[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1762457205791227.png (529 KB, 598x1123)
529 KB PNG
should women be judges?
https://x.com/unlimited_ls/status/2045185942172914160
>>
File: 1752131937739165.webm (3.92 MB, 960x720)
3.92 MB WEBM
>>
>>533407038
women shouldn't even be citizens
>>
>>533407038
Can i get an early life check on that judge?
>>
>>533407077
what is this pulling the slide on every shot technique??? is he jamming on every shot
>>
>>533407077
>>533407038
Okay, he's shooting them as they are running away, from a place of safety. How can you argue self defense? He's not in physical danger.
>>
>>533407038
The real redpill would be look at who she previously convicted and what punishments they got and the race etc...
>>
File: 1752515516166726.jpg (183 KB, 1100x1458)
183 KB JPG
>>533407357
So you're saying.. they dindu nuffin?
>>
>>533407105
Yuu can tell from her thin drawn eye brows that she is a russian/slavic. No idea about her religion.
>>
>>533407594
Every single person in this collage was an immediate physical threat. People sprinting away from you are not an immediate physical threat.
>>
>>533407038
Why do Anglo whites have such thin lips?
>>
>>533407357
Legal in Texas. After retreating from a break-in you still pose a threat to others and that has important legal ramifications. Jamal running with your TV in hand can be legally shot in the back as he goes down the sidewalk.
>>
>>533407357
you have an innate right to protect your property
how do you know he wasn't in physical danger?
>>
>>533407038
No.
>>
File: 1767844925337652.jpg (62 KB, 1080x309)
62 KB JPG
>>533407726
they broke iinto his fucking place
you gotta be a troll or a liberal moron
>>
>>533407038

From the video it looks like he shot them when they were fleeing. That's not a good idea. Lots of people have gotten in deep shit for that when it goes to court.

My suspicion is the nog he killed and the nog he injured have bullet wounds in their back. If he'd shot one of them in the chest, I doubt there would be charges. Even if they weren't armed and they didn't attack the simple fact that there are 5 or 6 of them in your garage would likely justify a defensive shooting IF you shot them in the front. If you shoot them in the back when they're trying to flee, then you get in deep shit because you can't argue that you were defending yourself.

Moral of the story, if you want to execute a nog who broke into your house make them face you first.
>>
>>533407861
What threat does someone running away from you pose?
>>
>>533407726
anon.. six niggers repeatedly broke into his residence, i don't think anyone cares
>>
>>533407908
Retreat from a crime is one of the things that makes justifiable force unjustified.
>>
>>533407906
They could have a gun and shoot it backwards while running. Now what?
>>
>>533407736
Why do you lie?
There are no self defense laws that allow you to shoot someone running away from you and they’re not an active threat.
>>
>>533407038
this is why its important to never skip jury duty. one of your fellow anons could be on the stand and you need to save him by cucking the kikes.

this is also why kikes are trying to get rid of jury trials altogether so you live in a world where kiked judges will determine your outcome
>>
>>533407357
this
>>533407747
I watched the video where the dudes were all running away and he shot at them as they ran
>innate right to protect your property
I have an innate right to execute you because you stole my candy bar?
>>533407736
only if you reasonably believe that you have no other way to get your property back. shooting jamal in the back while he runs away with your tv is probably going to lead to your tv hitting the concrete and having jamal fall on it
>>
>>533408029
Texas allows you to use up to deadly force to retrieve your property or stop someone from taking it.
>>
>>533408097
I’ve never been called for jury duty and i really wish they would. Unfortunately I just know I’d be dismissed immediately because I’m not an idiot nor a boot licker so the chance either the defense or prosecution would want me is slim to none. They pretty much only choose old folks and women because they’re easier to emotionally manipulate
>>
>>533407357
>you can't protect your property unless you follow these explicit guidelines because some robed person declaring the legal word of god said so
>>
>>533407105
Property has no rights. Women are equivalent to pets legally.
>>
>>533407038
desu if 6 people wearing hoodies standing 5'9 to 6' broke into my garage I would fire multiple shots too.
I wouldn't be able to tell if they were teens until after the fact either.
>>
He made a mistake of releasing his own security footage. As soon as he shot them he should've wiped the memory. Now he cant plead in any way and his lawyer is tied up making a bad case. Worse still he has a dike judge who clearly is biased. What a miscarriage of justice.
>>
>>533408265
once they're running away, your property is protected.
>>
>>533407077
What jam o matic pistol is he shooting holy shit.
>>
>>533407038
Who could possibly watch this pack of rats crawling around someone's house like this and think, "Yeah they didn't deserve to get shot"?
>>
File: chick.png (404 KB, 610x838)
404 KB PNG
>>533407357
>place of safety
There were seven(!) of them. How can he know whether or not they suddenly decide to turn around and group up on him? He can't know whether one of them has a gun he's trying to get out of his pocket? They represent an ongoing threat. You're just as stupid as this woman judge. He should be let go immediately.
>>
>>533407601
she is wearring a cross
>>
>>533407038
his mistake was following outside and shooting them as they're leaving.
if he wanted to bag a couple of nigger thieves he should have shot them while they were still inside.
>>
>>533407594
look, the question is this: is he the kinda guy that has a firearm and is looking for an excuse to use it on somebody or to protect him and his own?
>>
>>533407357
At any moment of the FIVE intruders could turn and pull a weapon. It is more than reasonable to assume that at least one of them could still turn and attack. There is no point in waiting for that to happen. They already crossed a line of no return and the home owner has full discretion to protect himself. He doesn’t have the luxury to evaluate a video for hours and hours and decide whether or not it’s a threat. He has about 2 seconds to defend his home from 5 intruders.
>>
>>533408392
Deserved? Sure
But in the U-niggered States of America anyone with half a brain knows you can’t (((legally))) do that lmao even
>>
File: 1731022048176549.jpg (184 KB, 1254x2048)
184 KB JPG
Let those young niggers rob you white boy. THat is reparation. Fucking white peepo man i swear to god they never gone learn.

