can I get a shoutout pls
Can I move to Reichskommissariat Ostland after the war
>>533492634how sticky would it be if you hit he griddy?
>>533492634WHAT.. is your name?>Adolf HitlerWHAT.. is your quest?>To defeat the JEWWHAT.. is your favourite colour?>...BLUEOk, off you go then
>HitlerWAS A STUPID FILTHY FUCKING JEWhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stennes_revolt>Stennes argued that National Socialism had been betrayed: the revolution was meant to destroy elites and big capital, not ally with them. He demanded real socialism—expropriation of financiers and industrialists, rule by the SA as a people’s army, and a revolution carried out from below rather than negotiated with conservative power.>Hitler rejected real socialism and deliberately aligned the Nazi movement with industrialists, financiers, and conservative elites. He protected big business, crushed anti-capitalist factions, and disciplined the SA in order to win elite backing, pursue power legally, and build a hierarchical state serving capital under absolute Führer control.TL;DR: Hitler betrayed National Socialism and was a stooge for rich capitalist jews.
>>533492634Like after death, and assuming he was compelled to speak only the truth?I'd ask why he permitted the genocides of various peoples in the territories he occupied.
>>533492634is it true you have a micropenis?
>>533492851Why the fuck would you ask him about that? He already talked about in this book and speeches he's probably bored as fuck of those questionsI'd ask him what it felt like getting gassed
>>533492634You want another beer?
>>533492847>commies flagCalm down jew
>>533492967You worship a sandnigger halfbreed sephardic jew
How's it feel to know Israel runs the world and managed to hold on longer than you did?
>>533492847>Hitler rejected real socialismhttps://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/%22Hitler%20rejected%20real%20socialism%22/You failed to cover.ypur tracks, posting with gommunist, UK and US flags.You're a 82(00) Jew. And I see you.
How do I finish what you started?
>>533492847>>533493023You are a sandnigger jew lol
I would ask Mr Hitler if we would rather have a blonde pornstar with big tits fart directly up his nostrils or alternatively straight into his mouth. Personally I'd recommend he go with the later, even if the original taste of a woman's fart on your taste buds can be initially quite shocking.
>>533493077>>533493023>>533492847>hellow fellow gentiles>please ignore my duplicitous behavior Lol no
>>533493077>>533493163>you are Jewish if you don’t worship a sephardic sandniggerFuck off ACTUAL JEWI DENOUNCE THE TALMUD
Nazism-vs.-Communism was just a psyop dialectic for the Germans to conduct social engineering in Europe, just as they had done the social engineering ploy of the French Revolution and the social engineering ploy of the Russian Revolution with German bankers in the US dressed up as Jews...
>>533492634Can I have your spaetzle recipe?
>>533492847Members of the SA in Berlin, led by Walter Stennes, had for some time been voicing objections to the policies and purposes of the SA as defined by Hitler. These SA members saw their organization as a revolutionary vanguard of a National Socialist order that would overthrow the hated Weimar Republic by force. Stennes complained that advancement within the SA was improperly based upon cronyism and favoritism rather than upon merit, and objected to the general law-abiding approach. He and his men chafed under Hitler's order to terminate street attacks upon Communists and Jews, sarcastically referring to him as "Adolf Legalité."The SA had developed a list of seven ambitious demands, including denunciations of capitalism and Catholicism >(just before an election in a country with a substantial Catholic population), an end to corruption and bureaucratization in the Nazi Party, the removal of Gauleiter power over SA men, the administration of SA independent of party administration, and a fixed appropriation from party funds to be earmarked for the SA.On 7 August 1930, Joseph Goebbels, the Gauleiter (Nazi regional leader) of Berlin, met with Stennes and other SA officers in Berlin. The SA also wanted three secure places on the party's list for the upcoming Reichstag elections. In addition, he complained that the SA members under his command were not being paid sufficiently.On 27 August, Stennes threatened Goebbels again: he wanted the three Reichstag seats, more money for the SA, and more political power in the movement. Hitler again refused to take it seriously. Pfeffer had resigned by this time, and Hitler assured Goebbels he would send the SA chief of staff, Otto Wagener, to fix things in the SA.
>>533493450Stennes decided that action was needed to make a statement. Accordingly, on 30 August 1930, the Berlin SA refused to provide protection for Goebbels at his Sportpalast speech, and instead held a parade in Wittenbergplatz. Goebbels turned to the Schutzstaffel (SS), who provided the necessary security for the speech and then assigned to protect the office of the Berlin Gau on Hedemannstrasse. The SA then stormed the Gau office, injuring the SS men and wrecking the premises. Goebbels was shocked at the extent of the damage done and notified Hitler, who left the Wagner Festival in Bayreuth and flew immediately to Berlin.Hitler talked to Stennes and groups of SA the next day, urging them to follow his leadership. He redefined the issue in different and simpler terms: Was the SA entirely loyal to Hitler under the Führerprinzip, or not? Then on the following day, he convened a meeting of some 2000 SA and announced he was personally taking over as Supreme Leader of the SA.The SA cheered and were delighted that their leader was finally giving them the recognition they felt they deserved. Hitler also had Stennes read a declaration increasing SA funding, and also promised free legal representation for SA men arrested in the line of duty. A special levy (20 pfennig) would be made on party dues to pay for it.
>>533493450>>533493505> He and his men chafed under Hitler's order to terminate street attacks upon Communists and Jews, sarcastically referring to him as "Adolf Legalité."SHUT IT DOWN!!!!
>>533493505In spring 1931, Stennes continued to complain that the SA in Breslau was not able to turn out for inspection in February 1931 because they lacked footwear.He also believed that the strategy of legality was a failure, as shown by the party failure to win the 1930 Reichstag elections outright by a clear majority. Stennes rebelled again. The SA once again stormed the party offices in Berlin on the night of 31 March – 1 April and took control of the building. In addition, the SA took over the offices of Goebbels' newspaper, Der Angriff. Pro-Stennes versions appeared of the newspaper on 1 April and 2 April.Hitler instructed Goebbels to take whatever means were necessary to put down the revolt. Goebbels and Göring purged the SA in Berlin, and Stennes was expelled from the party.There is some evidence that Stennes may have been paid by the government of German Chancellor Heinrich Brüning, with the intention of causing conflict within the Nazi movement.
