The President of Ireland is trying to kill a bill designed to prevent abuse of the asylum system in Ireland.
>Vote of No Confidence fails: fork found in KitchenDespite assurances from many TDs (independent and otherwise) that they would likely support a vote of no confidence, the Government passed; 92 to 78 was the end result. This was immediately followed by condemnation of the leadership by many members of Fianna Fáil.In other words, they turned the whole thing into a career move for themselves. More perma-coalition!>President demands examination to discuss International Protection Bill 2026The IPB is a Bill which passed through the Oireachtas by 86 to 62 last night.It is the most significant reform of asylum laws in Irish history, aimed at making it harder for people who claim Asylum in Ireland to stay here indefinitely. Catherine Connolly, the President of Ireland, has convened the Council of State to examine (see: try to block) the bill, a move welcomed by the Irish Aslyum Council.
Connolly won a landslide victory in the 2025 Irish Presidential Elections, which served as a lesson for those who don't bother to prepare for them.She recieved 914,143 votes-more than any candidate in the history of the state. An openly far-left poltician, she drew criticism for her condemnation of Israel, the UK and the USA-calling them untrustworthy.Many believe that she hopes to undermine or block the IPB to prevent any hardening of Ireland's refugee or asylum laws.
In other words, it has never been more over.
I said it 10 years ago and i will say it now. Violence is the only solution. Yes it is an uncomfortable reality. But it's true. And the people won't do it until they have exhausted every other option.
We are dealing with neo-bolsheviks
>>533334487The Irish President is technically a "ceremonial" head of state, but this is among the powers the office had. When the election was happening, I made threads pointing out to people that there was a massive alliance of every left wing party (from the moderates to the full blown socialist loopers) to get her into office, as a precursor to their plan to form the first proper left wing government.I think lots of people in Ireland are woefully complacent because they've convinced themselves that>awk sure, the government is already full of leftiesand I don't think they realise what is coming.
https://reclaim-ireland.ie/Will éire/pol/ be flocking to join Reclaim Ireland?
>>533334640>and I don't think they realise what is coming.Unfortunately they don't, anon. But i still keep faith. Because as grim as it might seem. We are still the only country in Europe with a bit of fight left in them against the brown hoards.
>>533334753Being shilled by this guy https://x.com/i/status/2045039577451446320
The people they imported to assault and replace us, to rape our children. See they are not against violence, and people need to wake up to that.
>>533334753>reclaim ireland>"we are keeping our cards close to our chest">born out of nowhere and shilled by people with accounts that get paid for engagement>website has 3 separate buttons that link to giving them moneyAlmost a certainty that they are just in it for cash. Nothing on their site suggests they have anything to offer not already on offer by several other older fringe parties.
Keeping the thread on life support
>>533334753They seem about as fake and gay as the NP and IFP.
Truly incredible that Fine Gael is a party quite literally founded via a merger with a fascist militia and they turned out to be at absolute most centre right, moreso economically than socially.
If she refuses to sign she'll be in dereliction of her duties and will be removed from office in disgrace. She could send it to referendum but she'd then be faced with the very plausible risk that it could pass. The only credible threat is that she could refer it to the Supreme Court, but only if its constitutionality is in doubt.
>>533337251>If she refuses to sign she'll be in dereliction of her duties and will be removed from office in disgraceShe can't outright refuse, best she can do is refer it to the Supreme Court and then they decide. Likewise with a referendum, she'd need a majority of the Seanar and a 3rd of the Dáil-although that second one would be easy enough.There is one funny quirk of the constitution; if she refers it to the Council of State (who she appoints personally) and they REJECT it, it can never be challenged again. I think the last time a bill was killed was in 2004, which was aimed at legalising the overcharging of elderly patients in hospital.
>leader of the NP Patrick Quinlan apparently has criminal convictionsAnd they expect to win elections?Vote splitting is a justified concern but we do NEED a fresh start. Legacy failure parties are still on 0% almost a decade on. Imagine how much more dirt there is on the NP just waiting to be investigated, never mind the damage that has already been done(gold heist, pedo discord run by their national organiser, closet nazis that blatantly lie about their real beliefs). You can have ethno-nationalist politics without the crippling baggage that comes with the NP.
>>533337995>Vote splitting is a justified concern but we do NEED a fresh startAnon, there's no such thing as a split vote in an Irish election. Ireland uses PR-STV. The only way to split a vote is to decide not to vote for someone. That said>And they expect to win elections?I don't really think they do.
Conor McGregor for presidentMIGA
>>533338467McGregor shills for Israel. Everything he says and does is to make money from engagement. If you think he cares one iota what happens to you or to Ireland you are no less retarded than dick chopping trannies, lad.
>>533334340>t.
>>533337616>There is one funny quirk of the constitution; if she refers it to the Council of State (who she appoints personally) and they REJECT it, it can never be challenged again.She's doing this in reverse.Yes, a piece of legislation that has been examined by the council of state, before enactment, can't be challenged in the Supreme Court.She may be in favour of the law, which undoubtedly legally enshrines infinite niggers. And is effectively blocking any chance of a concerned party from challenging the Government's immigration legislation through the courts.>oh you think handing out citizenship to infinite jeets is unconstitutional? It's already been found constitutional by the council of state chud.Catherine Connolly was a trained barrister before becoming President.
>>533337995They'll just do the usual thing of blaming everybody else but themselves when they fail again.
>>533338912No. But am i wrong? You would give a good counter argument if i was. Or maybe a different solution. But you know you deserve it.
It would be funnier if a nigger gets to you first. Divine karma
>>533333412Why is the media focused on this Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2026, Criminal Law and Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2026 and the directive that prohibits protesters from wearing face coverings.This populist bullshit where the media and establishment focus on direct provision and the opposition to it is becoming so retarded it's painful to watch a nation of spastics worry about bollux instead of the bigger changes.The same justice department tried to smear honest protestors as Tommy Rubenstein supporters when FF are the Zio puppets of Ireland.We are losing our rights in Ireland and all they want us talking about is how many niggers they WANT imported as requested by Jewish NGOs and American think tanks
>Council of State superceding the Supreme CourtIn the early 1980s Ireland went against the flow and actually enshrined the right of life of the unborn into the constitution by way of amendment passed by a national referendum.Then in the 1990s we had a Supreme Court decision, that came from a case of a gypsy impregnating his 14 year old niece who was put into state care, that implied that emotional distress of the mother outweighs the right to life of the unborn. Like the "Roe vs Wade" judgement in America (that legalised national abortion) it was on shaky ground and any legislation (that the pro-abortion campaigners were demanding) coming from the judgement would be likely reversed by the Supreme Court's interpretation of the 1980s constitutional amendment.One way around this that was being pushed by the pro-abortion lobby was for the president to call a council of state to rubber stamp the abortion legislation and therefore close off any path for anti-abortion campaigners to challenge what was clearly unconstitutional in the courts.The Government never went down this path, which was being pushed in the liberal media, and instead opted for another referendum that repealed the 1980s constitutional ban and gave power to the government to set laws for abortion.The legal loophole of legislation after being examined by the council of state not being open to challenge in the Supreme Court remains.
>>533333412https://youtu.be/-Fp7w3Jy3yk