This is why I'm so glad to be mexican in this great country because if a nigger breaks into my home it'll be looked at nothing more than that. Thank god for not being born white because i can murder a nigger without having to face the scrutiny of racism.
>>
>>533408316
that's how the shitty legal system judges it today yes
>>
>>533407077
I'm not in support of the judge giving him any actual sentence, but it's very obvious that he was shooting at the niggers as they were scrambling away in their backs, from cover, without any of them (visibly) armed or threatening him in any way. They clearly deserve it, because it's impossible to know what they're going to do when they've broken into your property (multiple times, at that), but there is plenty of case law and numerous examples that show that it's extremely difficult to defend shooting at people who are running away and pose no immediate threat as "Self-defense". It opens up far too broad of a window for things that can be qualified as "Self-defense" under vague implications of duress, and it's only a matter of time before you justify some greasy nigger shooting a mailman because "I THOUGHT HE WAS TRYNA STEAL MY MAIL NIGGUH!!!" being codified into law.

There are cases where these things need to be handled with exceptionally careful responses. Obviously giving him a manslaughter charge is outrageous, but logic needs to win out over emotions on this one or we get substantially worse problems in the future.
>>
>>533408546
Won't work in court sadly.

As soon as he left the home and aggressed on the niggers, he no longer was the victim. Now had he shot them in the garage and kept inside the home and wiped the footage, then there's plausible deniability.
>>
>>533408546
Unfortunately for him, that doesn’t matter. The court does have hours to dissect seconds of a video and come to a conclusion that he shot those filthy nigge I mean innocent young teens because he is indeed, rayciss
>>
>>533407038
>>533407077
I thought you're allowed to protect your property in America ?
>>
>>533408771
> without any of them (visibly) armed or threatening him in any way
There’s literally no way he can see this or know it. He had every reason to believe they had weapons. Police use the same excuse all the time.
>I saw a bulge his pocket
>his shirt was ruffled around his waistband like there was a gun
>his posture suggested he had a concealed weapon
5 people breaking and entering are highly likely to be carrying guns and the average person who is in a state of terror and shock from being broken in to would assume that.
>>
>>533408860
the law is feminized now
all questions of laws are viewed through a castrated, lobotomized, female lens

there is nothing left to do but tear society down and start over
the cancer is terminal and it's in every single aspect of society

CATACLYSM NOW
>>
>>533408860
You are
He will get off with a jury trial or appeal 100%
>>
>>533408772
>he no longer
Kek
>was the victim
Doesn't work like that Tyronell
>>
>>533408860
there's a big asterisk next to that, clearly.
how big of an asterisk depends on the state, i think
>>
>>533409014
"clear video footage of getting nogged" should result in immediate dismissal of all charges but courts and lawyers are sending us to south africa/mumbai tier existence thanks to their overlording
>>
>>533408860
Yes, but he could still be sued civilly. With 5 black “victims” at least one will have some friends or family crazy enough to hire a billboard lawyer and demand money from him.
>>
>>533409096
even so, the punishment is dragging you through the courts for years
>>
Did he ahve security footage of the previous attempts? And the police... didn't find and arrest the burglars, or what?
>>
>>533409206
Technically it’s supposed to. Being involved the process of a felony usually negates counter suites unless it’s something super crazy, like capturing and torturing them or something. But judges are so dumb these days they want to look good and please the internet so they make wild rulings to stand out.
>>
>>533409014
>There’s literally no way he can see this or know it.
>He had every reason to believe they had weapons.
You can "believe" someone is armed or dangerous. That does not warrant or justify violent reprisal. I could just as likely shoot some person on the street because they had a bulge in their pants and I "believed" it was a firearm and they intimidated me.

>Police use the same excuse all the time.
You should already know by now that Zogbots are immune to legal repercussions from explicit violation of law. The Acorn Cop fired an entire magazine of ammunition into his own cruiser because he "thought" he heard gunshots and encouraged other officers to do the same, and faced not one singular criminal charge.

>5 people breaking and entering are highly likely to be carrying guns and the average person who is in a state of terror and shock from being broken in to would assume that.
If he fired at them from within the house as they were still trying to enter, there wouldn't be anything vaguely resembling doubt for these claims. The issue specifically is that he was firing into their backs from cover as they were all running away. There were no weapons drawn, no threats made towards him, and they were all in full-retreat. If you use this loose logic, he could also hop into his car, grab more firearms, and continue hunting them down all the way to their houses, killing them all until they have entered their own premises.

