while men are NEETmaxxing like there's no tomorrow how many years until women take our rights away /pol/?
>>533387026You're a fucking retard for believing that tranny larp.
>>533387026Do guys ever group up and live with two or three other people in a rented house and just work some part time job to pay for food and rent and just play video games and smoke weed for the rest of the time?
women will eventually be brought back under control, either society collapses into a hyper criminal state and they're taken by force, the birthrate stays low and humanity dies, or islam takes over and forces them, to submit, either way the ''uppity woman'' is and always has been a part of history, in europe before the revolutions against monarchies, women were not having children, they were uppity, 400 women stormed british parliment and when their demands were ignored they beat a lord to death, women acting they way they do today is just a indicator that we're living in the time before the collapse of the old order and the rise of a new one
>>533387026> The opinions of angry womenNo thanks, I have actual shit to care about.> Take my rights awaylmao lol evenKikes will do that first
The current trajectory of women growing ever more powerful won't be stopped and it's because of demographic reasons. Women are now settled in all relevant positions of educational, cultural and even judiucial power structures. Since they control the majority of the media outlets, they can just block any content that tries to reveal psychopathic, destructive female behavior. All people do this once they are in power. Women and their successful long march through the institutions are the elephant in the room. Phenomena like discrimination against white men, the LGBTQ craze, the trans movement, suppression of meritocracy, free speech, scientific inquiry, due process, forced identification for social media access, open borders, critical race theory etc. are rooted primarily in the rise of women’s power in institutions and culture. A majority of all college students are female and in the US this has been the cast since the 1980s. By the means of propaganda we were made believe that women see the world as men do, but in reality, women’s emotional and evolutionary instincts differ greatly, or even outright oppose typical male thinking patterns. Women, shaped for maternal, nurturing roles, tend to prioritize short-term, feel-good, protective outcomes. When they enter public life, they often react against aspects of Western civilization (built and maintained by men): free speech, meritocracy, open debate, and legal fairness - that conflicts with their emotional comfort. They seek to dismantle these pillars, which they find uncomfortable or threatening. While not all women are "woke," on average, women tend to be more biased toward progressive, identity-focused ideologies. This bias is amplified among childless, activist, or young anxious women, who seek activism as a form of purpose or status enhancing. >https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/
>>533387026If they can't be plummbers, electrician, binmen, miners, oil riggers, software engineers, they aren't talking over shit.Women do fuck all at work.
>>533387026Women don’t actually have real wealth or real power. I’ll try not to go full autistic essay post but basically the neoliberal elites allow women into high paid busywork positions in society like HR or whatever else because they’re useful as bulwarks and golems. Women with these jobs and money sexually select for only the most agreeable and simpoid men, helping to negate any working class male movement that would unite people against the elites themselves. So it’s still elites actually pulling the strings, as it’s always been, women and their fake jobs and fake money are just their useful idiots. If the systems ever collapses or a revolution ever happens women are easily subordinated back to their rightful positions, because when push comes to shove they have zero deployable power themselves; they’re weak.
>>533387026Women were never the problem. There are men in power who give them gibs and empower them and even school them to think that way. They are the issue.If women were the root cause, we could just beat them up.
>>533387026ive seen worse
>>533387026cannot be soon enough. young men are absolute cancer. they should be put into prison right after hitting puberty. no demographic is more criminal and degenerate.
>>533387350 All they need to be is in charge of HR, mass media and science. Plumbers, electricians, binmen, miners, oil riggers and software engineers hold zero institutional power. Men are also so terribly inept at organizing into any kind of collective activist groups (compared to women) that we seem to be utterly powerless. One huge disadvantage is also the fact that most men seem to be biologically unable to ever view women as "enemies", whereas most women have no problem designating men for all evil in the world.
>be woman>work meme email job that produces nothing>MEN ARE PARASITES, MY HUSBAND JUST NEETS ON CRYPTO ALL DAY AIEEEEEEEEEEE>we need eugenics for the guy who fixes my toilet, my car, does my taxes and builds my house!Yeah I expected that much and that's why women's opinions are worthless kekkle.
>>533387026Don't care, not my problem.
>>533387465Very succinct, and yeah it’s obviously true. If women were legitimately outcompeting and out fighting men for power and status now, the obvious question would be: why did they not do this at any point in the last 5000 years in any culture? The answer isn’t that women magically became stronger or better organized than men. They just became the useful idiot golems of globalist neoliberals who opportunistically saw that they could exploit their naive short sightedness for profits in a consumer economy, and also to act as a sexual selection bulwark, discouraging men from adopting anti institutional views and anti-liberal views.