>>533493880>>533493892Brüning's government, which lasted from 1930-1932, was marked by severe austerity measures and reliance on presidential emergency decrees. Historical accounts suggest Brüning's government, in its attempt to stabilize Germany and fight the rise of the Nazis, provided financial support to Stennes to create instability within the NSDAP.Despite these attempts to disrupt the Nazis, Brüning was unable to sustain his authoritarian regime.Brüning’s economic program, often called "deflation," was designed to stabilize the Reichsmark and demonstrate to the world that Germany could not afford its war reparations. His policies favored large industrial and banking sectors by providing tax cuts and public subsidies to major firms and failing banks. He rejected Keynesian stimulus plans that would have increased government debt.To lower production costs and increase export competitiveness, he forcibly slashed wages and unemployment benefits.The Nazi Party (NSDAP) ruthlessly attacked Brüning to channel public suffering into electoral gains. They framed him not as a conservative patriot, but as a puppet of "Jewish high finance." Propaganda like Joseph Goebbels’ newspaper Der Angriff labeled Brüning as the face of the "Weimar System," which they claimed was controlled by a global Jewish conspiracy.The Nazis used the term "thraldom of interest" to claim that Brüning's austerity was a way to keep Germany enslaved to Jewish bankers and the Young Plan reparations.They leveraged the "Hungerkanzler" (Hunger Chancellor) nickname to argue he was deliberately starving the German "Volk" to satisfy foreign creditors. >Hitler was in the pocket of capitalists!>er no Communists!>this definitely isn't an attempt to reuse an old Jewish calitalist psyop
>>533493955After the Nazi takeover in 1933, Stennes went with his wife and daughter into exile. Göring had made him promise to leave the country immediately and not to settle in Switzerland.Stennes then emigrated to China and arrived with his wife in Shanghai on 19 November 1933 on board the steamboat Ranchi. Stennes served as a military advisor to Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang until 1949. His efforts were to reorganise the army and police forces of the Chinese nationalists on the model of the Prussian armed forces.>... wait a sec...Many in the SA itself — including the leadership — held a contrary, and more glorious, view of the SA's role. To them, the SA was a nascent military organization: the basis for a future citizen army on the Napoleonic model, an army which would, ideally, absorb the Reichswehr and displace its "outmoded" Prussian concepts with "modern" Nazi ideals.>declares Prussian ideals "outdated" while being funded by Jews>immediately travels to China to teach Prussian idealsBut wait! It gets better!Stennes returned to Germany in 1949China became communist on October 1, 1949, when Mao Zedong proclaimed the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing following the victory of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) over the Nationalists in the Chinese Civil War. In 1951, he was a leading member of the right-wing German Social Party. Afterwards, he retired to private life. He applied for recognition as a victim of National Socialist tyranny, which was rejected in 1957 by the Federal Court.>lol treacherous little faggot>join Nazis>betray Nazis>run to China>join Kuomintang>betray Kuomintang>run back to Germany>become a major figure in capitalist conservative faggot politics>decry the Nazis and seek recognition for getting BTFOd by them>get BTFOd again>decades later neo-conservative capitalist faggots masquerading as communists try to use the psyop againYou never change.
>kike kvetching trying to discredit Stennes with “le evil socialism!”>conveniently ignores the fact that NATIONAL SOCIALISM is SOCIALIST. It’s literally in the FUCKING NAMEEVA BRAUN'S SISTER stated that she and EVA had JEWISH ORIGINS.HITLER was in BED, LITERALLY, with the FUCKING JEWSYOUTUBE LINK at 40min30s:https://youtu.be/uhLQpjbmPro?&t=2427 [Open]Catbox Link:https://files.catbox.moe/qdqp8n.mp4
>>533494299Regarding the post-war German Social Party, an argument can be made about its role in the early Federal Republic suggesting further controlled opposition behavior on behalf of Stennes.The DSP, under Stennes and Günther Gereke, advocated for a neutral Germany that could act as a bridge to the East. Because Gereke had ties to East German officials, some contemporary critics viewed the party as a vehicle for Soviet influence or a "controlled" nationalist front designed to pull West Germany away from its alliance with the United States.Like the 1931 revolt, the DSP’s existence helped fragment the far-right vote in Lower Saxony, preventing a single, massive nationalist party from challenging the established CDU or SPD in the early 1950s. Ultimately, while Stennes’ personal grievances against Hitler were likely sincere, his movements frequently received support from external actors—the Brüning government in the 1930s and potentially Eastern interests in the 1950s—who viewed him as a useful tool to manipulate the German political landscape.
>>533492634his spirit lives on within every human being todaynot jews tho, obviously
>>533494559Yeah, nah.Stennes was a controlled asset his entire life and a traitor.You are an asset of big money, masquerading as a Marxist.You're trying to revive the old psyop, and its not working.>oy vey but eva brau saidYou use duplicitous argumentation, you have no solid rhetorical nor narrative throughline, and you utilize and rely on extremely kosher sources.The issue not, nor ever was, that Stennes was a socialist - the issue is that he was a traitor, being paid by the NSDAPs enemies, namely those with strong alliance to big money anti-labor forces, to stir up division.As you are doing right now.You never change.
>>533492847And it's a good thing for Nazis that he did. If the rapist pedo hooligan degenerate junkies in the SA took over the armed forces like Strasser wanted, Poles would have been at the gates of Berlin in 1940. To add to this, Hitler's economic model only worked because the Junker class (famously not Jews) administered it, and even Franco's Spain run by Opus Dei and the assorted economic miracle it caused have conclusively shown that a relatively free market combined with radically traditionalist social values makes for the best performing economic and social system imaginable. Conversely, Mussolini's economy ate shit because he tried to implant his fucking parasitical nu-elites from the Party fucking everywhere and hated the guts of Italy's traditional ruling classes. Some even compare him negatively to Tito here for that reason.
>>533492634Maybe what this feels like.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-We6WnA8aQ
I'll probably just beat him and sodomise him with a broomstick or a metal pipe lol, like those 2 polish guys they left with the dick wrinkle or whatever his name was.
>>533492634What went wrong?
>>533494559Also, protip: My great grandmother told my father we were Jewish.Problem is, we have a full genealogy going back to the 1730s and DNA test showing - magically, apparently, given so many people DO get the jew result - 0% Semitic DNA.So whyd she say that?Because as a German person in the post-WW2 clime, especially as a woman, claiming Jewish ancestry was a good way to try to shirk the stigma of being a German.And that was an American German woman in Pennsylvania, can you imagine what it was like for German women in Germany?
>>533494839well suomi let's have a think
>>533494824>I'll probably just beat him and sodomise him with a broomstick or a metal pipe lol, like those 2 polish guys they left with the dick wrinkle or whatever his name was.
>>533494559kind of like how the modern alt-right movement and MAGA got taken over by Jews left/right we all still end up being their puppets one way or another
>>533494946but when you do it its "le faustian spirit" or whatever. STFU
>>533493023>muh haplogroupretard doesnt even know what a haplogroup is. no one knows what the gene expression of haplogroup even is. if your grand grand grand grand grand grand mother fucked a nigger once on her stay in some colony then returned home & the child ended up being part of a bloodline that would breed out all the nigger genetics over generations by only procreating with whites the haplogroup will still say that you are a nigger. haplogroups are meaningless. you can be 99.9999% whyte aryan ubermensch but still have that haplogroup tag floating in there somewhere in your genetics.