For reference I am entirely and unquestionably in favor of the man defending his house. I'm still firmly upset that he's getting charged for this when common sense would dictate he should be able to throw these people back to the woods where they belong. It's just a matter of legal understanding of the situation, and where adding poor case law can lead to substantially worse situations in the future being justified from this point onwards. Thankfully at least one of those niggers isn't going to do this ever again.
>>
>>533407726
Nah, man, yous gotta wait for dems to be an inevitable threat AGAIN, before killin' dems.
>>
>>533408224
>I have an innate right to execute you because you stole my candy bar?
Did I break into your house to steal the candy bar?
>>
>>533407077
All this niggers could be armed. Just because they are fleeing doesn't mean they aren't dangerous.
>>
File: Women Rainbow.jpg (605 KB, 2550x3300)
605 KB JPG
>>533407038
No woman should ever be allowed to hold any position of authority or vote.
>>
>>533407906
They broke in, only they know what they intended to do to sleeping white people at night. You don't think they'll do it again and actually kill someone next time? You have to be retarded.
>>
>>533409485
> no threats made towards him
Buddy, they broke into his home. That is the threat. And for some reason people describe “breaking into a home” like it’s stealing a pack of gum. It’s a violent act that violates all decency. It’s a nightmare to experience and the guy had to be terrified. You don’t need to verbalize a threat or brandish a weapon. YOU ARE BREAKING INTO HIS HOME. The fact that they were crawling, or trying to get away, or that he was in cover has absolutely no bearing. This is fundamental castle doctrine home defense.
>>
>>533408771
>pack of feral niggers
>no threat
Go back to africa.
>>
>>533407038
He blindly shot into the building through the closed garage door. The nigger inside happened to get hit and killed. It's obviously not self defense because he wasn't even shooting directly at a threat, he was shooting in the general direction of the people that were on his property. This is exactly the reason why they train you not to fire warning shots in self defense situations in handgun classes.
>>
>>533407038
I remember this one being dodgy at the time. It was more revenge than defense. Still, he'll get off unless he gets a nigger jury
>>
>>533408860
Michigan has been a blue state for a long while with the auto unions and higher conditions of negroids. In blue states you aren't allowed to defend your property and you can rarely defend yourself if your attacker is black.
>>
>>533408523
Christkikery strikes again.
>>
>>533408860
How is this man protecting his property exactly? Those kids were literally running away. I’m sure that fucking donut thought he was John Rambo or something firing off shots into the night. What a dumb fuck.
>>
>>533408713
>nigger break into a spics roachpad
Anon I...
>>
>>533407038
I would jail the guy for being under armed and a terrible shot. No reason he couldn't have taken them all out. Also fry the judge alive in boiling piss in a city center and livestream it pay per view with all funds going to that white commune in arkansas.
>>
>>533409688
>>533409746
>Buddy, they broke into his home. That is the threat. And for some reason people describe “breaking into a home” like it’s stealing a pack of gum. It’s a violent act that violates all decency. It’s a nightmare to experience and the guy had to be terrified.
Again, I'm not defending their actions. All of them deserve to be in jail for being repeat offenders, and one of them is permanently off the street for doing so.
>This is fundamental castle doctrine home defense
It quite literally isn't. As long as they were approaching him, breaking in, or still remaining inside of his home, he is perfectly within his rights to perform whatever defense he believes is appropriate, and for a whole group of men breaking into his home, there's quite a lot he could get away with. The instant they all start running away, with not one of them attempting to remain in his property, defend themselves, violently retaliate, etc., you start losing any justification of "Reasonable" Force, and the space you are firing on them from ceases to be your private residence and begins to extend into public space. That is the literal only reason why this would even stand trial in the first place. You can feel that it'd be right for him to go around murdering each one of them all the way on the road home, but the second he started shooting them outside of his home and firing openly into his neighborhood is when this becomes legally foggy, and needs to be addressed appropriately.
>>
>>533407077
The judge deserves a bullet too. Just adding my 2 cents.
>>
>>533407357
Any second the niggers could turn and shoot him you fucking faggot
>>
>>533407038
Remember the Tony Martin case some years back? This has a lot of parallels with that. I don’t care what happens to any thieving nigger or gypsy but he only got nailed because he shot them in the back as they were fleeing. Never mind they were raiding his remote farmhouse in the middle of the night. Yet people have got away with shooting people to death in the right circumstances.
>>
>>533407890
>You can shoot only when the nog starts shooting at you first and possibly kills you.
Wow, what an amazing!
>>
>>533410065
This. Niggers and niggerlovers can burn in the same Hell
>>
Can someone answer this question, I thought Michigan was one of the few states that is BOTH Castle Doctrine AND a Stand-Your-Ground state?

I thought with those kind of laws he would be allowed to just fucking pull out a fucking m60 machine gun and go full rambo on his property, am I missing something?
>>
>>533407601
Looks very Scottish
>>
>>533407077
I just noticed his shitty gun apparently jammed like 4x, better off with a big revolver
>>
>>533410330
Difficult to shoot a fleeing man in the back anywhere. No longer defense or life threatening. The law at the time implied that police would catch them though
>>
>>533410330
legally it requires you to be defending and not attacking people who are running away. You are suppose to be in immediate danger. You are only allowed to shoot when you "reasonably" feel in danger, and its typically up for the jury or judge to determine what is reasonable at the time. If the guy didnt supply video evidence he most likely would have gotten off.
>>
>>533410330
There are legal limitations to defense for both Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws. It isn't an open invitation to allow you to stalk people down in the streets and keep shooting at them until they die, it's a legal justification to defend yourself with reasonable force when you believe your life is in danger. Otherwise you could simply suggest that someone was somewhere they shouldn't have been, drag them into your property, cut their limbs off with a chainsaw, and say "Well I felt my life was in danger, so I had to defend myself" as a justification.

When they broke into his house, he has perfect reason to believe his life was in danger and to respond appropriately with his firearm. When they started scurrying away like cockroaches into the night and were clearly leaving the premises, continually firing into them is no longer "reasonable" response unless one of them turned around and seemed to be reaching for a firearm or moving in some way to retaliate. You can justify shooting at a home intruder/burglar/etc. who is still within the home or is moving to attack you. It's very hard to justify shooting someone trying desperately to get away from you in a panic because they were caught breaking in, even if the goal could be anything from infantile trespassing to murderous intent.
>>
>>533409485
>That does not warrant or justify violent reprisal.
When they are on your ground without your consent it does
>>
>>533407038
>>
>>533409485
God you're such a faggot.
>>
>>533409067
I wonder if the outcome would have been different if it was a woman shooting after a nigger who tried to rape her?
>>
TOTAL

TRAITOR

DEATH

SOOON
>>
>>533410709
>legally it requires you to be defending and not attacking people who are running away
You're arguing semantics because he defended himself and his property by attacking them
If he wasn't armed the outcome could have been different for him
It's always down to your intention if you're interested to protect the victim or the niggers
And nigger shills always defend the cute and valid niggers
>>
>>533412371
If they decided to shoot back it would have been different too, his gun was malfunctioning badly. Luckily they were cowards
>>
>>533407038
As usual you can't fire on people running away from you for it to be a clean shot. Either get them to attack you or don't have cameras and witnesses showing they didn't attack you, also don't shoot people in the back unless they're attacking someone else, no one likes that shit.
>>
>>533407747
>you have an innate right to protect your property
No, you don't. You have a right to protect your life, the law does not treat life and property as equal, which it should not.
>how do you know he wasn't in physical danger?
Because he shot at them from behind dumbass.
>>
File: 1776133515149159.jpg (49 KB, 715x490)
49 KB JPG
>>533407357
>>533408771
>>
>>533407357
>Dude, just let them retreat so they can regroup and attack you again or rob someone else's house.
That man should have received a medal and a bounty.
>>
>>533407038
>>533407077
Pure germanic foid stock too.

