Penis
>>533188661Not as much as will happen with our drone laws
>>533188661The reds states don’t have gun laws any more, so nothing will change here. The blue states have gone nuts and are putting g more and more ridiculous restrictions in place. I expect that to continue. On the federal level, I expect SBRs will get removed from the NFA because the ban is so ludicrous, but that’s about it.
>>533188865>The reds states don’t have gun laws any more, so nothing will change here.God damn I wish.
>>533188865Red states a turning blue, Virginia just fell yesterday and implemented California tier gun control brought to you by a wonderful bangladeshi shit skin. Not only that the states about to be gerrymandered 1 to 9 or something similar. Everything is falling because of forigners Americans can't run anymore.
>'gun laws'No such thing. Not possible to make a 'gun law' any more than a 'baseball bat law' or 'kitchen knife law'. Violent crime and murder is illegal.U.S. Constitution, BoR 2nd Amendment protects the natural God-given right to keep and bear arms.
>>533188974Virginia has been a bluish-purple state for many years. Thank the DC suburbs for that.>>533188928My state just passed constitutional carry last year and we don’t have any laws beyond the federal minimums. Feels good, man.
>>533188974>VirginiaIs getting sued for that by Department of Justice Civil Rights division head Harmeet Dhillon:https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/532981360
>>533189068>federal minimumsFederal minimums are still BS.
>>533188661>What will happen with our gun laws in 10 years time?They will be tyrannical in any form. The 2nd Amendment is the only gun law that matters, and restricts the government from making any more, so all that matters is you ignore any others.
>>533189201The problem with the Second Amendment was that it was written in Masonic coding. The language was intentionally made so that it could always be overridden at a later date. The proof is in the logical fallacy that comes with the Second Amendment: >Either the Second Amendment applies to illegal guns, or it applies to no guns. Because the jews only need to claim something "illegal" and then nothing prevents it.
>>533188661Could you imagine if they made laws against the first amendment in the same way they make laws against the second amendment.I know they are trying to ban "assault words" with (((hate speech))) laws but so far have been unsuccessful.If they get the guns they will be successful and they will start arresting people for anti-semitic memes.
>>533190082You know pornography used to be illegal until quite recently, right?
The founding fathers did not have the Internet, therefore the first amendment does not apply to internet speech and we are going to curtail your ability to freely speak your mine by forcing you to get a license to use the internet, which we can and will revoke anytime we want for any reason.
>>533188661Guns? I lost those in a boating accident years ago
>>533190158It should still be Illegal....porn is not freedom of speech, that's communist pushing it to degrade American society, it's a weapon of war being wielded by Jews.
>>533190082The government's job is to remove the freedoms and lifeblood from man that his creator endowed him with. The state is a masonic false god to spite the creator.
