So, this pretty much debunks the Shining Theory about Stanley Kubrick, doesn't it?https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2041565728562675976https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNu5JKxldjI
>>533063816The moon moves silly.
>>533063880The moon is a breader machine by contract.
>>533063816It gets further away over time
>>533063816they traveled to the shart side of the moon
That’s because they orbited around the moon, if it was just earths surface to the moons surface then it’s 237,000 miles.Also, no the moon isn’t moving further away, you guys are idiots.
So tired of these retarded, uneducated and low iq threads. OP should be permabanned and jailed for life.
>>533064043Yeah, I don't give a fuck. You were all wrong for long enough and I want my woman back.
I thought they sent the Apollo missions to the moon, is that fucker further away then it was back in the day or what?
When do we get to see the full video from take off to landing on the moon. That would be cool to see.
>>533064238Actually it is by a few small centimeters. But the current projections are that the Sun will engulf the Earth before we lose our moon.
>>533063816>retard 1 PBTID thread
>>533063960More like a breeder machine, amirite? *PLAP* *PLAP *PLAP*
>>533064238>no the moon isn’t moving further away, you guys are idiots.why do they say its the furthest any human has been if we have sent several missions to the moon before?
>>533064373No, they went around the moon. The were at a distance of 4600 miles from the moon while going around it.
>>533064650i don't think the apollo missions just stop dead and return to earth, I'm not too good with orbital mechanics, but surely they must have orbited the fucking thing to return home too just the same as they are now? is the mass of the capsule that significantly different it orbited further out the the apollo missions?
>>533064583Apollo's orbit was a lot closer to the Moon than Artemis II's free returnHeck, even Apollo 13's free return didn't need to go as high as Artemis because they got a lot more energy during TLI from the S-IVB than Artemis got from the ICPS.
>>533064885Apollo 13 had the old record with its aborted landing and went around at a distance of 157.8 miles. Typically the apollo mission orbited at a distance of 60-70 miles.
>>533063816How do you retards even function?
>>533065337fascinating, it is quite a bit different. i wonder what drives that kind of mission parameter.
>>533065393Do they function?
>>533063816The orbit isn't perfect, but stable. That makes a small difference at times.They were circling behind the moon to snap pictures, that is also further than "from grass on Earth to closest cheese on Moon"
>not in c.1800s Britain>milesCringe.
>>533063816the orbit is not a perfect circle you retard but an ellipse
>>533064583because none of the Apollo missions swung as far around the back of the moon as Artemis did
>>533063816Earth is actually shrinking. Ever notice things from when you were a kid seem smaller now?
>>533064238tell em’ bro. they just hate on american space dominance because they are anti-white pedo democrats.
>>533063816the "moon" it's a projection on the stellar plane from an earth station deep beyond the ice wall
>>533063816I'm going to go out on a limb and take an uneducated guess that you suffer from severe mental retardation.
>>533063816I can't help but think these retarded threads are part of a concerted effort to undermine /pol/'s influence.
>>533063816Retard. The moon moves.
>>533064043Technically true but only a few cm per year.
>>533065512SLS is not capable of putting Orion into an Apollo style Orbit around the moon. Actually this wasn't an orbit at all and was free return.Now it can do orbits around the moon but the closer they can get I believe is around 2000 miles above the surface. Apollo was orbiting around 80 miles.
Retards in the thread are retardsKM is superior anyway.Also the moon has width, and the orbiters apogee was further than the moon too.
>>533063816One of these distances is longer than the other.
>>533063816What about that one cosmonaut that broke earth orbit and was set adrift? Wouldn't he be the furthest humans have gone, presumably?
>>533063816That was the farthest the spacecraft rached in space, not the distance of the moon.
>>533063816
>>533063816237,000 is the mean distance.