Women are just subhuman. Face it lads.
>>
>>533410065
You’d be correct. In a jury system with this judge on trial, we’d get our justice.
>>
>>533407038
>should women be judges?
In all honesty I believe women should not be taught to talk more that 200 words, They should be numerate enough to buy groceries and enough literacy to read food labels and nothing beyond that.
>>
>>533412475
Maybe the niggers had no guns
>>
>>533408860
>muh property
Protect your life, you mean. Do you know how many "robberies" turned into hours long torture and rape, concluded by murder?
>>
>>533407077
I fucking detest American cunts and i will gladly celebrate on this shithole when I see mutt Cunt gets killed by killer apes a white man and child is free.
>>
>>533407038
whites are pathetic
but sure keep voting
that will fix things lmao
>>
>>533407038
No. They shouldn't be working at all. It artificially inflates the supply of workers to depress wages while providing people who aren't actual workers and instead almost always are a liability to their employers. They also should not vote. Equality is a lie. Different things are different and that's okay.
>>
>>533407077
>Living beside niggers
>>
>>533407726
College* youa re welcome
>>
>>533407357
>Okay, he's shooting them as they are running away, from a place of safety. How can you argue self defense? He's not in physical danger.
Yeah, the correct way to do this so that he could have killed every single one of them AND had a clear argument for self defense would have been to hide in a pile of tarps or behind some boxes in a corner with an AR-15 and wait until all of them were inside before you opened fire. Don't even reveal yourself, just start blasting. As long as they're in the same room as you when you start blasting "self defense" will always hold in every State or jurisdiction because both parties are within the bounds of your property AND you can claim they're a threat because they're "within striking distance" if they had a concealed weapon. No DA would ever prosecute.
>>
>>533413272
Anon people work hard for the things they keep in their house
You're allowed to protect your belongings
>>
>>533407038
>should women be judges?
Honestly no. There was a study that showed the section of women's brains that are responsible for empathy light up regardless of if the person is good or bad. Men however react based on situation and if they believe someone was in the wrong then the pleasure part of the brain lights up when watching punishment. I can't be arsed looking up the study to post link
>>
>>533407726
The existence of niggers is a civilizational threat
>>
>>533407357
Its called the castle doctrine
>>
>>533407077
Unfortunately for him, he was definitely firing at them as they were running away and obviously no longer a direct threat to his immediate safety. That shit is not legal almost anywhere. Maybe it should be, but it isn't.
>>
>>533407077
Yeah it's fucked up... but he was shooting them in the back as they were fleeing. Clearly not a self defense case.
The only danger to his safety at that moment was from his pistol jaming after every shot.
>>
>>533410330
In the US judges are literal Gods, you just have to pray you get a judge that had a good night of sleep before your sentence
>>
>>533407357
I agree shot them in the back as they were leaving the property. Not exactly life or death self defense now is it
>>
File: 1768971859100166.gif (38 KB, 638x640)
38 KB GIF
>>533407038
stupid cunt
>>
>>533413633
Fuck it here is the study for anyone with an IQ above 80
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2636868/
>>
>>533408821
>>533413695
>>533412663
>Unfortunately for him
Thank you nigger defense league
>>
File: 1651538557520.jpg (26 KB, 738x703)
26 KB JPG
>>533407038
I think you can get away with shooting someone 'fleeing' if they are still in the house and things are a lot more murky if they broke into your home and are still there. But they are running away in the front lawn, and he was never attacked. It sucks, because these robbers probably deserve it, but a self-defense argument should fail here.
>>
>>533407077
Since they were already fleeing maybe he shouldn't have shot at them. I wouldn't call it fair but I can see why he could get charged for that.
>>
>>533414004
>Thank you nigger defense league
>NYOOOOOO THERE SHOULD BE LAWS AGAINST KILLING PEOPLE WHO ARE NO THREAT TO YOU, HOW CAN I SATE MY BLOODLUST?
retard.
>>
>>533413633
>>533413948
because women are biologically wired for caring for babies and toddlers.

our ancestors understood this and didn't let them wreak havoc with executive decisions
>>
Too bad he didn't get all 5.
>>
>>533414216
>Niggers who come to steal your shit at night are not a threat to you i heckin promise you
Sucks that he managed to kill only 1 nigger thief
>>
File: German Faggot.gif (814 KB, 167x167)
814 KB GIF
>>533407890
>>533410278
>You can shoot only when the nog starts shooting at you first and possibly kills you.

No, that's not what I said you dumb German faggot.

I said you can't shoot them in the back when you're running away. You need to shoot them in the chest before they run away.
>>
>>533407105
AWAP - ALL WOMEN ARE PROPERTY
>>
>>533407038
>should women be judges?
No.

>>533407077
That's self-defense. They broke into his garage.
Dude did the needful & made those nigger roaches running for their lives. He took out one of them out, meaning he took out the trash. He should be let free.

Get this incompetent old cunt of a judge off the judge's seat & out of the courthouse.
>>
>>533415337
The judge doesn't make the laws, anon. Law says that you can't shoot people who are running away.
>>
File: HGJPTVObgAAMXWC.jpg (57 KB, 801x960)
57 KB JPG
>>533407038
>>
>>533407038
No. They shouldn't be lawyers either.
>>
>>533415581
Feds don't appoint state judges. Maybe that's how it works in leafistan, but not here.
>>
>>533415552
Niggers should be shot for trespassing on White soil.
They shouldn't be a protected specie anywhere outside africa
>>
>>533407105
Giga based.
>>
>>533408224
The moment you enter my home your life is forfeit. Running away won't save your ass, because I know the cops won't do shit to catch your ass if you get away.
>>
>>533407105
fpbp (OP's doesn't count)
>>
>>533415686
Once again, the judge doesn't make the laws.
>>
>>533415552
They are trespassing on his property. It's attempted burglary. What's the difference? Castle Doctrine states he has every right to defend his property.
>>
>>533407038
I obviously despise home invasion perps - like George Floyd! - and I'm on homeowners side, but is he legally permitted anywhere in the US to blast trespassers while they're fleeing?
>>
>>533407038
>>AS THEY WERE LEAVING.

Sorry but castle defense is that, not shooting the fleeing men. They have to be attacking you not running away.
>>
>>533415846
Michigan's castle doctrine means you don't have to retreat, but doesn't apply when they're running away - at that point you've already successfully defended yourself from "imminent death, serious injury, or sexual assault".
>>
>>533407357
It's about sending a message, he had previous break ins, perhaps by the same group of people and wanted to show them it's not safe to continue messing with him.
There was of course also the possibility they would turn on him.
>>
>>533407038
No. She should be dragged in front of the courthouse and turned into a lamp-post decoration
>>
If the property has been broken into twice before and the police did nothing about it and told him to just deal with it then he isn't guilty.
>>
File: 1746810925954151.jpg (27 KB, 509x645)
27 KB JPG
if you break into a home in a red state with no gun laws in 20 fucking 26, where they have Home Intruder Killer 3000 ARs on red-tag sales at Walmart, you automatically forfeit your life, and no one can save you from the aftermath of what may come.
>>
>>533407038
no women are incapable of brutal executions, there is a certain cool logic required when being a judge and women being emotional creatures are incapable of detached rational thinking
>>
>>533407077
Some fucking chud wanted to save money with a discount gun and now we have FOUR more niggers than we should.

