Why can't we just revive rococo?
Too busy
>>533454348Rock cock o
>>533454348I guess we could now that the art production can be assigned to AI rather than real costly human artists
>>5334543481. The technical know how has been lost to the ages2. No interested patrons
Oh yeah, Rocco Rapes Poland 2, man that was a hot movie.
>>533454348looks like vomit on a plate
>>533454348Baroque was better.
>>533455066Shit covered hands typed this
>>533454422This, reminds me of Asian stuff. Indian, SEA and a lot of Buddhist stuff is busy and it is hard to see core element among all the miscellaneous stuff everywhere. IMO just adding more and more doesn't make things attractive.
>>533454348Post the one where the guy is looking up the woman's dress while he's pushing her on a swing.
>>533455382see>>533455418You have Indian taste.
>>533454348because the goyim must be conditioned to accept ugliness in preparation for their future neon feudalism
>>533456301Wasn't feudalism the dominating system when Rococo was big? Retard.
>>533454348>rococotoo gaudy
>>533456285It's Indian Architecture that practices extremely busy design. Elegance is lost in the noise.
>>533454348You can, you just need a lot of money
>>533454348Rococo is actually just gaudy trash. Your desire to retvrn to a better aesthetic is not unfounded, but rococo aint it, chief.
>>533456631It's hurts my eyes just to look at it.
>>533454348Competency crisisWe literally forgot how to build beautiful things. Brutalism is all we know