>>533495462krauts be like >there were this guys called the aryans having this halogroup proves you're related to them>turns out people they called subhumans are related to aryans more than them>UMM ACTUALLY NEVERMIND SCRATCH THAT THATS FAKE JEWISH SCIENCE JUST WAIT HERE WHILE I COME UP WITH SOMETHING BETTER!XD
>>533494730>YOU ARE LE TRAITOR IF YOU DONT SUBMIT TO RICHFAG JEWS!!Lmao fuck off. Stennes was right to stand up to Adolf (((Schiklgruber)))>jewish pilpul to cope with the fact Eva (((Braun))) was a halfbreed mischlinge kikeNice cope faggot. Braun said she was Jewish, end of story.> the issue is that he was a traitor, being paid by the NSDAPs enemies, namely those with strong alliance to big money anti-labor forces, to stir up divisionSo being anti Jewish capitalism is treason now? Kill yourself kike.>>533494801Lmao you’re a fucking retard, trying to come of with excuses for Hitler sucking Jewish cock. The truth is a National Socialist economy based on blood, soil, and labor WORKS. >muh FrancoAnother faggot sellout. Spain was poor as fuck under him.>b-but Mussolini.More gypsy lies. Mussolini was the best leader in Italy’s history.>>533494907>he admits he’s JewishWe know, Moshe. It was extremely obviousFuck off>b-but le stigma!Most Europeans are extremely antisemitic. They wouldn’t care.Picrel: Nazis sent JEWISH SS SOLDIERS to rescue him you retard. Now cope with the fact that whole kosher nostra outfit called Chabad wouldn't even exist if it hadn't been for the golem Fuhrer and his merry band of cryptokikes
>>533493880lol jesuits are a secret society that spies on nations & has no loyalty to anyone but the pope & has no other coutnry but the vatican. confession booths were used to extort crucial info from influential individuals like kings & nobility, hitler was expliticitly against such practices & the enmity of the catholic church against ns proves this. the jesuits were like the elite catholics.“Secret organizations have only illegal aims. [...] What we needed then, and need now, is not 100 or 200 reckless conspirators but 100,000 fanatical fighters for our worldview. The work mustn't be done through secret groups but through formidable mass demonstrations in public. Dagger, poison, and pistol cannot clear the way for the progress of the movement, but only by conquering the streets.”Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, 1925/26, Dalton Translation—german original:„Der Zweck von Geheimorganisationen kann nur ein gesetzwidriger sein. [...] Was wir brauchten und brauchen, waren und sind nicht hundert oder zweihundert verwegene Verschwörer, sondern hunderttausend und aber hunderttausend fanatische Kämpfer für unsere Weltanschauung. Nicht in geheimen Konventikeln soll gearbeitet werden, sondern in gewaltigen Massenaufzügen, und nicht durch Dolch und Gift oder Pistole kann der Bewegung die Bahn freigemacht werden, sondern durch die Eroberung der Straße.“Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, 1925/26
>>533495144I don't say weird shit like that, because Im not a debased cretin.
>>533495594the demoralization nigger slandering hitler is wrong in either case."What bears for thee true fruit alone is true."Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, A Legacy (1829)-"Was fruchtbar ist, allein ist wahr."Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Vermächtnis (1829)
>>533495119Pretty much>>533495462Kek what the fuck is this retarded cope. Hitler was A SEPHARDIC JEW as proved by his FUCKING HAPLOGROUOENDOFSTORY>>533495594This. Germans love to systematize shit but they’re inconsistent as fuck
>>533494559>some retarded woman says some stupid bs for the camera & moneymany such cases. here in saxony we have a lot of bums living in poverty & cpommunis blocks & such, the tv made a doc about one such "town-looney", he claimed afterwards that he was offered hundreds of euros to exaggerate his behaviour & act extra unhinged & asocial.reporters & ppl from the media are vermin who only chase sensationalism & force things, every time they have a story about hitler in "der spiegel" the sales numbers increasy by up to 30%.>say the line frau braunimagine trusting jewish media.
>>533495672Nice cope tukroachHitler was a well known Jesuit supporter, Picrel >>533495727Hitler was a fucking Jew. You can’t debunk this.
>>533495614>>YOU ARE LE TRAITOR IF YOU DONT SUBMIT TO RICHFAG JEWS!!Full stop.>>533493892>>533493955He worked for big money Jews. He was a paid traitor.>Lmao fuck off. Stennes was right to stand up to Adolf (((Schiklgruber)))>Braun said she was JewishNo, her sister said that, after the war. Why are you being obtuse?> the issue is that he was a traitor, being paid by the NSDAPs enemies, namely those with strong alliance to big money anti-labor forces, to stir up divisionThis is a fact.>So being anti Jewish capitalismHe wasn't. He was being paid by Bruning.Explain how that is "anti Jewish capitalism" to be paid by the guy who is the dog of Jewish capitalists.>Lmao you’re a fucking retard, trying to come of with excuses for Hitler sucking Jewish cock. No, thats you Stennes worked for Bruning>The truth is a National Socialist economy based on blood, soil, and labor WORKS.Bruning was devoted to maintaining the gold standard.>Another faggot sellout. Bruh Stennes was a literal sellout.Repeatedly, no less, given the 50s party was explicitly designed to lose and split the rightwing Nationalist vote.>More gypsy lies. Mussolini was the best leader in Italy’s history.Hitler disagreed, he suggested National Socialism and Fascism differed vastly, and I doubt hed approve of Mussolinis Jewish mistress.>he admits he’s JewishWhat? Thats legit the polar opposite of what I said.>b-but le stigma!Yes, German people were heavily stigmatized, especially in the USDo you... deny that?>Most Europeans are extremely antisemitic. They wouldn’t care.In the 1940s? Bruh...>Picrel: Nazis Traitors, you mean, bought out, like Stennes.You attribute the behavior of traitors to Hitler onto Hitler himself. Very semitic behavior.There is no historical evidence that Adolf Hitler was personally aware of the specific efforts or the operation to rescue Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn
>>533496009More retarded copeThere’s no reason why Jews would want Hitler to be jewish faggot. Use Occam’s razorHe was Jewish and had sex with Jewish womenIt’s not rocket science.He was funded and controlled by Jews which is why he purged the National Socialist Worker’s Party of its anti Jewish elements (Stennes faction)
>>533496017>obscure conspiracies about Jesuits>steps right over his oy Stennes being funded by BruningHmmmm.
>>533495737>END>OF>STORY
>>533496114>There’s no reason why Jews would want Hitler to be jewishThe reason you do: To demonize him to people who hate Jews.Its obvious.Your denial of it despite being so obvious paints you as acting in bad faith with ulterior motives, much like your refusal to address your boy Stennes being paid by the big money antilabor Bruning and then bouncing from China right as Communism was taking over to come back to Germany to run a Soviet-linked faux-rightwing party to split the vote.
>>533495737>something is happening>Jews declare victory>it continues to happen>Jews declare victory again>it's still happening>Jews declare it's over and they won>it continues>Jews yet again claim victory>the thing that's happening continues to happen>someone clarifies that the thing is continuing to haopen and thus, by definition, Jews have not "won">Jews put on theatrical exaggerated performative display, slinging emotive insulting language around while brazenly declaring their victory yet again>the thing that's happening continues happening>Jews declare victory once again>the thing is still happening>Jews say they won and anyone who says they didnt is [insult] [Jewish enemy group]>the event which is transpiring yet again continues to transpireWhy are Jews and Jewraped goyslave shabbos goyim like this?You realize you cant employ chutzpah bloviation pressure against reality itself, right?Its wild to see it again and again and again, like youre totally unaware you behave this way as a group systemically.