Interesting. So only men who are super submissive and non violent should be bred through eugenics, but we should also force all men to be in a permanent death match where they constantly fight amongst eachother? So you see no problem with these two lines of thought?Also, don't the most "enlightened" men think women are a sexual organ that has a person attached to it, while they believe men are a person with a sexual organ?
>>533387604>zero institutional power.You mean made up power? You retards complete forget who runs the world. If they say men should not vote then men will stop working and the system collapses. If men say women should not vote nothing happens
>>533387255it's called being 30 and single
>>533387604Those are fake jobs. You sound like the guy who says the Jews run the world because some of them work in finance when finance is just moving money around, it's not the means of production.
>>533388014As long as we keep willingly subscribing to a system that bends to money moving around, they do “run the world”.
>>533387676 >>533387465 And like clockwork, here come the feminist apologetics. Like I wrote here >>533387604 >One huge disadvantage is also the fact that most men seem to be biologically unable to ever view women as "enemies", whereas most women have no problem designating men for all evil in the world. You're the best feminist slaves, without even realizing it.>>533387914 >If they say men should not vote then men will stop working and the system collapses. What happened when they forced everyone into accepting a deadly "vaccine" and lockdowns in your country? Did men collapse the system? No, they just went along like the good sheeple they are.>>533388014 The fiat money system is also "fake", that does not render any of it's effects powerless, quite the contrary. If you get denied a job by the HR lady for posting wrong speech 10 years ago in some forum, that effect is very real. Good luck screaming "fake job!" then.
>>533387026Be a gold digger. Just find a woman of wealth. I am a neet and graduated finding an older divorced woman. She has some years ahead of me but I dont care I eat at michelin star restaurants and at least chilis at the worst. I suck her hairy pussy on command. She feeds, clothes and gives me shelter. Even gives me a car to drive us around in. She usually sits in the back and I chaffeur her around but I dont care. Not paying taxes and I like this areangement coming from my parents basement. So fuck you aint dying for your war. Suck old hag pussy anon. Or fatties. Its better than flipping burgers for tree fiddy unless you are a faggot. So next time when you are driving your honda accord or your jeep wrangler on your wagie schedule I hope you remember reading this.
>>533388426Modern feminism is just the symptom of the underlying rot. The elites want you endlessly and ineffectively fighting all their golems; women, fags, minorities, etc. But think about it; if these groups were truly capable, competent, and dangerous, why did they never pose any threat to civilization at any other point in all of human history? Because in reality; it’s not women or fags or browns who are deploying power against men, it’s the elites themselves. If you tell a woman to stfu and get back in the kitchen, you don’t get beat up by a strong badass woman, you get cancelled by Jewish institutional power. If you hit a woman to discipline her, the woman doesn’t fight back and beat your ass, a male cop shows up and takes you to jail. Women are a great bulwark for institutional power; they keep the dissidents endlessly raging and fighting them, and they keep other men subordinated through sexual politics. But it’s still the (mostly male) neoliberal elites actually holding the levers of power. Seize those, and women are back to their roles instantly because they have no real power. Nazi Germany proved this once already; overnight women were kicked out of busywork jobs and sent back to the home to have kids, and no feminist movement opposed them at all. Because women can’t actually do anything of their own accord, else they would have even one other time in the last 5000 years.
>>533388426>Forced Vaccine!!!That was illegal in my country so it never happened. Sounds like you need stronger laws. That's not a woman issue, it's a retard issue. Vote better.
>>533388666>why did they never pose any threat to civilizationThey did pose a threat to society? You don't need to be competent to be a threat to society. Fags have aids and without modern medicine they will die from it, but we keep them alive artificially. In the past, faggots would spread diseases and kill everyone, that's why people stoned them to death. Since basically everyone used the local water source for everything, fags washing in it or their clothes, would really endanger everyone.
>>533388014kek you're proving their point. you can't just say "it's this way cuz i demand it to be!"
>>533388820Yeah that’s my point though; exactly as you said: “we” enable them. We do everything. If they were truly an independent threat they’d be capable of organizing competent power structures independently and would therefore be in some ways legitimate and respectable as peer opponents. We reject them precisely because we recognize that their prevalence is completely fabricated and nonsensical. But if something undesirable is being fabricated you need to destroy the fabricators. Focusing even an ounce of energy on women or faggots is a waste because that energy needs to be directed at ousting jewish/neoliberal institutional capture.
>>533387026>Autistic foidShe's obviously talking to other autistic foids who hate men. This is not representative of normal women who actually have a social life.
>>533389078Cope and seethe, moid
>>533389850Most chronically online response you could have given. Autistic women are just as pathetic as chuds.
