>>53349828313% black people.. But 51% women totally fucked everything up. They're idiots who think that they're being good for voting for pie in the sky idiocy like welfare, green energy, jeet spic and Mudslime hoards coming here and running fraud and drug crime ring.Tired of it. Take away the property right and voting rights of women and keep them from destroying the white race.
>>533498420Voting really ought to be limited to just landowners
>>533498283Those are Indian women.
I mean I'm just saying that it's kind of odd if you really think about it like women everywhere in any country kind of make that country liberal it doesn't really matter the race though. honestly, I'm going to take out race because even though I really will focus on race, it's kind of you know there's plenty of the threads on that like let's be real. there's no guys out there that are voting. yeah let's let in the immigrants bro
>>533498566genuinely anybody here. want to bring that to surface? de men ever vote for immigration or is it just women exclusively? if you really think about it, I've never met another guy that was like. yeah, let's vote in the immigrants
>>533498554What the fuck? Genuinely, who sees these people and says, "Yeah we need that piece of shit?"
>>533498283Unironically, nigger men are preferable to vote than White women.That said, neither should be voting. Neither should the majority of White men.
>>533498608I don't remember voting for bringing immigrants but greedy business owners are bringing them in without asking anyone
>>533498674it is pretty Stark of a point to make that the founding fathers assumed thatthey genuinely were like you know what we should let these people who are fucking slaves and shit like we should let them vote first. this is retarded we can't let the women vote I don't think people appreciate thatAll right. real question everyone WHAT WOULD OUR FOREFATHERS BE MORE SURPRISED ABOUT, NIGGERS OR WOMEN "VOTING?"
>>533498283Is it not the case that the reason women were given the vote was so that women would vote in such a way as to legislate Prohibition of alcohol? Women were against alcohol because it got their husbands drunk, violent, and shiftless. The Prohibition movement needed votes, so somehow they exchanged that for getting women the vote. Something like that.Anyway, if that's right, it's funny that women were given the vote for one reason, that reason was made into a constitutional amendment, and then after 10 years of trying it out, it had to be abolished by another amendment basically annulling the first one, which was the one thing that got women the vote.So shouldn't the 19th Amendment have been overridden then too with a canceling amendment? It should be now. Women are retards. Men have always known this. Now we have pretended for a little while and we have observed that it was wrong to do so. It's time for women to go back to knowing they are inferior. That's the main thing.
>>533498566Women are obviously better people than men and when they think of immigration they think of other women (good people) and not men. Men are the issue
>>533498283I hate women so god damn much it's unrealthe female gender as a whole was a mistake
>>533498699no, I think that that's an unfair thing to say. honestly all kidding aside, you know that most women that vote would definitely say oh my goodness look at look poor little Jamal there is not one man in this world that is like look at poor little Jamal that just doesn't happen dude even Jamal isn't saying that - do you know how many fucking black chicks get into like criminal justice? they hate each other dude. they're just like all women. they all hate each other
>>533498780women know women very well and they hate each other why don't we quote Florence Nightingale?
>>533498806Women should be drawn and quartered for being race traitors. That would beat it out of them quick, I'll bet.
>>533498848I feel like this just eternally bitches out all women since she's the mother of all feminism pretty much. you know it's fucking hysterical she hated you idiots, imagine her defending them. suck a penis cake
>>533498862touch grass fren
>>533498517Turns out landowners can't be trusted because if you let them make their own rules they end up with e.g. slave plantations.
>>533498773Prohibition occurred before women were allowed to vote, nigger. That kinda makes the rest of your comment irrelevant, as it is based on an false premise.Men voted in it at the behest of women, and it was a disaster, and should have confirmed that women are retarded. Prohibition is actually the best example you can make of how women had a say in the political process without actually voting, since obviously the main argument foids try to use is that things effect them too, so they should be able to vote.
The only true love I believe a woman can feel is for her Son. But only if the son brings pride through genetics, understanding of the world, and achievement. But even that love is exceedingly rare and most women are completely broken.Leftism is an extreme cope for not having a chadson, wanting to burn everything down because of sour grapes
>>533498908You should search dekulakization.You're pretty dull.