>>533496114>muh hitler needs to convince jews to come togetherlol jews with the highest ingroup prefecrence of prob all the ethnicities in the world, already scheming for 4 fucking millenia, rather suffer terrible genetic defects from inbreeding thatn outbreed with the goy, suddenly need some hitler to make them cooperate lol.
>>533495737Yes all socialists must die regardless if they are centralised socialists or decentralised socialists, they have fucked our future and our modern economies including society so badly thinking they can turn around and say the ends justify the means without ever reaching the end.
>>533496114>oy vey goy, hiutler was actually a jew helpiung us achieve our goals, better not follow his ideology since its only to our benefit anyway, go back to sleep, its all a jewish conspiracylol what reason could there possibly be to make hitler look like false opposition>if you cant beat them join themsince ns is such a powerful antidote to judaism the onkly thing jews can do is to soften the blow, not deny its validity but make it look like a ruse.
>>533496114>muh hitler was actually a jewHitler is being quoted in Dietrich Eckhart, Bolshevism From Moses To Lenin, 1924:"Every time new and promising opportunities for meddling have arisen," he brought out, "the Jew has been immediately involved. He has demonstrated an uncanny ability to sniff out like a bloodhound anything which was dangerous to him. Having found it, he uses all his cunning to get at it, to divert it, to change its nature, or, at least, to deflect its point from its goal. Schopenhauer called the Jew 'the dregs of mankind,' 'a beast,' 'the great master of the lie.' How does the Jew respond? He establishes a Schopenhauer Society. Likewise, the Kant Society in his work, in spite of the fact that -- or, rather, because -- Kant summarily declared the Jewish people to be a 'nation of swindlers.' The same with the Goethe Society. 'We tolerate no Jews among us,' said Goethe. 'Their religion permits them to rob non-Jews,' he wrote. 'This crafty race has one great principle: as long as order prevails, there is nothing to be gained,' he continued. He categorically emphasized: 'I refrain from all cooperation with Jews and their accomplices. All in vain; the Jewish Goethe Society is still there. It would be there even if he himself had expressly forbidden such knavery."
>>533492634with all due respect, there's no time for stupid questions, the Bolsheviks will take over half of Europe, the Yankee will level whole cities with atom bombs and the Brits will destroy Dresden out of pure spite. Use the Sarin gas, ALL OF IT, they have given up their humanity a long time ago.
>>533496487Hitler wird zitiert in 'Bolschewismus von Moses bis Lenin', von Dietrich Eckart und Adolf Hitler, 1924:"Noch jederzeit," holte er aus, "war der Jude sofort auf dem Plan, wenn es galt, etwas Neues von Bedeutung zu vermanschen. Das ihm Gefährliche witterte er wie ein Schweißhund, und dann sucht er ihm mit allen Listen beizukommen. Verdrehen, etwas anderes daraus machen, oder wenigstens die Spitze umbiegen, ist sein Ziel. Schopenhauer hat ihn 'Abschaum der Menschheit', hat ihn 'Vieh', hat ihn 'großen Meister im Lügen' genannt – was tut er? Er gründet eine Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft. Auch die Kant-Gesellschaft ist sein Werk, trotzdem oder vielmehr weil Kant das jüdische Volk summarisch für eine 'Nation von Betrügern' erklärt. Dasselbe mit der Goethe-Gesellschaft. 'Wir dulden keinen Juden unter uns', sagt Goethe. 'Sie haben einen Glauben, der sie berechtiget, die Fremden zu berauben,' dichtet er. 'Und dieses schlaue Volk sieht einen Weg nur offen: solang die Ordnung steht, solang hat's nichts zu hoffen,' fährt er fort. Kategorisch betont er: 'Ich enthalte mich aller Teilnahme an Juden und Judengenossen. Umsonst. Die jüdische Goethe-Gesellschaft ist da. Und sie wäre da, auch wenn er sich eine solche ausdrücklich als Lumperei verboten hätte."
>>533492634“Do you approve of Poroshenko and Zelensky?” And if he gave any other answer than “no” I’d never shut up about it on here.Z !
>>533492634I wouldn't say a single word to him. I would listen to what he had to say, and that's what no one did.
>>533492634What is your favorite jojo stand?
Lets review>>533492847>posts easily debunked goyslop, literally trying to reuse a psyop from the 1930s>>533493023>doubles down with baseless angloid claims about Hitlers ancestry>>533493212>>533493212Gets exposed as an IP-hopping ethos-shifting liar.>>533493450through>>533494576Stennes conspiracy theory debunked, exposed as a traitor serving big money antilabor Bruning.>>533493880>forgets he was claiming Hitler worked for big money Jews and accuses him of being pro-Communist>>533494559>tries to claim the accusation against Stennes was that he was a socialist when its actually that he's a capitalist asset>cites Eva Brauns elderly sister post-war claiming Jewish ancestry>>533495614>claims Stennes stood up to big money despite the evidence of him being paid by Bruning in the 30s and helping to split the rightwing vote in the 50s>shifts goalposts from "eva brains sister said post war" to "eva Braun said">purposefully and in bad faith rejects the notion that Germans would claim Jewish heritage to escape accusation/stigma of Nazism post-war>cites a case of a mischling traitor who betrayed Hitler, helping big money Jews rescue a rabbi, with 0 evidence existing of Hitler being aware of this happening
>>533496074>>533496133Bruning wasn’t a capitalist. He was a far right politician. Very different from a Jew you fucking moron> No, her sister said that, after the war. Good, so you admit they were Jewish. Finally we’re making some progress.> > the issue is that he was a traitor, being paid by the NSDAPs enemies, namely those with strong alliance to big money anti-labor forces, to stir up division>This is a fact.No it isn’t, you’re blowing things out of proportion. Unlike Hitler’s long standing relationship with zionists and Freemasons, Bruning and Stennes simply had a brief, one off meeting where the former agreed to fund. That’s it. And again Bruning wasn’t Jewish or a capitalist.> Hitler disagreed, he suggested National Socialism and Fascism differed vastlyLmao see this is how I know you’re Jewish (you admitted to being Jewish). You think being a National Socialist is worshipping that sandnigger faggot Adolf Hitler. Dumbfuck> What? Thats legit the polar opposite of what I said.You literally said your great grandmother told your father they were Jewish LMAOThere’s no coming back from this Moshe, you are Jewish.> Yes, German people were heavily stigmatized, especially in the USMost German immigrants to the US were actually Jews. Large scale ethnic German migration to America stopped in the early 1860s>muh traitors copeLmao. More cope, no arguments.
>>533492634What's with the mustache?
>>533494730Everything Hitler said about being opposed to the capitalistic economic system was a fucking lie. Why weren't the junkers and industry magnates sent to the camps? Why weren't their assets appropriated for the good of the German People?
