>We are told that modern humans [evolved in] Africa and then magically all of a sudden left 60,000 years ago><Modern humans actually [evolved after] they left Africa approx 60,000 years agoWhich one is true and why?How do you explain the rapid advancement of the human species that occurred approx 60,000 years ago?
bots like herbs
>>532847536Homo Sapiens evolved in Africa a little over 300,000 years ago. Their dispersal out of Africa wasn't sudden and happened in multiple phases over the course of tens of thousands of years.
>>532847687
>>532847767how does this affect u personally doe
>>532847745count the chirpshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M46kHcPrxOs
>>532847536"Out of Africa" is total horseshit. Things that were vaguely humanoid left Africa 300,000 years ago (Out of Africa Pt 1) and they evolved into neanderthal, denisovans, pygmies, proto-abbos maybe idk.Out of Africa pt 2 was 60,000 years ago but it still took 30,000 years for them to migrate up to Europe. Mankind magically all coming from Africa is total bullshit. For fuck's sake, by the time "modern humans" arrived in Europe, neanderthal were already there and the two were totally capable of interbreeding, which they did.Neanderthal could only grunt and were missing vast ranges of speech that the "modern humans" were capable of. In my opinion nobody was even speaking until something predating proto-Indo-European (it can trace back to common substrates with Afro-Asiatic languages, see "The Horse, the Wheel & Language" Anthony Burgess, conveniently around Anatolia where wine was discovered). I think speech was invented around 15,000 bc along with sailing and that's when people went beyond very simple tool use and began sailing.But all of this coincided with lots of interbreeding. Think like this: a room full of various weird different subhumans fucked until they get smarter, better with tools, and better at speaking. This is much more plausible than "ape-man got better at man than ape!" Don't trust academics they're full of shit. Sometimes academics write big books and they might be right when you really dig into it, but not always. They fight over their big books.
>>532847806its still 10 times better than the slop posted all over social media now so a bunch of retards can earn 7 dollars a week. social media went to hell after they started offering mass monetization programs
>>532847894>Neanderthal could only gruntactually youre wrong because Neanderthals had very high pitched voiceshttps://x.com/MattHighton/status/1524022696908099587/
>>532847536THIS THREAD AGAIN??http://www.google.com/search?q=out+of+africa+debunked
>>532847536Humans didn't evolve at all. It's all made up bullshit by the same academic institutions that have made up all sorts of other (((science))).
>>532848194Its never been officially settled bro
>>532848162They talked like Jews obviously
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humansthis is the shit.It's easier to sell people some dumbass simple theory (materialism, darwinism) than whatever is highly highly complicated and actually accurate (m-theory, punctuated equilibrium, respectively)>>532848162yeah they were really high pitched but it's still grunting. Be fucking glad we wiped them all out. White man interbred with them more but the further north you get the more sparse populations become. Desperate times you know. I don't even like humans. In my deep reconstructive thoughts I think neanderthals could only form word-pairs with mostly names. "Name" seems like a much older invention than "verb." Point at an object and grunting a name for it is easier than chaining a logical sequence of cause and effect together with an abstract idea which is what a verb is.
>>532848194Have you tried actually reading any of the articles that come up from that search?Out of Africa is still concensus.
If the out of africa "theory" is wrong then where did humans come from
I would actually argue that (pre-)proto-indo-European is a highly artificial construction that was imposed on people (probably true in an archaeological record sense), but taking it further and saying it was a construct imposed from its beginning. A few language users planning together would have a basically infinite advantage over non-language users. Subject-object-verb construction (or variably object-verb-subject, (sum) tempum habeO) seems more artificial than subject-verb-object as well: "I'm typing this."The greater and ease detail with factual precision (excluding chained possessives) that subject-object-verb allows makes me think it was divinely inspired.
>>532848507My theory is that we were all a bunch of retarded apes up until about 60,000 years ago when ayy lmaos came and genetically engineered us. Then after that we realized we're all fucking retarded for living in Africa where there's no food so we all moved to Europe where we grew crops and made computers.
>>532848962In all seriousness I believe in the multiregional theory humans didn't have one origin place we all came about from multiple migrations that happened over the span of tens of thousands of years
>>532848507we just kinda evolved into different branches innit doe, black people got nappy hair, big noses to breath a lot of air, and bee bee seas, asian peepo got squinty eyes and spiky hair to protect from alien rays, brown peepo got body hair and inbred breathing issues and crossed eyes to protect from predators, and white peepo got albinism, pink skin and neurodivergence
>>532849374Which is why I find the whole non-africans went out of Africa 60000 years ago to be quite stupid if that were the case how come most africans look quite similar to each other despite having "higher" genetic "diversity"
>>532847767Would, would, and would. Yes I fuck niggers.
>>532847536>theoryUnproven hypothesis.
>>532849541>how come most africans look quite similar to each other despite having "higher" genetic "diversity"Look into the founder effect. The reason other populations have their distinguishing features is precisely because of reduced genetic diversity.>>532849687Tested and substabtiated model which has yielded many accurate predictions.
>>532847536Certainly both. Evolution is a constant process.
>>532847536Out of Australia makes more sense.Basal K y haplotype(ancestor to q and r types) is only found in long dead Siberian and living Aborigines.Aborigines have the same mc1r mutation as Europeans being the only other group with natural red and blonde hair
>>532848291https://voca.ro/1ce0l9z05eUm