>>533499005she only sevee truly feels above a son, albeit it be a short time - they spend a lot of their older years chasing that child that they could control they kind of do that with their men too
>>533498780>men are the issueand yet they depend on men to live in a civilization and society
>>533499010You should search pleftenguinenflargenphook.For you.
>>533498283Why are sluts so hot?
>>533498763>WHAT WOULD OUR FOREFATHERS BE MORE SURPRISED ABOUT, NIGGERS OR WOMEN "VOTING?"Women.
>>533499077>control what does that mean though. Deep down a good mother or wife wants you to be the ultimate mogger. That probably means bitching if you are a natural genetic failure or fall to awful habits like alcoholism. When they see you not giving a fuck and not falling for elementary tricks like being a simp they naturally adopt your superior world view and ideas
>>533499182Because they're sluts
>>533498283What is wrong with American women?
>>533499156yeah just kill anybody kill anybody with anything more than you you're so brilliant you remind me of the Mao Zedong four pests campaign that's comical it's what leads to famine you know when you kill the farmers and stuff like that you guys just don't think of second and third order consequences>>533499182In the defense of real women that are wholesome, you never see them do sexual acts. so you can't sexualize them because they would only be with you if you were like there one and only person so every time you see one of these sluts your brain is like. oh wow, she's attractive, but like honestly, you've never given a chance to the other onesbut I mean I don't give a fuck. do what you want to do man. fuck fuck fuck bitches they really all suck
>>533499286No one is saying anything about killing anyone, schizo.
>>533498283At least is white.
>>533499246it means that it's kind of odd that the only man a woman actually ends up liking in her life is actually her son, and she has a little bit of control over that son for a small period of time before he's 18 perceivably then she gets older and he gets older and she doesn't have that control. but she does hearken back to that. she often imagines him as the little baby child this is akin to her trying to find a man like with a scar in his face. if you look this up, women are more attracted to a temporary partner if they have a facial star. so meaning like you know you can look this up the dark triad traits, and then once they settle down they want the more beta male as a matter of fact, you can even look up that women are attracted to males differently based upon if they're on their luteal phase or not when women are fertile they crave an alpha male and this is scientific fact and when women are not fertile they crave a "safe provider"you should also look into the fact that men go through a hormone cycle but it's only 24 hours long and women go through that fucking cycle and never forget that because them running a country is fucking insane too
>>533498674We should make everything a government does subject to a referendum and then require everyone who wants to vote in the national election have proof (some sort of ticket system) of having participated in 90% of other votes.That way participation in the democratic system becomes so arduous and time consuming that only people of real conviction get involved, so idiot politics would no longer count, plus you end up with actual democracy rather than the sham “representative” democracy we have now where we basically get the privilege of sort of getting to select which ruler we get.
>>533499311your argument against landowners is a slippery slope go look up how they utilize that in communist ideology also, you should be conscientious of the fact that every single ideology that's a big you know fascist when you want to probably be against they all start on the left that's right. even Hitler's NSDAP was a leftist movement when it first started, after all you need the masses and the masses are usually workers workers party blah blah blah
>>533499311I don't mean to conflate that if it wasn't your argument, but at the same time, what do you mean by landowners are a problem I mean sure but like propose a solution because you know what I mean. it sounds like you're fucking heading back to history there and you're like merk em', you know what I mean I'm just saying, and it ends up leading to dumbass motherfuckers just doing that because they're retarded whether more or less uneducated than you, never assume somebody thinks like you, be specific in your statements if you intend them to be foundational, such as "landowners are not to be trusted," like that's a hugely broad statement that can lead to a lot of things. you know what I mean. it's just you got to be specific or we can just troll and say fuck it
>>533499355Even democracy is a little bit weird would you allow a prison to vote? why not? are you realizing that prison rape is technically Democratic?are you realizing that thievery is technically Democratic, if you're numbered by bad people?what about intelligence, we know there's less intelligent people than there are regular and dumber people so intelligent people will never really have the helm in your worldview America is a Democratic Republic in which you elect somebody to make decisions for you, but you don't actually vote on every single decision kind of works, aside from the fact that the dumb people run the electionyou know America has a little bit of a successful form of ideological nationalist socialism without the Jew hatred because honestly, if you really think about it the whole I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one. they should undergone divisible with Liberty and justice for all that's nationalism and if you go to Germany, you can't even like sing the first part of the national anthem and then we have socialism there's like social security and stuff like that. so I mean you could argue all these other points but it's whatever