>>533496717>Bruning wasn’t a capitalist.Historical accounts suggest Brüning's government, in its attempt to stabilize Germany and fight the rise of the Nazis, provided financial support to Stennes to create instability within the NSDAP.Despite these attempts to disrupt the Nazis, Brüning was unable to sustain his authoritarian regime.Brüning’s economic program, often called "deflation," was designed to stabilize the Reichsmark and demonstrate to the world that Germany could not afford its war reparations.His policies favored large industrial and banking sectors by providing tax cuts and public subsidies to major firms and failing banks.He rejected Keynesian stimulus plans that would have increased government debt.To lower production costs and increase export competitiveness, he forcibly slashed wages and unemployment benefits.The Nazi Party (NSDAP) ruthlessly attacked Brüning to channel public suffering into electoral gains.They framed him not as a conservative patriot, but as a puppet of "Jewish high finance."Propaganda like Joseph Goebbels’ newspaper Der Angriff labeled Brüning as the face of the "Weimar System," which they claimed was controlled by a global Jewish conspiracy.The Nazis used the term "thraldom of interest" to claim that Brüning's austerity was a way to keep Germany enslaved to Jewish bankers and the Young Plan reparations.They leveraged the "Hungerkanzler" (Hunger Chancellor) nickname to argue he was deliberately starving the German "Volk" to satisfy foreign creditors
>>533496487>the Jewish Goethe Society is still there. It would be there even if he himself had expressly forbidden such knavery.what does hitler mean by that? goethe was antisemite, so jews form a goethe society to only push kosher goethe & leave out his antisemitic remarks, same with luther, eraly luther praised the jews bc of ot, late luther got redpilled & got wise to their nature,l the jew now can form a luther trust & push his pro-semitic views only & drop the dangerous teachings, the well-meaning german then even thanks the jew & considers the jews engagement in german culture as a sign for the jews willingness to assimilate into german society while in reality the jew does the the exact opposite. the jew takes over german culture & occupies the critical positions not because of his interest in german matters but to push the germans out of the game, those germans who would neutrally approach the topic & quickly notice the antisemitism of germanies greates thinkers. with his wealth he can fund large exhibitions in big cities, make a big theatre about it, luther this, goethe that, the culture ppl go there thinking they have learned everything there is to know about germanies geniuses bc the exhibition looks to be sophisticated with all the jewish money behind it. truly the way the jew operates makes you think he is the devil incarnate, no one lies & schemes like that.
>>533496695Continuing on>>533496717>the obvious antilabor pro-finance gold standard obsessed capitalist wasn't a capitalist, he was just rightwing>eva brauns elderly sister post-war claimed Jewish ancestry in a public statement, thats means is 1000% true>no you see Stennes wasn't a traitor working for capitalists he just had a meeting with a capitalist politician and enemy of the NSDAP and then started causing division over pay and not having enough power for himself, but it was just a one off thing stop being a conspiracy theorist... now let me tell you about the JESUITS>you said your grandmother claimed Jewish ancestry in postwar period despite DNA and genealogical eivd3nce showing 0 Jewish presence back, AT LEAST, to the 1730s, but imma ignore the part that's actually important and demonstrates the point, being purposefully obtuse>mentions something about German immigrants in the 1800s despite my family arriving in the 1730s, which he's already been told, repeatedly>continues ti deny Bruning was a big money capitalist funding the traitor StennesThis is one nasty piece of Jewish work right here, I tell you hwat.
>>533496194More mental gymnastics. Again use Occam’s razor>>533496252>jew projectingMany such cases.>>533496353>>533496487It’s true. During the 1880-early 1900s periods ashkenazi jews came closed to assimilating into European society and ceasing to be a separate race. Zionists didn’t like that so they funded Hitler.
>>533496391Fuck off boomer. You people are mind broken by the red scare>>533496436Lmao more dumb cope. Let me ask you these simple questions:Would the state of Israel exist without Hitler? Yes or no?Would 60 million white Europeans have died in a war without Hitler’s suicidal jingoism? Yes or no?
>>533496778>fiscal conservatism is le capitalismMidwit take. Read a book fag>>533497053I’ve already debunked each and every single one of your weak arguments.
>>533497053And some more>>533497090>JewAngloid interests who want you, the antisemite, to hate Hitler would NEVER try to imply Hitler was himself Jewish to demonize him! Occams razor only when its convenient fellow gentiles! Muh Jesuits!>chutzpathically bloviating in accusing others of projecting when they point out your behavior falling in line with a trend amongst semitic interest narratives and rhetoric, namely extremely chutzpathic bloviation>>533497121You're just a Zionist lol
>>533497248Continuing>>533497187His policies favored large industrial and banking sectors by providing tax cuts and public subsidies to major firms and failing banks.He rejected Keynesian stimulus plans that would have increased government debt.To lower production costs and increase export competitiveness, he forcibly slashed wages and unemployment benefits.>thats not a capitalist goy>more chutzpah bloviation and projection
>>533497090>came closed to assimilating into European societybs, 4 millenia of strong racial instincts, jews dont need any motivational group forming training, ask any jew anywhere about the holocaust, regardless of socio-economic standing or religious affiliation, not one will allow his holy victim narrative be shaken, thats how they stick together, they have it from the tv, now the holocaust is the new factor that helps them getting priviliges & victim points & many of them just write random books about their involvement in the supposed genocide though they were nowhere near the camps. a unified race, like never endings of a greater organism dispersed all over the world, intuiting what is beneficial & what is detrimental to their cause instantly. thats racial consciousness & hitler wanted to establish the same for whyte people & the jews sent the shabbos nations to crack down on his movement because they wan the healthy natural principles of lyfe fr themselves only, the cant elevate themsevles above other because they are weak & cowardly so the only way to win is to push the other down.
>>533497248>>533497315More cope.Even if it was true that Bruning was a capitalist (he wasn’t)So what? Hitler was also funded exploitstive Jewish capitalist interests. So you’re actually proving my point Kek.
>>533497090>jews came closed to assimilating into European societylol a whole laundry list of genetic diseases from incest, the jew doesnt mix with the goy, except for if he wants to poison the goys blood. whereever he is he is jew first & his nationalism is merely like a coat he put on to get the priviliges & right of the host nation.'He (the jew) occasionally bestowed one of his female offspring on an influential Christian, but the racial stock of his male descendants was always preserved unmixed on principle. He poisoned the blood of others, but preserved his own blood unadulterated. The Jew scarcely ever married a Christian girl, but the Christian took a Jewess to wife. The mongrels that were the issue of this latter union always took after the Jewish side.'Adolf Hilter, Mein Kampf_Houston Stewart Chamberlain, who Hitler admired and frequently quoted in Mein Kampf writes about that topic:'Consider with what mastery they (the jews) use the law of blood to extend their power: the principal stem remains spotless, not a drop of strange blood comes in; as it stands in the Thora, “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord“ (Deuteronomy xxiii. 2); in the meantime, however, thousands of side branches are cut off and employed to infect the Indo-Europeans with Jewish blood. If that were to go on for a few centuries, there would be in Europe only one single people of pure race, that of the Jews, all the rest would be a herd of pseudo-Hebraic mestizos, a people beyond all doubt degenerate physically, mentally and morally.'Houston Stewart ChamberlainThe Foundations of the Nineteenth Century
>>533497398>unironically parroting Jewish propagandaNo surprise there. You hitlerites are mindbroken Jewish dick suckers.
