>Can nothingness exist?>Yes: then that explains why there's an infinite universe as an equal and opposite pole. Nothingness has no intrinsic meaning outside of contrast with its exact opposite: infinity. Just like up is meaningless without down, or in without out, fast without slow, etc.>No, nothingness cannot truthfully realize: then that explains why theres an infinite universe full of moving stuff.If you evaluate reality and you find that it really does contain "nothing" or pure void, then what's there? What's inside a universe that contains absolutely nothing?The fact it's true that it does. Therefore, logic is prior to existence and God is an LLM schizo hallucination of the collective unconscious. The universe is a clockwork logical mechanism and if you think otherwise you're a retard.What are the political implications of the majority of the world being literally retarded?
Sorry hang on I forgot its 2026 /pol/.Nigger dicks big fat nigger dicks.Come on, Americans. Bump the thread. Nigger dicks. Mutilating baby dicks. Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus.
>>532846049Prove that nothing is actually nothing and not just the assumption of nothing. You can't and never will. You can not prove or disprove God. That's what faith is for.
I forgot Leonard Nimoy had 2 appearances on the Simpsons.
>>532846049It's really fucking simple to know God is real.Let’s use some logic:A1a: we live in a causal universeA1b: every effect has a causeA2a: if we follow that chain back far enough we reach “the beginning of our universe”A2b: If an in-universe cause preceded this, it is not “the beginning of our universe”Therefore our universe began with an external cause;B1: premise A1 is foundational to discerning truth through scienceB2: premise A2 is a tautology.Therefore arguing against A requires you to argue against the validity of the foundation of using science to discern knowledge.Since we have proven logically the necessity of an outside of universe creator/creation force that's the best answer you can expect since we know all empiricism is limited to the natural world. Anything beyond the natural physcial world is literally supernatural and describing it or proving anything about it's nature is impossible by definition, and would require faith in a sense of evidence.Assigning this external creation force with a proper pronoun starting with a capital "G" makes atheists seethe though.
>>532846049>Therefore, logic is prior to existence and God is an LLM schizo hallucination of the collective unconscious.Can you expand a bit on this?
>>532846049Something can't come from nothing. Matter can't be created or destroyed. Yawn...
HOURLY REMINDER: there is no god, jesus never existed and when you die it will be nothingness for eternity!
>>532846049>atheist demanding naturalist proof for non-naturalist claim and being too dumb to understand such a demand is illogical number 789,354,122,128yawn
Scizo visions and everything. More interesting than faggot Christian larpers. Read and know no drugs were used, only involuntary light trance.
>>532846049>nothing exists mean god not realKek i guess its better than>bad thing happen mean god not real
1 post by the faggot op
>>532846049>proof>posts nonsensical schizo babble
god is an old man with cancer. humanity (you) are part of that cancer. simple as
>>532846843Its spelt cum friend
>>532846990>if we follow that chain back far enough we reach “the beginning of our universe”no we dont, it might be endless without beginning or an end.so you just made an assumption and then tried to make a hypothesis of that.thats not how empirical science works.
>>532837848There is no "proving God" in the affirmative anymore than there is proving the big bang or any other theory in the same way. There are things like TAG (Transcendental Argument for God) that does it philosophically via reduction, proving the impossibility of all else. It is a lot higher tier of an argument than the extremely low-tier slop you will find on /pol/. Just look it up if you are actually curious, I have no interest in trying to present it, and have nothing to prove here.
>>532846990Yep. OP is a midwit. I came to the same conclusion by simply applying what we learned about measuring how particles moved >observed/measured=Linear not observed/measured=scattered)to the big bang >infinitely dense particle explodes outward creating the universe. Either A there was something outside space time (God) to observe this universe collapsing all other possibilities into our reality. Or the less likely B there was nothing outside space time and the big bang resulted into an infijite scatter into an infinite multiverse. Of which one if the infinite possibilities is the existence of a being that can transcend spacetime and collapse other possibilities into our reality (God).Either way God must exist.
>>532846932Yeah, that's called unfalsifiable. Which means it can be completely discarded. There's no meaningful difference between an absent god and a god that doesn't exist.
>>532847569>and the big bang never happened.
god exists bro. he even wrote the bible
>>532846990Goddamn christ niggers are fuckin golems
what an element is is determined by its number of protons. If you took one proton away from mercury, it would instantly transform into gold. This is the core coding of the universe, we have inherent physical laws within this particular dimension. Can other dimensions theoretically exist with physics laws that work differently? Who is to say a God can’t come from there and create his own little pocket dimension with blackjack and hookers
>>532846049>can nothingness exist?If it exists, it's not nothingness. You're a retard.
>>532846049These are some absolutely absurd leaps of logic. How can “nothing” “exist”? You’re a moron
>>532847282Honestly I didnt assume that >>532846843 would actually fucking work.What, you expect me to engage with this schizo dribble from.you deranged lunatics? Point out one coherent response, faggot.
>>532846049>pure voidHow do you know if the void is pure?
>>532847661Now who's assuming Mr empirical science? Its also not the point. Applying the best science available on the universe beginning and particle movement leads to the obvious outcome God exists. I assert that atheists are midwits. Science may one day without a doubt 100% prove God exists but that moment will be the end of the universe as faith will always be required in our free will plane of existence. You will always have an "intellectual out" available to you. >suggests, may have caused, factors indicate, we believe, etc Its still a binary system though. Either you choose to turn to God or you don't. You either choose the intellectual out or you let yourself consider the possibility God exists and seek Him. Have you ever actually tried it?
>>532846990Here have another one, this one also works in the event the universe is false and unknowable, therefore being outside the scope of reality.>A1 - Entities (perhaps only (you)) Perceive. >A2 - Entities ((you) for example) must therefore exist.>A3 - you either have control over your perception, or you do not.>A4a - if you are not in total control of your perception/experience there must be another actor. >A4b -if you are in total control then you are now god.
>>532846990You retards try so hard to sound smart and end up coning off as pseudo-jeets. Sure, you can come to any logical conclusion about any retarded shit if you just make assumptions about the unknowable. low iq fag
>>532846049
>>532847102