>>533388666 >overnight women were kicked out of busywork jobs and sent back to the home to have kids, and no feminist movement opposed them at all. That's because there was no noteworthy feminist movement at the time in Germany. >why did they never pose any threat to civilization at any other point in all of human history? Because the technology wasn't there to support it, that's pretty simple. Every change in culture is preceded (and enabled) by a newly introduced technology.
>>533390181That would imply that feminism and women in general are effective wielders of technology. They’re not, really. They’re not well organized, well motivated, or capable of handling the downsides of genuine power seeking (like war and conflict). What technology do you think came into existence in the last 100 years that magically empowered women as an independent and competent force to challenge men? The major elements that changed were social and cultural; driven by boomer/neoliberal individualism, decadence, as well as Jewish and Jew-adjacent financialism and institutional capture. It’s still overwhelmingly men who control the real power structures. It’s male police and military they’ll deploy to protect women and minorities, it’s men in charge of mega corporations and government institutions. They’re not “men” as a collective though, they’re a corrupt subset of traitor men who must be rooted out and executed promptly. Attacking women or minorities or any other golem is a frivolous endeavour because those groups are easily replaced and easily made into martyrs.
>>533387026posts >>533386515>>533391552
>>533387026The game is over, as I am fond of saying. The women won. They are in control of the eugenics program and the multi-trillion-dollar pussy reward system — a highly symbolic fertility ritual. But they are in control of much more than the reproductive apparatus. They control not only the men and government of the United States of America but through the power of pussy and the susceptibility of men and government officials, fiat currency manipulation by the Witches of Fiat Currency at the Federal Reserve System, a large army of simps and "backers" (this is a technically incorrect use of the term) who are fighting to maintain control of the Frankenstein monster they created called Onlyfans (in a war I fear we are going to lose), and even the Republican form of government they created which inevitably—and I would argue by design—fosters centralized female matrilineal control and assures only a handful of "pre-selected" men must be sacralized to control an entire country, they control the entire world.
>>533392354>eugenics programThat's the one where 70IQ drug dealer schizos get to reproduce because they've got a sharp jaw, while 140IQ neurosurgeons are forever alone incels, right?
>women taking men's rights awayThat only works as long as females have simp men helping them. Women are incapable of physically enforcing anything on men. It all falls apart as soon as men stop playing along with their stupid games. That is what the concept of "force doctrine" is all about.
>>533388426>feminist apologeticsThere is zero benefit of feminism, I would never defend something like that.I'm not even inclined to defend women at all as I am a permavirgin and the way that they live so undeservedly easy is horribly irritating.It's just that there is absolutely no point in viewing someone who has no agency as an enemy. Before cca. 1930 most women in America voted conservative. Christianity which is the opposite of sexual revolution was highly popular among women in antiquity. They do what they're told by people they view as authority figures. They never have original ideas. Hell, they can't even decide on a restaurant where they want to go without their boyfriend/husband picking for them most of the time.To view women as enemies because of feminism would be like considering a pitbull that attacked you as your nemesis and killing the dog's offspring in revenge while ignoring the nigger who bred it and let it loose in your street. It's a stupid fucking dog designed to be a bloodthirsty beast, any revenge towards it will be completely useless and won't make the society any better in the future. If you catch its owner instead and string him up, that will make a positive change.
>>533387026I’ve been saying for years the ideal society in the eyes of women is one where all men are slaves and all women are royalty and the top 1% of men get chosen to be breeding slaves. It seems I am vindicated that this is 100% what women want. Women truly are the Jews of the genders
>>533395893The pitbull is a bad example. They are aggressive at the genetic level. There are countless examples of "good" pitbulls with "good" owners snapping one day. All pitbulls need to be exterminated. They are a useless breed.
>>533387026HAH. women cant be in a relationship if most men are single.
>>533396122Pitbulls belong in dog fighting pens to make (you) money, they were bred exclusively for making (you) money in illegal dog fighting rings
>>533388852>kek you're proving their point. you can't just say "it's this way cuz i demand it to be!"That's exactly what >>533387604 did though. He said It's this way because I want it to be.
>>533387026>women doing workKek
>chimp brainswomen's threat detection is broken
>>533387451Yeah the elites empower women as a means to control men. This isn't anything new either I recall Aristotle wrote something about tyrants empowering women and slaves to be snitches and morality enforcers. This was a known strategy all the way back in ancient Greece
>>533387026They're saying that on devices created by men, connected via infrastructure created by men, from a place of security and comfort created by men.Just refuse to put up with this nonsense and tell them to shut the fuck up.