>>533497495"Wohl hängt er (der Jude) seine Frauen manchmal einflußreichen Christen an, allein, er erhält seinen männlichen Stamm grundsätzlich immer rein. Er vergiftet das Blut der anderen, wahrt aber sein eigenes. Der Jude heiratet fast nie eine Christin, sondern der Christ die Jüdin. Die Bastarde aber schlagen dennoch nach der jüdischen Seite aus."Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf_"Man sehe doch, mit welcher Meisterschaft sie das Gesetz des Blutes zur Ausbreitung ihrer Herrschaft benutzen: der Hauptstock bleibt fleckenlos, kein Tropfen fremden Blutes dringt hinein; heisst es doch in der Thora: „kein Bastard soll in die Gemeinde Jahve's kommen, auch nicht nach zehn Generationen“ (Deuteronornium XXIII, 2); inzwischen werden aber Tausende von Seitenzweiglein abgeschnitten und zur Infizierung der Indoeuropäer mit jüdischem Blute benutzt. Ginge das ein paar Jahrhunderte so fort, es gäbe dann in Europa nur noch ein einziges rassenreines Volk, das der Juden, alles Übrige wäre eine Herde pseudohebräischer Mestizen, und zwar ein unzweifelhaft physisch, geistig und moralisch degeneriertes Volk."Houston Stewart ChamberlainDie Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts
>>533492634I read his book so I've zero interest. He was a worthless little dictatorslop retard like stalin also spewing inane shit for tards to justify his dictatorslop.
>>533497315>>533497428>he wasn't>Historians frequently describe Heinrich Bruning as a figure who "saved capitalism from capitalists" during the Great Depression through state intervention. Heinrich Brüning was comparable to other contemporary "orthodox" capitalist leaders, like Herbert Hoover in the U.S. and Ramsay MacDonald in the UK, who initially met the Great Depression with rigid fiscal discipline. He used anti-market state powers specifically to safeguard the long-term foundations of the capitalist system—namely the gold standard, private property, and international creditworthiness. Brüning’s "surgery" on the economy was a more extreme version of the era's standard capitalist response before the shift toward Keynesian "New Deal" thinking.Like Brüning, Hoover initially resisted direct federal relief and prioritized balanced budgets and the gold standard to maintain investor confidence.While Hoover and MacDonald operated within functional parliaments, Brüning used authoritarian decrees to force the market to "reset" because the German democratic process had paralyzed.
If might is right as Hitler reasoned then he was wrong and democracy is right. Nazism and communism got crushed by democracy because they were weak and inferior and unfit.
>>533497315>>533497617Brüning’s interventions were not intended to replace the market, but to "purge" it of what he saw as Weimar-era distortions (like high social spending and union power). He used state power to legally lower prices and wages. This was an anti-market mechanism (price fixing) used to achieve a capitalist goal: making German exports competitive again without devaluing the currency.His "temporary" takeover of major banks during the 1931 crisis was a classic preservationist move—using state capital to prevent a systemic collapse that would have obliterated private wealth.He deliberately let the domestic economy suffer to prove to the world that Germany was physically incapable of paying war reparations. He believed that once the debt was cleared, a "pure" capitalist recovery could begin. Historians often describe him as a "Reactionary Modernist". He wasn't a liberal capitalist who believed the "invisible hand" would fix everything; he was a technocrat who believed the state had to manhandle the economy into a shape where capitalism could survive. Ironically, his attempt to save the system through "starvation" destroyed the middle-class stability that the capitalist system required to resist the Nazis. >not a capitalist fellow gentiles>so what if the guy i was trying to shill as baste was actually a stooge for big money capitalist interests LITERALLY trying to undermine the NSDAP for Jewish capitalists!? H-Hitler got money from them too! I DONT KNOW WHAT CONTEXT DENIAL MEANS!El oh el
>>533495672some jesuits are modern mountain jews/the swiss, i think some are ancient>punicnobility that escaped carthage before rome destroyed itthey make up the >swiss guardthat literally guards the popetheir 'mantra' from the very beginning has been to kiss the pope's ass for as long as possible until they could finally get a jesuit pope in thereobviously this happened with what's his nigger, but JD vance possible assassinated him, and there's this pope from chicago now loli'm lutheran>the best protestantsbut the >jesuitswere founded by force-converted kikes during the >inquisitionthis was their means of slowly infiltrating the churchand holy shit canaanites can hold a GRUDGE dude
>>533497653>If might is right as Hitler reasonedAt no point was that Hitlers professed reasoning.
>>533497572>I read his bookWhat page does it talk about might makes right.I'll wait.
>>533497680But it was, you have not read mein kampf I have hitler viewed war as darwinian competition, he lost. Democracy won. In fact before he killed himsekf he himself stated the nazi state as the German did not deserve to survive defeat
>>533497729I'm not your search engine little tard, Read the book, I recommend the 1939 english edition which I own. Hitlers ideas are too tarded to be iteresting to dicuss, he was smart enough to craft something that appealed to retards like you, just like communist nonsense, all to justify dictatorslop being tested to failure
>>533492634Where are za treasure caches covered in cosmoline
>>533492634happy birthday Adolf
>>533497760See>>533497729Im waiting.>democracy wonDid it?From what I see in history, Gommunism defeated National Socialism, most of the brunt was Eastern Front not Western.If you want to talk in ecologic terms, NatSoc was perceived as a threat by gommunism and capitalism, they came together to attack it, with Communism bearing most of the weight of the struggle, and then in the aftermath the democratic capitalist US became dominant as the sheer consequence of poat-war circumstance as opposed to any sort of meritocratic element.By your reasoning it was more "luck makes chance" than "might makes right".Likewise, Hitlers premise was more "might makes ability", as perceived rights will not be honored by foes in most cases, thus absent might you will be but prey, regardless of right.
>>533497844That's the thing little tard, I've read the book, and I don't think you have, because your description doesn't follow the text, rather sounds like some shit you read about it in Rolling Dtone magazine or some shit in an article by a guy whose last name ends in Stein or Witz.
>>533497844>>533498148To expand further, my tiny potatonigger frfriendthe issue is one of mechanism as opposed to morality: Rights exist but must be honored to have application, as nlfoes will rarely honor such, might must be fostered to secure against predation.Darwinian selection is not a moralistic argument, but a mechanistic one, and thats where things break down in your interpretation od the text you didnt read and refuse to cite: Its not "might makes right" ala you have the moral right to do whatever you want if you have power, but rather "might makes ability", a commentary on the mechanistic outflow of naturalistic processes like natural selection.
>>533492634What’s up with the summer camps?