Life in prison without parole. Fuck this retard.
>>
>>533416128
SIX
FUCKING SIX
SIX MORE NIGGERS
JUST FUCKING BURY HIM ALIVE AT THE PRISON.
>>
>>533407038
>>533407077
a judge with a toy on ... her .... table.
does she not know the gravity of sitting there?
>>
>>533407357
>He's not in physical danger.
kill yourself asap
>>
>>533415846
That literally isn't what castle doctrine is. Learn something before you end up in prison like he will.
>>
>>533407077
Just like South Africa and whi could of guessed White women am I right lmao
>>
>>533408523
>woman
>judge

>christian
nope

1 Timothy 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1 Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1 Timothy 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1 Timothy 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

women are not to hold positions of authority over men according to the Bible, she is a heretick
>>
>>533410065
agreed, she is a woman judge, she is probably a lesbian
>>
A lesson has been learned here:
DO NOT KEEP SECURITY CAMERAS!
>>
>>533408860
Anyone that uses their constitutional rights in this shithole is thrown under the bus or labelled a fed.
Just look at the cocksuckers in this thread rationalizing this shit.
>>
>>533407038
OJ was retaliation for Rodney King. Time for white people to vote not guilty for white people. Just like every other race already does.
>>
>>533410330
Michigan is one of the most left wing states in the country
>>
>>533412371
Im not arguing semantics, im telling you what the law is. The word "reasonable" is relative, and its up to the jury/judge to decide.
Castle doctrine and stand your ground laws rely on the person to "reasonably feel they are in immediate danger", that is literally the law even in the USA.
>>
>>533407038
Women are the problem, not jews. /pol/ will never accept this because its a MIGA tradcuck board moderated by women.
>>
>>533407357
>>533407726
So if I was a feral niggergoblin, I could break into your place with the intent of robbing, killing, raping and eating you, not necessarily even in that order, BUT the moment I turn around, you're not going to shoot me because I am no longer a threat.
It doesn't matter that this is the third time I've broken in here. It doesn't matter that I could very easily turn right around and re-attempt my attack. As soon as I turn around and start moving away, in your mind, I have an invincible force field around me and the immutable power of the law on my side.
>>
I am all for dead nigger
But the law is very clear about shooting people running away
>>
>>533407038
you can't just shoot people fleeing...unless you are the cops
>>
>>533416354
>THAT'S NOT REAL CHRISTIANITY
Yes it is. Christians brought feminism to Rome which is what destroyed it from the inside. Rome created bachelor taxes attempting to force Roman men to marry, but men had already checked out of society so the empire collaped.
>>
>>533409485
Kys faggot. You’re pathetic
>>
>>533407940
Its unjustified for you to take so many dicks in your ass but you still do.
>>
>>533407357
>Niggers exist
He is always in physical danger
>>
>>533407077
wtf? this is a literal 8 person home invasion, this guy did NOTHING wrong. these niggers all deserved it
>>
>>533407038
White men will lose in the future. You will be wiped out. Trump is your last huzzah then the Elimination begins.
>>
>>533407726
I dont give a fuck. they deserved to die

none of this gay pussy muh dey wuz defenseless n harmless boys law shit any more
>>
>>533416776
>Christians brought feminism
again not real Christianity, the Bible is against feminism, men are supposed to lead their wives and men are to rule over women while women stay at home and raise kids. any standard that is against what the Bible teaches is not real Christianity. It’s like people calling the clotshot a “vaccine” even though it doesn’t have a dead virus in it. People change definitions all the time to suit their own agendas, don’t fall for it
>>
>>533417099
canadian poster aka Ranjeet the poo eating cow worshipper virgin lmao
>>
>>533407726
shiiiiiieeeettt
>>
>>533408713
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtHxgxpDqhU
lol
>>
>>533409485
>You can "believe" someone is armed or dangerous. That does not warrant or justify violent reprisal
By definition, it does.
>>
>>533408519
this
>>
>>533417135
The institutions and theologians themselves went for it anon. You sound like one of those no real communism leftists.
>>
total white men death
>>
>>533407038
I don't get the fucking point of 2A if you can't shoot at five people breaking into your home. It's like the law exists to protect criminals, not law-obeying citizens.
>>
>>533407077
tell that hunch back bitch no matter how short she cuts her hair she will never be a man
>>
File: 1771635699382009.jpg (136 KB, 544x680)
136 KB JPG
>>533407077
>>533407038
i was charged with shooting with intent to kill. i was literally shot in the arm while defending myself. more than 2 years later, they changed my charge to assault and battery with a deadly weapon, and my lawyer just keeps filing motions and dragging each date out for as long as possible. I had to pay $10k (100k) to bond out and another $10k to get a good lawyer, if I didn't I would be sitting in prison right now due to a shifty public defender that never even spoke to me 1 on 1 and just would have advised for me to plead guilty for a lesser sentence regardless of what actually happened.

unfortunately, this kid mag dumped a group of people in the back as they ran away. thats prison for life. i even live in the state where our law is literally called "make my day" lmao
>>
>>533407038
>>533407077
>told to get better security
>gets better security
>punished for it?
>>
>>533417202
i hate niggers so much its unreal

the fact that we have to pretend they're just like us is a daily humiliation ritual
>>
>>533417135
>again not real Christianity
There is no such as a real Christian, dumbass.
>>
Protestants loves feminist this is what you get.
>>
>>533407736
This has always been iffy in Michigan. If you shoot a robber in the back there will be a trial. Then it is 50/50 if you get off or not depending on the judge and jury.
>>
>>533416635
>Im not arguing semantics
>rely on the person to "reasonably feel they are in immediate danger"
You see how much of a retarded nigger you're
5 niggers on your property at night ain't a big deal
Let's leave it to a bitch who lives in a gated community to determine if it was an immediate danger
How would you react if you catched 5 whitey on your property at night ?
>>
>>533417442
The 2A is primarily for use against a tyrannical government and rulings on it reflect this.

