[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>thousands of data centers get constructed
>scientists learn how to compile the entirety of a data center into a single quantum computer
>instead of abandoning reliance on massive polluting data centers the corporations pretend this solution doesn’t exist
Screencap this
>>
>>533427976
Those datacenters are the backend of something huge and 90% of the media surrounding their construction and implementation is false.
>>
K. Keep me posted
>>
>>533427976
Quantum supremacy still isn't proven.
How are they going to outclass normal computers when they can't even solve ONE problem shown to be computationally hard?
>Inb4 muh AI will figure it out
AI still needs human examples before it can work.
>>
>>533428139
They need those facilities track and confine the goyimz in 15 minute chicken coops. The best part is jews think jeets will be able to create and run it.
>>
>>533428305
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5
>>
>>533428874
There is still no useful computational task that's been demonstrated to be possible on quantum computers. This is why many people say quantum supremacy isn't real yet, myself included. Even if such a thing is possible, wrap your head around that. THOUSANDS of man years of research, BILLIONS invested. Not one single problem solved. I ask again, how are you going to overtake modern computers when you can't solve one problem? Quantum supremacy is just a term, you can argue all you want in semantics, but show me one thing solved. Just one thing.
>>
>>533429208
>possible
*Better, not possible
>>
>>533427976
Dont invent an alternative fual source if you do keep your fucking mouth shut. Dont patient it dont sell it just keep it for personal use. You will get suicided if you get caught.
>>
>>533427976
I believe it. Power companies are too big to fail.
>>
>>533428305
you don't understand how AI works if you think it's a better autocomplete. do you think it's completing your sentences for you when it reasons on how to troubleshoot a formula in Excel?
>>
quantum computer: 99% elaborate refrigerator and teensy brain that has qbits that can be anything you want it to be in a given instant
>>
>>533427976
That's not how Quantum Computers work... MORON.
>>533429208
There's a shit ton of algorithms for quantum computers. The reason they can't be applied as of now is that no one can make quantum gates which won't drown all the signal with noise.
>>
>entirety of a data center into a single quantum computer
I don't think that is physically capable.
>>
>>533429305
>not possible
Well, you said

Quantum compute in theory is nice. But its not a thing that the average person can even grasp which makes grasping a functional purpose for it more of a guessing game than anything.

I mean you cant use a quantum comouter to make lara crofts tits palpable so whats the fucking point? You going to optimize how the feds spy on me and search their database for information about me when i complain about kikes and their quantum computer spying on me for their jewish tricks?

Jews going to use it to break all encryption and prevent all organization of humans again?

Jews going to yse it to break nuclear encryption and sampson the earth.
>>
>>533429708
I never said that it was just a better autocomplete. If you want to argue against my position, learn it first.
It does need human data to train against, and it's not completing words (it's completing tokens), but it can't "reason" like you or I can.
They essentially just emulate a thinking process, which seems to help them check themselves. Any time a model "thinks", go and read its internal monologue. It's nothing like you or I, it has no internal experience and limited capabilities of logical reasoning. It's more synthesis than thesis.
And under all that, yes, it is still just predicting the next token based on human data. Everything we see is emergent behavior. Can it come up with novel things? Sometimes, if they're a likely answer in a field of work with rich data. On the cutting edge? Absolutely not yet, it is still just a statistically driven stochastic process. I will be very surprised if that behavior is emergent from current algorithms.
>>
>>533429875
>That's not how Quantum Computers work
>He hasn't heard of quantum storage
We could fit the entire internet, magnitudes of times, into the same space as a micro sd card.
>>
>>533429556
Sometimes I wonder what secrets have been discovered and lost to time by smart individuals that thought to just keep it to themselves.
>>
>>533428139
The data centers will also serve as their own energy facilities. They say its to not over stress thd energy grid we already have. Really, the elites are building power plants to run the under ground cities that they are also building, near, at, and under the same sites.
They will flee to the under ground cities when " the event " that they all expect to take place, happens.
>>
>>533432877
Not many because there's enough people and knowledge to basically invent everything imaginable. Novelty is dead



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.