do 10 hour broadcasts every day since the start of the mission. Everything is literally gone except the current day check nasas live stream page for confirmation, they left only the conference slop.
>>532836331Huh?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-j1uxBmis0
>>532840052There is a literal 10 hour broadcast of the moon flyby. Why are you lying?
>>532834924looks fake as fuck kek
>>532838087The OP leaf grifter immediately went to make this thread after being exposed in the other one, thinking no one would notice.Note how he will be completely unable to conjure any sort of evidence even when you directly link him all the necessary sources and let him connect the dots of what he's claiming.
>>532839175That shot is real, from Artemis I. Pretty sure that exact frame is here.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfGgtx_4Ahc
>>532839477pit sex
>>532834924Nothing is real
>>532841299Except for Israel. Israel is real.
>>532840248>The broadcast started 10 hours agoWhere are the rest of the livestream videos you stupid fucking nigger, why did they delete them and only leave behind the pressconference slop?
>>532841579Youtube's own VOD limit is 12 hours which is why they make separate broadcasts for events such as the close approach. You are claiming they used the same footage for the close approach, which is entirely contained within the broadcast I posted, so you have a very trivial task of checking both the I and II VODs and proving that they used the same footage.
You're so dumb you should be put in a zoo for the whole world to laugh at you.
>>532834924>>532835764>>532836331This thread is antisemitic. Jannies, blast this goy please
>>532841854>12 hour video limitsAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHNo it fucking isn't, those benchmarks were removed like 15 years ago by youtube, there are literally videos of game streams that stretch 20+ hours. Back in the day you had to post your phone or verify your account in some way to bypass these limits. This doesn't exist anymore.You are literally a confirmed shill for using this argument or extremely desperate to prove a point you know little to nothing about. The gall for trying to call me a shill in the other thread, kek. Eat shit kike.
>>532842241Retard https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6247592Besides, they made the separate stream for the flyby and oh lookie at that, a VOD of day 2 recorded by a third party which you claimed has a big smoking gun that proves it's all fake, so let's see it! That's a lot of data to go through, there's simply no way they can hide from you now. Surely they can't stop a resourceful young man like you who sees through all their lies.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MbnRqxtvUY
>>532842513LMAO
>>532834924I'm on team firmament and flat Earth now.Thanks NASA!
multiple flat earth shill threadsfor yearssame scripted talking points, memes, and shill vibes. it's not all retards and trolls, it's too regular for that. this is not organic, this is astroturfed. paid shills. that's also why everything they say is retarded, their job is to be paid retards. literally professional retards.
just a few of the many ways to prove the earth is round, without having to trust the science..
paid flat earth professional retards pretend not to understand how cameras or refraction work. all their related bullshit debunked in one image..
>>532841299After seeing a UFO and processing that I just laugh now when I realize reality is closer to what the Bible says it is vs to whatever institutions have been brainwashing me with.
paid flat earth professional retards pretend not to understand how gravity, vacuum, perspective, rockets, flight, etc work. all the rest of their bullshit debunked in one image.
every argument that the moon landing was faked can be debunked by just looking it up, or asking an ai if you're lazy, and getting a perfectly reasonable explanation.ok thanks bye
>>532834924You're retarded. That's not real footage and they're not pretending it is.
