New numbers come out showing shitskins are actually, as essentially everyone else knew already, a cost on the state and country and does not bring anything positive to europe. Leftists then go on TV to deboonk this.Shitskins contribute negatively to the economy.>No they don'tbut look at these numbers, they show that they do.>No they don'twell, i understand that not all these immigrants contribute negatively to the economy; if you see here, white immigrants from western countries contribute positively to the economy compared to the shitskins>No they don'tokay, if we look at the integration efforts then, we can clearly see that some, mostly whites, integrate easily while others still can't honestly say are properly integrated even if they've been here 10, 20, 40, or even more years.>No they don'tYou say they supposedly come from war torn areas and are so traumatized that they can't easily integrate and such, so why do they routinely go back there on vacations and visits?>No they don'tWhen Denmark reduced welfare to shitskins, migration went down by 75%>No they don'tI could go on and on, but I assume you get the point. I genuinely don't understand what goes through their heads. It must be religious at this point. They must be so completely brainwashed and infatuated that it can't even possibly cross their minds that whites aren't irrationally evil and that shitskins aren't an unquestionable good.I mean for God's sake, one of the reporters literally said "Well, since James from England and Jacque from France integrate well and contribute, why can't we then also import the whole third world so they can continuously rape and murder?"I refuse to believe they're simply stupid.
>>532868136>It must be religious at this point.Yes. Ideology has replaced religion. We've gotten over the radical political extremism of the 1880s to 1980s so now you have mainstream talking points and corporate slogans acting as ideas to frame a person's entire worldview around.
>>532868136>Why are leftists and libtards like this?That's just how they are, anon. It's always like this.
>>532868136I knew a gypsy girl from here that ended up in some gang in the Netherlands that robbed fancy clothes stores. She got arrested and I have no idea what happened to her after that. Hopefully she is dead in a ditch somewhere right now.
>>532868277Yeah, i've thought a lot about this for the past year or so, coming more and more to this conclusion. It must be some sort of neo/postmodern-Abrahamic secularism. I mean they talk very religiously about a lot of things, they appeal to things, like human rights for example, in a very sacrilegious way. Ironically for how atheist and secular they are, they do seem to hold the human rights text as sacred. Although unlike most actual religions, these texts are not sacred as in you have to interpret them, but that they can simply be changed on a whim by its priests to simply fit whatever they desire.They clearly deify both women and the third world, even though they can't actually define what they are. If you cite their own holy texts against them, they simply ignore and censor you and they are seemingly so ideologically/religiously brainwashed that they'd happily let themselves be raped and murdered instead of admitting to blasphemy. I'd argue it's even worse than the soviet sham trials, as even though many of its victims lied to maintain the face of marxism-leninism, they at least knowinlgy told a lie to maintain the face of their in-group and tribe. These people, many if not most of them women, seemingly lie in spite of their own security and prosperity. They'd happily let their own secular, atheist, material deities rape, pillage and murder them than dare to even think or move against them. I don't think they're even lying, unlike the soviet sham trial victims, they simply can not fathom the thought that they might not be 100% correct.It's like a mass psychosis, i don't like thinking that i know everything and no one else can understand as it's simply a byproduct of either narcissism, low iq, lack of information or echo-chamber thinking, but i've routinely tried to place myself in their shoes, when i was younger i even was a marxist-leninist, with my primitive understanding of ML-ism of course, although i genuinely have a hard time understanding them.
Surprised we have people there.
>>532868384If you have read MK, you would recognize discourse with leftists is really discourse with the jew.
>>532868136>capitalists import immigrants to drive down wages>WHY ARE LEFTIST LIKE THIS??????
>>532869202I agree, and this is something i could extrapolate on. It does seem that the new left, the left born out of the frankfurt school of the 20s and the postmodern movement of the 60s, has worked tirelessly against the actual working class proletariat and with the interests of international finance and business. I mean just look at immigration alone; any actual working class party would be against immigration as it obviously lowers wages due to increased labour competition, amongst many other things of course that's detrimental to the working class. I could go on, but you get the point.I'm simply trying to enter the heads of these people, we all know who's behind it, but i'm trying to understand how the average lefftist/liberal can justify this to themselves. I mean, it should be relatively obvious that they've supported policies and stances that's obviously been in the interests of these business owners, the bourgeois and the top percentages, no? I mean wouldn't they be on the frontlines to fight for the re-industrialization of the west? As the exportation of manufacturing to the third world has obviously disproportionally enriched the top percentages of the west, leaving the average working class westerner behind.I just don't understand how they can remain so obviously self-contradictory and never fucking realise it.
>>532869202Capitalists are leftists. Its a brave new world