>>533498983Maybe women were promised the vote if they pushed their husbands for Prohibition. There was some kind of relationship there so that it was Prohibition that got women the vote. And it was a complete disaster. That should have ended it right there.But no matter. It still needs to be ended today. Women don't have the franchise because they cannot defend their rights. Men can defend their rights. So if you have men vote, the outcome is about the same as if the men fought, but cheaper and with less death. This is why men accept the outcome of elections when only men vote. Because if men don't win, they'll simply kill the other side if they think they can.Consider if women vote one way and men vote another, but women get just enough men on their side to tip it and they win the election. In this case, fighting would lead to a very different out come, because the women would immediately vanquished in the blink of an eye. There wouldn't even be a cost to the war. It would be every man reaching out and grabbing the nearest woman by the hair and putting her on her knees. That war would be over in 10 minutes, with the men the winner. That is, women cannot defend their rights, and therefore they have none.And one of the rights they don't have is the right to vote. They now vote against us, so we'll just put them on their knees by force without breaking a sweat. All it takes is for men to get fed up and do it. Women won't be able to raise a peep without getting their jaw broken. And that will be the first lesson in reminding women that they are infinitely inferior to us. They used to know it and were much easier to manage. Now they're deluded, and they need to have it beaten out of them.
>>533499532I meant to say thievery and rape are also Democratic if you are surrounded by a gang of bad people, or just dumb people, because it's akin to like mob rule which we all tend to make fun of
>>533499345That fact ought to redpill most men; that women want two different types of men depending on their cycle. They want a barbarian to drag humanity back into the Stone Age to breed with, and they want humanity’s finest to fritter away his hard won resources in trying to raise the genetic garbage, ultimately failing to raise a generation of men that was even as good as the one that preceded it.Women are basically trying to destroy the human race through their sexual choices.
>>533499568I'm not saying women are evil or anything like this, but women made a lot of mistakes and they'd no reason to actually still formulate groups against things for feminism there is nothing in the United States that a man can do that a woman can't do legally speaking in fact, it's quite the opposite and additionally to that, they didn't actually win anything, companies just said "Okay, you want to work, great." they then took 100% from the husband and divided it in half giving you 50% and him 50%. , you can see this is obvious because people used to be able to afford a family with one job and now there's two people working and they can't afford one house which leaves nobody home to raise the children except for the state - A little ancillary consequence of your righteous movement that you didn't think of the consequences of
>>533499355I would say limiting it to White married men who have children would be a good start. In the past I might have said property ownership, but our country is way too controlled by corporations, and they would be able to control that.>>533499568The relationship was that Prohibition was a woman's issue, not men's, but men are the ones who voted. Most women were likewise against suffrage, but once again, men voted for it, so in reality, this just shows the general population is retarded. While limiting to only men would be an improvement, it can't be only that, there are plenty of men who shouldn't be voting either.
>>533499686Agreed. There should be an IQ requirement for voting.
>>533499634so now you have women that want to stay home and want to raise their children and want to be good wives or unable to that's not even possible because of your little feminist movement because now you made it that way why wouldn't a company, it's not capitalism that's the problem, but seriously, why WOULDN'T a company owner say "Take 50% of his check and give it to his wife kek, she is uneducated and if he fights it he'll end up in a domestic issue" to deny that that happened is retarded, it's almost as retarded as saying the gender wage gap thing makes sense because whilst women do make whatever 75 cents for every dollar a man makes they actually didn't take into account the jobs that they were looking at. they just said across the board in other words, they didn't say female doctors make less than male doctors they just said that well in this country right now. out of all the females working they make $0.75 for every dollar a male makes I hate to break this to you but there's a lot of women who just don't want to do the jobs that make a lot of money like coal mining, and I'm not saying people always avoid coal mining if they're a woman, but it's not normal to want to be a woman coal miner and I highly doubt coal miners are down there like insulting women, saying. yeah let's stick it to the women, I think they're just down there like let's get the fuck out of here with our money if we can so we can feed our families so you basically have a statistic where hairdressers are compared to doctor salaries because again men can't go be hairdressers you assholes only only women can go to the better jobs, but men can't go to the easy jobs. you don't allow that oh, unless they're completely gay and not a threat to you, or a job? will you'll make fun of them like nursing
>>533499267>>533499286Sometimes I feel bad for enjoying them.