>>533498306Hitler doesn't advocate for nihilistic power (doing whatever one wants because they can), but rather for biological stewardship (using power to fulfill a natural duty). In this view, might is the tool required to satisfy the moral demand of the "folkish" struggle.However, the "might makes right" label is often applied because Hitler denies the existence of any "right" that stands above or against that biological struggle. He views "might" as the only mechanism that validates "right".In the context of a naturalistic moral premise, Hitler frames the relationship between might, ability, and morality.Hitler argues that "altruism" and "care for fellows" (the social instinct) only have value if they strengthen the Volk for the external struggle. If a group is too weak to defend itself, its internal "morality" is irrelevant because it will be extinguished. Whether that is moral or not is not in question - it is a mechanistic reality.>"The instinct of self-preservation has reached its most noble form [in the Aryan]... because he willingly subordinates his own ego to the life of the community and, if the hour demands, even sacrifices it."Here, "might" (the strength of the community) is the moral goal, and the "ability" to survive is the proof of that morality.Hitler does not believe a weaker group has a "right" to life that the stronger group can respect without by-deinition underming its own interests, an immoral and unnatural act.>"If the power to fight for one's own health is no longer present, the right to live in this world of struggle ends."
>>533498931For Hitler, there is no moral "right" to exist that is separate from the physical "ability" to stay alive. In his view, or rather, in the material reality we face, to be "unable" is all that matters, irrelevant of any notion of being "unworthy."Hitler argues that nature itself is the judge, and she only delivers a verdict through victory. This illuminates the distinction between "what happened" (mechanics) and "what should have happened" (morality).>"Success is the only earthly judge of right or wrong."This is the core of the "might makes right" attribution: If success (might/ability) is the only judge, then there is no "right" beyond the outcome of the struggle - though, we as conscious human beings are capable of moralistic beyond this, it is idealism and sadly often falters before reality.Might provides the functional capacity to fulfill the moral aim of survival.Hitler argues that because survival is the highest moral aim, the exercise of might is the definition of "right."He doesn't say "do what you want because you're strong"; he says "you have a right and duty to do what is necessary for the Volk because you are strong enough to achieve it."
how to become immortal?
>>533498960I found myself mulling over a discussion in our class in History and Moral Philosophy. Mr. Dubois wastalking about the disorders that preceded the breakup of the North American republic, back in the XXthcentury. According to him, there was a time just before they went down the drain when such crimes asDillinger’s were as common as dogfights. The Terror had not been just in North America — Russia andthe British Isles had it, too, as well as other places. But it reached its peak in North America shortlybefore things went to pieces. "Law-abiding people," Dubois had told us, "hardly dared go into a public park at night. To do so was torisk attack by wolf packs of children, armed with chains, knives, homemade guns, bludgeons... to be hurtat least, robbed most certainly, injured for life probably — or even killed. This went on for years, right upto the war between the Russo-Anglo-American Alliance and the Chinese Hegemony. Murder, drugaddiction, larceny, assault, and vandalism were commonplace. Nor were parks the only places — thesethings happened also on the streets in daylight, on school grounds, even inside school buildings. But parkswere so notoriously unsafe that honest people stayed clear of them after dark." I had tried to imagine such things happening in our schools. I simply couldn’t. Nor in our parks. A park was a place for fun, not for getting hurt. As for getting killed in one — "Mr. Dubois, didn’t they havepolice? Or courts?" "They had many more police than we have. And more courts. All overworked." "I guess I don’t get it." If a boy in our city had done anything half that bad... well, he and his father wouldhave been flogged side by side. But such things just didn’t happen. Mr. Dubois then demanded of me, "Define a ‘juvenile delinquent.’ "
>>533499132If you wanna live forever, first you have to do something amazing.>>533499248Uh, one of those kids — the ones who used to beat up people." "Wrong." "Huh? But the book said — " "My apologies. Your textbook does so state. But calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit ‘Juveniledelinquent’ is a contradiction in terms, one which gives a clue to their problem and their failure to solve it.Have you ever raised a puppy?" "Yes, sir." "Did you housebreak him?" "Err... yes, sir. Eventually." It was my slowness in this that caused my mother to rule that dogs must stayout of the house. "Ah, yes. When your puppy made mistakes, were you angry?" "What? Why, he didn’t know any better; he was just a puppy. "What did you do?" "Why, I scolded him and rubbed his nose in it and paddled him." "Surely he could not understand your words?" "No, but he could tell I was sore at him!" "But you just said that you were not angry." Mr. Dubois had an infuriating way of getting a person mixed up. "No, but I had to make himthink I was.He had to learn, didn’t he?" "Conceded. But, having made it clear to him that you disapproved, how could you be so cruel as tospank him as well? You said the poor beastie didn’t know that he was doing wrong. Yet you indictedpain. Justify yourself! Or are you a sadist?"
>>533499330I didn’t then know what a sadist was — but I knew pups. "Mr. Dubois, youhave to! You scold him sothat he knows he’s in trouble, you rub his nose in it so that he will know what trouble you mean, youpaddle him so that he darn well won’t do it again — and you have to do it right away! It doesn’t do a bit of good to punish him later; you’ll just confuse him. Even so, he won’t learn from one lesson, so youwatch and catch him again and paddle him still harder. Pretty soon he learns. But it’s a waste of breathjust to scold him." Then I added, "I guess you’ve never raised pups." "Many. I’m raising a dachshund now — by your methods. Let’s get back to those juvenile criminals.The most vicious averaged somewhat younger than you here in this class... and they often started theirlawless careers much younger. Let us never forget that puppy. These children were often caught; policearrested batches each day. Were they scolded? Yes, often scathingly. Were their noses rubbed in it?Rarely. News organs and officials usually kept their names secret — in many places the law so requiredfor criminals under eighteen. Were they spanked? Indeed not! Many had never been spanked even assmall children; there was a widespread belief that spanking, or any punishment involving pain, did a childpermanent psychic damage." (I had reflected that my father must never have heard of that theory.)
>>533499402 "Corporal punishment in schools was forbidden by law," he had gone on. "Flogging was lawful assentence of court only in one small province, Delaware, and there only for a few crimes and was rarelyinvoked; it was regarded as ‘cruel and unusual punishment.’ " Dubois had mused aloud, "I do notunderstand objections to ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment. While a judge should be benevolent in purpose,his awards should cause the criminal to suffer, else there is no punishment — and pain is the basicmechanism built into us by millions of years of evolution which safeguards us by warning when somethingthreatens our survival. Why should society refuse to use such a highly perfected survival mechanism?However, that period was loaded with pre-scientific pseudo-psychological nonsense.As for ‘unusual,’ punishment must be unusual or it serves no purpose." He then pointed his stump atanother boy. "What would happen if a puppy were spanked every hour?"
>>533499430"Uh... probably drive him crazy!" "Probably. It certainly will not teach him anything. How long has it been since the principal of this schoollast had to switch a pupil?" "Uh, I’m not sure. About two years. The kid that swiped — " "Never mind. Long enough. It means that such punishment is so unusual as to be significant, to deter, toinstruct. Back to these young criminals — They probably were not spanked as babies; they certainlywere not flogged for their crimes. The usual sequence was: for a first offense, a warning — a scolding,often without trial. After several offenses a sentence of confinement but with sentence suspended and theyoungster placed on probation. A boy might be arrested many times and convicted several times beforehe was punished — and then it would be merely confinement, with others like him from whom he learnedstill more criminal habits. If he kept out of major trouble while confined, he could usually evade most ofeven that mild punishment, be given probation — ‘paroled’ in the jargon of the times.This incredible sequence could go on for years while his crimes increased in frequency and viciousness,with no punishment whatever save rare dull-but-comfortable confinements. Then suddenly, usually by lawon his eighteenth birthday, this so-called ‘juvenile delinquent’ becomes an adult criminal — andsometimes wound up in only weeks or months in a death cell awaiting execution for murder.You — " He had singled me out again.
