https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15722915/Starmer-gives-rebellion-female-Labour-MPs-government-unveils-new-laws-regulate-porn.htmlhttps://news.sky.com/story/ban-on-step-incest-porn-and-barely-legal-content-in-government-climbdown-13530107>Government agreed to ban the portrayal of sex between step-relatives> possession and publication of pornography showing incest between white family members, and sex between step or foster relations where one person is pretending to be under-18, will be criminalised.>Publishing the banned material will carry a maximum penalty of between two and five years’ imprisonment, depending on the type of content.>She previously warned that nearly half of sexual abuse cases were perpetrated by step parents>The Government has already criminalised pornography which shows women being choked after a review found such images are rife on websites and have helped to establish it as a sexual norm.>Under the plans, senior executives could face imprisonment or a fine or both if their companies fail to comply with Ofcom’s demands to remove content.>The government will ban so-called "barely legal" pornography of adults role-playing>Non-Consensual Content: Sharing intimate images without consent is illegal.>Depictions of female ejaculation are illegal>Ball busting porn is illegal>Anything that could cause serious damage to the anus is illegal>Colonisation and pet play porn is illegal. >Depictions of white males abusing under age girls are criminalised>Physical restraint preventing withdrawal of consent, erotic asphyxiation, fisting, urolagnia are banned and criminalised>Sharing intimate images without consent is illegal.>The Online Safety Act requires websites to implement robust age verification,>Attempting to circumvent these restrictions is illegal>Possession or distribution of banned "extreme" material is a criminal offense.>there are over 28,000 banned terms, >1 in 4 women in the UK will be raped
(1) It is an offence for a person (P) to be in possession of an image if— (a) the image is pornographic, within the meaning of section 63, (b) the image portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, a person (A) sexually penetrating— (i) the vagina or anus of another person (B) with a part of A’s body or anything else, or (ii) B’s mouth with A’s penis, (c) a reasonable person looking at the image would think that A and B were real, and (d) a reasonable person— (i) looking at the image, and (ii) taking into account any sound or information associated with the image, would think that A and B were related, or pretending to be as defined in section 27 (family relationships) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.Section 27 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 includes:The relation of A to B is within this subsection if A and B live or have lived in the same household... and (a)one of them is or has been the other’s step-parent, (b)A and B are cousins, (c)one of them is or has been the other’s stepbrother or stepsister...>>533372409
>>533372409Ofcom is made up of real people with names and addresses
>>533372409Wait, fisting and squirting porn is illegal too?
>>533372409But will they regulate British slags?
>>533372409>showing incest between white family membersWhy just this specific case???
>>533372862
>>533372409You know she's a Jewish intelligence asset, right? (Mia Khalifa)
>>533372409Finally UK solved it's biggest problem. Off to the bright future.
>>533372409I genuinely don't have a problem with any of thisNone of the "step" porn that is absolutely everywhere now actually involves actors who are related, it's just jews poisoning the culture for no reason
>>533372409Some of these banned points are actually going to cause more harm than good.Like "fisting" videos actually deter people from ever increasing anal penetrations and act as harm awareness.
>>533372409So solo roleplay porn would be fine? How do they plan to enforce any of this anyway?
>>533372498>one of them is or has been the other’s stepbrother or stepsisterWait so I can't bang the stepsister that I had for 3 months 20 years ago?
>>533375608>Wait so I can't bang the stepsister that I had for 3 months 20 years ago?Well the laws are about porn so you just can't film it
>>533372409>showing incest between white family members>Depictions of white males abusing under age girls>but brown niggers are allowed to do itthese can not be real.
>>533373329That would be highly unlikely
>>533372409shame on this country
>>533378035Your Jewdar needs work little bro. When we say every single time we mean every single time.Her real name is Sarah Joe Chamoun. Pic related is her yearbook photo from Massanutten Military Acadamy (prior to plastic surgery) in Maryland about 45 minutes from DC and an hour from Langley. Its a 40k a year school for the kids of glowniggers. Chamoun is an Arabic Jewish name and her parents are obvious glowniggers with a million shady connections (like the fact that her father owns a hair salon next door to CIA headquarters in Langley).A porn star trying to destroy the morals of the goyim who got astroturfed out of nowhere. Do you really need to check the early life at that point?
>>533379333Checked trips.Note the name of her jewellery line.
But cousin marriages are fine, right?
>>533379333>Chamoun
>>533379333lol wouldn't porn be a bit of a waste of an asset?
Just hit 21 and still a virgin and my choices are not good here in America. They are all obese whore single mothers or whore single mothers and I frankly can’t imagine a life with any of them. I have a plus size coworker who not kidding had a black baby and she throws these stupid unsubtle hints like he’s going to need a daddy as if she was flirting. Anyone my older sister is thin pretty and pleasant we get along well and I was thinking of asking her out on a romantic date. How do I do this and get her to say yes or at least without her freaking out and telling our parents? Thanks
>>533372409Islamic nanny state
>>533372409Jews created porn to brainwash us and it all should be bannedOnly jews and gooners seethe at porn bans
>>533372409Well they should ban only whores. I mean only fans. Its a online prostitution website.
>>533379631Depends what your goals were. She wasn't in the industry long, like at all. But she's still one of the highest searched stars out there to this day. The scene of her fucking in a hijab put a really big target on her back from a lot of agitated sides and her own bad attitude didn't help her in the industry either. The fact that she was a military asset in the industry at all calls something into question.
>>533379889dude I just don't want to get arrested for washing machine pornthat's not a lot to ask here
Ban facesitting and piss too
>>533379631Sarah Joe Chamoun/Mia Khalifa made it big in porn with her schtick of, "here's an Arabic girl wearing a hijab getting violated by infidels!" She quickly rose to become the #1 porn star in the world as she was heavily promoted by not only Jewish porn sites, but also CNN and mainstream news outlets that were fanning the flames of this "outrageous insult to Islam". In other words, it was the equivalent of blacked demoralization porn, but aimed at Palastinians instead of young white men.That little bit of her bio that is known by everybody should be enough to get a blip on your Jewdar without going too deep.It may seem like a waste of an asset to you, but the honeypot trap is a tried and true part of the intelligence profession. I'm sure that there are probably more than a few girls that jump at the opportunity to have the government pay for their bolt-on tits, make them celebrities, and live the James Bond femme fatale lifestyle instead of working as a filing clerk at Langley.