The fact we have an insane amount of niggers here and the 2A sometimes helps with that is just a happy coincidence.
>>
>>533417715
>Protestants loves feminist
>THAT'S NOT REAL CHRISTKEKERY
Yes it is, because all Christians are larpers. Either every Christian is real or every Christian is fake. There is no in between, because you don't judge, only God does.
>>
>>533416776
>real Christianity is when you disobey God and Christ
Interesting… tell me more.
>>
>have place broken into multiple times
>tell police
>police tell you to fuck off
>have 7+ ppl break into your garage connected to your house
>you shoot after them
>the system now puts you on blast for shooting at them
>you will pay out the nose for a lawyer, lose anyway, and now get put in a prison for multiple years where it is crowded to the gil with hyperviolent black people and no white gangs since your not on the west coast

this anarcho tyranism is brutal in how hyperviolent it is against whites.
>>
>>533407038
So where's the judge's garrage at? Sounds like a free for all loot drop.
>>
>>533417810
You worship a jewish woman who cheated on her husband and said God inseminated her with magic semen, and her cuck husband believed her and raised another man's son. I can't think of anything more feminist than that.
>>
>>533407038
Women shouldn't be doing anything they weren't doing 100 years ago. Nothing changed. We just lowered our standards and let women do things they can't do, so they fuck it up. It's time for men to step back into this nonsense and push the women out. They can't do their jobs, and they aren't capable of recognizing how incapable they are. So they are going to have to be pushed out by force, which is a coincidence because women are so small and easy to push around.
>>
>>533417916
It's not so much that women are incapable. They are very capable when they organize together. The problem is they are completely selfish which makes them evil.
>>
Why do whites have these ridiculous limitations on how to shoot someone breaking into your house?
>>
>>533407038
this is some Russia prior to the Soviet Union shit
>>
>>533417992
Feminism.
>>
>>533408821
>>533408247
>>533413695
>>533417459
>unfortunately
Unfortunately you can't help yourself you retarded nigger abomination
Try to be accurate at least he didn't shoot at people he shoot at some niggers
>>
>>533418032
Gun limitations predate the civil war
>>
>>533408247
I got rejected on man's defense in a domestic dispute basically for being a fem anon who has seen this sort of thing before. I really would have been neutral if he could prove his wife was a bitch. Oh well his loss. I got paid for a day to just sit around and eat coffee and doughnuts.
>>
>>533407038
Half of you are LARPing as vigilante heroes, furiously masturbating to the idea of defending your worthless property from the hordes you're too cowardly to even look at in real life. You scream "castle doctrine" from the safety of your keyboard, but you'd be the first to call the cops if you heard a strange noise outside. Your "heroism" is a pathetic fantasy to distract from your own impotence.
The other half are equally pathetic, desperately clinging to the corpse of a legal system that hates you. You bleat about "due process" and "reasonable force" as if the dyke judge and the feral criminals give a single shit about your precious rules. You're polishing the brass on a sinking ship, pretending the water filling your lungs is just a minor inconvenience.
Both sides are losers. The country is dead, the rule of law is a joke, and you're all just screaming into the void. None of this matters. Log off and enjoy the decline.
>>
>>533418077
That's nice. Feminism didn't start overnight and was already well in motion during the 1800s. And YOU are a memeflag.
>>
>>533417459
if you break into someones house I hope you can out run their bullets, play stupid games win stupid prizes, I'd have shot the niggers regardless which direction they were facing
>>
>>533417202
Damn they were already on their way back out after trying to knock and the unfortunate dude brought them him to kill almost his entire family (except for the toddlers).

Had someone of them been armed inside the home it could have been the intruders dead instead.
>>
>>533407077
Morally the white man was in the right here.
You should not expect to make it out alive if you're out robbing people with your shitty nigger gang. God will forgive him for this killing.

Legally he's in the wrong, at least if he claims self-defense which is clearly not the case. That said I would have done the same if my place was robbed twice and the police is just sitting there talking shit about "beefing up my defenses". Bitch, if I do that then what the fuck do I need the police for?
>>
>>533407726
sprinting does not absolve you of consequences of your actions, the rest of those niggers should be hunted down, I believe police are legally obliged to find them
>>
>>533407077
Niggers are just weird man on a elemental level. They don't think of things like we do.

Sometimes if you try to protect your stuff it makes them feel offense and want to steal it more. They don't even want to kill the homeowner its just the principle of the reinforcing the house for them. Oh you insult me by adding extra steel on your garage door? I have to steal your stuff now.
>>
>>533407038
Don't go peacefully don't let them disarm you.
>>
>>533408224
>I have an innate right to execute you because you stole my candy bar?
Depends. Am I breaking into your home to get it?
>>
File: Neutral_Markiplier.png (14 KB, 600x800)
14 KB PNG
>>533417825
You're a fucking LARPer. You sit here and type out the grimdark fanfiction of your own demise because it's the only thing that makes you feel alive. You won't do shit. You'll whine on the internet until the day they come for you, and then you'll cry and beg and hand over everything you own, hoping it's enough. It won't be.
>>
>>533407357
I'd kill you.
>>
>>533418612
He needed a serious lock on that door, besides moving somewhere else could have saved this dude's life (from prison).
How is he supposed to keep living there with non acting police and being targeted by criminals.
>>
>>533417768
>You see how much of a retarded nigger you're
no one actually says "you're" at the end of a sentence like that. you are obviously ESL and not worth the time of day. Im not "arguing semantics" Im literally telling you what the law is, you turbo nigger retard. The law literally uses the word "reasonably" and intentionally leaves it open to interpretation.
>>
>>533418470
They had the son at gun point. If someone was armed he'd probably be killed still. It would probably even be messier because they'll just shoot whatever moves and those two toddlers... When you're surprised, you're compromised and forced to do what they say and hope they don't execute you.
>>
>>533407038
if you're white and male you need to get the fuck out of these progressive hellscape counties
>>
>>533416327
The Jews are the ones that forced niggers into our communities, not white women.
>>
>>533418950
It was really a team effort.
>>
btw all white people should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
>>
The west would be so much better if local towns could just appoint respected elders who acted as arbiters in all disputes with a view of what is fair and best for that community.
>you shot at them?
>yeah they broke into my house for a second time
>he shot at you?
>yeah, we were breaking into his house
>case dismissed, stop being fucking thieving retards
>>
File: Anime Kneel.webm (645 KB, 612x360)
645 KB WEBM
>>533407105
>>
File: Women Jew Yin Yang.jpg (193 KB, 650x647)
193 KB JPG
>>533407198
>>
>>533408523
demonic phenotype
>>
>>533407038
Even in "the wild west" ambushing/bushwhacking would get you hung. You gotta announce your intent. You can't shoot a man in the back.
>>
>>533419385
I retract that, just saw the video. Way too many people.
>>
>>533419473
dey dindoo nuffin
>>
nothing will happen about this until judges and DAs are able to be held criminally liable and put on trial for decisions that go against the public interest
>>
>>533419385
in the wild west if you broke into someones house they had the right to liquidate you any time any place, you know what they did to horse thiefs regardless how far they ran away or how many days it had been? you break into their fucking house is a death sentence in the old days
>>
File: 1769031559774239.jpg (85 KB, 960x723)
85 KB JPG
>>533418448
same. most people would.
by law tho, and I found out trust me lmao... you cannot use a deadly weapon unless your life is threatened. for some reason, this enormous defining factor that decides the difference can only be interpreted subjectively by the DA and judge, depending on how badly they want to fuck you over for no reason.

