Is hierarchy a natural feature of society that should be preserved, or a structure that should be actively reduced?
.
This is one of our Kings. What do you see here?
>>532865810Retarded thread.If there are two people in a room together, there is a hierarchy, even if only a loose one. The reason why libertariniggers are reacting against hierarchy in the last few years is because our current State sucks, and is anti-white. They then take the wrong lesson of being anti-hierarchy, which is a useful idiot position that is pushed on them so they make themselves ineffectual, rather than taking the correct position.
>>532866337Quiet migger
>>532865810Finally a real thread but not really an interesting oneHierarchy = efficient distribution of powerSociety = powerful group>is efficient distribution of power a natural feature of powerful groups?Yes obviously.>should we reduce our group's power so individuals have more freedomIf you do then some other group that didnt reduce its power will wipe out and replace your group. Sorry thats just God's law.
>>532867201Also want to add, since you left open this possibility: Hierarchy should be actively reduced in enemy groups. E.g. if you're white in America then the hierarchy doesn't serve you>>532866337Also this. Libertarians are fucking retards t. Son of 2
>>532866476What a weird response
>>532865810yes it is. but the jews won and we lost. the next hierarchy will be a jewish one
>>532865810Hierarchy is like giving a scooter to the one highest in hierarchy during a sprint. Its not the fastest person who needs the scooter to exist.
>>532865810it's a natural feature that should be actively reduced.preferably to ashes.