>>533499728
>>533498283No, the average male nigger is actually more intelligent than the average woman (of any given race). Which is not to say that the nigger is smart - women are just really, really fucking stupid.
>>533499532Democracy is our way of creeping towards libertarianism without actually burdening ourselves with the hardships associated with true stateless society. Removing the common persons ability to rule himself will only ever lead to dissatisfaction, no matter how perfect a system you might devise to select a ruler for him. Nobody wants to be anybody’s bitch, so we’re stuck with democracy, but right now it’s democracy in name only. Democracies at the moment are merely the kingdoms of deceivers. Take away the ability to wield low-info, low-engagement voters and we could start getting real representation.
>>533499826yikes. looks like you have to compare actual jobs and you can't just say damn it. the fucking daycare worker doesn't make as much money as the fucking fishermen. I don't understand I don't understand why the fishermen is not suffering like the daycare worker, or I wonder about the whole entire meme that was recently out that women were bragging about the lazy girl job it wasn't called the lazy guy job cuz that would have literally been something they made fun of but for them it's okayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_girl_jobI wonder when the inevitable woman will come in here and actually tell me that she's not just you know some vagina, but then she'll insult me by saying I can't have sex implying that that's all that women have to bring to the table when? honestly, I'm actually totally fine with women they're like a walking contradiction truly like women will say things like you know, all men think about is sex but the only insult they ever come up with is like penis size or you can't have sex
>>533499717I think IQ would be too broad. An understanding of how government works should suffice.A "low-IQ" farmer in Iowa who dropped out of school in 9th grade and didn't pursue higher education but understands our system and the struggles of the common man is more valuable than the 10th million aristocrat living in the city with rich parents who could afford to send him to Harvard. They each have their value with legitimate and unique insights that the other does not have.
lol I mean think of the most well meaning man he's not going to go Gucci gaga to kids you know what I mean unless he's a fucking freak and women are going to do that. they're going to be able to play with children like on a level that men can't and I think to do that they have the kind of still be partly children. it's weird. it's like they're a mix between a child and an adult. they're not actually a full adult I don't mean they can't be, but I mean the way they choose to see the world is like childish, but you know what I kind of like that and that's what I'm attracted to I don't want them to change. I want them to accept that that's how they should raise children, I want my child to have a fucking mother not a person that is a strong, powerful fake zoomer in a mini whatever the fuck it was
>>533499964furthermore, think of the whole recess analogy when women go out to play as children nobody tells them what to do at recess and they choose games like hopscotch, playing house, little things like that, they role-play what do boys do? boys always play something with competition even if it's chess they play sports and like you know, no matter what they're doing, it comes down to like if there's conflict. there's always a winner and a loser so you can be like you know what man. here's how we're going to solve this. I want that side of the court and if I went I get that side of the court but when women have conflict the teacher has to come over and say we're not going to play this game anymore and you can see this in politics. when women run a country they go throw a tantrum and that's really not plausible you see this in HR departments in the United States where women try to like be bosses and they can only talk as if they're talking to a child like they down talk an adult male or an adult female as if they are a child because that's all they know how to do In a dominant's role that is still feminine think about it like there's just a motherly roll. so like you have these HR department people and they say things like " nonono, we don't do that here" you know what I mean and it's like this is like for a daycare, not a company and if there wasn't quotas, there's most certainly no way anybody would ever hire anybody like that
>>533500065and if I win I get that side of the court**sorry this is speech to text and I don't really give a fuckyo this place is so fucking gay now that there's a captcha they should sue this fucking place for the captcha and say it's abliest against fucking dyslexics or some shit