life threat literally meaning, a nigger can kick your door in and literally beat the shit out of you and this will not constitute a "life threat" because "he wuz jus tryins 2 rob u for dems shoez."

my advice, the law is a fucking joke. fuck cops, and fuck niggers, and also fuck the DA and the judge. if you carry a gun, your intent is to use it. my mistake was saving his life after I shot him in the neck, as I was losing consciousness from blood loss due to being shot I kept him alive with pressure on his squirting neck wounds after he attacked me from behind. In the eyes of the law I guess that is the difference between "shooting with intent to kill" and "assault and battery with a deadly weapon", both carrying a life sentence.
lmao. i should have killed everyone.
unironically, it is unreal how much of a joke our "rights" and "laws" "work". the lawyer that hangs out the most with the DA is the one you want
>>
In America a white person can only shoot other whites.

This man is found guilty of shooting a superior American black god and therefore must spend the rest of his life in jail.

Anyone who gets robbed by a black person should consider themselves very lucky because you were chosen to give reparations personally to them.
>>
>>533419663
depends if you live in a cucked shithole or not. some states have castle doctrine which means you can execute anyone who breaks into your property with no duty to retreat. other states are cucked shitholes about it.
>>
>>533419516
Riiiiiight.
>>
>>533407357
Holy cuckold, batman. You'd refrain from shooting your wife's rapist because you could masturbate from a place of safety and aren't in any physical danger.
>>
>>533419045
Are you Jewish?
>>
>>533419592
I dunno. Shooting unarmed men in the back was always honorless, but when there are 8 of them it's different
>>
>>533419732
I live in Florida, sheriff Grady says to shoot intruders ""if you kick my door in, in the middle of the night, I will kill you graveyard dead, and the owners of the house would certainly have every right do to that""
>>
>>533419847
in the moment it is not known if they are armed or not, what's more they forfeited any honor based system when they broke into someones house

I wish he shot every one of those niggers.
>>
>>533407357
We like to look the other way in instances like this. It's called "discretion".
>>
>>533419949
Same
>>
Good thing we got 20/20 Captain Hindsights on /pol/ telling us all the joggers were fleeing and not one of the feral black beasts was gonna turn and shoot when he popped out. Why didn't any tell the homeowner any of this at the moment? Crazy shit!
>>
In florida this would have been legal and the sheriffs would have bought him a beer
>>
>>533418820
>>no one actually says "you're" at the end of a sentence like that. you are obviously ESL and not worth the time of day.
>calls me an ESL all of a sudden as if it matters to the conversation
>hides his nigger flag
What a tough nigger we have here
>Im literally telling you what the law is, you turbo nigger retard.
you clearly went forward with your own interpretation
>The law literally uses the word "reasonably" and intentionally leaves it open to interpretation.
>I think it's not reasonable to shoot after criminals who are leaving a crime scene
That's you own interpretation
But i don't like your nigger interpretation
>>
>>533407105
He right, he's fucking right.
>>
>>533407730
Thin lips are better for cold weather.
>>
File: 1601436301489m.jpg (317 KB, 1024x768)
317 KB JPG
>>533419845
He's not wrong faggot.
>>
>>533407038
>And opened fire as they were leaving
If this is true, it would certainly give reason for why this is allowed to go to trial.
>>533407747
>how do you know he wasn't in physical danger?
That would be for a jury to decide. It is still possible he gets acquitted because of self defense. Just because you have a self defense case doesn't mean it's solid enough to not go to trial. But you can still be acquitted just like Rittenhouse was acquitted.
>>
ITT: People defending nigger behavior.
>>
>>533407736
>>533408233
This is in Michigan, not Texas.
>>
>>533407312
I bet is a TAURUS gun.
>>
>>533420802
Brainwashed by the Jews in that pic.
>>
wtf a handgun, a shitty one no less, for home defense? D-did he not have an AR? I’d use an MG-42 for home defense if I could afford one.
>>
File: IMG_6102.jpg (125 KB, 673x606)
125 KB JPG
>>533407594
When the white man, with cold steel eyes, emotionlessly perform the tiresome work of exterminating vermin, the rest will be satisfaction.
>>
>>533407726
Anyone saying “a gang of niggers” isn’t a physical threat is going to get their head kicked in when they relax.
>>
>>533407726
Why weren't they a physical threat?
Had he gone outside in your dressing gown and asked those feral nogs nicely to please leave his stuff alone, they would have taken it as a sign of weakness and robbed him blind.

The only reason you don't perceive them as having been a physical threat, is because he used a gun and scared them off.