>>533499448Suppose you merely scolded your puppy, never punished him, let him goon making messes in the house... and occasionally locked him up in an outbuilding but soon let him backinto the house with a warning not to do it again. Then one day you notice that he is now a grown dog andGenerated by ABC Amber LIT Converter, http://www.processtext.com/abclit.html still not housebroken — whereupon you whip out a gun and shoot him dead. Comment, please?" "Why... that’s the craziest way to raise a dog I ever heard of!" "I agree. Or a child. Whose fault would it be?" "Uh... why, mine, I guess." "Again I agree. But I’m not guessing." "Mr. Dubois," a girl blurted out, "but why? Why didn’t they spank little kids when they needed it and usea good dose of the strap on any older ones who deserved it — the sort of lesson they wouldn’t forget! Imean ones who did things reallybad . Why not?" "I don’t know," he had answered grimly, "except that the time-tested method of instilling social virtue andrespect for law in the minds of the young did not appeal to a pre-scientific pseudo-professional class whocalled themselves ‘social workers’ or sometimes ‘child psychologists.’ It was too simple for them,apparently, since anybody could do it, using only the patience and firmness needed in training a puppy. Ihave sometimes wondered if they cherished a vested interest in disorder — but that is unlikely; adultsalmost always act from conscious ‘highest motives’ no matter what their behavior."
>>533499469"But — good heavens!" the girl answered. "I didn’t like being spanked any more than any kid does, butwhen I needed it, my mama delivered. The only time I ever got a switching in school I got another onewhen I got home and that was years and years ago. I don’t ever expect to be hauled up in front of ajudge and sentenced to a flogging; you behave yourself and such things don’t happen. I don’t seeanything wrong with our system; it’s a lot better than not being able to walk outdoors for fear of your life— why, that’shorrible!" "I agree. Young lady, the tragic wrongness of what those well-meaning people did, contrasted with whattheythought they were doing, goes very deep. They had no scientific theory of morals. They did have atheory of morals and they tried to live by it (I should not have sneered at their motives) but their theorywaswrong — half of it fuzzy-headed wishful thinking, half of it rationalized charlatanry. The more earnestthey were, the farther it led them astray. You see, they assumed that Man has a moral instinct." "Sir? But I thought — But he does!I have." "No, my dear, you have a cultivated conscience, a most carefully trained one. Man hasno moralinstinct . He is not born with moral sense. You were not born with it, I was not — and a puppy hasnone. Weacquire moral sense, when we do, through training, experience, and hard sweat of the mind.
>>533499537These unfortunate juvenile criminals were born with none, even as you and I, and they had no chance toacquire any; their experiences did not permit it. What is ‘moral sense’? It is an elaboration of the instinctto survive. The instinct to survive is human nature itself, and every aspect of our personalities derives fromit. Anything that conflicts with the survival instinct acts sooner or later to eliminate the individual andthereby fails to show up in future generations. This truth is mathematically demonstrable, everywhereverifiable; it is the single eternal imperative controlling everything we do." "But the instinct to survive," he had gone on, "can be cultivated into motivations more subtle and muchmore complex than the blind, brute urge of the individual to stay alive. Young lady, what you miscalledyour ‘moral instinct’ was the instilling in you by your elders of the truth that survival can have strongerimperatives than that of your own personal survival. Survival of your family, for example. Of yourchildren, when you have them. Of your nation, if you struggle that high up the scale. And so on up. A scientifically verifiable theory of morals must be rooted in the individual’s instinct to survive —andnowhere else! — and must correctly describe the hierarchy of survival, note the motivations at eachlevel, and resolve all conflicts."
>>533499558We have such a theory now; we can solve any moral problem, on any level. Self-interest, love of family,duty to country, responsibility toward the human race — we are even developing an exact ethic forextra-human relations. But all moral problems can be illustrated by one misquotation: ‘Greater love hathno man than a mother cat dying to defend her kittens.’ Once you understand the problem facing that catand how she solved it, you will then be ready to examine yourself and learn how high up the moral ladderyou are capable of climbing. "These juvenile criminals hit a low level. Born with only the instinct for survival, the highest morality theyachieved was a shaky loyalty to a peer group, a street gang. But the do-gooders attempted to ‘appeal totheir better natures,’ to ‘reach them,’ to ‘spark their moral sense.’Tosh! Theyhad no ‘better natures’;experience taught them that what they were doing was the way to survive. The puppy never got hisspanking; therefore what he did with pleasure and success must be ‘moral.’
>>533499591"The basis of all morality is duty, a concept with the same relation to group that self-interest has toindividual. Nobody preached duty to these kids in a way they could understand — that is, with aspanking. But the society they were in told them endlessly about their ‘rights.’ " "The results should have been predictable, since a human being hasno natural rights of any nature." Mr. Dubois had paused. Somebody took the bait. "Sir? How about ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit ofhappiness’?" "Ah, yes, the ‘unalienable rights.’ Each year someone quotes that magnificent poetry. Life? What ‘right’to life has a man who is drowning in the Pacific? The ocean will not hearken to his cries. What ‘right’ tolife has a man who must die if he is to save his children? If he chooses to save his own life, does he do soas a matter of ‘right’? If two men are starving and cannibalism is the only alternative to death, whichman’s right is ‘unalienable’? And is it ‘right’? As to liberty, the heroes who signed that great documentpledged themselves tobuy liberty with their lives. Liberty isnever unalienable; it must be redeemedregularly with the blood of patriots or italways vanishes. Of all the so-called ‘natural human rights’ thathave ever been invented, liberty is least likely to be cheap and isnever free of cost. "The third ‘right’? — the ‘pursuit of happiness’? It is indeed unalienable but it is not a right; it is simply auniversal condition which tyrants cannot take away nor patriots restore. Cast me into a dungeon, burn meat the stake, crown me king of kings, I can ‘pursue happiness’ as long as my brain lives — but neithergods nor saints, wise men nor subtle drugs, can insure that I will catch it."
>>533499620Mr. Dubois then turned to me. "I told you that ‘juvenile delinquent’ is a contradiction in terms.‘Delinquent’ means ‘failing in duty.’ Butduty is anadult virtue — indeed a juvenile becomes an adultwhen, and only when, he acquires a knowledge of duty and embraces it as dearer than the self-love hewas born with. There never was, there cannot be a ‘juvenile delinquent.’ But for every juvenile criminalthere are always one or more adult delinquents — people of mature years who either do not know theirduty, or who, knowing it, fail." "Andthat was the soft spot which destroyed what was in many ways an admirable culture. The juniorhoodlums who roamed their streets were symptoms of a greater sickness; their citizens (all of themcounted as such) glorified their mythology of ‘rights’... and lost track of their duties. No nation, soconstituted, can endure."