There's literally no logical way you can defend the type of retarded animal that breaks into the same place several times in a row, unless you're brown in spirit (a criminal) or brown in person (a nigger).
>>
>>533407038

No, their retarded suicidal application of sympathy is fucking everything up.
>>
>>533407038
>>533407077
The only thing to charge him with is missing.
>>
File: 1755540678313447m.jpg (216 KB, 1024x884)
216 KB JPG
>>533421162
No such thing as brainwashed white cunts support and side with niggers and third world immigration of their own doings no one kike put a gun to their head and forced them,stop thinking women shit don't stink.
>>
>>533413720
Shut the fuck up
>>
>>533419732
oklahoma. we have the law, even extended as the make my day law. even recently, you can now brandish and point a gun at people legally if "threatened", it is no longer a felony to brandish.
actually read it. i promise "fafo" people have no fucking clue what they're talking about, and I've literally shot someone.
the missing piece that they will never bring up is:
>you shot someone in self defense
>he says you were the aggressor
>there is now probable cause to arrest you
>begin legal battle and tens of thousands of dollars in expense
>you will either not have the money to fight it, accept a plea deal for a lesser charge and hopefully suspended sentence, or trial
>trial is not a haha funni fuck around and find out kind of thing or a televised psyop
>it takes probably years depending on local factors and no matter what you say or actually did will come up in trial
>just a bunch of other people (probably lying) trying to PROSECUTE YOU by questioning other people (if witnesses)
so heres how it goes
>"did you shoot that person over there?"
yes, in self defense
>"thats all my questions your honor, bring witnesses pls"
>"did you see anon shoot that person over there?"
>yes
>"was the victim threatening to kill anon?"
>idk i dont think so, maybe
>"thats it ur honor also i rest my case"
badabing badaboom life sentence because you went to trial
thats literally how it goes btw. im not even trying to larp, im experiencing it
>>533419871
i mean he has to justify his job by making more crime in some way i guess lol
>>
>>533407357
Brother, More and more people are feeling like laws only protect the criminals at this point.
Who feels safe in this day and age? Who feels like the laws will help them if they're victims?

We are saturated with criminals who feel entitled to committing crime because they know the law supports them to commit crime with a harder burden on law abiding citizens. Our legal system cannot even keep up and so they let people go for burglary yet those same people tend to commit 10 other crimes until they're caught for their inevitable murder charge.
At the grocery store down the street from me someone was beat up by a pack of 5 "people" while putting away groceries.

Can these judges or liberals know think of 3 people who would agree to beat an innocent person up together? It just shows we're surrounded by insane criminals who the law pretends can be rehabilitated and demands that they should be protected during their crimes.
And by not putting these people away for decades for violent or serious offenses like burglary, they allow more to fester and grow in numbers to where it clogs up the legal system.

Criminals feel safe committing crime with impunity because they know the law abiding citizens are the ones who will suffer most if they "do the wrong thing" and intervene during an act of crime.

Our laws and justice system, especially our judges and DAs have failed us.
Only liberals are deluded enough to feel safe because in their minds it's "simply not likely to happen" to them. But screw the other people whom are victims of crime, huh?
The laws will not protect you if someone wants to mess with you, only if you respond.
More and more people are feeling like laws only protect the criminals at this point.
Judges, the FBI, DOJ, police departments, and other bodies that deal with "justice" should be calling on counties and states to change their laws to better protect their law abiding citizens.
>>
>>533408224
Can you see if they have guns or are turning around? No?
>Just trust the criminals to make it obvious when they are going to kill you.
Ya right
>>
>>533413886
I bet you lick up what the bull leaves behind.
>>
>>533416737
>BUT the moment I turn around
Exactly. We need to change these laws to help protect innocent people and be a *deterrent* against criminals targeting people.
>>
>>533412663
>>533412894
>>
It's a sad state of affairs when you're imprisoning people that should be receiving awards.
>>
>>533414216
>>533412894
>>
>>533407357
This post proves that liberal trash will never have power again.
The guy will get a clean slate on appeal.
The judge will get brained.
End of.
>>
>>533407726
It’s beyond time for all liberal trash to be hung
Starting with that cunt judge.
Then your entire bloodline.
>>
>>533407038
>opened fire
>as they were leaving
nigger that's illegal. I'm not saying it SHOULD be illegal, but it is illegal.

>>533407077
what the fuck is going on with his gun

>>533408771
This post does not belong on /pol/, it is way too literate
>>
>>533407906
Stfu faggot
>>
>>533407038
They should be charging him for not bagging up all 7
>>
File: 17491774001387.png (5 KB, 222x227)
5 KB PNG
>>533407038
>shooting people in the back
>>
>>533423607
And also he put up the security camera that is being used to try him for manslaughter. The thing he put up to protect himself is now used to put him behind bars. If there wasn't a camera this would have been a lot more clean cut for him. The prosecutor can sit there frame by frame and nitpick with perfect hindsight every millisecond, every angle, every line of sight, every footstep.
>>
>>533407038
No. They are fish out of water at the higher/highest level of authority. Same reason they shouldn’t be president. Women instinctively do not understand what a state of anarchy is, or what it means to be “arbiter of reality”. There is always a daddy or arbiter around, to whom they submit, and who dictates the conditions of their life. Men are much better suited to “arbiter of reality” jobs. Judges, lawmakers, cops, soldiers, politicians, president, etc.
>>
>>533407038
no
>>
Fuck niggers
>>
>>533407038
Life not in imminent danger. Detached garage is not your castle. Firearm deadly force day one. Off to jail he goes.
>>
>>533407038
Libs will sell your rights out first chance they get. They'll start to say you have no right to defense because they'll take it away. Leftism is mercy to the guilty, cruelty to the innocent.
>>
>>533407077
bro needs to get a proper reliable handgun.
>>
>>533408523
I definitely don't hope this ugly dyke gets ass cancer. Wouldn't that be terrible?
>>
>>533424472
yeah, its actually very unfortunate.
our laws do not exist for our protection, or benefit. im not saying anarchy, that is gay.
This kid is 24, ethically and morally he did nothing wrong. His life is now over, and not just over in an easy way like dying. Every waking second will be a reminder that all hopes, dreams, experience, and happiness are not possible and completely out of your control. Now add in prison culture. 24.

I was only in jail for like 2 months and I will fucking die before spending a single second again in a cell. Not even anything to do with the people.
My opinion about "crime" and "law" has changed almost completely. Most people locked up are chill, and are only in because of simple shit like not being able to PAY these cunts money or drug charges.
Prison only needs to be the sentence for sex offenders and probably murderers. But honestly, just kill them lmao
im not even going to look at the faction of people that own the prison industry



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.